PART 1 Flashcards

1
Q

Complete definition of an obligation

A

An obligation is a juridical relation whereby a person (called the creditor) may demand from another (called the debtor) the observance of a determinative conduct (the giving, doing, or not doing), and in case of breach, may demand satisfaction from the assets of the latter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Elements of a contract

A

a. essential - consent, object, consideration
b. natural - can be suppressed or waived (ex: warranty) (xpn: for pre-loved items, you cannot demand beyond wear & tear); those which are deemed to exist in certain contracts, in the absence of any contrary stipulations, like warranty against eviction (Art. 1548.) or hidden defects (Art. 1561.)

c. accidental - those which may be present or absent
depending on the stipulations of the parties, like conditions, interest, penalty, time or place of payment, etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Defective Contracts

A

a. rescissible
b. voidable
c. unenforceable
d. void & inexistent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

A obliged himself to deliver a certain thing to B. Upon delivery, B would pay a sum of money to A. Is there a contract of sale?

A

Not necessarily. The contract may also be resolved in a contract of agency or lease.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When is a contract, therefore, considered a contract of sale?

A

When there is a transfer of ownership

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

A contract of sale may be absolute or conditional. T or F.

A

True.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Characteristics of contract of sale

A

(1) Consensual - it is perfected by mere consent without any further act;

(2) Bilateral - both the contracting parties are bound
to fulfill correlative obligations towards each other — the seller, to deliver and transfer ownership of the thing sold and the buyer, to pay the price;

(3) Onerous - the thing sold is conveyed in consideration of the price and vice versa
burden (seller - property/ownership; buyer - money)

(4) Commutative - the thing sold is considered the
equivalent of the price paid and vice versa. However,
the contract may be aleatory as in the case of the sale of a hope (e.g., sweepstakes ticket) gross inadequacy of price can make a contract of sale void

(5) Nominate - it is given a special name or designation
in the Civil Code, namely, “sale”; and

(6) Principal - it does not depend for its existence and
validity upon another contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a contract of sale?

A

By the contract of sale one of the contracting parties obligates himself to transfer the ownership and to deliver a determinate thing, and the other to pay therefor a price certain in money or its equivalent. (1458)

The contract of sale is an agreement whereby one of the parties (called the seller or vendor) obligates himself to deliver something to the other (called the buyer or purchaser or vendee) who, on his part, binds himself to pay therefor a sum of money or its equivalent (known as the price).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Tender of payment is not necessary before the debtor can consign the thing due with the court in the following cases

A
  1. When the creditor is absent or unknown, or does not appear at the place of payment
  2. When he is incapacitated to receive the payment at the time it is due
  3. When, without just cause, he refuses to give a receipt
  4. When 2 or more persons claim the same right to collect
  5. When the title of the obligation has been lost
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Tender of payment

A

The act, on the part of the debtor, of offering to the creditor the thing or amount due. The debtor must show that he has in his possession the thing or money to be delivered at the time of the offer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Consignation

A

The act of depositing the thing or amount due with the proper court or judicial authorities when the creditor does not desire, or refuses to accept payment, or cannot receive it, after complying with the formalities required by law. It is necessarily judicial and it generally requires a prior tender of payment which is by its very nature extra-judicial.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Stages of a contract of sale

A

(1) negotiation, starting from the time the prospective contracting parties indicate interest in the contract to the time the contract is perfected
(2) perfection, which takes place upon the concurrence of the essential elements of the sale

[3] performance

(3) consummation, which commences when the parties perform their respective undertakings under the contract of sale, culminating in the extinguishment of the contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Kinds of Sale

A

A. As to the nature of the subject matter

  1. sale of real property
  2. sale of personal property

B. As to whether the object is tangible/corporeal or incorporeal

  1. sale of a thing
  2. sale of a right

C. As to validity or defect of the transaction

  1. valid sale
  2. rescissible
  3. voidable
  4. unenforceable
  5. void

D. As to the presence or absence of condition

  1. absolute sale
  2. conditional sale
  3. contract to sell

E. Distinguished from other transactions

  1. contract for a piece of work
  2. lease
  3. dacion en pago
  4. barter or exchange
  5. agency to sell
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Maceda Law

A

to protect real property owners from inequitable conditions imposed on sale transactions involving real estate purchase financed through installment basis

Under the Maceda Law, buyers of real properties who have paid at least two (2) year installments but defaults in the payment of the remaining installments, and the contract is thereafter cancelled, are given the benefit of, among others, the refund of a percentage of the cash surrender value of the payments on the property

Under Section 3, it only applies to residential real estate, as it excludes other real estates, such as, industrial lots, commercial buildings [and/or commercial lots by implication] and sale to tenants under agrarian laws. Moreover, Section 2 of this law provides that it was enacted to protect buyers of real estate on installment payments against onerous and oppressive conditions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Recto Law

A

to prevent abuses in foreclosure of chattel mortgages, especially when the mortgagee-creditors foreclosed the mortgaged properties and bought them at a much lower price, then continues collecting for deficiencies against the mortgagor-debtor.

It provides for remedies in case the buyer fails to pay.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

3 alternatives or remedies provided under the Recto Law

A
  1. demand payment
  2. cancellation of sale
  3. foreclosure of mortgage
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Rescissible contracts

A
  1. Those which are entered into by the guardians whenever the wards whom they represent suffer lesion by more than one-fourth of the value of the things which are the object thereof (in behalf of wards)
  2. Those agreed upon in representation of absentees, if the latter suffer the lesion stated in the preceding number (in representation of absentees)
  3. Those undertaken in fraud of creditors when the latter cannot in any other manner collect the claims due them (those undertaken in fraud of creditors, when the latter cannot in any other manner collect claims due them) - accion pauliana
  4. Those which refer to things under litigation if they have been entered into by the defendant without the knowledge and approval of the litigants or of competent judicial authority (things in litigation)
  5. All other contracts specially declared by law to be subject to rescission (other instances)

1381

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Voidable contracts

A
  1. Those where one of the parties is incapable of giving consent to a contract
  2. Those where the consent is vitiated by mistake, violence, intimidation, undue influence or fraud

1390

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Unenforceable contracts

A

(1) Those entered into in the name of another person by one who has been given no authority or legal representation, or who has acted beyond his powers;
(2) Those that do not comply with the Statute of Frauds as set forth in this number. In the following cases an agreement hereafter made shall be unenforceable by action, unless the same, or some note or memorandum, thereof, be in writing, and subscribed by the party charged, or by his agent; evidence, therefore, of the agreement cannot be received without the writing, or a secondary evidence of its contents:
(a) An agreement that by its terms is not to be performed within a year from the making thereof;
(b) A special promise to answer for the debt, default, or miscarriage of another;
(c) An agreement made in consideration of marriage, other than a mutual promise to marry;
(d) An agreement for the sale of goods, chattels or things in action, at a price not less than five hundred pesos, unless the buyer accept and receive part of such goods and chattels, or the evidences, or some of them, of such things in action or pay at the time some part of the purchase money; but when a sale is made by auction and entry is made by the auctioneer in his sales book, at the time of the sale, of the amount and kind of property sold, terms of sale, price, names of the purchasers and person on whose account the sale is made, it is a sufficient memorandum;
(e) An agreement for the leasing for a longer period than one year, or for the sale of real property or of an interest therein;

( f ) A representation as to the credit of a third person.

(3) Those where both parties are incapable of giving consent to a contract.

1403

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Void Contracts

A

(1) Those whose cause, object or purpose is contrary to law, morals, good customs, public order or public policy;
(2) Those which are absolutely simulated or fictitious;
(3) Those whose cause or object did not exist at the time of the transaction;
(4) Those whose object is outside the commerce of men;
(5) Those which contemplate an impossible service;
(6) Those where the intention of the parties relative to the principal object of the contract cannot be ascertained;
(7) Those expressly prohibited or declared void by law.

1409

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Contract for a piece of work

A

When the subject good is manufactured especially for the customer or when it is requested to be customized for the buyer, and not just for the general market.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Sale v. Lease

A

Sale - transfer of ownership

Lease - temporary enjoyment or possession of a thing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Sale v. Dacion en Pago

A

(1)
s - there is no preexisting credit
dep - there is

(2)
s - obligation is created
dep - obligation is extinguished

(3)
s - causes are price paid and the thing sold
dep - causes are extinguishment of debt and acquisition of object

(4)
more freedom in fixing the price in sale

(5)
s - buyer still has to pay
dep - debtor shall receive payment for the contract to be perfected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Sale v. Barter or Exchange

A

In sale, the cause of the seller is money. In barter, it can be any thing or promise other than just money.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Sale v. Agency to Sell

A

(1)
s - the buyer receives the good as the owner
as - the agent receives the good and possesses temporary ownership until the principal owner gets the thing

(2)
s - buyer pays
as - agency to account for proceeds of the sale he may make on behalf of the principal

(3)
s - buyer cannot return the object
as - agent can return the object if he is unable to sell the same

(4)
s - there is warranty
a - agent makes no warranty

(5)
s - buyer can enjoy the thing according to his own terms
a - agent is responsible of taking care of the object according to the principal’s demands

(6)
s - there is transfer of ownership
a - there is only a transfer of authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Essential Elements of a Contract

A
  1. Consent
    a. Parties
    b. Capacity of the parties (absolute, relative)
  2. Object or subject matter (things & rights)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What is a contract?

A

A contract is a meeting of minds between two persons whereby one binds himself, with respect to the other, to give something or to render some service. (1305)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What is consent?

A

Consent is manifested by the meeting of the offer and the acceptance upon the thing and the cause which are to constitute the contract. The offer must be certain and the acceptance absolute. A qualified acceptance constitutes a counter-offer.

1319

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Gross inadequacy of price can make a contract of sale void. T or F.

A

True.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Why is a contract of sale not a real contract?

A

A real contract requires the delivery of a thing. In a contract of sale, the contract is deemed perfected by mere consent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Is a sale of piece of land valid if done orally?

A

Yes, but it is binding only between the buyer and the seller. It cannot affect 3rd persons. Legal basis: Arts. 1357 and 1358 (1)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

What makes a contract legally binding?

A

Consent made in good faith.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Why should we study the different kinds of contract?

A

Different laws would govern every kind, relationship, scope

Ex: Condominium law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

What is the subject matter of a contract?

A

The object of the contract itself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

What is the subject matter in a contract of sale?

A

The thing itself that is being sold

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

What is the subject matter in a contract of piece of work?

A

The service rendered by the worker because there is work especially done to customize the said order

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Why is there pre-existing credit in dacion en pago?

A

Because it is a special form of payment wherein transmission or delivery of a thing is considered an equivalent of the outstanding debt to extinguish the obligation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

Sale v. Dacion en Pago

A

There is pre-existing credit in dacion en pago

in sale, the obligation is created

dacion en pago is a form of payment which presuposses debtor-creditor relationship

contract of sale - suspensive
dacion - resolutory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

In an agreement where A obliged himself to give to B a watch worth P800,000 and B obliged himself to give to A, his car and cash P350,000. What contract was entered into?

A

Art. 1468 - if party in money and thing, the parties shall determine if the contract is of sale or of barter. pero if no manifest intention, barter sya if the value of the thing given as a part of the consideration exceeds the amount of the money or its equivalent. Otherwise, it is a sale.

  • if partly money or thing, depende sa parties
  • if mas malaki yung value ng object to be paid than the value of the money to be paid, BARTER
  • if mas malaki yung value ng money to be paid than the object to be paid, SALE
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

Who cannot give consent?

A
  1. unemancipated minors

2. insane or demented persons and deaf-mutes who do not know how to write

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

Contracts agreed to in a state of drunkenness or during a hypnotic spell are voidable. T or F.

A

True.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

When can husband and wife sell property to each other?

A

(1) When a separation of property was agreed upon in the marriage settlements; or
(2) When there has been a judicial separation of property under article 191.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

The following persons cannot acquire by purchase, even at a public or judicial auction, either in person or through the mediation of another:

A

(1) The guardian, the property of the person or persons who may be under his guardianship;
(2) Agents, the property whose administration or sale may have been intrusted to them, unless the consent of the principal has been given;
(3) Executors and administrators, the property of the estate under administration;
(4) Public officers and employees, the property of the State or of any subdivision thereof, or of any government-owned or controlled corporation, or institution, the administration of which has been intrusted to them; this provision shall apply to judges and government experts who, in any manner whatsoever, take part in the sale;
(5) Justices, judges, prosecuting attorneys, clerks of superior and inferior courts, and other officers and employees connected with the administration of justice, the property and rights in litigation or levied upon an execution before the court within whose jurisdiction or territory they exercise their respective functions; this prohibition includes the act of acquiring by assignment and shall apply to lawyers, with respect to the property and rights which may be the object of any litigation in which they may take part by virtue of their profession;
(6) Any others specially disqualified by law. (1459a)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

A consensual contract is always valid.

A

False.

Despite consensuality, there may be forms required for the VALIDITY of a contract. It is not different to say that contract is valid and contract is perfected.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

Until all of the terms and conditions are accepted by both parties, there is no contract yet. If a certain term or condition is given a counter-offer, there is no contract yet. T or F.

A

True.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

Stages of a Contract of Sale

A
  1. Negotiation - starting from the time the prospective contracting parties indicate interest in the contract
  2. Perfection - concurrence of the essential elements
  3. Consummation - performance of respective undertakings resulting to the extinguishment of obligation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

Conditional Sale v. Contract to Sell

A

Conditional sale - there is a condition imposed by the seller before there can be a transfer of ownership despite delivery of the thing. Before there is transfer, condition must be fulfilled first. But once a condition is fulfilled, the buyer becomes the absolute owner of the thing.

Contract to sell - it is a special type of conditional sale where ownership does not automatically passes to the buyer upon fulfillment. Both the buyer and the seller must fulfill another agreement that will transfer ownership. Ex: Sale of a new car. If you buy a car through installment, hindi naman kayo agad ang owner ng car ah kasi di pa tapos bayaran. Pero once mabuo yun, mag eexecute ulit ng contract sa bank (if naka-mortgage sa bank) this time to transfer ownership from seller to buyer.

In a conditional sale, once the condition is fulfilled, no need to execute deed of sale.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

Absolute Sale v. Conditional Sale

A

Ordinary contract of sale, once there is delivery, there is also transfer of ownership. If there is no condition imposed > absolute contract of sale.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

Arthur gave Richard a receipt which states
“Receipt
Received from Richard as down payment for my 1995 Toyota Corolla with plate no. XYZ-123….P50,000
Balance Payable 12/30/01….P50,000
Sept. 15, 2001
Sgd. Arturo.

A

Contract of Sale. Why? The seller did not reserve or make a condition on the ownership of the thing sold. Nothing in the facts say that upon full payment, there will be transfer of ownership. This is an absolute sale or contract of sale.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

The assumption will always be that the contract is of sale if there is no condition clearly imposed. T or F.

A

True.

In a conditional sale or contract to sell, a condition must be clearly imposed. Otherwise, assumption is contract of sale because there is commutativeness or exchange of values. Ambiguity in contract is not appreciated so assumption will always be made that the contract is a contract of sale.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

What is the remedy for breach of contract of sale?

A

Rescission, not recovery of possession because there is no reservation of ownership.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
52
Q

Nante, a registered owner of a parcel of land in QC sold the property to Monica under a Deed of Sale which reads as follows: “That for and in consideration of P500,000 to be delivered to me and receipt of which will be acknowledged by me, I hereby transfer, cede to Monica, a parcel of land covered by TCT No. 9138.”

After delivery of initial payment of P100,000, Monica took possession of the land but failed to pay the remaining balance. Nante filed an action to recover the property alleging that the contract is one to sell which was not perfected because of non-payment of the price in full. Is the contention of Nante tenable?

A

Contract of sale. No condition. No reservation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
53
Q

If there is consent in the contract, the same is valid?

A

Not necessarily. Art. 1327

Article 1327. The following cannot give consent to a contract:

(1) Unemancipated minors;
(2) Insane or demented persons, and deaf-mutes who do not know how to write.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
54
Q

If there is no consent in one or both of the contracting parties, what is the status of the contract?

A

Void

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
55
Q

If both of the contracting parties who gave consent are minors, what is the status of the contract?

A

Unenforceable. Art. 1403 (3)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
56
Q

What is a simulated contract?

Why do people enter into a simulated contract?

A

Real property in a contract. real value of property is bigger. to avoid paying higher taxes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
57
Q

What would be the status of the contract if one of the contracting parties has no juridical capacity?

A

Void

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
58
Q

Juridical Capacity v. Capacity to Act

A

Juridical capacity is the fitness to be the subject of legal relations; it is inherent in every natural person. Capacity to act is the power to do acts with legal effect; it may be acquired and it may also be lost; it is acquired upon the attainment of the age of majority.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
59
Q

What if one of the parties has incapacity to contract?

A

Voidable only

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
60
Q

Incapacity may be absolute or relative.
If the contract does not have all of the essential requisites, that is an absolute incapacity. If relative, only one of the contracting parties is prohibited from transacting for one reason or another. T or F.

A

True.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
61
Q

Can a former Filipino citizen acquire land through succession?

