Part I

Question 1

Distinguish between joinder of parties and causes of action (Requisites)

Answer 1

Joinder of Parties:

Rule 3, Section 6. Permissive joinder of parties. - All persons in whom or against whom any right to relief in respect to or arising out of the same transaction or series of transactions is alleged to exist, whether jointly, severally, or in the alternative, may, except as otherwise provided in these Rules, join as plaintiffs or be joined as defendants in one complaint, where any question of law or fact common to all such plaintiffs or to all such defendants may arise in the action; but the court may make such orders as may be just to prevent any plaintiff or defendant from being embarrassed or put to expense in connection with any proceedings in which he may have no interest.

Joinder of Causes of Action

Rule 2, Section 5. Joinder of causes of action. - A party may in one pleading assert, in the alternative or otherwise, as many causes of action as he may have against an opposing party, subject to the following conditions:

(a) The party joining the causes of action shall comply with the rules on joinder of parties;

(b) The joinder shall not include special civil actions or actions governed by special rules;

(c) Where the causes of action are between the same parties but pertain to different venues or jurisdictions, the joinder may be allowed in the Regional Trial Court provided one of the causes of action falls within the jurisdiction of said court and the venue lies therein; and

(d) Where the claims in all the causes of action are principally for recovery of money, the aggregate amount claimed shall be the test of jurisdiction.

Question 2

What are the requisites for securing a declaration of default and what are the remedies against a declaration of default?

Answer 2

RULE 9

Requisites for securing a declaration of default:

1. The court must have validly acquired jurisdiction over the person of the defending party, either by service of summons or voluntary appearance;
2. The defending party must have failed to file his answer within the time allowed therefor;
3. The claiming party must file a motion to declare the defending party in default;
4. The claiming party must prove that the defending party has failed to answer within the period provided by the ROC;
5. The defending party must be notified of the motion to declare him in default; and
6. There must be a hearing set on the motion to declare the defending party in default.

Remedies against a declaration of default:

Before judgment
1. File a motion under oath to set aside the order of default upon proper showing that:

i. His or her failure to answer was due to fraud, accident, mistake or excusable negligence; and
ii. He has a meritorious defense - such that the motion must be accompanied by a statement of the evidence which he intends to present if the motion is granted and which is such as to warrant a reasonable belief that the result of the case would probably be otherwise if a new trial is granted [Sec. 3(b),Rule 9].

In such a case, the order of default may be set aside in such terms and conditions as the judge may impose in the interest of justice [Sec. 3(b), Rule 9].

After judgment but before it has become final and executory
1. Motion for new trial under Sec. 1(a), Rule 37; or
2. Appeal from the judgment as being contrary to the evidence or the law.

After judgment has become final and executory
1. Petition for relief under Rule 38; or
2. Petition for certiorari under Rule 65 will lie when said party was improperly declared in default.

Question 3

What are the remedies against a default judgment?

Answer 3

Remedies against a declaration of default:

Before judgment
1. File a motion under oath to set aside the order of default upon proper showing that:

i. His or her failure to answer was due to fraud, accident, mistake or excusable negligence; and
ii. He has a meritorious defense - such that the motion must be accompanied by a statement of the evidence which he intends to present if the motion is granted and which is such as to warrant a reasonable belief that the result of the case would probably be otherwise if a new trial is granted [Sec. 3(b),Rule 9].

In such a case, the order of default may be set aside in such terms and conditions as the judge may impose in the interest of justice [Sec. 3(b), Rule 9].

After judgment but before it has become final and executory
1. Motion for new trial under Sec. 1(a), Rule 37; or
2. Appeal from the judgment as being contrary to the evidence or the law.

After judgment has become final and executory
1. Petition for relief under Rule 38; or
2. Petition for certiorari under Rule 65 will lie when said party was improperly declared in default.

Question 4

What are the undertaking implied in signature of counsel in pleadings?

Answer 4

RULE 7, Sec. 3

(a) Every pleading [and other written submissions to the court] must be signed by the party or counsel representing him or her.

(b) The signature of counsel constitutes a certificate by him or her that he or she has read the pleading and document; that to the best of his or her knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances:

(1) It is not being presented for any improper purpose, such as to harass, cause unnecessary delay, or needlessly increase the cost of litigation;
(2) The claims, defenses, and other legal contentions are warranted by existing law or jurisprudence, or by a non-frivolous argument for extending, modifying, or reversing existing jurisprudence;
(3) The factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, will likely have evidentiary support after availment of the modes of discovery under these [R]ules; and
(4) The denials of factual contentions are warranted on the evidence or, if specifically so identified, are reasonably based on belief or a lack of information.

(c) If the court determines, on motion or motu proprio and after notice and hearing, that this [R]ule has been violated, it may impose an appropriate sanction or refer such violation to the proper office for disciplinary action, on any attorney, law firm, or party that violated the rule, or is responsible for the violation. Absent exceptional circumstances, a law firm shall be held jointly and severally liable for a violation committed by its partner, associate, or employee.

The sanction may include, but shall not be limited to:
1. non-monetary directive or sanction;
2. an order to pay a penalty in court; or,
3. if imposed on motion and warranted for effective deterrence, an order directing payment to the movant of part or all of the reasonable attorney’s fees and other expenses directly resulting from the violation, including attorney’s fees for the filing of the motion for sanction.

The lawyer or law firm cannot pass on the monetary penalty to the client.

Question 5

What are the remedies against splitting a cause of action?

Answer 5

RULE 4, Sec. 2. Splitting a single cause of action; effect of. - If two or more suits are instituted on the basis of the same cause of action, the filing of one or a judgment upon the merits in any one is available as a ground for the dismissal of the others.

The defendant facing a complaint which is infirm due to the plaintiff splitting causes of action may either allege the infirmity as an Affirmative Defense in his Answer [Sec. 5(b), Rule 6] or file a Motion to Dismiss on the following grounds:

a. Litis Pendentia: There is another action pending between the same
parties for the same cause [Sec. 12 (a)(2), Rule 15]; or
b. Res Judicata: The cause of action is barred by a prior judgment. [Sec.
12 (a)(3), Rule 15.

Question 6

What is the rule on partial default? Discuss.

Answer 6

RULE 9. Sec. 3(c)
Effect of partial default. – When a pleading asserting a claim states a common cause of action against several defending parties, some of whom answer and the others fail to do so, the court shall try the case against all upon the answers thus filed and render judgment upon the evidence presented.

