Part 2: Operant/Instrumental Conditioning Flashcards

1
Q

Instrumental Behaviour

A

Behaviour that is repeated because is was previously successful at producing a certain consequence; specific and required (in comparison to operant responses)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Goal-Directed Behaviour

A

Behaviour that elicits a result or consequence (difficult to isolate)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why is goal-directed behaviour difficult to isolate?

A

Difficult to determine whether action is due to previous learning (dog is barking to scare intruders because it worked in the past) or if the action is due to novel stimuli (the intruder is a new person- emotion evoking)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Thorndike’s Puzzle Box

A

early investigations of S-R responses; hungry cat put into box with food outside within sight; must learn to escape; escaping becomes faster

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did Thorndike conclude from his puzzle box experiments?

A

that if an association (S=being in box, R=escape) occurs and is followed by a satisfying event (food), the association will be stronger (law of effect)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Law of Effect

A

If a response in the presence of stimuli is followed by a satisfying event, the association between stimuli and response will be strengthened (or weakened in the case of annoying event)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Discrete-Trial Procedures

A

(T-Box or straight line); method of instrumental conditioning where participant can only perform instrumental response during specified period of time (when inside the box or when reinforcer is present); measure speed and latency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Free-Operant Procedures

A

(Skinner box); method of instrumental conditioning in which participant is able to continuously perform response without intervention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Skinner box

A

free-operant procedure apparatus; lever press = reinforcement delivery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Operant response

A

a response that is defined by the effect is has on the environment, not the specific action (ex. pressing a lever; does not matter if nose or paw is used)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Magazine Training

A

preliminary stage of instrumental conditioning in which participant learns to associate a stimuli with reinforcer to learn where to retrieve reinforcer (ex. sound of food delivery mechanism and food)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Response Shaping

A

Reinforcing successive approximations of the desired instrumental response; involves both reinforcement of successive approximations and withholding reinforcement for earlier responses/steps

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Why is shaping different than teaching a new behaviour?

A

shaping occurs through using existing behaviours in combination to create a unique outcome; synthesis of a new behavioural “unit” from naturally occurring behaviours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Positive Reinforcement

A

instrumental response produces an appetitive stimuli; behaviour increases (ex. giving a child a sticker for good behaviour)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Negative Reinforcement

A

instrumental response eliminates or prevents aversive stimuli; behaviour increases (ex. opening an umbrella to stop the rain)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Positive Punishment

A

instrumental response results in aversive stimuli; behaviour decreases (ex. yelling at an employee for being late to work)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Negative Punishment

A

instrumental response eliminates or prevents appetitive stimuli; behaviour decreases (ex. taking a child’s phone away for failing a test)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Stereotypy Behaviour

A

behaviour becomes too similar across trials if variability of responding is not reinforced

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Instinctive drift

A

increased responding depending on activation of a behaviour system; instinct overpowers ability to learn

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Temporal Response-Reinforcement Relation

A

time between response and reinforcer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Causal/contingent response-reinforcement relation

A

extent to which response is necessary and sufficient to produce reinforcer

22
Q

Temporal Contiguity

A

reinforcer is presented directly after response

23
Q

Secondary reinforcer

A

a CS previously paired with the reinforcer; can be used to provide immediate reinforcement for behaviour when their is a delay (ex. a coach saying “good job” mid game)

24
Q

Marking Procedure

A

procedure in which instrumental response is directly followed by a distinct event to make response more memorable (can overcome some effects of delayed reinforcement)

25
Q

Superstitious Behaviour (theory)

A

behaviour that increases due to accidental pairing of delivery of reinforcer and whatever behaviour that was occurring at the time

26
Q

Terminal versus interim responses (reinterpretation of superstitious behaviour)

A

Terminal: behaviour increases towards the end of interval between reinforcers (search behaviours)
Interim: behaviour increases around the middle of the interval between reinforcers (post-food focal search)

27
Q

Learned Helplessness Effect

A

decrease in responding due to inescapable or unavoidable aversive stimuli

28
Q

Learned Helplessness Hypothesis

A

exposure to inescapable/unavoidable aversive stimuli reduces motivation to respond and disrupts instrumental conditioning (participants learn their response does not change their outcome)

29
Q

Activity-Deficit Hypothesis

A

unescapable/unpreventable aversive stimuli leads to slower conditioning due to freezing effect

30
Q

Attention-Deficit Hypothesis

A

inescapable shock limits the attention that can be paid to one’s own behaviour

31
Q

Why is exposure to ESCAPABLE shock not as detrimental for learning?

A

The cessation of shock becomes a conditioned inhibitor of fear

32
Q

Simple Schedule of reinforcement

A

a single factor determines when the reinforcer will be presented

33
Q

Ratio Schedule

A

reinforcement depends only on the number of responses (ex. every 3 lever pushes)

34
Q

Continuous Schedule (Ratio)

A

reinforcement occurs every time the instrumental response is performed (ex. button press = food)

35
Q

Partial/Intermittent Schedule (ratio)

A

Responding is only reinforced SOMETIMES

36
Q

Fixed-Ratio Schedule

A

reinforcement occurs after a set number of responses every time (ex. 10 responses = food)

37
Q

Variable-Ratio Schedule

A

reinforcement occurs after a varying number of responses between trials

38
Q

Interval Schedules

A

Based on time passed between response and reinforcer

39
Q

Fixed-Interval Schedule

A

reinforcement occurs after a set amount of time has passed, every single time

40
Q

Variable-interval schedule

A

reinforcement occurs after a different amount of time between trials

41
Q

Associative Structure of Instrumental Conditioning (Theory of motivation)

A

(Thorndike) 3-term contingency (stimulus context, instrumental response, and response outcome) activate S-R association

42
Q

Response-Allocation Approach (theory of motivation)

A

(Skinner) looks at how instrumental conditioning limits an organism’s free flow of behaviour through limited choices

43
Q

What does failure to pair appropriate stimuli to instrumental response produce?

A

Abnormality; the instrumental response of undressing is normal in the context of your home, but not in the context of the public

44
Q

Stimulus Discrimination

A

behaviour is controlled by different aspects of a single stimulus (red colour versus shape)

45
Q

Stimulus generalization

A

responding to other test stimuli that were not present during training (opposite of discrimination)

46
Q

Stimulus Generalization Gradient

A

gradient of responding that occurs when stimuli become increasingly different from stimuli in training (gradual increase followed by gradual decrease)

47
Q

Extinction

A

occurs with repeated omission of the reinforcer

48
Q

Overtraining Extinction effect (paradoxical reward effect)

A

training that is too extensive is quicker to extinguish due to stronger frustration when extinction occurs

49
Q

Magnitude Reinforcement extinction effect (paradoxical reward effect)

A

responding declines more rapidly in extinction following reinforcement of large magnitude (more frustration from loss of a large reward than a small one)

50
Q

Partial Reinforcement Extinction Effect (paradoxical reward effect)

A

partial reinforcement extinguishes slowest because participants are used to the frustration

51
Q

Frustration Theory (for partial reinforcement extinction effect)

A

Partial reinforcement is slow to extinguish because participants have been conditioned to expect frustration and non reward

52
Q

Sequential Theory

A

partial reinforcement is slower to extinguish because instrumental conditioning is associated with the memory of non reward