A

Yes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
62
Q

What if the property was sold to a 3rd person?

A

Any disposition of the conjugal property shall be void if without authority from the court especially if there are debtors of the family. This is an example of defrauding the creditors. Court authorization will now be required for you to sell that property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
63
Q

Requisites for subject matter or object of contract

A
  1. Subject matter must have possibility of existence;
  2. Subject matter must be determinate or, at least, determinable;
  3. Subject matter must be licit; and
  4. Vendor must have the right to transmit ownership at the time of delivery.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
64
Q

Things having potential existence may be the object of a contract of sale. T or F.

A

True. Such a sale is subject to the condition that the thing will come into existence. If the thing does not come into existence, the contract is deemed extinguished.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
65
Q

What is a determinate thing?

A

A thing is determinate when it is particularly designated or physically segregated from all others of the same class (Art. 1460, 1st par., NCC).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
66
Q

Requisites for price

A
  1. It must be real.
  2. It must be certain.
  3. In certain cases, the price must not be grossly inferior to the value of the thing (V Tolentino, 1992 ed., 13).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
67
Q

Exception to the general rule of prohibited sale between husband and wife

A

The sale between them is not prohibited if they are governed by a regime of complete separation of property, either pursuant to a marriage settlement or a decree of the court obtained in legal separation or in petition for judicial separation of property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
68
Q

Absolute incapacity

A
  1. unemancipated minors

2. insane/demented/deaf-mute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
69
Q

Relative Incapacity to Buy or Sell

A
  1. Husband & wife
  2. Guardian & ward
  3. Agent & principal unless principal gives consent
  4. Executors & administrators
  5. Public officers & employees
  6. Justices, judges, prosecuting attorneys, clerks of superior and inferior courts, and other officers and employees connected with the administration of justice
  7. Any others specially disqualified by law.
  8. Seller (even on his behalf) in his own bid
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
70
Q

Can a judge buy a property under litigation that he is not trying?

A

YES.
There is object, cause, consideration.
Ownership will only be acquired through delivery.
Despite the fact that the seller may be declared not the owner, at the time of sale, he WAS the owner and has the rights to sell. Pero if ultimately nadecide yung case against him, he will be liable for breach of warranty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
71
Q

Does the law prohibit a lawyer from acquiring property made as payment for his professional services?

A

No, as long as the property was not the subject of litigation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
72
Q

Other persons especially disqualified

A
  1. Aliens are disqualified to purchase private agricultural lands
  2. unpaid seller who has been prohibited from buying the resale
  3. officer conducting execution of sale
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
73
Q

If H had abandoned W for 10 years, can they now sell property to each other?

A

Not until the requirement of a dissolution of properties have been satisfied after legal separation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
74
Q

Is there a way for the husband to sell the property of the wife?

A

Yes. He can sell as an agent to a 3rd person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
75
Q

Why is it important to know the status of contract?

A

to know which remedy to use

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
76
Q

Why must the thing be licit?

A

If it’s illegal, it is void. If it’s a void contract, it can never be the subject of ratification.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
77
Q

PDAF case - those parties who have benefited shall not be prejudiced by a void contract. despite the fact that the thing came from an unconstitutional funding, the effects benefited the general public so it shall be valid.

A

ok

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
78
Q

A obliged himself to deliver and transfer ownership of the palay that will be harvested from a specific parcel of rice land in May 2017.

a. what if by May 2017, no palay was harvested, what would be the status of the contract?
b. may the seller A be held liable for damages for failure to comply with his obligation?

A

a. consent object cause
there is consent already
no object but the object is CONSIDERED so the contract is valid
future thing may be the object of a contract as long as it it will come into existence

b. It depends.
Article 1174. Except in cases expressly specified by the law, or when it is otherwise declared by stipulation, or when the nature of the obligation requires the assumption of risk, no person shall be responsible for those events which could not be foreseen, or which, though foreseen, were inevitable.
OR
Article 1170. Those who in the performance of their obligations are guilty of fraud, negligence, or delay, and those who in any manner contravene the tenor thereof, are liable for damages.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
79
Q

S and B. S sold a property to B. The property is under litigation. Is the sale valid, pending the result of the decision of the court?

A

No.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
80
Q

Is a contract of a sale is a mode of acquiring ownership over the thing?

A

No. It only gives rise to obligations. Art. 712

Article 712. Ownership is acquired by occupation and by intellectual creation.

Ownership and other real rights over property are acquired and transmitted by law, by donation, by testate and intestate succession, and in consequence of certain contracts, by tradition.

They may also be acquired by means of prescription.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
81
Q

When his father died, but before delivery of the property to him, a son sold his share of the property inherited. Is the sale valid?

A

Yes.

Article 777. The rights to the succession are transmitted from the moment of the death of the decedent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
82
Q

My car as the object of a contract of sale. Is this determinate?

A
It depends. If the seller only has one car, it is determinate. If the seller has many cars,
Art. 1460 contemplates a thing among many other things - several things of the same class - applies only to a multiple # of the same class but in the problem given, it was not stated. Answer is dependent on the # of objects.

Assuming that there are a lot of cars involved, but the contract only mentioned “my car.” What is the status of the contract?
Art. 1349 and 1409 (6)
VOID - another contract will necessitate the specificity of the object

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
83
Q

The thing must be seen first before a thing is considered determinate. T or F.

A

False.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
84
Q

When can ownership be transmitted?

A

It is not required at the time of the perfection of the contract, but only at the time of the delivery.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
85
Q

A perfected contract of sale cannot be challenged on the ground of the seller’s non-ownership of the thing sold at the time of the perfection of the contract. T or F.

A

True. Ownership matters during consummation stage.

Reason: Sale only creates title; it is delivery which serves as the mode of transferring ownership

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
86
Q

Effect if seller is not the owner at the time of delivery

A

The seller will only be liable for damages for breach of his obligation to transmit ownership to the buyer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
87
Q

Assignment of credit v. Sale

A

(1)
ac - intangible
s - tangible

(2)
ac - involves no transfer of ownership but merely effects the transfer of rights which the assignor has at the time to the assignee –> 3rd party steps into the shoes of the original creditor
s - transfer of ownership

(3)
ac - may be done gratuitously or onerously
s - gratuitous = donation

so after transfer in ac, a definite 3rd person is obliged
in s, the subject obliged is the whole world which must respect the title of the buyer

ac onerous - exchange, dacion en pago

(4)
ac - consideration is not always a requisite
s - consideration is a requisite

(5)
ac - title is transferred but possession need not be delivered
s - there is a delivery of possession

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
88
Q

Subject matter, consideration, and consent of assignment

A

credit or right assigned, price paid for the credit or right, agreement of the parties to the assignment of the credit or right at the agreed price

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
89
Q

Assignment distinguished from other terms: renunciation, agency, substitution, subrogation.

A
  1. Renunciation - abandonment of right without a transfer
  2. Agency - involves representation, not transmission wherein the agent acts for the principal
  3. Substitution - change of a new debtor for the previous debtor with the credit remaining in the same creditor
  4. Subrogation - change in the person of the creditor with the credit being extinguished
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
90
Q

A seller may sell the whole property. T or F.

A

True.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
91
Q

A seller may sell a specific portion of a thing only. T or F.

A

True.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
92
Q

A seller may sell an undivided interest in the thing itself. T or F.

A

True. ex: phone & battery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
93
Q

Effect of sale of an undivided interest

A

The buyer becomes the co-owner of the thing sold. As a co-owner, the buyer acquires full ownership if his part and he may sell it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
94
Q

Co-ownership

A

When the ownership of an undivided thing or right belongs to different persons.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
95
Q

Things subject to a resolutory condition may be the object of the contract of sale. T or F.

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
96
Q

The object of the contract is subject to the resolutory condition. T or F.

A

False. Not the thing which is the object that is the subject of condition. the sale itself is the condition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
97
Q

Sale of right is governed by the contract of sale. T or F.

A

Not necessarily because it can also be governed by donation or dacion en pago.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
98
Q

Assignment of credit follows the rules provided for in a contract of sale under Articles 1624 and 1475. T or F.

A

False. There are differences between a contract of sale and assignment.

Assignment of credit requires delivery by public instrument but sale does not. Sale is always tangible as opposed to assignment of credits (intangible).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
99
Q

In the case of assignment of credit, a person is subrogated to the rights of the other. T or F.

A

False. Assignment is different from subrogation.

By sale, dacion en pago, exchange without the need of consent of creditors&raquo_space; assignment. Consent is needed in subrogation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
100
Q

Legal subrogation v. Conventional subrogation

A

(1)
LS - not presumed, except in some cases
CS - must be clearly established to take effect

(2)
LS - by operation of law
CS - agreement between parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
101
Q

Subrogation v. Assignment

A

(1)
S: extinguishes the original obligation and gives rise to a new one
A: refers to the same right which passes from one person to another

(2)
S: nullity of an old obligation may be cured such that a new obligation will be perfectly valid
A: nullity of an obligation is not remedied by the assignment of the creditor’s right to another

(3)
S: needs consent (conventional: original creditor, debtor, new creditor consent)
A: no need for consent; mere notice is enough

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
102
Q

Peter Co, a trader from Manila, has dealt business with Allied Commodities in HK for 5 years. All through the years, Peter Co accumulated an indebtedness of P500,000 with Allied Commodities. Upon demand by its agent in Manila, Peter Co paid Allied Commodities by check the amount owed. Upon deposit in the payee’s account in Manila, the check was dishonored for insufficiency of funds. For and in consideration of P1.00, Allied Commodities assigned the credit to Hadji Butu who brought suit against Peter Co in the RTC of Manila for recovery of the amount owed. Peter Co moved to dismiss the complaint against him on the ground that Hadju Butu was not a real party in interest and, therefore, without legal capacity to sue and that he had not agreed to a subrogation of creditor. Will Peter Co’s defense of absence of agreement to a subrogation of creditor prosper?

A

No, Co’s defense will not prosper. This is not a case of subrogation, but an assignment of credit. ASSIGNMENT OF CREDIT is the process of transferring the right of the assignor to the assignee. The assignment may be done either gratuitously or onerously, in which case, the assignment has an effect similar to that of a sale (Nyco Sales Corp. v.BA Finance Corp. G.R No.71694. Aug.16, 1991 200 SCRA 637). As a result of the assignment, the plaintiff acquired all the rights of the assignor including the right to sue in his own name as the legal assignee. In assignment, the debtor’sconsent is not essential for the validity of the assignment

(Art.1624; 1475, CC; Rodriguez v. CA, et al, G.R. No. 84220, March 25, 1992, 207 SCRA 553).

ALTERNATIVE ANSWER:

No, the defense of Peter Co will not prosper. Hadji Butu validly acquired his right by an assignment of credit under Article 1624 of the Civil Code. However, the provisions on the contract of sale (Article 1475 Civil Code) will apply, and the transaction is covered by the Statute of Frauds. (Art.1 403 par. (2) Civil Code)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
103
Q

An assignment of credit is valid despite the fact that it is in a private instrument. T or F.

A

True. Art. 1356 (De Leon)

State will not allow land to be registered orally. Public document is required if need ng notice to the govt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
104
Q

The assignment of a credit includes all the accessory rights, such as guaranty, mortgage, pledge or preference. T or F.

A

True. 1627

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
105
Q

In 2 deeds of sale, real properties assuredly worth in actual value of at least P10,5000,000 going only by assessment for tax purposes “which, it is well known, are notoriously low indicators of actual value”–were sold at a stated price of only P100,000 in each deed plus unspecified past, present and future services to which no value was assigned. Status of contract?

A

Void

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
106
Q

A deed of sale was entered into by A and B. The price agreed upon was 1M yen.

a. may that be a valid sale?
b. can the seller compel the buyer to pay in yen?

A

a. yes
b. it depends. if the contract was entered today, the contract would be valid despite the stipulation of yen. but if it was entered into prior to 1996 stipulation of yen must be converted (RA 8183)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
107
Q

Who can fix the price in a contract of sale?

A

Either both or one of them (with the consent of the other)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
108
Q

May the sale be perfected if the agreement of the parties was for one of them to fix the price?

A

Yes. Only if the other party accepts it.

If offer pa lang, wala pa perfection. Negotiation pa lang.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
109
Q

What if a third person was asked to fix the price – A and B agreed that X will fix the price. May the sale be voided?

A

Yes.

  • may be voided not the same as voidable
  • no meeting of the minds if hindi mag-aaggree si A and B
  • may be voided if third person doesn’t want to or is unable to fix the price
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
110
Q

If the third person fixed the price but it was too high or too low or maybe there was fraud committed by the third person or he was in connivance with one of the parties, may the sale be void?

A

No. Because the remedy would be to go to court and ask for price.

Art. 1469

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
111
Q

General rule: price is stated in the contract.

Exceptions?

A

Exceptions: price is determinable by its relation to a certain thing
ex: price of the house when it was bought

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
112
Q

Effect where price not fixed by third person designated

A

General rule is that this is legally binding to the parties.

Exceptions: when the person acted in bad faith (Art. 1469) or when the the 3rd person disregarded the specific instructions or procedure with fixing the price
ex: Parties asked third person to look at the stock market and determine price from there
unless the parties later on agree on the price

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
113
Q

The price of securities, grain, liquids, and other things shall also be considered certain, when the price fixed is that which the thing sold would have on a definite day, or in a particular exchange or market, or when an amount is fixed above or below the price on such day, or in such exchange or market, provided said amount be certain. T or F.

A

True.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
114
Q

Exception to the general rule that contracts that do not state the price have no effect.

A

Art. 1474. Where the price cannot be determined in accordance with the preceding articles, or in any other manner, the contract is inefficacious. However, if the thing or any part thereof has been delivered to and appropriated by the buyer he must pay a reasonable price therefor. What is a reasonable price is a question of fact dependent on the circumstances of each particular case.

Pag ginamit mo na, you can no longer return the item. ex: underwear pero dapat reasonable price padin (accdg to shared market value, consent of both buyer and seller)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
115
Q

What is RA 8183?

A

All monetary obligations shall be settled in the Philippine currency which is legal tender in the Philippines. However, the parties may agree that the obligation or transaction shall be settled in any other currency at the time of payment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
116
Q

Will you consider all of your money as legal tender?

A

No.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
117
Q

What is BSP Circular No. 537, Series of 2008?

A

In the case of coins in denomination
of 1-, 5-, and 10-Piso they shall be legal tender in amounts not exceeding PHP1,000.00 while
coins in denomination of 1-, 5-, 10-, and 25-Sentimo shall be legal tender in amounts not
exceeding PHP100.00, pursuant to BSP Circular No. 537, Series of 2008.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
118
Q

Legal tender in coins. What if tig P5 na P10,000? Is it valid?

A

It depends. If the person accepts it, ok lang.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
119
Q

Mercantile documents are not legal tender. T or F.

A

True. Art. 1249. The payment of debts in money shall be made in the currency stipulated, and if it is not possible to deliver such currency, then in the currency which is legal tender in the Philippines.

Regardless of the check issued, that is not a mode of extinguishing an obligation. the law requires that the check must be credited already to the account of the creditor.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
120
Q

What is earnest money?

A

Art. 1482

Money given by prospective buyer to manifest his interest to the property considered as part of the price

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
121
Q

What is the effect of earnest money?

A

a. When earnest money is given, it shall be considered part of the price and proof of the perfection of the contract (Art. 1482, NCC).
b. And it in effect exempts the sale from the requirement of the Statute of Frauds. Recall that the Statute of Frauds does not apply when the contract has already been performed, either partial or complete.

If the contract does not push through, ibabalik yung earnest money.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
122
Q

Earnest money (1482) v. Option money (1479)

A

em - part of purchase price; paid in a perfected sale

om - not part; separate contract; wala pang perfection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
123
Q

What is lesion?

A

Injury or loss. In the civil law jurisdictions the word is often used in the context of an ‘unfair’ loss, as where an adult takes advantage of a minor or someone purchases something for much less than it’s worth.

art. 1470 and 1355

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
124
Q

Can lesion be presumed?

A

Lesion cannot be presumed, it shall be proven as a fact.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
125
Q

The general rule is that gross inadequacy of price does not affect a contract of sale. What are the exceptions?

A

Except as it may indicate a defect in the consent, or that the parties really intended a donation or some other act or contract.

Unless there has been fraud, mistake or undue influence (1355).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
126
Q

Simulated contract v. Gross inadequacy of price

A

SC - parties to an alleged contract do not really intend to be bound by it, the contract is simulated and void.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
127
Q

Contract of sale may be in any form because it is perfected by mere consent. T or F.

A

True. 1475

  1. Subject to the provisions of the Statute of Frauds and of any other applicable statute, a contract of sale may be made in writing, or by word of mouth, or partly in writing and partly by word of mouth, or may be inferred from the conduct of the parties.
  2. Contracts shall be obligatory, in whatever form they may have been entered into, provided all the essential requisites for their validity are present. However, when the law requires that a contract be in some form in order that it may be valid or enforceable, or that a contract be proved in a certain way, that requirement is absolute and indispensable. In such cases, the right of the parties stated in the following article cannot be exercised.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
128
Q

Paredes was a prospective buyer. Espino owns a land in Palawan. Paredes is from Northern Luzon. Their negotiation was thru letters and telegrams. Espino sent a letter to Paredes stating that he and his wife agreed to sell the land to Paredes, that the deed of sale will be executed upon the arrival of Paredes in Palawan. When Paredes arrived, Espino said he is no longer interested in selling. Paredes filed a case to compel Espino to sell the land. Espino contended that the contract is unenforceable because it is not in writing. He contended that under the statute of frauds, it is unenforceable. Who has the better contention?

A

Nasa case to sa outline. Contention of Espino is untenable in this case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
129
Q

Rules governing auction sales

A
  1. Sales of separate lots by auction are separate contracts of sale
  2. Sale is perfected by the fall of the hammer
  3. Seller has the right to bid in the auction, provided:
    a. such right was reserved
    b. notice was given that the sale was subject to a right to bid on behalf of the seller
    c. right is not prohibited by law or by stipulation
  4. Advertisements for bidders are simply invitations to make proposals, and the advertiser is not bound to accept the highest or lowest bidder, unless the contrary appears.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
130
Q

Who has the right to prescribe the terms of the public auction?

A

The owner.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
131
Q

The conditions of a public sale announced by an auctioneer or by the owner of the property at the time and place of the sale are binding upon all bidders, whether they know of such conditions or not. T or F.

A

True.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
132
Q

If a “by-bidder” or “puffer” is employed by a seller without notice in sale by
auction, the sale may be treated as fraudulent by the buyer. T or F.

A

True. It is the secrecy of puffing which renders it a fraud upon bidding.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
133
Q

It is not enough for the parties to agree on the price of the property, but they must also agree on the manner of payment of the price of the property to give rise to a binding and enforceable contract of sale or contract to sell. T or F.

A

True. This is so because the agreement as to the manner of payment goes into the price, such that a disagreement on the manner of payment is tantamount to a failure to agree on the price.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
134
Q

Effect of perfection

A

From that moment on, the parties may reciprocally demand performance, subject to the provisions of the law governing the form of contracts. (Art. 1475, 2nd par., NCC).

Exception: In conditional sales, the obligations of the parties are subject to the general law of obligations with respect to conditional ones. Accordingly, the acquisition of the rights of the vendor and the vendee, as well as the extinguishment of those already acquired, depends upon the event which constitutes the condition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
135
Q

Effect of loss of thing sold

A
  1. if prior to perfection - seller bears the loss, being the owner of the thing
  2. if at perfection
    a. entirely lost - contract shall be without any effect
    b. partly only - buyer may choose to withdraw or demand for the remaining price/part
    c. specific good - buyer may treat sale as avoided or treat sale as valid
  3. if after perfection but before delivery
    a. if loss without vendor’s fault, obligation is extinguished
    b. if loss through fault of vendor, he is obliged to pay damages
    c. if thing deteriorates without fault of vendor, impairment is borne by buyer
    d. if thing deteriorates through fault of vendor, buyer may choose between rescission or fulfillment with indemnity for damages.
  4. if after delivery - buyer’s risk
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
136
Q

Accepted unilateral promise to sell or buy

A

Mere acceptance but without a promise to buy does not bind the promissor and may be withdrawn anytime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
137
Q

Policitation

A

An unaccepted unilateral promise to buy or sell. Even if accepted by the other party, it does not bind the promissor and maybe withdrawn anytime. This is a mere offer, and has not yet been converted into a
contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
138
Q

Option Contract

A

A contract granting a privilege in one person, for which he has paid a consideration, which gives him the right to buy certain merchandise, at anytime within the agreed period, at a fixed price.

An option without consideration is void and the effect is the same as if there was no option.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
139
Q

Kinds of Promise

A
  1. an accepted unilateral promise to sell in which the promisee (acceptor) elects to buy
  2. an accepted unilateral promise to buy in which the promisee (acceptor) elects to sell
  3. a bilateral promise to buy and sell reciprocally accepted in which either of the parties chooses to exact fulfillment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
140
Q

S offers or promises to sell to B his car at a stated price and B just let the promise go by without accepting it.

A

Neither S nor B is bound by any contract. Obviously, this is not the one contemplated in Article 1479.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
141
Q

Option

A

A privilege existing in one person for which he has paid a consideration which gives him the right to buy/sell, for example, certain merchandise or certain specified property, from/to another person, if he chooses, at any time within the agreed period at a fixed price, or under, or in compliance with certain terms and conditions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
142
Q

A contract of option to buy is separate from the contract to sell, and both contracts need separate and distinct considerations for validity. T or F.

A

True.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
143
Q

An option to buy is not a contract of purchase and

sale. T or F.

A

True. So full payment of price is not necessary for exercise of option to buy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
144
Q

Option Contract

A

An option contract is a contract where one-person (the offeror/promissor) grants to another person (the offeree/promisee) the right or privilege to buy (or to sell) a determinate thing at a fixed price, if he or she chooses to do so within an agreed period.

An Option Contract is a contract by which the owner of the property agrees with another person that he shall have the right to buy his property at a fixed price within a certain time.

An option imposes no binding obligation on the person holding the option aside from the consideration for the offer. Until accepted, it is not treated as a sale.

An option contract must be supported by a separate consideration that is either clearly specified as such in the contract or duly proven by the offeree/promisee.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
145
Q

A purchaser who is unsure whether or not he wants to buy the property can enter into an option contract with the seller. This will give the him/her an option to buy a particular asset at a later date at an agreed upon price. If the seller reneges on his word and disposes of the property in favor of another before the end of the agreed time, the purchaser can sue him for damages. T or F.

A

True.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
146
Q

The consideration in an option contract may be anything of value, unlike in a sale where the purchase price must be in money or its equivalent. T or F.

A

True.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
147
Q

Exceptions to the general rule that sale is perfected by mere consent.

A

In order to be enforceable by action, the following must be in writing:

a. sale of property at a price not less than P500
b. sale of real property or an interest therein
c. sale of property not to be performed within a year from the date thereof
d. applicable statute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
148
Q

Statute of Frauds

A

A legal concept that requires certain types of contracts to be executed in writing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
149
Q

Statute of Frauds is applicable only to executory contracts and not to contracts which are totally or partially performed. T or F.

A

True.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
150
Q

Is form generally important for validity of sale?

A

No. Formalities intended for greater efficacy or convenience or to bind third persons, if not done, would not adversely affect the validity or enforceability of the contract between the contracting parties
themselves.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
151
Q

Formalities of Contract of Sale

A

Article 1483. Subject to the provisions of the Statute of Frauds and of any other applicable statute, a contract of sale may be made in writing, or by word of mouth, or partly in writing and partly by word of mouth, or may be inferred from the conduct of the parties. (n)

Article 1403. The following contracts are unenforceable, unless they are ratified:

(1) Those entered into in the name of another person by one who has been given no authority or legal representation, or who has acted beyond his powers;
(2) Those that do not comply with the Statute of Frauds as set forth in this number. In the following cases an agreement hereafter made shall be unenforceable by action, unless the same, or some note or memorandum, thereof, be in writing, and subscribed by the party charged, or by his agent; evidence, therefore, of the agreement cannot be received without the writing, or a secondary evidence of its contents:
(a) An agreement that by its terms is not to be performed within a year from the making thereof;
(b) A special promise to answer for the debt, default, or miscarriage of another;
(c) An agreement made in consideration of marriage, other than a mutual promise to marry;
(d) An agreement for the sale of goods, chattels or things in action, at a price not less than five hundred pesos, unless the buyer accept and receive part of such goods and chattels, or the evidences, or some of them, of such things in action or pay at the time some part of the purchase money; but when a sale is made by auction and entry is made by the auctioneer in his sales book, at the time of the sale, of the amount and kind of property sold, terms of sale, price, names of the purchasers and person on whose account the sale is made, it is a sufficient memorandum;
(e) An agreement for the leasing for a longer period than one year, or for the sale of real property or of an interest therein;

( f ) A representation as to the credit of a third person.

(3) Those where both parties are incapable of giving consent to a contract.

Article 1625. An assignment of a credit, right or action shall produce no effect as against third persons, unless it appears in a public instrument, or the instrument is recorded in the Registry of Property in case the assignment involves real property. (1526)

Article 1356. Contracts shall be obligatory, in whatever form they may have been entered into, provided all the essential requisites for their validity are present. However, when the law requires that a contract be in some form in order that it may be valid or enforceable, or that a contract be proved in a certain way, that requirement is absolute and indispensable. In such cases, the right of the parties stated in the following article cannot be exercised. (1278a)

Article 1357. If the law requires a document or other special form, as in the acts and contracts enumerated in the following article, the contracting parties may compel each other to observe that form, once the contract has been perfected. This right may be exercised simultaneously with the action upon the contract. (1279a)

Article 1358. The following must appear in a public document:

(1) Acts and contracts which have for their object the creation, transmission, modification or extinguishment of real rights over immovable property; sales of real property or of an interest therein are governed by articles 1403, No. 2, and 1405;
(2) The cession, repudiation or renunciation of hereditary rights or of those of the conjugal partnership of gains;
(3) The power to administer property, or any other power which has for its object an act appearing or which should appear in a public document, or should prejudice a third person;
(4) The cession of actions or rights proceeding from an act appearing in a public document.

All other contracts where the amount involved exceeds five hundred pesos must appear in writing, even a private one. But sales of goods, chattels or things in action are governed by articles, 1403, No. 2 and 1405. (1280a)

Article 1874. When a sale of a piece of land or any interest therein is through an agent, the authority of the latter shall be in writing; otherwise, the sale shall be void. (n)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
152
Q

For an assignment of credit to be binding against third persons if a movable property is involved, the same must be in a public instrument and recorded in a Registry of Property. T or F.

A

False.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
153
Q

On June 1, 2o14, S offered to sell his only car to B for P100,000. B accepted the offer by mailing his letter of acceptance on June 10, 2014. On June 12, 2014, B revoked his previous acceptance and mailed his letter of revocation on the same date. S received the letter of acceptance on June 14, 2014 and the letter of revocation on June 15, 2014.

A

The contract was not perfected because of the time the acceptance was received, the parties were no longer of one mind.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
154
Q

Article 1483

A

Subject to the provisions of the Statute of Frauds and of any other applicable statute, a contract of sale may be made in writing, or by word of mouth, or partly in writing and partly by word of mouth, or may be inferred from the conduct of the parties.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
155
Q

Article 1403

A

The following contracts are unenforceable, unless they are ratified:

(1) Those entered into in the name of another person by one who has been given no authority or legal representation, or who has acted beyond his powers;
(2) Those that do not comply with the Statute of Frauds as set forth in this number. In the following cases an agreement hereafter made shall be unenforceable by action, unless the same, or some note or memorandum, thereof, be in writing, and subscribed by the party charged, or by his agent; evidence, therefore, of the agreement cannot be received without the writing, or a secondary evidence of its contents:
(a) An agreement that by its terms is not to be performed within a year from the making thereof;
(b) A special promise to answer for the debt, default, or miscarriage of another;
(c) An agreement made in consideration of marriage, other than a mutual promise to marry;
(d) An agreement for the sale of goods, chattels or things in action, at a price not less than five hundred pesos, unless the buyer accept and receive part of such goods and chattels, or the evidences, or some of them, of such things in action or pay at the time some part of the purchase money; but when a sale is made by auction and entry is made by the auctioneer in his sales book, at the time of the sale, of the amount and kind of property sold, terms of sale, price, names of the purchasers and person on whose account the sale is made, it is a sufficient memorandum;
(e) An agreement for the leasing for a longer period than one year, or for the sale of real property or of an interest therein;

( f ) A representation as to the credit of a third person.

(3) Those where both parties are incapable of giving consent to a contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
156
Q

Art. 1625

A

An assignment of a credit, right or action shall produce no effect as against third persons, unless it appears in a public instrument, or the instrument is recorded in the Registry of Property in case the assignment involves real property. (1526)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
157
Q

Art. 1356

A

Contracts shall be obligatory, in whatever form they may have been entered into, provided all the essential requisites for their validity are present. However, when the law requires that a contract be in some form in order that it may be valid or enforceable, or that a contract be proved in a certain way, that requirement is absolute and indispensable. In such cases, the right of the parties stated in the following article cannot be exercised. (1278a)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
158
Q

Art. 1357

A

If the law requires a document or other special form, as in the acts and contracts enumerated in the following article, the contracting parties may compel each other to observe that form, once the contract has been perfected. This right may be exercised simultaneously with the action upon the contract. (1279a)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
159
Q

Art. 1358

A

The following must appear in a public document:

(1) Acts and contracts which have for their object the creation, transmission, modification or extinguishment of real rights over immovable property; sales of real property or of an interest therein are governed by articles 1403, No. 2, and 1405;
(2) The cession, repudiation or renunciation of hereditary rights or of those of the conjugal partnership of gains;
(3) The power to administer property, or any other power which has for its object an act appearing or which should appear in a public document, or should prejudice a third person;
(4) The cession of actions or rights proceeding from an act appearing in a public document.

All other contracts where the amount involved exceeds five hundred pesos must appear in writing, even a private one. But sales of goods, chattels or things in action are governed by articles, 1403, No. 2 and 1405. (1280a)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
160
Q

Art. 1874

A

When a sale of a piece of land or any interest therein is through an agent, the authority of the latter shall be in writing; otherwise, the sale shall be void. (n)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
161
Q

Sec. 22 of Act No. 1147

A

enacted May 3, 1904, provides that, “No transfer of large cattle shall be valid unless registered, and a certificate of transfer secured as herein provided.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
162
Q

What is a sale by auction?

A

Public sale wherein people are to bid on the price they are willing to pay for the thing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
163
Q

When can an offer be withdrawn in an auction sale?

A

Before the fall of the hammer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
164
Q

General rule: seller cannot bid. Exceptions?

A

a) the right shall be reserved from the beginning b) notice shall be given to the bidders c) right is not prohibited by law or stipulation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
165
Q

Sergio is the registered owner of a 500-square meter land. His friend, Marcelo, who has long
been interested in the property, succeeded in persuading Sergio to sell it to him. On June 2, 2012, they agreed on the purchase price of P600,000 and that Sergio would give Marcelo up to June 30, 2012 within which to raise the amount. Marcelo, in a light tone usual between them, said that they should seal their agreement through a case of Jack Daniels Black and P5,000 “pulutan” money which he immediately handed to Sergio and which the latter accepted. The friends then sat down and drank the first bottle from the case of bourbon.

On June 15, 2013, Sergio learned of another buyer, Roberto, who was offering P800,000 in
ready cash for the land. When Roberto confirmed that he could pay in cash as soon as Sergio could get the documentation ready, Sergio decided to withdraw his offer to Marcelo, hoping to just explain matters to his friend. Marcelo, however, objected when the withdrawal was communicated to him, taking the position that they have a firm and binding agreement that Sergio cannot simply walk away from because he has an option to buy that is duly supported by a duly accepted valuable consideration.

a. Does Marcelo have a cause of action against Sergio?
b. Can Sergio claim that whatever they might have agreed upon cannot be enforced because any agreement relating to the sale of real property must be supported by evidence in writing and they never reduced their agreement to writing?

A

a. Yes, Marcelo has a cause of action against Sergio. As a rule, an offer can be withdrawn at any time before acceptance by communicating such withdrawal (Art. 1324) except when the option is founded upon a consideration as something paid or promised. In this case, although there was no separate consideration for the option, the offer had already been accepted and thus, it resulted into a perfected contract of sale between Marcelo and Sergio. Sale being a consensual contract is perfected by mere consent.

b. No, Sergio cannot claim that the agreement cannot be enforced because it was not reduced into writing. Contracts shall be obligatory, in whatever form they may have been entered into, provided all the essential requisites for their validity are present. (Art. 1356) In fact when the law requires a document or other special form, as in the acts and enumerated by law, the contracting parties may compel each other to observe that form, once the contract has been perfected, and this right may be exercised simultaneously with the action upon the contract. (Art. 1357) Even an oral sale of a parcel of land is valid between the parties.
- option contract lang kasi kaya valid. pero hindi pa naman yan sale of real property eh.

  • the bottle and the pulutan are valid options for a consideration
  • the law does not demand that option money shall be actual money
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
166
Q

Option money is independent from a contract of sale. T or F.

A

True.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
167
Q

What is the purpose of an option money?

A

to reserve the property to the offeree until a certain period of time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
168
Q

Mrs. Rigos offered to sell her land to Sanchez for a certain price. Rigos gave Sanchez 2 years within which to decide. In this case, Sanchez has an option. Before the lapse of 2 years, Sanchez told Rigos that he is buying and offered the price agreed upon but Rigos refused claiming that she was not bound by the written option agreement because no option money (consideration) was given by Sanchez. According to Rigos, the option contract is void.

A
  • Yes. An option without consideration is void. P. 83 of De Leon.
  • Sanchez v. Rigos (case nasa outline)
  • There is a perfected contract of sale. What was given to Sanchez was mere offer in a period of 2 years. Option shall be founded on a consideration separate and distinct from a contract of sale. Otherwise, it can be withdrawn any time.
  • Consideration need not be money. But there MUST be a consideration.
  • There is a valid contract of sale despite the fact that there is a void option contract. OFFER. Contract of sale was manifested to have been perfected when the offer was accepted. So the offer can no longer be withdrawn.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
169
Q

If 2 years was given within which to decide, and assuming there was an option money, before the offeree could decide to buy, the offeror withdraw on the 6th month. Can the offeree on the 10th month say “I would like to buy”?

A

No, because there was withdrawal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
170
Q

Can the buyer compel the seller to sell?

A

No. Action for specific performance will not prosper because there was no more offer to be considered. There was a valid withdrawal. UNLESS inoffer ulit ni offeror.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
171
Q

If the offeree files an action for damages, may that action prosper there being option money given?

A

Yes. Because the option contract is perfected and the parties are bound by such contract.
- liquidated and actual damages.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
172
Q

Natural Elements of a Contract

A

Those that are inherent in the contract, and which in the absence of any contrary provision, are deemed to exist in the contract.

  1. Warranty against eviction
  2. Warranty against hidden defects
  3. Subrogation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
173
Q

Accidental Elements of a Contract

A

These elements may be present or absent depending on the stipulation of the parties (conditions, interest, penalty, time or place of payment)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
174
Q

Warranty against eviction

A

Warranty in which the seller guarantees that he has the right to sell the thing sold and to transfer ownership to the buyer who shall not be disturbed in his legal and peaceful possession thereof.

Art. 1548. Eviction shall take place whenever by a final judgment based on a right prior to the sale or an act imputable to the vendor, the vendee is deprived of the whole or of a part of the thing purchased.

The vendor shall answer for the eviction even though nothing has been said in the contract on the subject.

The contracting parties, however, may increase, diminish, or suppres’s this legal obligation of the vendor.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
175
Q

Warranty against hidden defects

A

Art. 1561. The vendor shall be responsible for warranty against the hidden defects which the thing sold may have, should they render it unfit for the use for which it is intended, or should they diminish its fitness for such use to such an extent that, had the vendee been aware thereof, he would not have acquired it or would have given a lower price for it; but said vendor shall not be answerable for patent defects or those which may be visible, or for those which are not visible if the vendee is an expert who, by reason of his trade or profession, should have known them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
176
Q

B bought on a partial payment of P1,000.00, evidenced
by a receipt, a portion of a subdivision from S, administrator of the testate estate of his deceased spouse. Subsequently, S was authorized by the court to sell the subdivision. In the meantime, PT Co. became the new administrator. It sold the lot to another which sale was judicially approved. B files a complaint which seeks, among other things, for the quieting of title over the lot in question.

Was there a valid and enforceable sale to B?

A

No. An examination of the receipt reveals that the
same can neither be regarded as a contract of sale nor a promise to sell. There was merely an acknowledgment of the sum P1,000.00. There was no agreement as to the total purchase price of the land nor to the monthly installments to be paid by B. The requisites for a valid contract of sale are lacking.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
177
Q

B Company and S, subdivision developer, agreed to
enter into a new Contract to Sell whereby S will sell seven (7) lots at P423,250.00 with a down payment of P42,325.00 and the balance payable in 48 monthly installments of P7,395.94. The draft of the Contract to Sell prepared by S was sent to B Company but B’s president did not sign it although he sent five (5) checks covering the down payment totalling P27,542.72. S received the checks but did not encash it because B’s president did not sign the draft contract, the reason given by the latter was that the draft covered seven (7) lots instead of six (6). Since no written contract was signed, S sued B to recover
possession of the lots still occupied by the latter.

(1) May the unsigned draft be deemed to embody the agreement between the parties?
(2) May the receipt of the five (5) checks by S serve to produce the effect of tender of down payment by B?

A

(1) Based on the facts, the parties had not arrived at a
definite agreement. The only agreement they arrived at was the price indicated in the draft contract. The number of lots to be sold was a material component of the Contract to Sell. Without an agreement on the matter, the parties may not in any way be considered as having arrived at a contract under the law.

(2) Moreover, since the five (5) checks were not encashed, B should have deposited the corresponding amount of the said checks as well as the installments agreed upon. A contract to sell, as in this case, involves the performance of an obligation, not merely the exercise of a privilege or a right. Consequently, performance or payment may be effected not by tender of payment alone but by both tender and consignation. It is consignation which is essential to extinguish B’s obligation to pay the balance of the purchase price. (see Arts. 1256-1258.) B did not even bother to tender and make consignation of the installments or to amend the contract to reflect the true intention of the parties as regards the number of lots to be sold.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
178
Q

Art. 1475

A

The contract of sale is perfected at the moment there is a meeting of minds upon the thing which is the object of the contract and upon the price.

From that moment, the parties may reciprocally demand performance, subject to the provisions of the law governing the form of contracts. (1450a)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
179
Q

Art. 1479

A

A promise to buy and sell a determinate thing for a price certain is reciprocally demandable.

An accepted unilateral promise to buy or to sell a determinate thing for a price certain is binding upon the promisor if the promise is supported by a consideration distinct from the price. (1451a)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
180
Q

Art. 1324

A

When the offerer has allowed the offeree a certain period to accept, the offer may be withdrawn at any time before acceptance by communicating such withdrawal, except when the option is founded upon a consideration, as something paid or promised. (n)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
181
Q

Art. 1483

A

Subject to the provisions of the Statute of Frauds and of any other applicable statute, a contract of sale may be made in writing, or by word of mouth, or partly in writing and partly by word of mouth, or may be inferred from the conduct of the parties. (n)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
182
Q

Art. 1403

A

The following contracts are unenforceable, unless they are ratified:

(1) Those entered into in the name of another person by one who has been given no authority or legal representation, or who has acted beyond his powers;
(2) Those that do not comply with the Statute of Frauds as set forth in this number. In the following cases an agreement hereafter made shall be unenforceable by action, unless the same, or some note or memorandum, thereof, be in writing, and subscribed by the party charged, or by his agent; evidence, therefore, of the agreement cannot be received without the writing, or a secondary evidence of its contents:
(a) An agreement that by its terms is not to be performed within a year from the making thereof;
(b) A special promise to answer for the debt, default, or miscarriage of another;
(c) An agreement made in consideration of marriage, other than a mutual promise to marry;
(d) An agreement for the sale of goods, chattels or things in action, at a price not less than five hundred pesos, unless the buyer accept and receive part of such goods and chattels, or the evidences, or some of them, of such things in action or pay at the time some part of the purchase money; but when a sale is made by auction and entry is made by the auctioneer in his sales book, at the time of the sale, of the amount and kind of property sold, terms of sale, price, names of the purchasers and person on whose account the sale is made, it is a sufficient memorandum;
(e) An agreement for the leasing for a longer period than one year, or for the sale of real property or of an interest therein;

( f ) A representation as to the credit of a third person.

(3) Those where both parties are incapable of giving consent to a contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
183
Q

Contracts that need to be in writing

A
  1. Sale of property at a price not less than P500
  2. Sale of real property or an interest therein
  3. Sale of property not to be performed within a year from the date thereof
  4. Applicable statute
  5. Executory contracts
  6. A special promise to answer for the debt, default, or miscarriage of another
  7. Agreement made in consideration of marriage, other than a mutual promise to marry
  8. Agreement for the sale of goods, chattels or things in action, at a price not less than 500 pesos, unless the buyer accept and receive part of such goods and chattels
  9. Agreement for the leasing for a longer period than one year, or for the sale of real property or of an interest therein
  10. Representation as to the credit of a third person
  11. Sale of a piece of land or any interest therein done through an agent—such authority shall be in writing, otherwise the sale will be void
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
184
Q

Contracts that need to be in a public instrument/document

A
  1. Assignment of a credit, right or action
    a. Shall be recorded in the Registry of Property if the assignment involves real property
  2. Acts and contracts which have for their object the creation, transmission, modification or extinguishment of real rights over immovable property; sales of real property or of an interest therein are governed by Articles 1403 (2) and 1405
  3. Cession, repudiation or renunciation of hereditary rights or of those of the conjugal partnership of gains
  4. Power to administer property, or any other power which has for its object an act appearing or which should be appear in a public document, or should prejudice a third person
  5. Cession of actions or rights proceeding from an act appearing in a public document
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
185
Q

equitable mortgage

A

one which lacks the proper formalities, form of words, or other requisites prescribed by law for a mortgage, but shows the intention of the parties to make the property subject of the contract as security for a debt and contains nothing impossible or contrary to law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
186
Q

General rule on the formalities of contract of sale

A

Sale is a consensual contract and is perfected by mere

consent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
187
Q

S, for and in consideration of P1.00 and other valuable
considerations, executed in favor of B then a minor, a
Quitclaim Deed whereby she transferred to B all her rights and interests in the 1/2 undivided portion of a parcel of land. Later, S claimed that the deed is null and void as it is equivalent to a Deed of Donation, acceptance of which by the donee is necessary to give it validity.

Is the Quitclaim Deed a conveyance of property with
a valid cause or consideration?

A

Yes. The cause or consideration is not the P1.00 alone but also other valuable considerations. Although the cause is not stated in the contract it is presumed that it is existing unless the debtor proves the contrary. (Art. 1354.) This presumption cannot be overcome by a simple assertion of lack of consideration especially when the contract itself states that consideration was given, and the same has been reduced into a public instrument with all due formalities and solemnities. Moreover, even granting that the Quitclaim Deed is a donation, Article 741 of the Civil Code provides that the requirement of the acceptance of the donation in favor of a minor by parents or legal representatives applies only to onerous and conditional donations where the donee may have to assume certain charges or burdens.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
188
Q

Obligations of a vendor/seller

A

Art. 1495

  1. To transfer ownership and to deliver the thing which is the object of the sale (not waivable)
  2. To warrant the thing which is the object of the sale (waivable and may be modified)
  3. To deliver fruits and accessories
  4. If contract of sale covers determinate object, seller, upon perfection of contract, is obliged to preserve the thing to be delivered (Art. 1163)

**5. pay for the execution and registration of the sale unless there is a contrary agreement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
189
Q

Who can transfer ownership?

A
  1. owner
  2. authorized seller
  3. other seller, with consent of the owner

Art. 1505

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
190
Q

What if a buyer buys from an unauthorized seller?

A

The buyer acquires no better title to the goods than the seller had, unless the owner of the goods is by his conduct precluded from denying the seller’s authority to sell.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
191
Q

Instances sale can be valid in case of unauthorized seller

A

(1) The provisions of any factors’ act, recording laws, or any other provision of law enabling the apparent owner of goods to dispose of them as if he were the true owner thereof;
(2) The validity of any contract of sale under statutory power of sale or under the order of a court of competent jurisdiction;
(3) Purchases made in a merchant’s store, or in fairs, or markets, in accordance with the Code of Commerce and special laws.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
192
Q

What if a buyer buys from a seller with voidable title?

A

Where the seller of goods has a voidable title thereto, but his title has not been avoided at the time of the sale, the buyer acquires a good title to the goods, provided he buys them in good faith, for value, and without notice of the seller’s defect of title.

Art. 1506

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
193
Q

Rules on implied warranty

A

Article 1547. In a contract of sale, unless a contrary intention appears, there is:

(1) An implied warranty on the part of the seller that he has a right to sell the thing at the time when the ownership is to pass, and that the buyer shall from that time have and enjoy the legal and peaceful possession of the thing;
(2) An implied warranty that the thing shall be free from any hidden faults or defects, or any charge or encumbrance not declared or known to the buyer.

This article shall not, however, be held to render liable a sheriff, auctioneer, mortgagee, pledgee, or other person professing to sell by virtue of authority in fact or law, for the sale of a thing in which a third person has a legal or equitable interest. (n)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
194
Q

Art. 1431

A

Through estoppel an admission or representation is rendered conclusive upon the person making it, and cannot be denied or disproved as against the person relying thereon.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
195
Q

2 types of estoppel

A
  1. by pais

2. by deed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
196
Q

Art. 1434

A

When a person who is not the owner of a thing sells or alienates and delivers it, and later the seller or grantor acquires title thereto, such title passes by operation of law to the buyer or grantee.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
197
Q

The possession of movable property acquired in good faith is equivalent to a title. T or F.

A

True.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
198
Q

One who has lost any movable or has been unlawfully deprived thereof, may recover it from the person in possession of the same. T or F.

A

True.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
199
Q

If the possessor of a movable lost or which the owner has been unlawfully deprived, has acquired it in good faith at a public sale, the owner cannot obtain its return without reimbursing the price paid therefor. T or F.

A

True.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
200
Q

Mode of transferring ownership in sales

A

Delivery

Sale is not a mode, but merely a title. Sale by itself does not transfer or affect ownership; the most that sales does is to create the obligation to transfer ownership. It is tradition or delivery, as a consequence of sale, that actually transfers ownership.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
201
Q

The critical factor in the different modes of effecting delivery which gives legal effect to the act, is the actual intention of the vendor to deliver, and its acceptance by the vendee. Without that intention, there is no tradition. T or F.

A

True.

202
Q

Execution sales do not require the delivery of thing since a one year period of redemption is available to seller. T or F.

A

True.

203
Q

Elements of warranty against eviction
Warranty against eviction 1548
Forcible entry and unlawful detainer
Requsites:

A
  1. vendee is deprived, in whole or in part, of the thing purchased
  2. the deprivation is by virtue of a final judgment (final and executory and can no longer be appealed)
  3. the judgment is based on a prior right to the sale or an act imputable to the vendor
  4. the vendor was summoned in the suit for eviction at the instance of the vendee
  5. no waiver of warranty by the vendee
204
Q

Mode

A

the legal means by which dominion or ownership is created, transferred or destroyed

205
Q

Sale of real property by minors who have already
passed the ages of puberty and adolescence and are
now in the adult age, when they pretended to have
already reached their majority, while in fact they have
not, is valid, and they cannot be permitted afterwards
to excuse themselves from compliance with the
obligations assumed by them or to seek their
annulment. T or F.

A

True. This is guided by the principle of estoppel.

206
Q

Law on estoppel

A

When the person who is not the owner of a thing
sells or alienates and delivers it, and later the seller or grantor acquires title thereto, such title passes by operation of law to the buyer or grantee.

207
Q

Q: In 1965, Renren bought from Robyn a parcel of registered land evidenced by a duly executed deed of sale. The owner presented the deed of sale and the owner’s certificate of title to the Register of Deeds. The entry was made in the daybook and corresponding fees were paid as evidenced by official receipt. However, no transfer of certificate of title was issued to Renren because the original certificate of title in Robyn’s name was temporarily misplaced after fire partly gutted the Office of the Register of Deeds. Meanwhile, the land had been possessed by Robyn’s distant cousin, Mikaelo, openly, adversely and continuously in the concept of owner since 1960. It was only in April 1998 that Renren sued Mikaelo to recover possession. Mikaelo invoked:
a) acquisitive prescription
b) laches, asking that he be declared owner of the land.
Decide the case by evaluating these defences. (1998 Bar)

A

a. Renren’s action to recover possession of the land will prosper. In 1965, after buying the land from Robyn, he submitted the Deed of Sale to the Registry of Deeds for registration together with the owner’s duplicate copy of the title, and paid the corresponding registration fees. Under Sec. 56 of PD No. 1529, the Deed of Sale to Renren is considered registered from the time the sale was entered in the Day Book (now called the Primary Entry Book). For all legal intents and purposes, Renren is considered the registered owner of the land. After all, it was not his fault that theRegistry of Deeds couldnot issue the corresponding transfer certificate of title. Mikaelo’s defense of prescription cannot be sustained. A Torrens title is imprescriptible. No title to registered land in derogation of the title of the registered owner shall be acquired by prescription or adverse possession (Sec. 47, P.D. No. 1529). The right to recover possession of registered land likewise does not prescribe because possession is just a necessary incident of ownership.
b. Mikaelo’s defense of laches, however, appears to be more sustainable. Renren bought the land and had the sale registered way back in 1965. From the facts, it appears that it was only in 1998 or after an inexplicable delay of 33 years that he took the first step asserting his right to the land. It was not even an action to recover ownership but only possession of the land. By ordinary standards, 33 years of neglect or inaction is too long and may be considered unreasonable. As often held by the Supreme Court, the principle of imprescriptibility sometimes has to yield to the equitable principle of laches which can convert even a registered land owner’s claim into a stale demand. Mikaelo’s claim of laches, however, is weak insofar as the element of equity is concerned, there being no showing in the facts how he entered into the ownership and possession of the land.

208
Q

The sale of real estate effected by minors who have already passed the ages of puberty and adolescence and are now in the adult age, when they pretended to have already reached their majority, while in fact they have not, is not valid, and they can be permitted afterwards to excuse themselves from compliance with the obligations assumed by them or to seek their annulment. T or F.

A

False. (estoppel)

209
Q

Jackie, 16, inherited a townhouse. Because she wanted to study in an exclusive school, she sold her townhouse by signing a Deed of Sale and turning over possession of the same to the buyer. When the buyer discovered that she was still a minor, she promised to execute another Deed of Sale when she turns 18. When Jackie turned 25 and was already working, she wanted to annul the sale and return the buyer’s money to recover her townhouse. Was the sale contract void, voidable or valid? Can Jackie still recover the property? Explain.