Partial default, when applicable:
a. There is more than 1 defendant
b. The pleading states a common action against the several defendants
c. Some of the defendant answered
d. The others failed to do so

Effect:
1. An order of default may be issued against the defendants who failed to file an Answer. These defendants in default will be give notice of the subsequent proceedings but are not entitled to participate in the trial. They are not entitled to present evidence, and object on evidence presented.
2. But reception of evidence ex parte and Default Judgment is not allowed. This is because the court shall try the case against ALL defendants based upon the answers filed and render judgment upon the evidence presented. The non-defaulting defendants are entitled to present their evidence, participate during the trial, and the end-result of the trial shall affect all the defendants, including the defendant in default.

Paragraph (c) only provides for the manner in which the trial will be conducted in a case where a defendant filed no Answer although his co-defendants did. The paragraph provides only that the case will be tried upon the Answers filed by the responsive defendants. Nowhere does it state that the Rule on default does not apply. It is not an exception to a defendant being declared in default.

The defendant who does not file an Answer is to be declared in default. This is the Rule and paragraph (c) of Section 3, Rule 9 is no exception to it. Said provision, in fact, recognizes a situation where one defendant among several is in default. This is clear from paragraph (c)’s own heading, “Effect of partial default”. That very heading recognizes that default exists within the set. This recognition can only be upon the Court’s declaration of default pursuant to the first paragraph of Section 3 of Rule 9.

Paragraph (c) of Section 3, Rule 9 thus provides for the manner of the trial’s conduct in a situation where one party among several, but not all, were declared in default pursuant to the first paragraph of Section 3, Rule 9. It contemplates the existence of a default in one of the defendants. It is, therefore, not an exception to the rule on default, but a consequence.

Question 7

Distinguish between the ultimate objective approach from the textual approach in determining whether the subject matter of a complaint is beyond pecuniary estimation.

Answer 7

SKIP

Ultimate Objective Approach requires the judge to speculate on the defenses of the plaintiff beyond the material allegations contained in thecomplaint

Textual Approach
finding its basis in the body of the complaint and the relief sought without reference to extraneous facts not alleged or evidence still to be presented

Question 8

What is the Manotoc doctrine? Discuss the charactersitics if an ideal sheriff and how these are reflected in his return of service.

Answer 8

Manotoc doctrine (Substituted Service) - For substituted service of summons to be available, there must be several attempts by the sheriff to personally serve the summons within a reasonable period [of one month] which eventually resulted in failure to prove impossibility of prompt service. “Several attempts” means at least three (3) tries, preferably on at least two different dates. In addition, the sheriff must cite why such efforts were unsuccessful. It is only then that impossibility of service can be confirmed or accepted. (Manotoc vs. CA)

Sheriffs are asked to discharge their duties on the service of summons with due care, utmost diligence, and reasonable promptness and speed so as not to prejudice the expeditious dispensation of justice. Thus, Sheriffs need to be resourceful, persevering, canny, and diligent in serving the process on the defendant. (Manotoc vs. CA)

Question 9

What are the consequences of failure to attend pre-trial for the plaintiff and the defendant?

Answer 9

Failure to attend the pre-trial does not result in the “default” of the defendant. The failure of the defendant to attend shall be cause to allow the plaintiff to present his evidence ex parte and the court to render judgment on the basis thereof [Aguilar v. Lightbringers Credit Cooperative, G.R. No. 209605 (2015)]

Question 10

What should the initiatory pleading contain and how is it verified?

Answer 10

RULE 7

Initiatory pleading should contain the following:

1. Caption which sets forth:
   a. Name of the court;
   b. Title of the action (i.e. the names of the parties and their respective participation); and
   c. The docket number, if assigned.
2. Body which sets forth:
   a. Designation
   b. Allegations of the party’s claims or defenses which shall be divided into paragraphs. Each of which shall contain a statement of a single set of circumstances so far as that can be done with convenience.

When two or more causes of action are joined, the statement of the first shall be prefaced by the words “first cause of action,” of the second by “second cause of action,” and so on for others.

c. Relief prayed for - The pleading shall specify the relief sought, but it may add a general prayer for such further or other relief as may be deemed just or equitable.

d. Date of the pleading

3. Signature and address
4. Verification. A pleading is verified by an affidavit of an affiant duly authorized to sign said verification. The authorization of the affiant to act on behalf of a party, whether in the form of a secretary’s certificate or a special power of attorney, should be attached to the pleading, and shall allege the following attestations:

a. The allegations in the pleading are true and correct based on his or her personal knowledge, or based on authentic documents;
b. The pleading is not filed to harass, cause unnecessary delay , or needlessly increase the cost of litigation; and
c. The factual allegations therein have evidentiary support for discovery.

5. Certification Against Forum Shopping
6. Other contents of pleading such as:
   a. Names of witnesses who will be presented to prove a party’s claim or defense
   b. Summary of the witnesses’ intended testimonies, provided that the judicial affidavits of said witnesses shall be attached to the pleading and form an integral part thereof, and
   c. Documentary and object evidence in support of the allegations contained in the pleading.

Question 11

Discuss the concept of forum shipping and its legal consequences.

Answer 11

RULE 7, Sec. 5

Section 5. Certification against forum shopping. - The plaintiff or principal party shall certify under oath in the complaint or other initiatory pleading asserting a claim for relief, or in a sworn certification annexed thereto and simultaneously filed therewith: (a) that he [or she] has not theretofore commenced any action or filed any claim involving the same issues in any court, tribunal or quasi-judicial agency and, to the best of his [or her] knowledge, no such other action or claim is pending therein; (b) if there is such other pending action or claim, a complete statement of the present status thereof; and (c) if he [or she] should thereafter learn that the same or similar action or claim has been filed or is pending, he [or she] shall report that fact within five (5) calendar days therefrom to the court wherein his [or her] aforesaid complaint or initiatory pleading has been filed.

The authorization of the affiant to act on behalf of a party, whether in the form of a secretary s certificate or a special power of attorney, should be attached to the pleading.

Failure to comply with the foregoing requirements shall not be curable by mere amendment of the complaint or other initiatory pleading but shall be cause for the dismissal of the case without prejudice, unless otherwise provided, upon motion and after hearing. The submission of a false certification or non-compliance with any of the undertakings therein shall constitute indirect contempt of court, without prejudice to the corresponding administrative and criminal actions. If the acts of the party or his [or her] counsel clearly constitute willful and deliberate forum shopping, the same shall be ground for summary dismissal with prejudice and shall constitute direct contempt, as well as a cause for administrative sanctions.

Question 12

Distinguish personal service of the writ of summons from that of pleadings and other papers.

Answer 12

SERVICE OF SUMMONS IN PERSON RULE 14 SECTION 5. Service in Person on Defendant. — Whenever practicable, the summons shall be served by handing a copy thereof to the defendant in person and informing the defendant that he or she is being served, or, if he or she refuses to receive and sign for it, by leaving the summons within the view and in the presence of the defendant.
PERSONAL SERVICE OF PLEADINGS AND OTHER PAPERS. RULE 13. SECTION 6. Personal [S]ervice . — Court submissions may be served by personal delivery of a copy to the party or to the party’s counsel, or to their authorized representative named in the appropriate pleading or motion, or by leaving it in his or her office with his or her clerk, or with a person having charge thereof. If no person is found in his or her office, or his or her office is not known, or he or she has no office, then by leaving the copy, between the hours of eight in the morning and six in the evening, at the party’s or counsel’s residence, if known, with a person of sufficient age and discretion residing therein.

SERVICE OF SUMMONS IN PERSON 1. Personal Service
How done
a. By handing a copy to the defendant in person and informing the defendant that he or she is being served, or
b. If he or she refuses to receive and sign for it, by leaving the summons within the view and in the presence of the defendant. [Sec. 5, Rule 14] PERSONAL SERVICE OF PLEADINGS AND OTHER PAPERS
i. Personal service
How personal service is made Service by personal service shall be made by:
1. By personal delivery of a copy to the party, counsel, or to their authorized representative named in the appropriate pleading or motion, or
2. By leaving it in his or her office with his or her clerk, or with a person having charge thereof
● If (a) no person is found in his or her office, or (b) his or her office is not known, or (c) he or she has no office, then by leaving the copy at the party or counsel’s residence, if known, with a person of sufficient age and discretion residing therein.
● Such must be served at the residence at a time between 8 am to 6 pm. [Sec. 6, Rule 13]

Question 13

Distinguish substituted service of the writ of summons from that of pleadings and other papers.

Answer 13

(RULE 14) SECTION 6. Substituted Service. — If, for justifiable causes, the defendant cannot be served personally after at least three (3) attempts on two (2) different dates, service may be effected:
(a) By leaving copies of the summons at the defendant’s residence to a person at least eighteen (18) years of age and of sufficient discretion residing therein;
(b) By leaving copies of the summons at the defendant’s office or regular place of business with some competent person in charge thereof. A competent person includes, but is not limited to, one who customarily receives correspondences for the defendant;
(c) By leaving copies of the summons, if refused entry upon making his or her authority and purpose known, with any of the officers of the homeowners’ association or condominium corporation, or its chief security officer in charge of the community or the building where the defendant may be found; and
(d) By sending an electronic mail to the defendant’s electronic mail address, if allowed by the court.

(RULE 13) SECTION 8. Substituted Service. — If service of pleadings, motions, notices, resolutions, orders and other papers cannot be made under the two preceding sections, the office and place of residence of the party or his or her counsel being unknown, service may be made by delivering the copy to the clerk of court, with proof of failure of both personal service and service by mail. The service is complete at the time of such delivery.

Question 14

Distinguish the modes of service from the modes of filing pleadings and other papers.

Answer 14

I. MODES OF FILING
The filing of pleadings and other court submissions shall be made by any of the following means: (1) Personal service; (2) By registered mail; (3) accredited courier; and (4) Electronic mail.

1. Personal Service

This is done by submitting personally the original, plainly indicated as such, to the court. The clerk of court shall endorse on the pleading the date and hour of filing.

Proof of filing. The filing of a pleading or any other court submission shall be proved by its existence in the record of the case. If the pleading or any other court submission is not in the record, but is claimed to have been filed personally, the filing shall be proven by the written or stamped acknowledgment of its filing by the clerk of court on a copy of the pleading or court submission

2. By Registered mail

The date of the mailing, as shown by the post office stamp on the envelope or the registry receipt, shall be considered as the date of their filing, payment, or deposit in court. The envelope shall be attached to the record of the case.

Proof of filing. If the pleading or any other court submission was filed by registered mail, the filing shall be proven by the registry receipt and by the affidavit of the person who mailed it, containing a full statement of the date and place of deposit of the mail in the post office in a sealed envelope addressed to the court, with postage fully prepaid, and with instructions to the postmaster to return the mail to the sender after 10 calendar days if not delivered.

The modes of filing does not include ordinary mail, while the modes of service allows ordinary mail.

3. Accredited courier

The date of the mailing, as shown by the post office stamp on the envelope or the registry receipt, shall be considered as the date of their filing, payment, or deposit in court. The envelope shall be attached to the record of the case.

Proof of filing. If the pleading or any other court submission was filed through an accredited courier service, the filing shall be proven by an affidavit of service of the person who brought the pleading or other document to the service provider, together with the courier’s official receipt and document tracking number.

4. Electronic mail (see Electronic Filing and Service)

II. MODES OF SERVICE
Pleadings, motions, notices, orders, judgments, and other court submissions shall be served: (1) personally; or (2) by mail, either registered or ordinary; (3) accredited courier; (4) electronic means.

1. Personal Service

Court submissions may be served by personal delivery of a copy to the party or to the party’s counsel, or to their authorized representative named in the appropriate pleading or motion, or by leaving it in his or her office with his or her clerk, or with a person having charge thereof. The 1997 Rules simply provides “service of the papers may be made by delivering personally”, while the 2019 Amendments provides “court submissions may be served by personal service”.

If no person is found in his or her office, or his or her office is not known, or he or she has no office, then by leaving the copy, between the hours of eight in the morning and six in the evening, at the party’s or counsel’s residence, if known, with a person of sufficient age and discretion residing therein.

Proof of service. Proof of personal service shall consist of a written admission of the party served, or the official return of the server, or the affidavit of the party serving, containing a statement of the date, place, and manner of service. If the service is made by:

2. By mail

Service by registered mail shall be made by depositing the copy in the post office, in a sealed envelope, plainly addressed to the party or to the party’s counsel at his or her office, if known, otherwise at his or her residence, if known, with postage fully pre-paid, and with instructions to the postmaster to return the mail to the sender after 10 calendar days if undelivered.

If no registry service is available in the locality of either the sender or the addressee, service may be done by ordinary mail.

Proof of service, ordinary mail. For ordinary mail, proof shall consist of an affidavit of the person mailing stating the facts showing compliance with the immediately proceeding paragraph.

Proof of service, registered mail. For registered mail, proof of service shall be made by the affidavit mentioned above and the registry receipt issued by the mailing office. The registry return card shall be filed immediately upon its receipt by the sender, or in lieu thereof, the unclaimed letter together with the certified or sworn copy of the notice given by the postmaster to the addressee.

3. Accredited courier service

Proof of service. shall be made by an affidavit of service executed by the person who brought the pleading or paper to the service provider, together with the courier’s official receipt or document tracking number.

