Part 8: Chapter 29, 30 and 31 Risk measurement & reporting, Risk Transfer, Other risk controls Flashcards
Why risk reporting is important
New and changing of risks identified
Appropriate capital requirements can be set
Quantify impact of individual risks
Monitor effectiveness of existing control systems
Assess interaction between risks
Assess proper risk allocation by business units (ERM)
When quantifying the capital required for each retained risk, consider
The term of the risk exposure
Correlation allowances
Interdependencies of risk
Low likelihood high impact risks (especially operational risks)
Past data’s credibility
Scenario analysis
Group risk exposures into broad categories - input from several senior managers
Develop Plausible adverse scenario for each category - ideas!!
Set assumptions for the risk factors of each scenario
Calculate consequences based on certain assumptions - ideas!!
Total cost is cost of all risks in relevant scenario
Run several different scenarios - one for each group risk exposure
Probabilistic Risk measures
VaR/Tail VaR
Liability risk - measured by analysis of experience vs. expected
Asset risk - Active risk measure (forward/backward looking tracking error)
Deviation
Purpose of a stress test
Volatilities of results checked
Identify weak areas – where high volatility and correlation exists
Correlations between risks checked and held consistent
Sensitivity of certain risk factors
Impact of market turmoil on parameters
Reactions of rest of business on stress scenario: Ideas!
The pros and cons of VaR
Applicable to all risk types
Benchmark can be set from its outcome
Units are understandable
Comparable between various risk sources
Simple expression
Distribution of losses > than VaR not considered
Underestimation of fat tailed distributions
Sensitive to choices of data, assumptions and parameters
Addition of risks won’t increase the overall risk exposure
The contents of a risk register
Probability
Impact / Severity
Correlation
Risk score to compare risks with each other
Extension of risk register:
Diversified risk
Retained risk
Avoided risk
Mitigated risk
Controls measures
Owner of the risk
Concentration of risks
Key strategic risks identified
How to do a stress test
Subject portfolio to extreme market movements ( In the case of testing adverse claims experiences or solvency levels, subject portfolio to relevant extremes such)
- This can be done by for changing assets and liabilites to extreme low or high values, making new business volumes extremely high etc. Or by changing key assumptions such as the claim rate, interest rate, inflatiion
correlations should be considered carefully. This may lead to the need to do stress scenario testing
Two types of stress testing:
Identify weak areas in the portfolio
gauge the impact of major market turmoil
Reasons for reinsurance
SAD LIFES CLAP U
Smoothing of results / Smaller capital requirements Avoid large losses - Single/aggregated events or claims
Diversification
Limit exposure to large risks caused by:
- Single risk
- Single event
- Aggregation of events
Increase capacity to write more business/large risks
Financial assistance
Expertise
Solvency risk reduces
Credit risk
Liquidity risk
Administration cost
Profitability affected as premiums are ceded
Underwriting
Reasons for ART include
Diversification
Exploits risk as opportunity
Solvency management, sources of capital
Cheaper than other types of cover
Available when other cover might be unavailable
Results stabilized (Smoothing of results)
Tax advantages
Effective provision of risk management
Examples of ART contracts include
Post loss funding
Insurance derivatives
Securitisation (Catastrophe bonds)
Swaps
Integrated risk covers
Merits of XoL reinsurance:
+Caps losses, so can take on large risks
+Protects against individual/aggregate large claims
+Efficient use of capital (less provisions) due to less volatility
+Helps stabilise profits
- Premiums are expensive
- XL premiums may occasionally be far greater than pure risk premium due to underwriting cycle
- General poor claims experience not protected against
Expertise of reinsurer
Product Design/Data
Underwriting and claims control systems
Pricing
Actuarial services
Policy wording
Administration help
Merits of Proportional Reinsurance
Quota share
Surplus
PR Quota share
+ Simple to administrate
+ Reciprocal Business encouraged
+ Helps to diversify risk
+ Larger portfolios of risk written
- The same Proportion of each risk is ceded regardless of size
- and volatility
- It does not Cap the cost of very large claims
PR Surplus
+Reduces company’s exposure to certain risks
+Flexible, useful in achieving a well-balanced portfolio of risk
+Helps insurer to spread risk / Heterogeneous risks can be insured with this agreement
+Allows insurers to accept large risks
-More complex administration compared to share quote due to proportions changing for each risk
Factors affecting the extent of risk Transfer
Appetite for risk
Cost of transferring the risk
Counter party risk
Resources existing to finance the risk event if it happens
Probability of the risk Occurring
Willingness of a third party to take on the risk