A

The contract of sale is voidable. Where one of the parties in incapable of giving consent to a contract, the contract is voidable. (Art. 1390, Civil Code.) It appears that only Jackie was incapacitated by virtue of her minority. Jackie cannot recover the property. First, since the contract is voidable, Jackie only had 4 years from the time she attained the age of majority to bring the action for annulment of the contract (Art. 1391, Civil Code).

In this case, Jackie should have brought the action for annulment of the contract within four years after turning eighteen years old, or up until the age of twenty-two. Since she is already 25 years old, the period for bringing the action has prescribed. Second, Jackie may be considered to have actively misrepresented as to her age. Thus, she will be bound to the contract under the principle of estoppel.

210
Q

General rule on the sale of goods by a non-owner

A

Buyer acquires no title even if in good faith and for value under the maxim Nemo dat quid non habet (“You cannot give what you do not have”).

Sale is a derivative mode of acquiring ownership and the buyer gets only such rights as the seller had. A derivative right cannot exist higher than its source.

211
Q

Exceptions on the general rule that buyer acquires no title in good faith if bought from a non-owner

A
  1. Owner is estopped or precluded by his conduct
  2. When sale is made by the registered owner or apparent owner in accordance with recording or registration laws
  3. Sales sanctioned by judicial or statutory authority
  4. Purchases in a merchant’s store, fairs or markets
  5. When a person who is not the owner sells and delivers a thing, subsequently acquires title thereto (Art. 1434)
  6. When the seller has a voidable title which has not been avoided at the time of the sale (Art. 1506)
212
Q

Where a parcel of land is sold by one not the owner or the agent of the owner, but the real owner thereof upon being questioned in a criminal case instituted against the vendor states that he authorized such sales so that the vendor was acquitted of the charge against him, a purchaser in good faith acquires a valid title to the property as it is not lawful nor permissible for said owner to deny or retract his former sworn statement that he had consented to said sale. T or F.

A

True. #1 exception

213
Q

Using a falsified manager’s check, Justine, as the buyer, was able to take delivery of a second hand car which she had just bought from United Car Sales Inc. The sale was registered with the LTO. A week later, the seller learned that the check had been dishonored, but by that time, Justine was nowhere to be seen. It turned out that Justine had sold the car to Jerico, the present possessor who knew nothing about the falsified check. In a suit by United Car Sales against Jerico for recovery of the car, plaintiff alleges it had been unlawfully deprived of its property through fraud and should, consequently, be allowed to recover it without having to reimburse the defendant for the price the latter had paid. Should the suit prosper?

A

a. Yes, the suit will prosper because the criminal act of estafa should be deemed to come within the meaning of unlawful deprivation under Article 559, Civil Code, as without it plaintiff would not have parted with the possession of its car.
b. The suit should prosper as to the recovery of the car. However, since Jerico was not guilty of any fraud and appears to be an innocent purchaser for value, he should be reimbursed for the price he paid. This is without prejudice to United Car Sales, Inc. right of action against Justine. As between two innocent parties, the party causing the injury should suffer the loss. Therefore, United Car Sales, Inc. should suffer the loss.

c. Under the law on Sales, when the thing sold is delivered by the seller to the buyer without reservation of ownership, the ownership is transferred to the buyer. Therefore in the suit of United Car Sales, Inc.
against Jerico for the recovery of the car, the plaintiff should not be allowed to recover the car without reimbursing the defendant for the price that the latter paid.

214
Q

Art. 559

A

The possession of movable property acquired in good faith is equivalent to a title. Nevertheless, one who has lost any movable or has been unlawfully deprived thereof, may recover it from the person in possession of the same.

215
Q

Exceptions on art. 559

A

(a) By cross-reference to Article 1505, even if the owner of a movable has lost it or has been unlawfully deprived thereof, and even if he offers to reimburse the buyer, he cannot recover the movable from the buyer who bought it at a merchant store

(b) By cross-reference to Article 1506, even if the owner of a movable has lost it or has been unlawfully deprived thereof, if the possessor in good faith acquired title from a seller who at the time of delivery had a voidable title thereto, then the original owner
cannot recover the movable.

216
Q

Tagatac was the owner of a vehicle she sold to Feist who issued a check to cover the purchase price, which check bounced. In the meantime, buyer sold the vehicle to another person, and eventually the vehicle was sold to Jimenez, who bought it in good faith and for value. Subsequently, Feist was convicted for estafa.

Who was the rightful owner of the vehicle?

[Tagatac v. Jimenez]

A

Tagatac cannot be deemed to have been unlawfully deprived of the vehicle as the term is used in Article 559 since the failure of Feist to pay the purchase price of the vehicle or the issuance of a check for its price without funds to answer therefor did not or could not affect the validity of the transfer of title of the subsequent buyer who acquired the car in good faith; at the most it would give Tagatac a right to rescind the contract, but the title to the thing sold would not revert to the seller until the sale has been set aside by a competent court. Until that is done, the rights of stranger in good faith, acquired before resolution of the contract are entitled to protection.

217
Q

Aznar v. Yapdiangco

A

Where the owner had not yet consented to the sale of the vehicle when it was taken and driven away by the would-be buyer, the acquisition subsequently of another person who took it in good faith, would still entitle the original owner to recover the same since it constituted unlawful deprivation under Article 559 entitling the owner to recover it from any possessor thereof. Aznar also held that the provisions of Article 1506 would not apply to the present possessor since
it was essential that his seller should have a voidable title at least. In the case of the present possessor his seller did not even have any title to the property since it was never sold to him nor delivered to him pursuant to a valid or at least voidable sale.

218
Q

An impostor identifying himself as a professor obtained delivery of books from EDCA and for which he issued a check that subsequently bounced. The impostor sold the books to Santos, who bought them in good faith and for value.

[EDCA Publishing & Distributing Corp. v. Santos]

A

In the resulting suit over the books between EDCA and Santos, the Court held that Santos did not have to establish his ownership over the books since under Article 559 his possession of books acquired in good
faith is equivalent to title. In denying the contention of EDCA that it had been “unlawfully deprived” of the books, the Court held non-payment of the purchase price by the impostor, although amounting to fraud, did not amount to unlawful deprivation under Article 559, but merely may be considered vitiation of consent as
to make the contract voidable; but that so long as the contract has not been annulled, it remained valid, and the subsequent sale and delivery by the impostor of the books to Santos effectively transferred ownership to Santos.

219
Q

Implications of Tagatac & EDCA cases

A

The implication of the Tagatac and EDCA Publishing rulings is that Article 1506 represents an operative act which would constitute a further exception to the provisions of Article 559, which means that if the owner has been unlawfully deprived by means of deceit pertaining to the non-payment of the purchase price, but the one who takes the movable is able to sell and deliver the movable to another person who takes it in good faith and for value before the owner is able to rescind the earlier sale, the buyer obtains good title and the original owner has no cause of action to recover; and

What is gratifying from a reading of the foregoing three cases is that the Court incisively distinguished between the perfection stage and the consummation stage of the sale to arrive at a proper resolution of the issues.
In Tagatac, the Court ruled that deceit or fraud, which do not render the contract void but merely voidable (valid until annulled) resulted into the existence of a sale, so that when delivery was effected pursuant to such voidable contract, tradition effectively and legally transferred ownership to the buyer, even though
he was a deceitful person. It also correctly ruled that the nonpayment of the price by the bouncing of the check went into the performance of the contract and not to its perfection and therefore non-payment could not reverse the coming into existence of the sale by the meeting of minds of the parties.

220
Q

Pablo sold his car to Alfonso who issued a postdated check in full payment therefor. Before the maturity of the check, Alfonso sold the car to Gregorio who later sold it to Gabriel. When presented for payment, the check issued by Alfonso was dishonored by the drawee bank for the reason that he, Alfonso, had already closed his account even before he issued his check. Pablo sued to recover the car from Gabriel alleging that he (Pablo) had been unlawfully deprived of it by reason of Alfonso’s deception. Will the suit prosper?

A

No. The suit will not prosper because Pablo was not unlawfully deprived of the car although he was unlawfully deprived of the price. The perfection of the sale and the delivery of the car was enough to allow Alfonso to have a right of ownership over the car, which can be lawfully transferred to Gregorio. Art. 559 applies only to a person who is in possession in good faith of the property, and not to the owner thereof. Alfonso, in the problem, was the owner, and, hence, Gabriel acquired the title to the car. Non-payment of the price in a contract of sale does not render ineffective the obligation to deliver. The obligation to deliver a thing is different from the obligation to pay its price

221
Q

Pablo sold his car to Alfonso who issued a postdated check in full payment therefore. Before the maturity of the check, Alfonso sold the car to Gregorio who later sold it to Gabriel. When presented for payment, the check issued by Alfonso was dishonoured by the drawee bank for the reason that he, Alfonso, had already closed his account even before he issued his check.

Pablo sued to recover the car from Gabriel alleging that he (Pablo) had been unlawfully deprived of it by reason of Alfonso’s deception. Will the suit prosper?

A

No. The suit will not prosper because Pablo was not unlawfully deprived of the car although he was unlawfully deprived of the price. The perfection of the sale and the delivery of the car was enough to allow Alfonso to have a right of ownership over the car, which can be lawfully transferred to Gregorio. Art. 559 applies only to a person who is in possession in good faith of the property, and not to the owner thereof. Alfonso, in the problem, was the owner, and, hence, Gabriel acquired the title to the car.

Non-payment of the price in a contract of sale does not render ineffective the obligation to deliver.
The obligation to deliver a thing is different from the obligation to pay its price.

222
Q

In Asiatic Commercial Corporation vs. Ang, the plaintiff sold some cosmetics to Francisco Ang, who, in turn, sold them to Tan Sit Bin. Asiatic, not having been paid
by Ang, sued for the recovery of the articles from Tan, who claimed he had validly bought them from Ang, paying for the same in cash. Finding that there was no conspiracy between Tan and Ang to deceive Asiatic, the Court of Appeals declared:

A

‘Yet the defendant invoked Article 464 (now Art. 559.) of the Civil Code providing among other things that ‘one who has been unlawfully deprived of personal property may recover it from any person possessing it. We do not believe that the plaintiff has been unlawfully deprived of the cartons of Gloco Tonic within the scope of this legal provision. It has voluntarily parted with them pursuant to a contract of purchase and sale.
The circumstance that the price was not subsequently paid did not render illegal a transaction which was valid and legal at the beginning.

223
Q

B bought in good faith for value a car which was stolen
from C, the lawful owner. As against B, C has a better right to the car. Article 1506 is clearly inapplicable where the seller had no title at all.

A

C may recover the car without paying any indemnity, except when B acquired it in a public sale. (Art. 559)

224
Q

Art. 1477

A

The ownership of the thing sold shall be transferred to the vendee upon the actual or constructive delivery thereof.

225
Q

Art. 1459

A

The thing must be licit and the vendor must have a right to transfer the ownership thereof at the time it is delivered.

226
Q

Art. 1496

A

The ownership of the thing sold is acquired by the vendee from the moment it is delivered to him in any of the ways specified in articles 1497 to 1501, or in any other manner signifying an agreement that the possession is transferred from the vendor to the vendee.

227
Q

Art. 1547

A

In a contract of sale, unless a contrary intention appears, there is:

(1) An implied warranty on the part of the seller that he has a right to sell the thing at the time when the ownership is to pass, and that the buyer shall from that time have and enjoy the legal and peaceful possession of the thing;
(2) An implied warranty that the thing shall be free from any hidden faults or defects, or any charge or encumbrance not declared or known to the buyer.

This article shall not, however, be held to render liable a sheriff, auctioneer, mortgagee, pledgee, or other person professing to sell by virtue of authority in fact or law, for the sale of a thing in which a third person has a legal or equitable interest.

228
Q

Art. 1588

A

If there is no stipulation as specified in the first paragraph of article 1523, when the buyer’s refusal to accept the goods is without just cause, the title thereto passes to him from the moment they are placed at his disposal.

1532 (1) The unpaid seller may exercise his right of stoppage in transitu either by obtaining actual possession of the goods or by giving notice of his claim to the carrier or other bailee in whose possession the goods are. Such notice may be given either to the person in actual possession of the goods or to his principal. In the latter case the notice, to be effectual, must be given at such time and under such circumstances that the principal, by the exercise of reasonable diligence, may prevent a delivery to the buyer.

229
Q

Although the Supreme Court has held that the general rule under Philippine jurisdiction is that after perfection but before delivery, the risk of loss is borne by the seller under the rule of res perit domino, the statutory bases for such doctrine are not clear-cut and sometimes conflicting. T or F.

A

True.

230
Q

P leased to B a building with a stipulation in the lease
contract that all permanent improvements made by B on the leased premises shall belong to P and as part of the consideration of the monthly rental. Subsequently, B purchased on credit from S glass and wooden jalousies which were delivered and installed in the leased premises by S, replacing the existing windows.
For failure of B to pay for the items purchased, the same was levied upon and sold at public auction with S as the highest bidder. P filed an action to nullify the sheriff’s sale.

Will the action prosper?

A

Yes. When the items in question were delivered and
installed in the leased premises, B became the owner thereof even if the purchase price has been made on credit (see Arts. 1477, 1496, 1497.), and by virtue of the lease contract when levy was made, B, the judgment debtor, was no longer the owner thereof. The power of the court in execution of judgment extends only to properties unquestionably belonging to the judgment debtor only, and the purchaser acquires only the right as the debtor has at the time of the auction sale.

231
Q

Why does delivery seal the contract of sale?

A

Because the trader loses not only possession but also control over the shipment.

232
Q

Ways of effecting delivery

A
  1. by actual or real delivery
  2. by constructive or legal delivery
  3. by delivery in any other manner signifying an agreement that the possession is transferred to the vendee

*there must be actual intention

233
Q

S agreed to sell 170 cavans of rice to B at the price of
P37.25 per cavan, delivery to be made at T’s store. After the goods were unloaded at T’s store, S’s driver tried to collect the purchase price from T as B was nowhere to be found, but T refused, stating that he had purchased the goods from B at P33.00 per cavan and the price had already been paid to him.

This is a simple case of swindling perpetrated by B at the expense of S and T. However, three days after delivery, T was repaid by B. Is T duty bound to return the 170 cavans of rice to S or to pay its value?

A

Yes. Sale between B and T voluntarily rescinded by the
repayment. There was a perfected sale. (Art. 1475.) Ownership of the rice, too, was transferred to the vendee, B, upon its delivery at the place stipulated (Art. 1521.), and pursuant to Articles 1477 and 1496. At the very least, B had a rescissible title to the goods for non-payment of the purchase price but which had not been rescinded at the time of the sale to T. Having
been repaid the purchase price by B, the sale, as between B and T, had been voluntarily rescinded, and T was thereby divested of any claim to the rice. Technically, therefore, he should return the rice to B.

234
Q

“Delivered”

A

1497 - when it is placed in the control and possession of the vendee

1498 - execution of public instrument; delivery of keys of the place or depository where it is stored or kept (movable)

1499 - by mere consent or agreement if the object cannot be transferred yet (movable)

1500 - tradition constitutum possessorium (continued possession) Here the seller, after the sale, retains possession of the article acting as agent on behalf of the buyer.

1501 - placing of titles of ownership in the possession of the vendee or the use by the vendee of his rights, with the vendor’s consent

235
Q

KInds of Delivery

A
  1. Actual
    - when the thing sold is placed in the control and possession of the vendee
    a. If movable, this can be done when thing is transferred from hand to hand.
    b. If immovable, this can be done by certain material and possessory acts by the vendee in the presence and with the consent of the vendor, such as entering upon the property which is considered as taking possession.
  2. Constructive
    - change of possession is not actual or material but represented by some other signs or acts indicative thereof
236
Q

Forms of Constructive Delivery

A

a. Symbolic - effected thru delivery of symbols or things which represent the thing to be delivered. Hence, with regard to movable property, its delivery may be made by the delivery of the keys of the place or depository where it is stored (Art. 1498, 2nd par., NCC).

  1. Delivery by negotiable document of title: Delivery or negotiation of document of title, such as a bill of lading or warehouse receipt, constitute a symbolic delivery of the property it represents, provided there is an intent to thereby change possession
  2. Under the law, one to whom the negotiable receipt has been duly negotiated acquires such title to the goods as the person negotiating the receipt to him, or the depositor or person to whose order the goods were deliverable by the terms of the receipt, either had or had ability to convey to a purchaser in good faith for value (Art. 1513)

b. Execution of Public Instrument — when sale is made thru a public instrument, its execution shall be equivalent to the delivery of the thing which is the object of the contract (Art. 1498, 1st par.).
Exceptions: (a) when the instrument itself expresses or implies that delivery was not intended (Art. 1498); or (b) when there is an impediment that may prevent the passing of the property from the hands of the vendor to the vendee, as when a third person was actually in possession of the thing and objecting thereto

c. Traditio longa manu - Delivery is effected by vendor simply by pointing out to the vendee the thing to be transferred and which at that time must be within sight.
d. Traditio brevi manu - Vendee already had the thing in his possession for some reason (as a lessee, for example) and a mere declaration by the vendor that the vendee shall now hold the thing as owner operates as a form of delivery.
e. Traditio constitutum possessorium - The reverse of brevi manu. Delivery is effected by a mere declaration on the part of the vendor that he will hold the thing for the vendee, as when the owner alienates it and becomes a mere lessee.