The 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure (hereinafter, “1997 Rules”) does not provide for “accredited private courier”, although the Supreme Court has considered service/filing by private courier as equivalent to service/filing by ordinary mail (PSBank vs. Papa, G.R. No. 200469, 15 January 2018).

4. Service by electronic means and facsimile (see Electronic Filing and Service)

Question 15

Distinguish personal and substituted service of the writ of summons on private domestic juridical entitties.

Answer 15

Rule 14. SUMMONS. Section 12. Service upon domestic private juridical entity. - When the defendant is a corporation, partnership or association organized under the laws of the Philippines with a juridical personality, service may be made on the president, managing partner, general manager, corporate secretary, treasurer, or in­house counsel of the corporation wherever they may be found. or in their absence or unavailability. on their secretaries.

If such service cannot be made upon any of the foregoing persons. it shall be made upon the person who customarily receives the correspondence for the defendant at its principal office.

In case the domestic juridical entity is under receivership or liquidation. service of summons shall be made on the receiver or liquidator. as the case may be.

Should there be a refusal on the part of the persons above-mentioned to receive summons despite at least three (3) attempts on two (2) different dates. service may be made electronically. if allowed by the court. as provided under Section 6 of this Rule.

Defendant is a domestic private juridical entity.

When the defendant is a corporation, partnership or association organized under the laws of the Philippines with a juridical personality, service may be made on the president, managing partner, general manager, corporate secretary, treasurer, or in-house counsel of the corporation wherever they may be found or in their absence or unavailability, on their secretaries.

The enumerations made under this section of the Rule is restricted, limited and exclusive. This means that where the defendant is a private domestic corporation, summons shall be served only through the officers so enumerated therein wherever they may be found. In arriving at this doctrine, the Supreme Court applied the basic rule on statutory construction expressio unius est exclusio alterius and explained that what has not been stated therein is intended not to be included.

In another case, the Supreme Court reiterated the doctrine laid down relative to this restricted, limited and exclusive list when the plaintiff failed to present the sheriff to establish the fact that the summons was received by the cost accountant upon the instruction of the general manager.

Service at Principal Office

If service of summons cannot be made upon any of these officers or their secretaries, it shall be made upon the person who customarily receives the correspondence for the defendant at its principal office.

Question 16

Discuss the scope and subject matter of small claims under Expedited Rules in First Level Courts

Answer 16

A “small claim” is an action that is purely civil in nature where the claim or relief raised by the
plaintiff is solely for the payment or reimbursement of a sum of money. It excludes actions seeking
other claims or reliefs aside from payment or reimbursement of a sum of money and those coupled
with provisional remedies.
The claim or demand may be:
(a) For money owed under any of the following:
1. Contract of Lease;
2. Contract of Loan and other credit accommodations;
3. Contract of Services; or
4. Contract of Sale of personal property, excluding the recovery of the personal property,
unless it is made the subject of a compromise agreement between the parties.
(b) The enforcement of barangay amicable settlement agreements and arbitration awards,
where the money claim does not exceed One Million Pesos (₱1,000,000.00), provided that
no execution has been enforced by the barangay within six (6) months from the date of
the settlement or date of receipt of the award or from the date the obligation stipulated or
adjudged in the arbitration award becomes due and demandable, pursuant to Section 417,
Chapter VII of Republic Act No. 7160, otherwise known as The Local Government Code
of 1991.

Question 17

Discuss the instances when electronic service is not allowed

Answer 17

When party concerned did not give consent to such mode of service

Rule 13, Section 9. Service by electronic means and facsimile. - Service by electronic means and facsimile shall be made if the party concerned consents to such modes of service.

When party concerned did not give consent to such mode of service

Rule 13, Section 9. Service by electronic means and facsimile. - Service by electronic means and facsimile shall be made if the party concerned consents to such modes of service.

Question 18

Discuss the concept of presumptive service

Answer 18

Rule 13, Section 10 - Presumptive Service . — There shall be presumptive notice to a party of a court setting if such notice appears on the records to have been mailed at least twenty (20) calendar days prior to the scheduled date of hearing and if the addressee is from within the same judicial region of the court where the case is pending, or at least thirty (30) calendar days if the addressee is from outside the judicial region.

This is a new provision. It may have been made available in order to expedite cases, consistent with the aim of the amendments made.

Requisites:
1) Notice appears on the record;
2) Such record show that it was mailed at least:
a. 20 calendar days prior to the scheduled date of hearing, if the addressee is within the same judicial region; or
b. 30 calendar days prior to the scheduled date of hearing, if the addressee is outside the judicial region

Note: Since it is provided as a mere presumption, it may be subject to proof to the contrary, such as when counsel adduces evidence that notice of the court setting was indeed not served.

Question 19

Distinguish between prohibited pleadings in summary procedure under the Expedited Rules from the previous Rule in Summary Procedure

Answer 19

New Expedited rules:
Sec. 2. Prohibited pleadings and motions. - The following pleadings, motions, or petitions shall not be allowed in cases governed by these Rules:
(a) In civil cases, a motion to dismiss the complaint or the statement of claim, and in criminal
cases, a motion to guash the complaint or information, except on the ground of lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter or failure to comply with the requirement of barangay conciliation, pursuant to Chapter VII, Title I Book III of Republic Act No. 7160;
(b) Motion to hear and/ or resolve affirmative defenses;
(c) Motion for a bill of particulars;
(d) Motion for new trial or for reconsideration of a judgment on the merits, or
for reopening of proceedings;
e) Petition for relief from judgment;
(f) Motion for extension of time to file pleadings, affidavits or any other paper;
(g) Memoranda;
(h) Petition for certiorari, mandamus, or prohibition against any interlocutory order issued by the court;
(i) Motion to declare the defendant in default;
j) Dilatory motions for postponement. Any motion for postponement shall be presumed dilatory unless grounded on acts of God, force majeure, or physical inability of a counselor witness to personally appear in court, as supported by the requisite affidavit and medical proof;
(k) Rejoinder;
(l) Third-party complaints;
(m) Motion for and Complaint in Intervention;
(n) Motion to admit late judicial affidavit/s, position papers, or other evidence except on the ground of force majeure or acts of God;
(o) Motion for judicial determination of probable cause in criminal cases.

