Parties Case Law Flashcards

1
Q

R v Pene

A

A party must intention ally help or encourage - it is insufficient if they were reckless as to whether the principle was assisted or encouraged.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

R v Renata

A

The court held that where the principle offender cannot be identified, it is sufficient to prove that each individual accused must have been either the principle or a party in one of the ways contemplated by s66 (1)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Larkins v Police

A

While it is unnecessary that the principle should be aware that he or she is being assisted, there must be proof of actual assistance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Ashton v Police

A

An example of a secondary party owing a legal duty to a third person or to the general public is a person teaching another person to drive. That person is, in New Zealand, under a legal duty to take reasonable precautions, because under s156 of the Crimes Act 1961 he is deemed to be in charge of a dangerous thing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

R v Russell

A

The court held that the accused was morally bound to take active steps to save this children, but by his deliberate abstention from so doing, and by giving the encouragement and authority of his presence and approval to his wifes act he became an aider and abettor and thus a secondary offender.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

R v Betts and Ridley

A

An offence where no violence is contemplated and the principal offender is carrying out the common aim uses violence, a secondary offender taking no physical part in it would not be liable for the violence used.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly