PART 3 Flashcards
Indigent parties
A party who maybe authorized to litigate his action, claim or defense as an indigent if the court when the party is one who has no money or property sufficient and available for food, shelter and basic necessities for himself and his family.
Authority to litigate as an indigent party includes exemption from payment of:
Transcript of stenographic notes
Docket fees and other lawful fees
Guidelines for determining whether a party qualifies as an indigent litigant
- IL’s gross income and that of their immediate family do not exceed an amount double the monthly minimum wage of an employee
- Who do not own real property with a fair market value as stated in the current tax declaration of more than P300,000
Alternative defendants
Where the plaintiff is uncertain against who of several persons he is entitled to relief, he may join any or all of them as defendants in the alternative, although a right to relief against one may be inconsistent with a right of relief against the other.
Can a dead person be a plaintiff or defendant?
NO
WHO MAY BE PARTY PLAINTIFF OR PARTY DEFENDANT?
Natural and Juridical persons
Natural persons
Must be of legal age with capacity to sue
Husband and wife shall sue and be sued jointly
Minor or incompetent → with assistance from dad, mom, guardian or if he has none, a guardian ad litem
non-resident
Juridical persons
State and its political subdivisions
Other corporations, institutions and entities for public interest and purpose, created by law (GOCCs)
Corporations, partnerships and entities for private interest and purpose to which the law grants a juridical personality
Entities authorized by law (even if they lack juridical personality) → the persons who organized such entity may be sued under the name by which they are generally or commonly known
Classification of parties:
Real parties in interest
Representative parties
Indispensable parties
Necessary parties
Is lack of legal capacity to sue → considered as an affirmative defense ?
Yes
Permissive joinder of parties.
Right to relief by or against said persons in respect to or arising out of the same transaction or series of transactions
Question of law or fact common to all such plaintiffs or to all such defendants in th action
What may the court do with permissive joinder of parties?
The court may make such orders as may be just to prevent any plaintiff or defendant from being embarrassed or put to expense in connection with any proceedings in which he may have no interest.
Compulsory joinder of indispensable parties.
Parties in interest without whom no final determination can be had of an action shall be joined either as plaintiffs or defendants.
Whenever in any pleading in which a claim is asserted a necessary party is not joined, the pleader shall:
Set forth his name, if known
Shall state why he is omitted
Should the court find the reason for omission unmeritorious → it may order the inclusion of the omitted necessary party if jurisdiction over his person may be obtained
Effect of Failure to comply with the other of inclusion w/o justifiable cause
Deemed a waiver of the claim against such party
Effect of non inclusion of a necessary party
Does not prevent the court from proceeding in the action & the judgment rendered shall be w/o prejudice to the rights of such necessary party
What is the effect of failure to include indispensable parties
Failure to include indispensable parties → results in dismissal of the action
Absences of indispensable parties
renders all subsequent actions of the court null and void
It results in lack of authority to act not only as to the party absent but also as those present
Is failure to implead an dispensable party a ground for automatic dismissal of the action?
NO
Is misjoinder or non joinder of party ground for dismissal?
NO
When may parties be dropped?
may be dropped or added by order of the court on motion of any party on its own initiative at any state of the action and on such terms as are just
PROCEDURE FOR DISMISSAL IF INDISPENSABLE IS NOT IMPLEADED:
- The responsibility of impleading all the indispensable parties rests on the plaintiff
To avoid dismissal, the remedy is to implead the non-party claimed to be indispensable - If plaintiff refuses to implead an indispensable party despite the order of the court → the complaint may be dismissed upon motion of defendant or upon the court’s own motion
- Only upon unjustified failure or refusal to obey the order to include is the action dismissed
WHAT ARE THE EFFECTS OF NON-INCLUSION OF A NECESSARY PARTY?
Failure to comply with the order of his inclusion without justifiable cause → shall be deemed a waiver of the claim against such party
THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT
a claim that a defending party may, with leave of court, file against a person not a party to the action for:
Contribution
Ondeminity
Subrogation
Any other relief
The 3rd party complaint shall be denied admission and the court shall require the defendant to institute a separate action where:
- The 3rd party defendant cannot be located within 30 calendar days from the grant of such leave
- Matters extraneous to the issue in the principal case are raised
- The effect would be to the issue in a new and separate controversy into the action
Special joinder modes
Class suits
Intervention
Interpleader
When are parties joined in a class suit and interpleader?
parties are joined at the inception of the suit
INTERVENTION
act or proceeding by which a 3rd person is permitted to become a party to an action or proceeding between other persons and which results merely in the addition of a new party or parties to an original action