Previous Rule:
Sec. 19. Prohibited pleadings and motions. — The following pleadings, motions or petitions shall not be allowed in the cases covered by this Rule:
(a) Motion to dismiss the complaint or to quash the complaint or information except on the
ground of lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter, or failure to comply with the
preceding section;
(b) Motion for a bill of particulars;
(c) Motion for new trial, or for reconsideration of a judgment, or for opening of trial;
(d) Petition for relief from judgment;
(e) Motion for extension of time to file pleadings, affidavits or any other paper;
(f) Memoranda;
(g) Petition for certiorari, mandamus, or prohibition against any interlocutory order issued by the court;
(h) Motion to declare the defendant in default;
(i) Dilatory motions for postponement;
(j) Reply;
(k) Third party complaints;
(l) Interventions.
Note: Provided for an exception for dilatory motions for postponement namely; those grounded on acts of God, force majeure, or physical inability of a counselor witness to personally appear in court, as supported by the requisite affidavit and medical proof
This is an added list in the enumeration.

Question 20

Discuss preliminary conference proceedings under the Expedited Rules in First Level Courts

Answer 20

Preliminary Conference
A preliminary conference shall be held not later than 30 days after the last answer is filed.
• The provisions of Rule 18 on pre-trial shall be applicable to the preliminary conference unless inconsistent with the provisions of Rule 70.
1. The failure of the plaintiff to appear in the preliminary conference shall be cause for the dismissal of his complaint.
2. The defendant who appears in the absence of the plaintiff shall be entitled to judgment on his counterclaim in accordance with the next preceding section.
3. All cross-claims shall be dismissed.
4. If a sole defendant shall fail to appear, the plaintiff shall likewise be entitled to judgment in accordance with the next preceding section.
o This procedure shall not apply where one of two or more defendants sued under a common cause of action who had pleaded a common defense shall appear at the preliminary conference.
No postponement of the preliminary conference shall be granted except for highly meritorious grounds and without prejudice to such sanctions as the court in the exercise of sound discretion may impose on the movant [Sec. 8, Rule 70].

Question 21

Distinguish and discuss the grounds for a motion to dismiss from those affirmative defenses

Answer 21

S12, R15 states that a motion to dismiss is a prohibited motion with the exception of the following grounds:
1. That the court has no jurisdiction over the subject matter of the claim;
2. That there is another action pending between the same parties for the same cause; and
3. That the cause of action is barred by a prior judgment or by the statute of limitations
On the other hand, the grounds for affirmative defenses are: Fraud, statute of limitations, release, payment illegality, statute of frauds, estoppel, former recovery, discharge in bankruptcy, and any other matter by way of confession of avoidance. Affirmative defenses may also include grounds for the dismissal of a complaint, specifically, that the court has no jurisdiction over the subject matter, that there is another action pending between the same parties for the same cause, or that the action is barred by a prior judgment.

Question 22

Discuss court action on motion to dismiss and on affirmative defenses

Answer 22

Motion to Dismiss
The grounds under the current Rules are limited only to lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter, litis pendentia, res judicata, and prescription. [Sec. 12, Rule 15] Notably, the Amended Rules empower the court to dismiss a case motu proprio if the aforementioned non- waivable grounds are apparent on the face of the complaint. [Sec. 1, Rule 14]

b. Motion to hear affirmative defenses;
Note: Such motion is prohibited since the court is required to act on the affirmative defenses set out in the answer within 30 calendar days if the affirmative defense is among those listed in Sec. 12, Rule 8. The court is also allowed to avail of a summary hearing within 15 calendar days from the filing of the answer, and is thereafter mandated to resolve the affirmative defense within 30 calendar days from the termination of the summary hearing if the affirmative defenses are those set forth in the first paragraph of Sec. 5(b), Rule 6. [Sec. 12, Rule 8]

Question 23

Discuss the rule on class suits

Answer 23

Section 12, Rule 3 of the Rules of Court defines a class suit, as follows:

Sec. 12. Class suit. – When the subject matter of the controversy is one of common or general interest to many persons so numerous that it is impracticable to join all as parties, a number of them which the court finds to be sufficiently numerous and representative as to fully protect the interests of all concerned may sue or defend for the benefit of all. Any party in interest shall have the right to intervene to protect his individual interest.

From the foregoing definition, the requisites of a class suit are [Necessary elements for the maintenance of a class suit]:
1) the subject matter of controversy is one of common or general interest to many persons;
2) the parties affected are so numerous that it is impracticable to bring them all to court; and
3) the parties bringing the class suit are sufficiently numerous or representative of the class and can fully protect the interests of all concerned.

In Mathay v. The Consolidated Bank and Trust Company, the Court held that:

An action does not become a class suit merely because it is designated as such in the pleadings. Whether the suit is or is not a class suit depends upon the attending facts, and the complaint, or other pleading initiating the class action should allege the existence of the necessary facts, to wit, the existence of a subject matter of common interest, and the existence of a class and the number of persons in the alleged class, in order that the court might be enabled to determine whether the members of the class are so numerous as to make it impracticable to bring them all before the court, to contrast the number appearing on the record with the number in the class and to determine whether claimants on record adequately represent the class and the subject matter of general or common interest.

Question 24

Distinguish amended pleadings from supplemental pleadings

Answer 24

Section 1. Amendments in general. — Pleadings may be amended by adding or striking out an allegation or the name of any party, or by correcting a mistake in the name of a party or a mistaken or inadequate allegation or description in any other respect, so that the actual merits of the controversy may speedily be determined, without regard to technicalities, and in the most expeditious and inexpensive manner. (1)

Section 2. Amendments as a matter of right. — A party may amend his pleading once as a matter of right at any time before a responsive pleading is served or, in the case of a reply, at any time within ten (10) days after it is served. (2a)

Section 3. Amendments by leave of court. — Except as provided in the next preceding section, substantial amendments may be made only upon leave of court. But such leave may be refused if it appears to the court that the motion was made with intent to delay. Orders of the court upon the matters provided in this section shall be made upon motion filed in court, and after notice to the adverse party, and an opportunity to be heard. (3a)

Section 4. Formal amendments. — A defect in the designation of the parties and other clearly clerical or typographical errors may be summarily corrected by the court at any stage of the action, at its initiative or on motion, provided no prejudice is caused thereby to the adverse party. (4a)

Section 7. Filing of amended pleadings. — When any pleading is amended, a new copy of the entire pleading, incorporating the amendments, which shall be indicated by appropriate marks, shall be filed. (7a)

Section 8. Effect of amended pleadings. — An amended pleading supersedes the pleading that it amends. However, admissions in superseded pleadings may be received in evidence against the pleader, and claims or defenses alleged therein not incorporated in the amended pleading shall be deemed waived. (n)

WHEREAS

Section 6. Supplemental pleadings. — Upon motion of a party the court may, upon reasonable notice and upon such terms as are just, permit him to serve a supplemental pleading setting forth transactions, occurrences or events which have happened since the date of the pleading sought to be supplemented. The adverse party may plead thereto within ten (10) days from notice of the order admitting the supplemental pleading. (6a)

Question 25

Discuss the concept of amendments to conform with the evidence

Answer 25

No amendment necessary to conform to or authorize presentation of evidence.