Note: In all forms of constructive delivery, it is necessary that the vendor has and is able to transfer control over the thing to the vendee. If not, fiction yields to reality. There is no delivery.

237
Q

Delivery of Incorporeal Property

A

Three ways to effect delivery:

  1. When sale is made thru a public instrument, the execution thereof is equivalent to delivery (Art. 1501, in rel. to Art. 1498, NCC).
  2. By placing of the titles of ownership in the possession of the vendee; or
  3. Use by the vendee of his rights, with the consent of vendor (Art. 1501, NCC).
238
Q

Delivery of goods to carrier

A
  1. General rule: If pursuant to contract seller is authorized or required to send the goods to buyer, the delivery of the goods to carrier for transmission to buyer, whether named by the buyer or not, is deemed to be a delivery of the goods to the buyer (Art. 1523, NCC). Hence, ownership is transferred to buyer.
  2. Exceptions: Not considered delivery to buyer -
    a. If the contrary intention appears (Art. 1523, NCC) or if seller, by terms of contract, reserves the right of possession or ownership notwithstanding delivery of the goods to the carrier (Art. 1503, 1st par., NCC).
    b. When by bill of lading, goods are deliverable to the seller or his agent or to the order of the seller or his agent, seller thereby reserves ownership in the goods (Art. 1503, 2nd par., NCC).
    c. When goods are shipped, and by the bill of lading the goods are deliverable to order of the buyer or of his agent, but possession of the bill of lading is retained by the seller or his agent, seller thereby reserves a right to the possession of the goods as against the buyer (Art. 1503, 3rd par., NCC).
239
Q

When Delivery Does Not Transfer Ownership

A
  1. In sale on trial, approval or satisfaction (Art. 1502, 2nd par.)
  2. When contrary intention appears
  3. When ownership is reserved despite delivery, as in the following
    a. When by bill of lading, the goods are deliverable to the seller or his agent or to the order of the seller or his agent (Art. 1503, 2nd par.)
    b. When goods are shipped and by bill of lading, the goods are deliverable to order of the buyer or of his agent but possession of the bill of lading is retained by the seller or his agent (Art. 1503, 3rd par.)
    c. When seller of goods draws on the buyer for the price and transmits the bill of exchange and bill of lading together to the buyer to secure acceptance or payment of the bill of exchange, buyer is bound to return the bill of lading if he does not honor the bill of exchange, and if he wrongfully retains the bill of lading he acquires no added right thereby (Art. 1503, 4th par.)
  4. When sale is not valid
  5. When seller is not the owner at the time of delivery
240
Q

Although Article 1547 uses the phrase “unless a contrary intention appears,” there can be no legal waiver of such warranty without changing the basic nature of the relationship, for the warranty on the part of the seller that he has the capacity to sell, i.e., to transfer ownership of the subject matter pursuant to the sale, is the essence of sale; unless, it amounts to clear assumption of risk on the part of the buyer, as when the obligation of the seller is subject to a condition. T or F.

A

True.

241
Q

Condition v. Warranty

A

(1)

c: non-happening of the condition, although it may extinguish the obligation upon which it is based, generally does not amount to a breach of the contract of sale
w: non-fulfillment of a warranty would constitute a breach of the contract

(2)

c: generally goes into the root of the existence of the obligation, whereas a warranty goes into the performance of such obligation, and in fact may constitute an obligation in itself
w: goes into the performance of such obligation, and in fact may constitute an obligation in itself

(3)

c: must be stipulated by the parties in order to form part of an obligation
w: may form part of the obligation or contract by provision of law, without the parties having expressly agreed thereto

(4)

c: may attach itself either to the obligations of the seller or of the buyer
w: whether express or implied, relates to the subject matter itself or to the obligations of the seller as to the subject matter of the sale

242
Q

Requisites in an express warranty in a contract of sale

A
  1. it must be an affirmation of fact or any promise by the seller relating to the subject matter of the sale
  2. the natural tendency of such affirmation or promise is to induce the buyer to purchase the thing
  3. the buyer purchases the thing relying on such affirmation or promise thereon
243
Q

Warranty

A

An affirmation of fact or any promise made by a seller in relation to the thing sold, and that the decisive test is whether the seller assumes to assert a fact of which the buyer is ignorant of.

244
Q

Implied warranty

A

Those which by law constitute part of every contract of sale, whether or not the parties were aware of them, and whether or not the parties intended them.

245
Q

When there is breach of warranty against eviction

A

a. purchaser has been deprived of, or evicted from, the whole or part of the thing sold;
b. eviction is by a final judgment
c. basis thereof is by virtue of a right prior to the sale made by the seller
d. seller has been summoned and made co-defendant in the suit for eviction at the instance of the buyer

246
Q

Power Commercial and Industrial Corp v. Court of Appeals

A

Power Commercial and Industrial Corp. v. Court of Appeals, held that there can be no action for breach of the said warranty when the buyer was well aware of the presence of the tenants at the time the buyer entered into the sale transaction, and it even undertook the job of ejecting the squatters which in fact fi led suit to eject the occupants.

247
Q

Jovellano v. Lualhati

A

Jovellano v. Lualhati, held that “no discussion, therefore, should be made here as to whether or not the vendor had means of defense. All of this counts very little. There is only one condition to be complied with by the vendee, and that is to give notice of
the complaint. Once this is proven, his right to the warranty is perfect, and the vendor cannot set up anything against it.”

248
Q

Escaler v. Court of Appeals

A

Escaler v. Court of Appeals, held that the breach of
warranty against eviction cannot be enforced against the seller when the only thing that the buyer did was to furnish the seller, by registered mail, with a copy of the opposition the buyer filed in the eviction suit, without going through formally summoning the seller to be a party to the case. The Court held that —

This is not the kind of notice prescribed by the
aforequoted Articles 1558 and 1559 of the New Civil
Code … the respondents as vendor/s should be
made parties to the suit at the instance of petitioners vendees, either by way of asking that the former be
made a co-defendant or by the filing of a third-party
complaint against said vendors.

249
Q

S sells to B an automobile for P90,000.00, telling the latter that it is a 1977 model and that it is worth about P100,000.00. B sees the automobile and after a test run, expresses satisfaction over its condition. The automobile is really of 1976 vintage and is only worth about P80,000.00.

A

In this case, B has no right of action for breach of warranty because the inducing cause of the purchase is not the erroneous statement as to its model and value, but B’s reliance on its appearance and demonstrated condition. But the statement that
the automobile is in excellent running condition constitutes a violation of warranty if such is not the fact.

250
Q

Implies warranties in sale

A

(1) Implied warranty as to seller’s title. — that the seller guarantees that he has a right to sell the thing sold and to transfer ownership to the buyer who shall not be disturbed in his legal and peaceful possession thereof (Art. 1548.);
(2) Implied warranty against hidden defects or unknown encumbrance. — that the seller guarantees that the thing sold is free from any hidden faults or defects or any charge or encumbrance not declared or known to the buyer (Art. 1561.)

(3) Implied warranty as to fitness or merchantability. — that the seller guarantees that the thing sold is reasonably fit for the known particular purpose for which it was acquired by the buyer or, where it was bought by description, that it is of merchantable
quality. (Art. 1562.)

251
Q

G sold a parcel of agricultural land to ID, Inc. warranting that the land was “free from all liens and encumbrances.” ID, Inc., in turn, sold the land to AA, Inc. to which ID, Inc. warranted that the land was “free from all liens, adverse claims, encumbrances, claims of any tenant and/or agricultural workers, whether arising as compensation for disturbance or from improvements.” When G bought the land from the original owner, it was forced to stop cultivating the land because of the bulldozing caused by AA, Inc. G filed a complaint against ID, Inc., AA, Inc. for disturbance compensation under the land reform law. ID, Inc. in return, filed a cross-claim against G in case of a judgment adverse to it while AA, Inc. filed a cross-claim against ID, Inc.

Did G violate his warranty to ID, Inc.?

A

No. The term “hidden faults or defects” in Article 1547
pertains only to those that make the object of the sale unfit for the use for which it was intended at the time of the sale. Since the object of the sale by G to ID, Inc. is an agricultural land, the existing tenancy relationship with respect to the land cannot be a “hidden fault or defect.” It is not a lien or encumbrance that the vendor warranted did not exist at the time of the sale. It is a relationship which any buyer of agricultural land should reasonably expect to be present and which it is his duty to specifically look into and provide for. AA, Inc. saw to it that the warranty was specific when it, in turn, purchased the land. The difference in the phraseology of the two warranties is not an idle one.

252
Q

An implied warranty cannot be waived or modified.

A

False. It can waived or modified by an express stipulation.

253
Q

When is implied warranty not applicable?

A
  1. as is and where is sale
  2. sale of second-hand articles
  3. sale by virtue of authority in fact or law
254
Q

Cases wherein a buyer’s refusal to accept is justified

A

(1) Duty of buyer to take care of goods without obligation to return. — If the goods have been sent to the buyer and he rightfully refuses to accept them, as in the case where the goods are of not the kind and quality agreed upon, he is in the position of a bailee who has had goods thrust upon him without his assent. Doubtless, he has the obligation to take reasonable care of the goods, but nothing more can be demanded of him. Accordingly, he is under no obligation to return the goods to the seller.
(2) Duty of seller to take delivery of goods. — After notice that the goods have not been and will not be accepted, the seller must have the burden of taking delivery of said goods.

(3) Seller’s risk of loss of goods. — While the goods remain in the buyer’s possession under these circumstances, they are, of course, at the seller’s risk. But the buyer is not deemed and is not liable as a depositary, unless he voluntarily constitutes himself as
such.

(4) Right of buyer to resell goods. — Should the seller, when notified to take delivery of the goods fails to do so, the buyer may resell the goods. The provisions governing resale by the seller when the buyer is in default, it seems, will generally apply. (see
Art. 1533.)

255
Q

Art. 1502 (1)

A

When goods are delivered to the buyer “on sale or return” to give the buyer an option to return the goods instead of paying the price, the ownership passes to the buyer on delivery, but he may revest the ownership in the seller by returning or tendering the goods within the time fixed in the contract, or, if no time has been fixed, within a reasonable time. (n)

256
Q

Art. 1502 (2)

A

When goods are delivered to the buyer on approval or on trial or on satisfaction, or other similar terms, the ownership therein passes to the buyer:

(1) When he signifies his approval or acceptance to the seller or does any other act adopting the transaction;
(2) If he does not signify his approval or acceptance to the seller, but retains the goods without giving notice of rejection, then if a time has been fixed for the return of the goods, on the expiration of such time, and, if no time has been fixed, on the expiration of a reasonable time. What is a reasonable time is a question of fact. (n)

257
Q

Art. 1478

A

The parties may stipulate that ownership in the thing shall not pass to the purchaser until he has fully paid the price. (n)

258
Q

Art. 1503 (1)

A

When there is a contract of sale of specific goods, the seller may, by the terms of the contract, reserve the right of possession or ownership in the goods until certain conditions have been fulfilled. The right of possession or ownership may be thus reserved notwithstanding the delivery of the goods to the buyer or to a carrier or other bailee for the purpose of transmission to the buyer.

259
Q

Art. 1458 (2)

A

A contract of sale may be absolute or conditional.

260
Q

If one of the parties who gave consent is a minor or insane, what is the status of the contract?

A

Voidable

261
Q

If one of the parties cannot give consent, what is the status of the contract?

A

Void. (Art. 1318)

Article 1318. There is no contract unless the following requisites concur:

(1) Consent of the contracting parties;
(2) Object certain which is the subject matter of the contract;
(3) Cause of the obligation which is established. (1261)

262
Q

Example of relative incapacity for contracts

A

Under the Constitution, aliens cannot own land here.

263
Q

H&W got married. Foreign husband. Divorce. Husband wanted to get the land. Wife: bawal ka, alien ka.

Who shall retain ownership of the land?

A

Wife, kahit conjugal ownership. Husband cannot contend reimbursement. They cannot own directly or indirectly of such land.

Other than that, contract is void. Nothing to divide here.

Sec. 7, Art. 12, 1987 Constitution.

264
Q

Husband and wife were living under the conjugal partnership system. Later, because of a quarrel, the wife left the husband, without judicial approval. They have thus been living apart for the last ten years. Do you think that they can now sell the property to each other?

A

No. They are still married to each other.

265
Q

If may sale, who can question it?

A

None. Art. 1412 (1). Any sale, any void contract, cannot be questioned by the contracting parties. The Court will leave them as they are. Heirs or 3rd persons only can question.

266
Q

Art. 1347

A

Article 1347. All things which are not outside the commerce of men, including future things, may be the object of a contract. All rights which are not intransmissible may also be the object of contracts.

No contract may be entered into upon future inheritance except in cases expressly authorized by law.

All services which are not contrary to law, morals, good customs, public order or public policy may likewise be the object of a contract.

267
Q

The debtor who, before having knowledge of the assignment, pays his creditor shall be released from the obligation. T or F.

A

True. Art. 1626

268
Q

Art. 1469

A

Article 1469. In order that the price may be considered certain, it shall be sufficient that it be so with reference to another thing certain, or that the determination thereof be left to the judgment of a special person or persons.

Should such person or persons be unable or unwilling to fix it, the contract shall be inefficacious, unless the parties subsequently agree upon the price.

If the third person or persons acted in bad faith or by mistake, the courts may fix the price.

Where such third person or persons are prevented from fixing the price or terms by fault of the seller or the buyer, the party not in fault may have such remedies against the party in fault as are allowed the seller or the buyer, as the case may be.

269
Q

Art. 1504

A

Article 1504. Unless otherwise agreed, the goods remain at the seller’s risk until the ownership therein is transferred to the buyer, but when the ownership therein is transferred to the buyer the goods are at the buyer’s risk whether actual delivery has been made or not, except that:

(1) Where delivery of the goods has been made to the buyer or to a bailee for the buyer, in pursuance of the contract and the ownership in the goods has been retained by the seller merely to secure performance by the buyer of his obligations under the contract, the goods are at the buyer’s risk from the time of such delivery;
(2) Where actual delivery has been delayed through the fault of either the buyer or seller the goods are at the risk of the party in fault. (n)

270
Q

Art. 1480 v. Art. 1493 v. Art. 1504

A

1480

  • thing lost after perfection but before its delivery (non-fungible things and fungible things sold independently and for a single price or for a fixed price without consideration of their weight number, or measure
  • fungible things sold for a price fixed in relation to weight, number, or measure
  • par. 3 is an xpn to the rule that the vendee bears the loss after the perfection of the contract and before delivery. Vendee assumes risk if he has incurred in delay in receiving the goods sold

1493
- loss/injury has taken place before or at the time the contract of sale is perfected

1504
- xpns to the general rule that the risk is borne by the owner of the thing at the time of the loss if the thing is lost by fortuitous event

271
Q

If the thing is lost by fortuitous event, the general rule is that the risk is borne by the owner of the thing at the time of the loss under the principle of res perit domino. T or F.

A

True

272
Q

Art. 1504 situations

A
  1. where the seller reserves the ownership of the goods merely to secure the performance by the buyer of his obligations
  2. where actual delivery had been delayed through the fault of either the buyer or seller, the goods are at the risk of the party at fault with respect to any loss which might not have occurred but for such fault
273
Q

Conflict between Art. 1480 and Art. 1504

A

Under Art. 1480, risk of loss by fortuitous event without the seller’s fault is borne by the buyer if the thing sold is lost after perfection of the contract but before its delivery
(Consequently, the buyer’s obligation to pay the price subsists if he has not yet paid the same or if he had,
he cannot recover it from the seller although the latter’s obligation to deliver the thing is extinguished by its loss.)

Art. 1504, the goods remain at the seller’s risk until the ownership therein is transferred to the buyer.

274
Q

How to resolve the conflict between Art. 1480 and Art. 1504

A

1504 should be restricted in its application to sale of “goods,” and Art. 1480 to sales of “things.”

Art. 1636 - “Goods” includes all chattels personal but not things in action or money of legal tender in the Philippines. The term includes growing fruits or crops.

Art. 1480 the general rule on risk of loss and Art. 1504, the exception

275
Q

Art. 1480

A

Article 1480. Any injury to or benefit from the thing sold, after the contract has been perfected, from the moment of the perfection of the contract to the time of delivery, shall be governed by articles 1163 to 1165, and 1262.

This rule shall apply to the sale of fungible things, made independently and for a single price, or without consideration of their weight, number, or measure.

Should fungible things be sold for a price fixed according to weight, number, or measure, the risk shall not be imputed to the vendee until they have been weighed, counted, or measured and delivered, unless the latter has incurred in delay. (1452a)

276
Q

WHO BEARS RISK OF LOSS/ DETERIORATION/

FRUITS:

A
  1. BEFORE PERFECTION
    a. Res perit domino
    b. Owner is seller so seller bears risk of loss
  2. AT PERFECTION
    o Res perit domino
    o Contract is merely inefficacious because loss of the subject matter does not affect the validity of the sale
    o Seller cannot anymore comply with obligation so buyer cannot anymore be compelled
3. AFTER PERFECTION BUT BEFORE DELIVERY
o Loss – confused state
o Paras: BUYER
o Tolentino: SELLER
o Deterioration and fruits – Buyer bears loss;
  1. AFTER DELIVERY
    o Res perit domino
    o Delivery extinguishes ownership visa-vis the seller and creates a new one in favor of the buyer
277
Q

Four rules on risk of loss according to Art. 1480

A
  1. If the thing is lost BEFORE PERFECTION, the seller bears the loss (principle: the thing perishes with the owner or res perit domino)
  2. If the thing is lost AT THE TIME OF PERFECTION, the contract is void or inexistent. The legal effect is the same as when the object is lost before the perfection of the contract of sale
  3. If the thing is lost AFTER PERFECTION BUT BEFORE DELIVERY, risk of loss is shifted to the buyer even before the ownership is transferred. (xpn to general rule of res perit domino)
  4. If the thing is lost AFTER DELIVERY, the buyer bears the risk of loss following the general rule of res perit domino
278
Q

Scope of Art. 1480

A
  1. The first rule where the thing is lost after perfection but before its delivery (#3) applies to non-fungible
    things and fungible things sold independently and for a single price or for a price fixed without consideration of their weight, number, or measure.

Under this rule, which follows the Roman Rule, the risk of the thing sold passes to the buyer, even though the thing has not yet been delivered to him.

In other words, the buyer assumes the risk of loss caused by fortuitous event without the fault of the seller, that is, in spite of the exercise of due diligence on his part and before he has incurred in delay after the perfection of the contract to the time of delivery. With respect to the fruits, the buyer has a right to the same from the time the obligation to deliver the thing arises. If the risk ought to belong to the buyer before delivery, the benefit ought to belong to him who has the risk.

Article 1480, paragraph 1 is applicable only where the thing is determinate. It also applies to fungible things sold for a price not fixed in relation to weight, number, or measure because in such case the fungible things have been “particularly designated or physically segregated.”

  1. The second rule relates to fungible things sold for a price fixed in relation to weight, number, or measure. Under the third paragraph, “the risk shall not be imputed to the vendee until they have been weighed, counted, or measured, and delivered.” Paragraph 3 is an exception to the rule that the vendee bears the loss after the perfection of the contract and before delivery. However, the vendee assumes the risk if he has incurred in delay in receiving the goods sold.
279
Q

If a house (sold) be destroyed wholly or partly by fire, who bears the loss?

A

The loss falls upon the buyer who must pay the price, even though he has not received the thing. For the
seller is not liable for anything which happens without his fraud or negligence. But if after the sale any alluvion has accrued to the land, the benefit goes to the buyer for the benefit ought to belong to him who has the risk.

280
Q

B advanced P3,000 to S in payment of 600 piculs of
sugar. The written contract did not specify that the sugar was to come from the crop on S’s land which was destroyed by a flood. S claimed that the fortuitous cause excused non-performance by him of the contract.

A

S promised to deliver a generic thing. Any sugar of
the quality stipulated, regardless of origin or however acquired, (lawfully) would be obligatory on the part of B to receive and would discharge the obligation. It seems, therefore, plain that the sugar to be sold not having been segregated, the sale was not perfected and the loss of the crop even through force majeure, did not extinguish S’s obligation to deliver the sugar.

Flood, like other catastrophes, was a contingency, a collateral incident, which S should have provided for by proper stipulations. Genus nunquam perit (genus never perishes).

281
Q

S (vendor) delivered the tobacco in question to the
redrying plant of A, trading agent of B (vendee). The tobacco was burned while awaiting inspection, grading, and weighing. It appeared that S directed, supervised, and controlled A in receiving shipments of tobacco and in the performance of its activities, and that shipments, once received from trading entities like S, were under B’s control, and not subject to withdrawal without its authority.

Should B be considered as having accepted the tobacco shipments as of the fire and, therefore, should bear the loss?

A

Yes. The contract of sale has been perfected at the time of the loss (see Art. 1475.) and the shipment was placed in the control and possession of B. The technical defect that the tobacco in question “were still to be inspected, graded and weighed” cannot suffice to overturn the decision. Aside from raising an issue of fact (for B’s own fieldmen had the responsibility of such tobacco being graded, weighed, baled and loaded on trucks duly sealed for transportation to its redrying plant and that responsibility was fulfilled according to the trial court), the delay was traceable to the fault of B and A and that A was negligent in causing the fire, whereas S had done everything that was required of him by B’s regulations in order to have the tobacco inspected and paid for.

Furthermore, for sometime after the conflagration, there was no question raised by B as to its liability. It would, therefore, be the height of injustice to deny S’s claim for payment.

282
Q

PVTA, a government corporation, entered into a contract of procuring, redrying and servicing with FVTR for the 1963 tobacco trading operation. Petitioners ATC shipped to FVTR bales of tobacco. Not all the bales of tobacco were graded and weighed because some officers and employees in the premises of FVTR asked for money to have the remaining bales graded and weighed. The remaining ungraded and unweighed
bales were lost while they were in the possession of FVTR.

Having learned of such loss, ATC demanded for their value and the application of the same to ATC’s merchandising loan with PVTA but both the latter and the FVTR refused to heed said demands.

Was the contract of sale between ATC and PVTA perfected by ATC’s delivery of all bales of tobacco to FVTR, a contractee of PVTA, so as to hold PVTA liable for the loss of said bales while in the possession of FVTR?

A
  1. Delivery to buyer’s agent (FVTR) proven. — “Under
    the Santiago Virginia Tobacco Planters Assoc. vs. PVTA case, shipping documents and checklists which are
    accomplished prior to delivery do not prove actual delivery. To prove such delivery, documents such as the weigher’s tally sheet and the warehouse receipts which are accomplished when the actual delivery is made, are necessary.
  2. Seller (ATC) lost possession and control over shipment. — The Civil Code provides that ownership of the thing sold shall be transferred to the vendee upon the actual or constructive delivery thereof. (Art. 1477.) There is delivery when the thing sold is placed in the control and possession of the vendee. (Art. 1497.)
  3. Tobacco traders placed at a disadvantage.
  4. Delivery considered effective delivery to seller (PVTA).
283
Q

Art. 1493

A

Article 1493. If at the time the contract of sale is perfected, the thing which is the object of the contract has been entirely lost, the contract shall be without any effect.

But if the thing should have been lost in part only, the vendee may choose between withdrawing from the contract and demanding the remaining part, paying its price in proportion to the total sum agreed upon.

284
Q

Art. 1494

A

Article 1494. Where the parties purport a sale of specific goods, and the goods without the knowledge of the seller have perished in part or have wholly or in a material part so deteriorated in quality as to be substantially changed in character, the buyer may at his option treat the sale:

(1) As avoided; or
(2) As valid in all of the existing goods or in so much thereof as have not deteriorated, and as binding the buyer to pay the agreed price for the goods in which the ownership will pass, if the sale was divisible.

285
Q

Art. 1493 distinguished from Art. 1480 and Art. 1504

A

The loss or injury referred to in this article is one which has taken place before or at the time the contract of sale is perfected. It must be distinguished from the loss or injury mentioned in Articles 1480 and 1504 which occurs after the contract is perfected but prior to the time of delivery.

286
Q

What happens to a thing entirely lost at the time of perfection?

A

The contract is inexistent and void (Art. 1409[3]) because there is no object. (Art. 1318, par. 2)
There being no contract, there is no necessity to bring an action for annulment.

287
Q

What happens to a thing partially lost at the time of perfection?

A

If the subject matter is only partially lost, the vendee may elect between withdrawing from the contract and demanding the remaining part, paying its proportionate
price. (Art. 1493, par. 2.)

288
Q

S sold his car to B. Unknown to both of them, the car

has been totally destroyed before they agreed on the sale.

A

In this case, there is no valid contract of sale for lack of object. S, as owner, bears the loss and B does not have to pay for the price.

If the car sold is only partially destroyed, there still remains of the object. However, since it is not of the character or in the condition contemplated by the parties, the buyer may withdraw from the contract or demand the delivery of the car, paying its proportionate price.

289
Q

When is a thing considered lost?

A

The thing is lost when it perishes or goes out of commerce or disappears in such a way that its existence is unknown or it cannot be recovered. (Art. 1189[2])

The word “perishes” is sufficiently inclusive as to cover a case where there has been material deterioration or complete change in the nature of the thing in such a manner that it loses its former utility taking into consideration the time the contract was entered
into.

290
Q

Art. 1493 v. Art. 1494

A

1493
- applies to a sale of specific thing

1494
- applies to sales of goods

Both articles have actually the same essence providing two alternative remedies to the buyer in case of deterioration or partial loss of the object prior to the sale, namely: to rescind or withdraw from the contract or to give it legal effect, paying the proportionate price of the remaining object.

291
Q

Effect of loss in case of specific goods (Art. 1494)

A

(1) Sale divisible. — The second option is available only if the sale is divisible. (Art. 1494, par. 2.) A contract is divisible when its consideration is made up of several parts. (see Art. 1420.) When the consideration is entire and single, the contract is indivisible.
(2) Sale indivisible. — Suppose the sale is not divisible, what price is the buyer to pay for the remaining goods if he elects to continue with the sale? It is believed that the buyer should be made to pay only the proportionate price of the remaining goods as provided for in paragraph 2 of the preceding article. If the sale is indivisible, the object thereof may be considered as a specific thing.

292
Q

Suppose the subject matter sold was 100 cavans of rice in the warehouse of S at P1,000.00 per cavan or for a total price of P100,000.00. What happens if 60 cavans of rice were lost?

A

B may, at his option, withdraw from the contract without the obligation to pay for the rice; or demand the delivery of the 40 cavans, but binding him to pay the agreed price thereof which is P40,000.00.

If the contract is indivisible, that is, the 100 cavans of rice were sold for P100,000.00 fixed without consideration of the number of cavans, B should be made to pay only the proportionate price of 40 cavans which is also P40,000.00.

293
Q

Art. 1538

A

Article 1538. In case of loss, deterioration or improvement of the thing before its delivery, the rules in article 1189 shall be observed, the vendor being considered the debtor.

294
Q

Art. 1189

A

Article 1189. When the conditions have been imposed with the intention of suspending the efficacy of an obligation to give, the following rules shall be observed in case of the improvement, loss or deterioration of the thing during the pendency of the condition:

(1) If the thing is lost without the fault of the debtor, the obligation shall be extinguished;
(2) If the thing is lost through the fault of the debtor, he shall be obliged to pay damages; it is understood that the thing is lost when it perishes, or goes out of commerce, or disappears in such a way that its existence is unknown or it cannot be recovered;
(3) When the thing deteriorates without the fault of the debtor, the impairment is to be borne by the creditor;
(4) If it deteriorates through the fault of the debtor, the creditor may choose between the rescission of the obligation and its fulfillment, with indemnity for damages in either case;
(5) If the thing is improved by its nature, or by time, the improvement shall inure to the benefit of the creditor;
(6) If it is improved at the expense of the debtor, he shall have no other right than that granted to the usufructuary.

295
Q

S sold to B his car. If before delivery — (1) the car is lost or destroyed without the fault of S (assuming S is not guilty of delay and there is no contrary stipulation
that he shall be liable), the obligation to deliver is?

(2) if the loss is through S’s fault?
(3) if the car suffers damages without the fault of S?
(4) if the damage was due to S’s fault?
(5) if the market value of the car increased?
(6) if S had the car painted and its seat cover changed at
his expense?

A
  1. Extinguished and B shall be obliged to pay the price if he has not paid the same.
  2. He shall be liable to pay damages to B
  3. B shall have to suffer the impairment
  4. may choose, between the rescission (cancellation) of the contract with damages or the delivery of the car also with damages
  5. the increase shall inure to the benefit of B inasmuch as he suffers the deterioration in case of a fortuitous event
  6. he shall have the rights of a usufructuary with respect to the improvements
296
Q

Art. 1163

A

Article 1163. Every person obliged to give something is also obliged to take care of it with the proper diligence of a good father of a family, unless the law or the stipulation of the parties requires another standard of care.

297
Q

Art. 1174

A

Article 1174. Except in cases expressly specified by the law, or when it is otherwise declared by stipulation, or when the nature of the obligation requires the assumption of risk, no person shall be responsible for those events which could not be foreseen, or which, though foreseen, were inevitable.

298
Q

RULES ON RISK OF LOSS AND DETERIORATION:

A

a. The thing sold is lost before perfection: Seller bears the loss.
b. The thing sold is lost at the time of perfection: Contract is void or inexistent.

c. The thing sold is lost after perfection, but before delivery:
GENERAL RULE: Who bears the risk of loss is governed by the stipulations in the contract
In the absence of any stipulation

First view: Buyer bears the loss as an exception
to the rule of res perit domino.

EXCEPTIONS:

  1. when object sold consists of fungible goods for a price fixed according to weight, number or measure
  2. seller is guilty of fraud, negligence, default or violation of contractual terms
  3. object sold is generic

Contrary view:
Where the ownership is transferred by delivery, as in our code, the application of the axiom res perit
domino, imposes the risk of loss upon the vendor; hence, if the thing is lost by fortuitous event before
delivery, the vendor suffers the loss and cannot recover the price from the vendee

d. The thing is lost after delivery: Buyer bears the loss.

299
Q

If one does not comply, the other need not pay?

A

True. But this only applies when the seller is able to deliver but does not.

300
Q

EFFECT OF LOSS AT THE TIME OF SALE:

A

a. Thing entirely lost at the time of perfection: Contract is void and inexistent
b. Thing only partially lost: Vendee may elect between withdrawing from the contract or demanding the
remaining part, paying its proportionate price

301
Q

D sold a second-hand car to E for P150,000.00 The agreement between D and E was that half of the purchase price, or P75,000.00, shall be paid upon delivery of the car to E and the balance of P75,000.00 shall be paid in five equal monthly installments of P15,000.00 each. The car was delivered to E, and E paid the amount of P75.000.00 to D. Less than one month thereafter, the car was stolen from E’s garage with no fault on E’s part and was never recovered. Is E legally bound to pay the said unpaid balance of P75.000.00? Explain your answer.

A

Yes, E is legally bound to pay the balance of P75,000.00. The ownership of the car sold was acquired by E from the moment it was delivered to him. Having acquired ownership, E bears the risk of the loss of the thing under the doctrine of res perit domino (Articles 1496. 1497,Civil Code).

302
Q

Effect of Loss of Thing Sold (Atty Prime Notes)

A
  1. If occurs prior to perfection - would-be seller bears the loss, being the owner of the thing (res perit domino).
  2. If loss occurs at perfection:
    a. If subject matter has been “entirely” lost, contract shall be without any effect (Art. 1493, NCC).
    b. If the subject matter has been lost in part only, the buyer may choose between:
    1) Withdrawing from the contract; or
    2) Demanding the remaining part, paying its price in proportion to the total sum agreed upon (Id.).
    c. In the case of sale of specific goods, and without the knowledge of the seller, the goods have perished in part or wholly or in a material part so deteriorated in quality as to be substantially changed in character, the buyer may at his option:
    1) Treat sale as avoided; or
    2) Treat sale as valid in all of the existing goods or in so much thereof as have not deteriorated, and as binding the buyer to pay the agreed price for the goods in which the ownership will pass, if the sale was divisible (Art. 1494, NCC).
  3. If loss occurs after perfection bur before delivery:
    a. Rule: In case of loss, deterioration or improvement of the thing before its delivery, the rules in Article 1189 shall be observed, the vendor being considered the debtor (Art. 1538, NCC). Hence —
    1) If lost without fault of vendor, obligation is extinguished.
    2) If lost thru fault of vendor, he is obliged to pay damages.
    3) If thing deteriorates without fault of vendor, impairment is borne by vendee.
    4) If it deteriorates thru fault of vendor, vendee may choose between rescission of obligation and its fulfillment, with indemnity for damages in either case.
    b. If loss without seller’s fault: Two views —
    1) First view: Seller is released from his obligation to deliver but buyer’s obligation to pay subsists (Paras, Vol. V (1990 ed.), 58; Padilla, Civil Code, 840-841). Hence, buyer bears the risk of loss.
    2) Second view: Counter-prestation is also extinguished (IV Tolentino, Civil Code, 1991 ed., 337). Hence, risk of loss is borne by seller and buyer need not pay the price.

Note: View of Tolentino is more just and equitable and in conformity with the principle of res perit domino. At any rate, the Supreme Court had the occasion to hold that after perfection but before delivery, the risk of loss is borne by the seller under the rule of res perit domino (Union Motors v. CA, 361 SCRA 506; Chrysler Philippines v. CA, 133 SCRA 567).

