Parties Flashcards
S66 CA61
Parties to offences
(1) Every one is a party to and guilty of an offence who-
(a) Actually commits the offence; or
(b) Does or omits an act for the purpose of aiding any person to commit the offence; or
(c) Abets any person in the commission of the offence; or
(d) incites, counsels, or procures any person to commit the offence
(2) Where 2 or more persons form a common intention to prosecute any unlawful purpose, and to assist each other therein, each of them is a party to every offence committed by any one of them in the prosecution of the common purpose if the commission of that offence was known to be a probable consequence of the prosecution of the common purpose
S70 CA61
Offence committed other than offence intended
(1) Every one who incites, counsels, or procures another to be a party to an offence of which that other is afterwards guilty is a party to that offence, although it may be committed in a way different from that which was incited, counselled, or suggested
(2) Every one who incites, counsels, or procures another to be a party to an offence is a party to every offence which that other commits in consequence of such inciting, counselling, or procuring, and which the first-mentioned person knew to be likely to be committed in consequence thereof
In each case of charging a person with being a party to an offence, you must prove:
- The identity of the defendant, and
- An offence has been successfully committed; and
- The elements of the offence (s66(1)) have been satisfied
When participation must have occurred
To be considered a party to the offence, participation must have occurred before or during (contemporaneous with) the commission of the offence and before the completion of the offence
(Intention to help or encourage must exist) R v Pene
A party must intentionally help or encourage - it is insufficient if they were reckless as to whether the principal was assisted or encouraged
Distinction is made between the principal party and the secondary party. Explain what these are
Principal party is the person who actually commits the offence. A principal offender, and liable under s66(1)(a), where he or she personally satisfies the actus reus and mens rea requirements for the offence.
Secondary party is a person whose assistance, abetment, incitement, counselling or procurement is sufficient under s66(1)(b),(c), or (d) of CA61 to make them also liable due to their participation in the offence committed by the principal. This is despite the fact that the secondary party does not themselves commit that offence
Explain the two methods by which multiple offenders may be considered to be principals
- Each offender satisfies elements of offence committed : Each of the principal offenders may, separately, satisfy the necessary elements of the relevant offence committed. In such circumstances there is no requirement to refer to s66 of the act, despite the fact that it falls within the scope of s66(1).
- Each offender separately satisfies part of the actus reus: Under s66(1)(a) each offender may separately satisfy some part of the actus reus of the offence where their actions, when combined with the actions of the other person, satisfy the complete actus reus requirement of the offence. Their actions must also be accompanied by the requisite mens rea.
(Multiple offenders) R v Renata
The court held that where the principal offender cannot be identified, it is sufficient to prove that each individual accused must have been either the principal or a party in one of the ways contemplated by s66(1).
(3 offenders beat a person to death in carpark. The prosecution was unable to establish which blow was the fatal one or which of the 3 offenders administered it)
Aiding by omission
The secondary party does not necessarily have to be present when the offence is committed. Eg, a person who supplies a key or deliberately leaves a door unlocked for a burglar is a party even when they are not present at the scene when the burglary is committed
Define ‘Aids’
To aid means to assist in the commission of the offence, either physically or by giving advice and information. In order to aid, the presence of the person offering the aid is not required at the scene, before, or at the time of the offence being committed.
(Actual proof of assistance is required)
Larkins v Police
While it is unnecessary that the principal should be aware that he or she is being assisted, there must be proof of actual assistance
Three examples of assistance
- Keeping look out for someone committing a burglary
- Providing a screwdriver to someone interfering with a motor vehicle
- Telling an associate when a neighbour is away from their home so as to allow the opportunity to commit a burglary
Define ‘Abets’
Abets means to instigate or encourage; that is, to urge another person to commit the offence. As with aiding, the presence of the abettor at the scene of the offence at the time of its commission is not required.
Passive acquiescence may be considered abetting where there is a duty to act.
Merely being present at the scene of an offence and witnessing the offence while doing nothing to prevent it does not create liability on the part of that person unless, in the circumstances, there is a special relationship between that person and the principal offender or where they owe a legal duty to the victim or to the general public
(Legal duty) Ashton v Police
An example of a secondary party owing a legal duty to a third person or to the general public is a person teaching another person to drive. That person is, in New Zealand, under a legal duty to take reasonable precautions, because under s156 CA61 he is deemed to be in charge of a dangerous thing.