When issues are not raised in the pleadings but are tried with the consent of the parties, they shall be treated as if they had been raised in the pleading.

No amendment of such pleadings deemed amended is necessary to cause them to conform to the evidence. [Sec. 5, Rule 10]

Question 26

Distinguish the concept of “in relation to the office” as adverted to in the matters under the jurisdiction of the Sandiganbayan

Answer 26

In Alarilla v. Sandiganbayan, the Court held that “an offense is deemed to be committed in relation to the accused’s office when such office is an element of the crime charged or when the offense charged is intimately connected with the discharge of the official functions of accused.”

Jurisdiction of the Sandiganbayan
a. Exclusive Original Jurisdiction
1. Violations of R.A. 3019 or the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act
2. Violations of R.A. 1379 or An Act Declaring Forfeiture in Favor of the State Any Property Found to Have Been Unlawfully Acquired by Any Public Officer or Employee and Providing for the Proceedings Therefor
3. Bribery (Chapter II, Sec. 2, Title VII, Book II, RPC), where one or more of the principal accused are occupying the following positions in government, whether in a permanent, acting or interim capacity, at the time of the commission of the offense
a. Officials of the executive branch
occupying the positions of regional director and higher, otherwise classified as Grade 27 and higher, of the Compensation and Position Classification Act of 1989 (R.A. 6758), specifically including:
i. Provincial governors, vice- governors, members of the sangguniang panlalawigan, and provincial treasurers, assessors, engineers, and other provincial department heads
ii. City mayors, vice-mayors, members of the sangguniang panlungsod, city treasurers, assessors, engineers, and other city department heads
iii. Officials of the diplomatic service occupying the position of consul and higher
iv. Philippine army and air force colonels, naval captains, and all officers of higher rank;
v. Officers of the Philippine National Police while occupying the position of provincial director and those holding the rank of senior superintendent and higher
vi. City and provincial prosecutors and their assistants, and officials and prosecutors in the Office of the Ombudsman and special prosecutor;
vii. Presidents, directors or trustees, or managers of government-owned or controlled corporations, state universities or educational institutions or foundations
b. Members of Congress and officials thereof classified as Grade 27 and up under R.A. 6758
c. Members of the Judiciary without prejudice to the provisions of the Constitution
d. Chairmen and Members of the Constitutional Commissions without prejudice to the provisions of the Constitution
e. All other national and local officials classified as Grade 27 and higher under R.A. 6758
Note: Exclusive original jurisdiction shall be vested in the proper RTC or MTC, as the case may be, where none of the accused are occupying positions corresponding to Salary Grade 27 or higher, or military and PNP officers officers mentioned above [Sec. 4, P.D. 1606, as amended by R.A. 10660]
4. Other offenses or felonies whether simple or complexed with other crimes committed by the public officials and employees mentioned in subsection a. of section 4 (as amended) in relation to their office
5. Civil and criminal cases filed pursuant to and in connection with E.O. Nos. 1, 2, 14-A
6. Petitions for mandamus, prohibition, certiorari, habeas corpus, injunctions, and other ancillary writs and processes in aid of its appellate jurisdiction, and petitions of similar nature, including quo warranto, arising or that may arise in cases filed or which may be filed under Executive Order Nos. 1, 2, 14 and 14-A, issued in 1986 [Sec. 4, P.D. 1606, as amended by R.A. 10660]
b. Concurrent Original Jurisdiction
With SC, CA, and RTC for petitions for writs of amparo [Sec. 3, Rule on the Writ of Amparo] and habeas data [Sec. 3, Rule on the Writ of Habeas Data]

Question 27

Discuss the matter of actions which survive the death of the party

Answer 27

The wrong complained of affects primarily and principally property and property rights. Injuries to the person are merely incidental.

Example of actions which survive:
1. Actions to recover real and personal property from the estate;
2. actions to enforce a lien thereon; and
3. actions to recover damages for an injury to person or property

Court may order the opposing party, within a specific time, to procure the appointment of an administrator or executor of the estate in the ff. cases
1. No legal representative is named; or
2. The one so named fails to appear within the
specified period. [Sec. 16, Rule 3]

Question 28

Discuss the effects of the death of a party in the course of pending litigation and on appeal

Answer 28

Rule 3 Section 16. Death of party; duty of counsel. - Whenever a party to a pending action dies, and the claim is not thereby extinguished, it shall be the duty of his counsel to inform the court within thirty (30) days after such death of the fact thereof, and to give the name and address of his legal representative or representatives. Failure of counsel to comply with this duty shall be a ground for disciplinary action.

The heirs of the deceased may be allowed to be substituted for the deceased, without requiring the appointment of an executor or administrator and the court may appoint a guardian ad litem for the minor heirs.

The court shall forthwith order said legal representative or representatives to appear and be substituted within a period of thirty (30) days from notice.

If no legal representative is named by the counsel for the deceased party, or if the one so named shall fail to appear within the specified period, the court may order the opposing party, within a specified time, to procure the appointment of an executor or administrator for the estate of the deceased and the latter shall immediately appear for and on behalf of the deceased. The court charges in procuring such appointment, if defrayed by the opposing party, may be recovered as costs. (16a, 17a)

Section 17. Death or separation of a party who is a public officer. - When a public officer is a party in an action in his official capacity and during its pendency dies, resigns, or otherwise ceases to hold office, the action may be continued and maintained by or against his successor if, within thirty (30) days after the successor takes office or such time as may be granted by the court, it is satisfactorily shown to the court by any party that there is a substantial need for continuing or maintaining it and that the successor adopts or continues or threatens to adopt or continue the action of his predecessor. Before a substitution is made, the party or officer to be affected, unless expressly assenting thereto, shall be given reasonable notice of the application therefor and accorded an opportunity to be heard. (18a)

Question 29

Distinguish intervention from the third party complaints and interpleader

Answer 29

Intervention is a remedy by which a third party, not originally impleaded in a proceeding, becomes a litigant therein to enable him to protect or preserve a right or interest which may be affected by such proceeding.

[RULE 19 SEC 1]
Section 1. Who may intervene. A person who has a legal interest in the matter in litigation, or in the success of either of the parties, or an interest against both, or is so situated as to be adversely affected by a distribution or other disposition of property in the custody of the court or of an officer thereof may, with leave of court, be allowed to intervene in the action. The court shall consider whether or not the intervention will unduly delay or prejudice the adjudication of the rights of the original parties, and whether or not the intervenor’s rights may be fully protected in a separate proceeding.

