part 6 Flashcards

1
Q

X (minors) v Bedfordshire County Council [1995]

A

a public body can in the right circumstances, be found liable for negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

GN v Poole BC

A

Local authorities do not have a duty to protect from harm from third parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Morrison Sports Ltd v Scottish Power 2020

A

if a statute includes penalty for a breach, then there is no common law remedy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Dawson v Bingley Urban District Council

A

If a statute does not provide means of enforcement, parliament has intended that a common law remedy should be available

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Osman v UK

A

Where granting police immunity of a suit was held as a violation of article 6 of the ECHR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Rowling v Takaro Properties ltd 1983

A

Can Cure be worse than the disease
where gov ministers had duty to private companies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Santander UK PLC v Keeper of the registers of Scotland 2013

A

Is the act or omission complained of a matter of policy or an operational matter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Barrett v enfield London Borough Councl 2011

A

and examination of the facts may be necessary to determine justiciability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Justiciability

A

Is the court able to try the issue according to law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Chief Constable of Essex Police v Transport Arendock BvBA 2020

A

liability found where truck drivers cargo was stolen while he was detained
liability arisen where public bodies have stopped prevention of harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Dorset Yacht Co v Home Office 1970

A

Where boys from a youth detention centre escaped and damaged a yacht
liability arose where public bodies had assumed care of a third party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Smith v Chief Constable of Sussex

A

If aware of a specific risk to a specific individual, liability arises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Michael v chief constable of South Wales 2015

A

Duty is not owed to the public at large
Where delay in response led to murder of women by ex partner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Tindall v Chief constable of thames valley police 2024

A

an authority is not liable to pay compensation unless, using the same principles, a private individual would have been liable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Chief constable of Northamptonshire Police v Woodcock

A

Common law does not impose liability generally for omissions
Police do not owe a duty to individuals to protect them from harm arising from third party criminl actions
forseeability of harm is not sufficient to give rise to such a duty or to the narrower, duty to warn

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Van Colle v Chief constable of Hertfordshire 2008

A

hill Principle applied
even if risk was forseeable, no duty arises from police

17
Q

Rathband v Chief Constable of Northumbria Constabulary 2016

A

Police officer shot by Raoul Moat after he had said he was going to kill police officers
No duty was found to protect one specific officer, hill principle

18
Q

Thomson v Scottish Ministers 2013

A

No duty of care arose for release of a man from jail who killed someone