parties - struc and cases

Question 1

structure

Answer 1

**1. intro **
2. PP - 66(1)(a)
a. single person
b. joint - ngamu - cog
c. innocnet agent
3. SP - 66(1)(b)-(d)
Go thru for each person
AR
a. aiding 66(1)(b)
b. abet, incite, council 66(1)(c)-(d)
c. procurring 66(1)(d)
d. omission - legal duty 2 act
e. accessory after fact
MR
a. know intended actions
- type of offnece
- essential matters - bainbridge
- wilful blindness - crooks
b. intend to aid abet etc
- do something likely to cause offnecs, even if dont wnat offence (oblique)
- act deliberatley to cause the offence, virtual certinty (direct) wentworth
**4. defence **
a. defence of withdrawl
i. timely conduct thru words, actions showing with drawl
ii. take reasonable steps to counteract prior involvement or prevent principle steps
iii. IF NOT WHAT COULD THEY HAVE DONE

Question 2

PP cases
3

Answer 2

1. ngamu - cheque , joint ppt
2. patterson - keys to apartmnt, inn agt
3. police v b - police amde someone else get info - 66(1)(d) iin agt

Question 3

aid cases
6

Answer 3

1. larkins - yell cops- dindt know there- still aid
2. bainbridge - sold equit, know 4 illegal, suff know
3. maxwell - pp attack gun, bom didnt kno what 1, suff know
4. kumara - robbery v agg robb (pp knife) - only robb
5. hartley - group assault (pp knife) - only assult
6. heta - held dad - fear- still oblique intent

Question 4

abet by o cases

Answer 4

1. charnley - watched sex - didnt intervene
2. clarkson - barracks rape, presnece = encoruagement
3. witika - spouse abuse child, inacitvity = encouregement (speicial duty to act too)
4. claden larent - bad pjs, sold even when knew, didnt stop

Question 5

councell

Answer 5

baker - taught how to open bomb - went further than instriction, knew nature and kind too

Question 6

66(2) cases

Answer 6

hubbard - arson after burglary - not part of the shared common intent
rapira - group rob pizza del, del dies, pp intended gbh for offence, all knew of this