An interpleader is a special civil action filed by a person against whom two conflicting claims are made upon the same subject matter and over which he claims no interest whatsoever, or if he has an interest, it is one which, in whole or in part, is not disputed by the claimants [Sec. 1, Rule 62].

Requisites for Interpleader 1. There must be 2 or more claimants with adverse or conflicting interest; 2. The conflicting claims involves the same subject matter; 3. The conflicting claims are made against the same person; and 4. The plaintiff has no claim upon the subject matter of the adverse claims or if he has an interest at all, such interest is not disputed by the claimants [Sec. 1, Rule 62].

Question 30

Distinguish a motion for new trial from a motion for reconsideration

Answer 30

See photo

Question 31

Discuss at least 2 ways by which procedure is expedited pursuant to the rules in Expedited Procedure in First Level Courts

Answer 31

1.)Under the Rule on Small Claims, Notices may now be served through mobile phone calls, SMS, or instant messaging software applications.

2.)While videoconferencing hearings should be conducted using the Supreme Court-prescribed platform, the court may allow the use of alternative platforms or instant messaging applications with video call features, under certain conditions. The 30-day period within which to set the hearing was extended to 60 days if one of the defendants resides or is holding business outside the judicial region of the court. There shall only be one hearing day, with judgment rendered within 24 hours from its termination. The Small Claims Forms have also been updated and improved for ease of use, with translations in Filipino. The Rules maintained that the decision rendered by the first level courts in small claims shall be final, executory and unappealable.

RULE IV THE RULE ON SMALL CLAIMS Sec. 11. Electronic Filing and Service. - The service of court issuances and filings by the plaintiff/s and defendant/s may be made through elnail, facsimile, and other electronic means. Notices may also be served through mobile phone calls, short lnessaging service (SMS) or instant messaging (IM) software applications. The consent to, and chosen Iand chosen mode of electronic service and notice shall be indicated in the Statement of Claim/s or Response, as the case may be.

RULE II GENERAL COMMON PROVISIONS Sec. 3. Videoconerence. - As far as practicable, and if the court finds that the
conduct of a videoconference hearing will be beneficial to the fair, speedy
and efficient administration of justice! the court, on its own initiative or
upon motion! lnay set the case for a videoconference hearing at any stage
of the proceedings.

Question 32

Discuss the required matters that must be attached and stated in pleadings

Answer 32

skip

Question 33

Discuss the consequences of one’s failure or refusal to avail himself of the modes of discovery

Answer 33

Effect of failure to serve written interrogatories.
General Rule: A party not served with written interrogatories may not be compelled by adverse party to:
1. Give testimony in open court; or
2. Give a deposition pending appeal.
Exception: Allowed by the court for good cause shown and to prevent a failure of justice.

Effect of Failure to File and Serve Request for Admission
General Rule: A party who fails to file and serve a request for admission on the adverse party of material and relevant facts at issue which are, or ought to be, within the personal knowledge of the latter, shall not be permitted to present evidence on such facts.
Exception: Allowed by the court for good cause shown and to prevent a failure of justice.

Question 34

Distinguish Commissions from Letters Rogatory

Answer 34

Commission
1.) instrument issued by a court of justice, or other competent tribunal to authorize a person to take depositions, or do any other act by authority of such court or tribunal
2.) Issued to a non-judicial foreign officer who will directly take the testimony
3.) Applicable rules of procedure are those of the requesting court; the rules of procedure in issuing a commission are entirely under its control
4.) Resorted to if permission of the foreign country is given
5.) Leave of court is not necessary.

Letters rogatory
1.) An instrument sent in the name and by authority of a judge or court to another, requesting the latter to cause to be examined, upon interrogatories filed in a cause pending before the former, a witness who is within the jurisdiction of the judge or court to whom such letters are addressed
2.) Issued to the appropriate judicial officer of the foreign country; such officer will then direct somebody in said foreign country to take down the testimony
3.) The methods of procedure must, from the nature of the case, be altogether under the control of the foreign tribunal which is appealed to for assistance in the administration of justice
4.) Resorted to if the execution of the commission is refused in the foreign country
5.) Leave of court is necessary.

Question 35

Discuss the use of depositions

Answer 35

RULE 23, Sec. 4

Section 4. Use of depositions. — At the trial or upon the hearing of a motion or an interlocutory proceeding, any part or all of a deposition, so far as admissible under the rules of evidence, may be used against any party who was present or represented at the taking of the deposition or who had due notice thereof, in accordance with any one of the following provisions:

(a) Any deposition may be used by any party for the purpose of contradicting or impeaching the testimony of the deponent as a witness;
(b) The deposition of a party or of any one who at the time of taking the deposition was an officer, director, or managing agent of a public or private corporation, partnership, or association which is a party may be used by an adverse party for any purpose;
(c) The deposition of a witness, whether or not a party, may be used by any party for any purpose if the court finds: (1) that the witness is dead; or (2) that the witness resides at a distance more than one hundred (100) kilometers from the place of trial or hearing, or is out of the Philippines, unless it appears that his or her absence was procured by the party offering the deposition; or (3) that the witness is unable to attend or testify because of age, sickness, infirmity, or imprisonment; or (4) that the party offering the deposition has been unable to procure the attendance of the witness by subpoena; or (5) upon application and notice, that such exceptional circumstances exist as to make it desirable, in the interest of justice and with due regard to the importance of presenting the testimony of witnesses orally in open court, to allow the deposition to be used; and
(d) If only part of a deposition is offered in evidence by a party, the adverse party may require him or her to introduce all of it which is relevant to the part introduced, and any party may introduce any other parts.

Question 36

Distinguish Depositions via Oral Examination from those via Written Interrogatories

Answer 36

Section 15. Deposition upon oral examination; notice; time and place. -
- A party desiring to take the deposition of any person upon oral examination shall give reasonable notice in writing to every other party to the action.
The notice shall state:- the time and place for taking the deposition and- the name and address of each person to be examined, if known,- and if the name is not known, a general description sufficient to identify him or her or the particular class or group to which he or she belongs.
-On motion of any party upon whom the notice is served, the court may for cause shown enlarge or shorten the time

Section 25. Deposition upon written interrogatories; service of notice and of interrogatories. – A party desiring to take the deposition of any person upon written interrogatories shall serve them upon every other party with a notice

(A notice) stating the:-name and address of the person who is to answer them and -the name or descriptive title and address of the officer before whom the deposition is to be taken.
-Within ten (10) calendar days thereafter, a party so served may serve cross-interrogatories upon the party proposing to take the deposition.
-Within five (5) calendar days thereafter, the latter may serve re-direct interrogatories upon a party who has served cross-interrogatories.
-Within three (3) calendar days after being served with re-direct interrogatories, a party may serve recross-interrogatories upon the party proposing to take the deposition.

