Part 3 - Murder And Homocide Flashcards

1
Q

Drury v HM Advocate

A

WICKED INTENT NEEDED TO KILL
provocation reducing murder to (voluntary) culpable homocide
Man killed partner in law with a hammer after discovering her affair

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Actus reus of murder

A

CAUSING DEATH OF ANOTHER HUMAN BEING

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Mens rea of murder

A

HAVING A WICKED INTENT TO KILL provocation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

HM Advocate v Purcell

A

WICKED RECKLESNESS
Man ran over and killed 10 year old boy
Dangerously driving, overtook cars stopped at red lights hit the boy crossing the road
Court ruled he had no intention to harm in appeal
Charges reduced to culpable homocide

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Petto v HM Advocate 2011

A

FORESIGHT OF CONSEQUENCES IS = TO INTENT TO KILL
Accused stabbed a man, convicted of culpable homocide
Disposing of body that was set on fire, a woman in another flat was killed by this
Petto argued he did not know she was there ie no intent to kill
Court rejected, concluding wilful fire raising in urban tenements provides enough reckless intent for crime of murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

HM Advocate v Robertson and Donoghue (1945)

A

UNLAWFUL ACT, INVOLUNTARY CULPABLE HOMOCIDE
Men robbed store, had a struggle with elderly owner
Owner had weak heart and died of a heart attack
But for test found actions of accused material to death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Tomney v HM Advocate 2012

A

LAWFUL ACT, INVOLUNTARY CULPABLE HOMOCIDE
Accused, deceased and third party drunk and high in living room (sounds gid)
Pistol inadvertently pointed at deceased when accused in som way put pressure on trigger
Was agreed he was culpable through recklessness, was not wicked

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Transco plc v HM Advocate

A

CHARGE OF CULPABLE HOMOCIDE AGAINST A COMPANY
Transco was a gas company
Explosion where family of four was killed from gas company
Transco argued as a company they had no mens rea, or individual actus reus
Identification principle where one person, specifically management,
Company charged with culpable homocide

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the three types of road traffic homocide

A

Causing death by dangerous driving
Causing death by driving under the influence
Causing death by unlicensed, disqualified or uninsured

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Assault actus reus
Men’s rea

A

Attack on the physical person of another,
Doing so deliberately

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

John Roy 1839 Bells notes

A

No charge for a non deliberate attack

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Smart v HM Advocate

A

Consent is no defence for assault

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

R v Brown 1994

A

Sado masochism no defence for assault

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

New 2025 assault case

A

Evil intent in mens Rea

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What act banned hitting your kids

A

Children (equal protection from assault) Scotland act 2019

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What case is on reckless endangerment

A

Hm Advocate v Harris 1993
Assault requires intent but causing real injury by reckless conduct is a crime

17
Q

What act covers rape

A

Sexual offences Scotland act 2009

18
Q

What act covers incest

A

Criminal law (consolidation) (Scotland) act 2009