Parties Flashcards
Parties to Offences
Legislation
(1) Every one is a party to and guilty of an offence who-
Parties to Offences
Section 66 CA61
(1) Every one is a party to and guilty of an offence who-
(a) Actually commits the offence; or
(b) Does or omits an act for the purpose of aiding any person to commit the offence; or
(c) Abets any person in the commission of the offence; or
(d) Incites, counsels, or procures any person to commit the offence.
Parties to Offences
Legislation
(2) Where two or more persons…
and Example
Parties to Offences
Section 66 CA61
(2) Where 2 or more persons form a common intention to prosecute any unlawful purpose,
and to assist each other therein,
each of them is a party to every offence committed by any one of them
in the prosecution of the common purpose if the commission of that offence was known to be a probable consequence
of the prosecution of the common purpose.
Examples:
Where a person is a party to an agreed act with violence and the principal offender in carrying out the common aim does an act causing death, the secondary party is equally responsible in law for such violence.
Parties
What you must prove
Of note only
- Identity of the defendant
- Offence has been successfully committed
- Elements of the offence (s66(1)) have been satisfied.
When participation must have occurred
Of note only
To be considered a party to the offence, participation must have occurred before or during (contemporaneous with) the commission of the offence and before the completion of the offence.
R v Pene
A party must…
Intentionally help
R v Pene
A party must intentionally help or encourage
it is insufficient if they were reckless as to whether the principal was assisted or encouraged.
Two methods by which multiple offenders may be considered to be principals
Each offender…
Of note only
- Each offender satisfies elements of offence committed.
- Each offender separately satisfies part of the actus reus.
- Example
Independently guilty of assaults - Example
An offender prepares a poison before handing it to the other offender to administer the poison. In this example both offenders share the same intent.
R v Renata
The Court held…
R v Renata
The court held that where the principal offender cannot be identified,
it is sufficient to prove that each individual accused must have been
either the principal or a party in one of the ways contemplated by s66(1).