Question 37

How are depositions taken in foreign countries?

Answer 37

If in a foreign state or country, the deposition shall be taken: a.) On notice before a secretary of embassy or legation, consul general, consul, vice- consul, or consular agent of the Philippines, b.) Before such person or officer as may be appointed by commission or under letters rogatory, or c.) Any person authorized to administer oaths as stipulated by parties in writing. [Sec. 14, Rule 23]

Section 11. Persons before whom depositions may be taken in foreign countries. — In a foreign state or country, depositions may be taken (a) on notice before a secretary of embassy or legation, consul general, consul, vice-consul, or consular agent of the Republic of the Philippines; (b) before such person or officer as may be appointed by commission or under letters rogatory; or (c) the person referred to in section 14 hereof.

Question 38

Discuss the consequences of one’s disobedience or noncompliance with the rules on modes of discovery

Answer 38

RULE 29 - REFUSAL TO COMPLY WITH MODES OF DISCOVERY

Sec. 1 Refusal to answer. - If a party or other deponent refuses to answer any question upon oral examination, the examination may be completed on other matters or adjourned as the proponent of the question may prefer. The proponent may thereafter apply to the proper court of the place where the deposition is being taken, for an order to compel an answer. The same procedure may be availed of when a party or a witness refuses to answer any interrogatory submitted under Rule 23 or 25.

If the application is granted, the court shall require the refusing party or deponent to answer the question or interrogatory and if it also finds that the refusal to answer was without substantial justification, it may require the refusing party or deponent or the counsel advising the refusal, or both of them, to pay the proponent the amount of the reasonable expenses incurred in obtaining the order, including attorney’s fees.

If the application is denied and the court finds that it was filed without substantial jusitifcation, the court may require the proponent or the counsel advising the filing of the application, or both of them, to pay to the refusing party or deponent the amount of the reasonable expenses incurred in opposing the aplication, including attorney’s fees.

Sec. 2. Contempt of court. - If a party or other witness refuses to be sworn or refuses to answer any question after being directed to do so by the court of the place in which the deposition is being taken, the refusal may be considered a contempt of that court.

Sec. 3. Other consequences. - If any party or an officer or managing agent of a party refuses to obey an order made under Section 1 of this Rule requiring him or her to answer designated questions, or an order under Rule 27 to produce any document or other thing for inspection, copying, or photographing, or to permit it to be done, or to permit entry upon land or other property, or an order made under Rule 28 requiring him or her to submit to a physical or mental examination, the court may make such orders in regard to the refusal as are just, among others the following:

a. An order that the matters regarding which the questions were asked, or the character or description of the thing or land, or the contents of the paper, or the physical or mental condition of the party, or any other designated facts shall be taken to be established for the purposes of the action in accordance with the claim of the party obtaining the order;

b. An order refusing to allow the disobedient party to support or oppose designated claims or defenses prohibiting him or her from introducing in evidence designated documents or things or items of testimony, or from introducing evidence of physical or mental condition;

c. An order striking out pleadings or parts thereof, or staying further proceedings until the order is obeyed, or dismissing the action or proceeding or any part thereof, or rendering a judgment by default against the disobedient party; and

d. In lieu of any of the foregoing orders or in addition thereto, an order directing the arrest of any party or agent of a party for disobeying any of such orders except an order to submit to a physical or mental examination.

Sec. 4. Expenses on refusal to admit. — If a party after being served with a request under Rule 26 to admit the genuineness of any document or the truth of any matter of fact, serves a sworn denial thereof and if the party requesting the admissions thereafter proves the genuineness of such document or the truth of any such matter of fact, he or she may apply to the court for an order requiring the other party to pay him or her the reasonable expenses incurred in making such proof, including reasonable attorney’s fees. Unless the court finds that there were good reasons for the denial or that admissions sought were of no substantial importance, such order shall be issued.

Sec. 5. Failure of party to attend or serve answers. — If a party or an officer or managing agent of a party wilfully fails to appear before the officer who is to take his or her deposition, after being served with a proper notice, or fails to serve answers to interrogatories submitted under Rule 25 after proper service of such interrogatories, the court on motion and notice, may strike out all or any part of any pleading of that party, or dismiss the action or proceeding or any part thereof, or enter a judgment by default against that party, and in its discretion, order him or her to pay reasonable expenses incurred by the other, including attorney’s fees.

Sec. 6. Expenses against the Republic of the Philippines. - Expenses and attorney’s fees are not to be imposed upon the Republic of the Philippines under this Rule.

Question 39

Distinguish Request for Admissions from Interrogatories to Parties

Answer 39

Section 1. Request for admission. - At any time after issues have been joined, a party may file and serve upon any other party a written request for the admission by the latter of the genuineness of any material and relevant document described in and exhibited with the request or of the truth of any material and relevant matter of fact set forth in the request. Copies of the documents shall be delivered with the request unless copies have already been furnished.

Section 1. Interrogatories to parties; service thereof - Upon ex parte motion, any party desiring to elicit material and relevant facts from any adverse parties shall file and serve upon the latter written interrogatories to be answered by the party served or, if the party served is a public or private corporation or a partnership or association, by any officer thereof competent to testify in its behalf.

Question 40

Discuss the rule on Actionable Documents

Answer 40

A claiming party is allowed to file his or her Reply only if the defending party attaches an actionable document to the answer. If there is/are no actionable document/s attached to the Answer, a Reply is not allowed. Why is there a distinction on whether or not an actionable document is attached to the Answer?

The answer lies in Section 8, Rule 8 of both the 1997 and 2019 Amendments. Under the said Section: “[w]hen an action or defense is founded upon a written instrument, or attached to the corresponding pleading…, the genuineness and due execution of the instrument shall be deemed admitted unless the adverse party, under oath specifically denies them…; but the requirement of an oath does not apply when the adverse party does not appear to be a party to the instrument or when compliance with an order for an inspection of the original instrument is refused.”

Based on this provision, a party contesting the genuineness or due execution of an actionable document needs to deny it under oath. If he or she does not do so, the genuineness and due execution of such document would be deemed admitted.

Section 8. How to contest such documents. - When an action or defense is founded upon a written instrument, or attached to the corresponding pleading as provided in the preceding section, the genuineness and due execution of the instrument shall be deemed admitted unless the adverse party, under oath specifically denies them, and sets forth what he or she claims to be the facts; but the requirement of an oath does not apply when the adverse party does not appear to be a party to the instrument or when compliance with an order for an inspection of the original instrument is refused. (8a)