Parties Flashcards

1
Q

Parties to Offences

Legislation

A

S66 CA61

(1) Every one is a party to and guilty of an offence who-
(a) Actually commits the offence; or
(b) Does or omits an act for the purpose of aiding any person to commit the offence; or
(c) Abets any person in the commission of the offence; or
(d) Incites, counsels, or procures any person to commit the offence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Parties to Offences

Legislation

(2) Where two or more persons…

and Example

A

S66 CA61

(2) Where 2 or more persons form a common intention to prosecute any unlawful purpose, and to assist each other therein, each of them is a party to every offence committed by any one of them in the prosecution of the common purpose if the commission of that offence was known to be a probable consequence of the prosecution of the common purpose.

Examples:
Where a person is a party to an agreed act with violence and the principal offender in carrying out the common aim does an act causing death, the secondary party is equally responsible in law for such violence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Parties

What you must prove

Of note only

A
  • The identity of the defendant, and
  • an offence has been successfully committed; and
  • the elements of the offence (s66(1)) have been satisfied.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When participation must have occurred

Of note only

A

To be considered a party to the offence, participation must have occurred before or during (contemporaneous with) the commission of the offence and before the completion of the offence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

R v Pene

Intentionally help

A

R v Pene

A party must intentionally help or encourage - it is insufficient if they were reckless as to whether the principal was assisted or encouraged.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Two methods by which multiple offenders may be considered to be principals

Of note only

A

Method 1: Each offender satisfies elements of offence committed
Example
Independently guilty of assaults

Method 2: Each offender separately satisfies part of the actus reus
Example
An offender prepares a poison before handing it to the other offender to administer the poison. In this example both offenders share the same intent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R v Renata

Principal offender

A

R v Renata

The court held that where the principal offender cannot be identified, it is sufficient to prove that each individual accused must have been either the principal or a party in one of the ways contemplated by s66(1).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Larkins v Police

Actual proof of assistance

And Examples of assistance

A

Larkins v Police

While it is unnecessary that the principal should be aware that he or she is being assisted, there must be proof of actual assistance.

  • Keeping lookout for someone committing a burglary.
  • Providing a screwdriver to someone interfering with a motor vehicle.
  • Telling an associate when a neighbour is away from their home so as to allow the opportunity to commit a burglary.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Ashton v Police

Legal Duty

A

Ashton v Police

An example of a secondary party owing a legal duty to a third person or to the general public is a person teaching another person to drive. That person is, in New Zealand, under a legal duty to take reasonable precautions, because under s156 of the Crimes Act 1961 he is deemed to be in charge of a dangerous thing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v Russell

Special Relationship

A

R v Russell

The court held that the accused was morally bound to take active steps to save his children, but by his deliberate abstention from so doing, and by giving the encouragement and authority of his presence and approval to his wife’s act he became an aider and abettor and thus a secondary offender.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

R v Betts and Ridley

No violence is contemplated

A

R v Betts and Ridley

An offence where no violence is contemplated and the principal offender in carrying out the common aim uses violence, a secondary offender taking no physical part in it would not be held liable for the violence used.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly