Part 3: Sustainability Flashcards
What’s a balanced scorecard
A performance measurement and management system
Balancing financial and non-financial, short- and long-term measures
Three main motivations for architecture & design of a sustainability BSC (Hansen & Schaltegger, 2016)
Instrumental theories
Social & Political theories
Normative theories
The sustainability balanced scorecard (Hansen & Schaltegger, 2016) consists of:
- Sustainability strategy
- Defensive (add on)
- Accommodative (partly or fully integrated)
- Proactive (extended) - Value system
- Profit driven (strictly hierarchical)
- Care driven (semi-hierarchical)
- Systematic driven (non-hierarchical, network)
Difference between CSR and CSV
CSR is doing good separate from profit maximisation
CSV brings economic and social value together
(CSR could be argued to take a more neoclassical perspective)
Problems with sustainability balanced scorecard
- Things can be believed to be true even though they are not
- Not statistically testable
- Make sense but lack empirical evidence
- Illustrates a difficult reality
What’s a Sustainable Business case
The perspective managers take on a commercial activity related to sustainability
Ethical motivations (Schaltegger & Burrit, 2018)
- Reactionary
- Self-seeking behaviour defending the conventional business approach - Reputational
- Narcissism, seeking grandiosity - Responsible
- Striving for business performance excellence - Collaborative
- Developing business with stakeholder participation and collaboration
Shared value
- Social- and economic value are generated through organisational activities without any trade-off
- The concept recognises that markets are defined by both social and economic needs.
(Where the disregardment of economic needs is bad for the firm for obvious reasons, and neglecting social needs is argued to generate frequent internal costs such as wasted energy and raw materials)
Creating shared value
Rethinking products and markets
Redefining productivity in the value chain
Enabling cluster development
Business model according to Bocken et al (2014)
A conceptual tool to understand how a firm does business
- Value proposition
- Product/ Service - Value creation & delivery
- Key activities, resources, channels, partners, technology - Value capture
- Cost structure and revenue streams
(analysis, comparison, performance assessment, management, communication, and innovation)
Business model innovation for sustainability (Bocken et al., 2014)
Create significant positive or significantly reduce negative impacts
Through changes in:
- value proposition
- value creation & delivery
- value capture
Strategies in business model innovation (Bocken et al., 2014)
Defensive (adjustment)
Incremental adjustments to protect current business models, often driven by need of compliance
Accommodative (improvement, integration)
Modification of internal processes in some consideration of environmental or social objectives
Proactive (full integration)
Redesign core business logic for sustainable development
What are the groupings in sustainable business models (Bocken et al., 2014)
Technological
Social
Organisational
Parida et al. (2019) two stage process model and outcomes
Ecosystem readiness assessment
Ecosystem orchestration mechanisms
Outcomes
Business models are important for sustainability because
- Eco-design and eco-efficiency improvements have assisted in reducing energy, resource intensity, and emissions and waste per unit production
- Can serve as a vehicle to coordinate technological and social innovations with system-level sustainability