  1. If loss and deterioration occurs after delivery:
    a. Rule: When ownership over goods has been transferred to buyer, goods are buyer’s risk (Art. 1504, NCC).
    b. Exception:
    1) When delivery is made to buyer in pursuance of contract and ownership is retained by seller merely to secure performance of buyer’s obligations, goods are still at buyer’s risk from time of such delivery (Art. 1504, NCC).
    2) Where actual delivery is delayed thru fault of either buyer or seller, goods are at risk of party in fault (Art. 1504, NCC).
303
Q

Obligations of seller

A
  1. to transfer ownership and to deliver the thing which is the object of the sale
  2. to warrant the thing which is the object of the sale
  3. to deliver fruits and accessories
  4. if contract of sale covers determinate object, seller, upon perfection of contract, is obliged to preserve the thing to be delivered
304
Q

Sale is not a mode, but merely a title. Sale by itself does not transfer or affect ownership; the most that sales does is to create the obligation to transfer ownership. It is tradition or delivery, as a consequence of sale, that actually transfers ownership. T or F.

A

True.

305
Q

The critical factor in the different modes of effecting delivery which gives legal effect to the act, is the actual intention of the vendor to deliver, and its acceptance by the vendee. Without that intention, there is no tradition. T or F.

A

True.

306
Q

The vendee is bound to accept delivery and to pay the price of the thing sold at the time and place stipulated in the contract. T or F.

A

True.

307
Q

What if the time and place have been stipulated, when and where shall payment be made?

A

If the time and place should not have been stipulated, the payment must be made at the time and place of the delivery of the thing sold.

308
Q

Should the vendee be disturbed in the possession or ownership of the thing acquired, or should he have reasonable grounds to fear such disturbance, by a vindicatory action or a foreclosure of mortgage, he may suspend the payment of the price until the vendor has caused the disturbance or danger to cease, unless the latter gives security for the return of the price in a proper case, or it has been stipulated that, notwithstanding any such contingency, the vendee shall be bound to make the payment. A mere act of trespass shall not authorize the suspension of the payment of the price. T or F.

A

True.

309
Q

The vendee shall owe interest for the period between the delivery of the thing and the payment of the price, in the following three cases:

A

(1) Should it have been so stipulated;
(2) Should the thing sold and delivered produce fruits or income;
(3) Should he be in default, from the time of judicial or extrajudicial demand for the payment of the price.

310
Q

Art. 1584

A

Where goods are delivered to the buyer, which he has not previously examined, he is not deemed to have accepted them unless and until he has had a reasonable opportunity of examining them for the purpose of ascertaining whether they are in conformity with the contract if there is no stipulation to the contrary.

Unless otherwise agreed, when the seller tenders delivery of goods to the buyer, he is bound, on request, to afford the buyer a reasonable opportunity of examining the goods for the purpose of ascertaining whether they are in conformity with the contract.

Where goods are delivered to a carrier by the seller, in accordance with an order from or agreement with the buyer, upon the terms that the goods shall not be delivered by the carrier to the buyer until he has paid the price, whether such terms are indicated by marking the goods with the words “collect on delivery,” or otherwise, the buyer is not entitled to examine the goods before the payment of the price, in the absence of agreement or usage of trade permitting such examination.

311
Q

Art. 1481

A

In the contract of sale of goods by description or by sample, the contract may be rescinded if the bulk of the goods delivered do not correspond with the description or the sample, and if the contract be by sample as well as description, it is not sufficient that the bulk of goods correspond with the sample if they do not also correspond with the description.

The buyer shall have a reasonable opportunity of comparing the bulk with the description or the sample.

312
Q

Right to the fruits

A

Article 1537. The vendor is bound to deliver the thing sold and its accessions and accessories in the condition in which they were upon the perfection of the contract.

All the fruits shall pertain to the vendee from the day on which the contract was perfected.

Article 1164. The creditor has a right to the fruits of the thing from the time the obligation to deliver it arises. However, he shall acquire no real right over it until the same has been delivered to him.

313
Q

Unless otherwise agreed, the buyer of goods is not bound to accept delivery thereof by installments. T or F.

A

True.

Where there is a contract of sale of goods to be delivered by stated instalments, which are to be separately paid for, and the seller makes defective deliveries in respect of one or more instalments, or the buyer neglects or refuses without just cause to take delivery of or pay for one or more instalments, it depends in each case on the terms of the contract and the circumstances of the case, whether the breach of contract is so material as to justify the injured party in refusing to proceed further and suing for damages for breach of the entire contract, or whether the breach is severable, giving rise to a claim for compensation but not to a right to treat the whole contract as broken.

314
Q

Art. 1585

A

The buyer is deemed to have accepted the goods when he intimates to the seller that he has accepted them, or when the goods have been delivered to him, and he does any act in relation to them which is inconsistent with the ownership of the seller, or when, after the lapse of a reasonable time, he retains the goods without intimating to the seller that he has rejected them.

315
Q

Art. 1586

A

In the absence of express or implied agreement of the parties, acceptance of the goods by the buyer shall not discharge the seller from liability in damages or other legal remedy for breach of any promise or warranty in the contract of sale. But, if, after acceptance of the goods, the buyer fails to give notice to the seller of the breach in any promise of warranty within a reasonable time after the buyer knows, or ought to know of such breach, the seller shall not be liable therefor.

316
Q

Art. 1587

A

Unless otherwise agreed, where goods are delivered to the buyer, and he refuses to accept them, having the right so to do, he is not bound to return them to the seller, but it is sufficient if he notifies the seller that he refuses to accept them. If he voluntarily constitutes himself a depositary thereof, he shall be liable as such.

317
Q

Art. 1588

A

If there is no stipulation as specified in the first paragraph of article 1523, when the buyer’s refusal to accept the goods is without just cause, the title thereto passes to him from the moment they are placed at his disposal.

Article 1523. Where, in pursuance of a contract of sale, the seller is authorized or required to send the goods to the buyer, delivery of the goods to a carrier, whether named by the buyer or not, for the purpose of transmission to the buyer is deemed to be a delivery of the goods to the buyer, except in the cases provided for in article 1503, first, second and third paragraphs, or unless a contrary intent appears.

318
Q

Art. 1593

A

With respect to movable property, the rescission of the sale shall of right take place in the interest of the vendor, if the vendee, upon the expiration of the period fixed for the delivery of the thing, should not have appeared to receive it, or, having appeared, he should not have tendered the price at the same time, unless a longer period has been stipulated for its payment.

319
Q

Obligations of vendee

A
  1. payment of price

2. accepting the delivery of thing sold

320
Q

Rules on right of buyer to examine:

A

a. If not previously examined by buyer - if no stipulation to contrary, delivery is not deemed accepted unless buyer has reasonable opportunity to examine the delivered goods
b. Buyer has, upon request and unless there is contrary agreement, the right to examine the goods when seller tenders delivery of the same
c. If goods are delivered to carrier by seller upon terms that goods are not to be delivered by carrier to buyer until the latter has paid the price, buyer is not entitled to examine prior to payment of price, unless there is an agreement or usage of trade permitting such examination

321
Q

Circumstances indicating acceptance of goods

A

a. When buyer intimates to the seller that he has accepted them
b. When goods have been delivered to buyer and he does any act in relation to them which is inconsistent with the ownership of the seller
c. When, after the lapse of a reasonable time, buyer retains the goods without intimating to seller that he has rejected them

322
Q

Effect of acceptance on seller’s breach

A

a. Rule - seller remains liable for damages or other legal remedy for breach of any promise or warranty in the contract of sale, in the absence of agreement to the contrary.
b. But buyer must give notice to seller of such breach within a reasonable time after the buyer knows, or ought to know, of such breach; otherwise, seller is not liable

323
Q

Effect of refusal to accept delivery

A

a. If refusal is justified –
1. Buyer is not bound to return goods to seller but he must notify seller of his refusal;
2. If buyer voluntarily constitutes himself a depositary of goods, he shall be liable as such (Art. 1587, NCC).

b. If refusal is not justified, titled thereto passes to him from the moment goods are placed at his disposal (Art. 1588, NCC).

324
Q

Applicability of Maceda Law

A

Applies to sale or financing of real estate on installment payments, including residential condominium apartments. The MACEDA law applies to sale of real estate on installments, whether the contract be one of sale or one of contract to sell

325
Q

Maceda Law is not applicable to

A
  1. sale of industrial lots
  2. sale of commercial buildings
  3. sale of urban land covered by urban land reform and agricultural land under agrarian reform law
  4. sale of lands payable in straight terms
326
Q

RA 6552

A

AN ACT TO PROVIDE PROTECTION TO BUYERS OF REAL ESTATE ON INSTALLMENT PAYMENTS or Maceda Law or Realty Installment Buyer Act

327
Q

Coverage of Maceda Law

A

In all transactions or contracts involving the sale or financing of real estate on installment payments, including residential condominium apartments, where the buyer has paid at least two years of installments

EXCEPT

a. industrial lots
b. commercial buildings
c. sales to tenants under RA 3844, as amended by RA 6389

328
Q

Rights the buyer is entitled to in case he defaults in the payment of succeeding installments

A

a. To pay, without additional interest, the unpaid installments due within the total grace period earned by him which is hereby fixed at the rate of one month grace period for every one year of installment payments made: Provided, That this right shall be exercised by the buyer only once in every five years of the life of the contract and its extensions, if any.
b. If the contract is canceled, the seller shall refund to the buyer the cash surrender value of the payments on the property equivalent to fifty per cent of the total payments made, and, after five years of installments, an additional five per cent every year but not to exceed ninety per cent of the total payments made: Provided, That the actual cancellation of the contract shall take place after thirty days from receipt by the buyer of the notice of cancellation or the demand for rescission of the contract by a notarial act and upon full payment of the cash surrender value to the buyer.
* The buyer shall have the right to sell his rights or assign the same to another person or to reinstate the contract by updating the account during the grace period and before actual cancellation of the contract. The deed of sale or assignment shall be done by notarial act.

329
Q

Down payments, deposits or options on the contract shall be included in the computation of the total number of installment payments made. (Maceda Law) T or F.

A

True.

330
Q

In case where less than two years of installments were paid, the seller shall give the buyer ___

A

a grace period of not less than sixty days from the date the installment became due

If the buyer fails to pay the installments due at the expiration of the grace period, the seller may cancel the contract after thirty days from receipt by the buyer of the notice of cancellation or the demand for rescission of the contract by a notarial act.

331
Q

The buyer shall have the right to pay in advance any installment or the full unpaid balance of the purchase price any time without interest and to have such full payment of the purchase price annotated in the certificate of title covering the property. T or F.

A

True.

332
Q

Other term for Recto Law

A

Installment Sales Law

333
Q

In a contract of sale of personal property the price of which is payable in installments, the vendor may exercise any of the following remedies:

A

(1) Exact fulfillment of the obligation, should the vendee fail to pay;
(2) Cancel the sale, should the vendee’s failure to pay cover two or more installments;
(3) Foreclose the chattel mortgage on the thing sold, if one has been constituted, should the vendee’s failure to pay cover two or more installments. In this case, he shall have no further action against the purchaser to recover any unpaid balance of the price. Any agreement to the contrary shall be void.

**shall also be applied to contracts purporting to be leases of personal property with option to buy, when the lessor has deprived the lessee of the possession or enjoyment of the thing

**a stipulation that the installments or rents paid shall not be returned to the vendee or lessee shall be valid insofar as the same may not be unconscionable under the circumstances.

334
Q

Cash surrender value

A

the refund to the BUYER of the payments equivalent to fifty percent thereof and, after five years of installments, an additional five percent (5%) for every year but not to exceed ninety (90%) of the total payments made

335
Q

General rule in risk of loss or deterioration

A

Res perit domino (Art. 1504)

The thing perishes with the owner.

336
Q

A car was sold for P1,500,000. P750,000 was paid upon the execution of DOS. The balance payable on a monthly basis. The car was delivered to the buyer. However, before he could pay the balance, the car was destroyed due to a fortuitous event. Can he still be compelled to pay the balance?

A

Yes. Upon delivery of the car to the buyer, there being no retention of ownership by the seller, the buyer is still compelled to pay the balance because there is already a perfected contract of sale. Ownership passes automatically to the buyer.

337
Q

Exceptions to the general rule of res perit domino

A
  1. Lawyers Cooperative v. Tabora
    - intention of ownership on the part of the seller
  2. Delay in the delivery
    - due to one of the fault of the parties, whoever is at fault shall bear the risk
338
Q

The buyer and the seller may have agreed that the goods are to be obtained by the buyer at the warehouse of the seller on a specific date. On the date agreed upon, the seller demanded the buyer to get the goods. Despite such, the buyer failed to get the goods. On the next day, the warehouse was destroyed due to fortuitous event. Who is the owner at that time?

A

Seller. BUT Art. 1504&raquo_space; BUYER NA kasi may delay na. This is no longer fault of the seller because there is delay by buyer.

339
Q

If the seller was the one at fault because he was in delay in delivering the goods to the buyer, why would this be an exception to the res perit domino rule?

A
  • premise here is that ownership has already passed upon buyer but the goods are stll in possession of the seller (constructive delivery)
  • seller will bear risk of loss if he is at fault
340
Q

ART. 1504
General rule: if thing is lost by fortuitous event, risk of loss is borne by one who is in possession of such thing

Exception?

A

XPN: when seller reserves ownership merely to secure&raquo_space; ownership is transferred to buyer (yung sa case)
in case of delay, kung sino may fault, sya yung magbbear ng risk of loss

341
Q

S sold his horse to B for 15,000. No date or condition was stipulated. While still in possession of seller, horse gave birth. Who has the right over colt?

A

1164: buyer. All fruits will pertain to vendee Art. 1537 (2)

- perfected na kasi kaya si buyer na yung entitled sa fruits

342
Q

If buyer has paid for the thing already but before it could be delivered, it got lost by fortuitous event. Can he recover the payment?

A

No. THIS IS 1480 tho not 1504

343
Q

After perfection of the contract but before delivery of the thing, the thing got lost by fortuitous event. Can the seller compel the buyer to pay?

A

Yes, risk of loss by FE w/o seller’s fault is borne by buyer as XPN&raquo_space; buyer’s obligation to pay exists if he hasn’t paid yet. Still 1480 not 1504

344
Q

S sold his car to B. Unknown to both of them, the car was totally destroyed before they agreed on the sale. Is B liable for payment?

A

No. There is no valid contract of sale for lack of object. If the car was only partially destroyed, B may withdraw or demand for delivery and pay proportionate price.

345
Q

Sale of 100 cavans of rice at the price of P1,000 per cavan or in totality 100,000. If 60 cavans of rice were lost,

A

Buyer may withdraw without payment and delivery or pay.

If indivisible sya in agreement, P40,000 lang.

346
Q

Seller sold car to B

a. before delivery, car is lost without fault of S
b. before delivery, car is lost through fault of S
c. before delivery, car suffers damages without fault of S
d. before delivery, car suffers damages through S’s fault
e. if value increases

A

a. obligation to deliver is extinguished and B shall be obliged to pay if he hasn’t paid
b. he should pay damages to B
c. B shall bear payment of repair
d. pwede rescission with damages
e. at S’s expense, he shall have the right of usufructuary

347
Q

F sold a registered parcel of land to R who did not register the sale. Thereafter, F sold the very same parcel of land to C who registered and obtained a new TCT in his name. Who would have a better right?

A

It depends on WON C registered the sale in good faith. Registration is one of the reqs and good faith shall be an equally impt req. If the thing is sold twice, who would have a better right?&raquo_space; It depends. Depends on the object of sale if movable or real.

Article 1544. If the same thing should have been sold to different vendees, the ownership shall be transferred to the person who may have first taken possession thereof in good faith, if it should be movable property.

Should it be immovable property, the ownership shall belong to the person acquiring it who in good faith first recorded it in the Registry of Property.

Should there be no inscription, the ownership shall pertain to the person who in good faith was first in the possession; and, in the absence thereof, to the person who presents the oldest title, provided there is good faith.

348
Q

Sale of land to B who took physical possession but did not register. He is the first buyer. However, the seller (A) is a judgment debtor in one case to a certain creditor named C. The land became the subject of an execution sale. The buyer became C who registered the sale. Who would have a better right between C and B?

A

B. Kasi hindi registered under Torrens yung land. 1544 does not apply to unregistered lands.

Caruba v. CA

349
Q

It means he who is first in time is first in right or one who is prior in time has a superior right in law.

A

The maxim is qui prior est tempore potior est jure: he who is earlier in time is stronger in law.

possession and good faith pag movable?
pag immovable, first REGISTERED and in good faith, or oldest title in good faith if wala reg

350
Q

All the fruits shall pertain to the vendee from the day on which the contract was perfected. T or F.

A

True.

Article 1537. The vendor is bound to deliver the thing sold and its accessions and accessories in the condition in which they were upon the perfection of the contract.

All the fruits shall pertain to the vendee from the day on which the contract was perfected.

Article 1164. The creditor has a right to the fruits of the thing from the time the obligation to deliver it arises. However, he shall acquire no real right over it until the same has been delivered to him.

351
Q

Kinds of delivery (accdg to lecture)

A
  1. Incorporeal property (quasi-traditio)
    - A supposed or implied delivery of property from one to another
    - if in A’s possession na tapos binili nya, no need to deliver it back to B for B to deliver to him
  2. Corporeal property (traditio)
  3. Constructive
352
Q

With respect to incorporeal property, the provisions of the first paragraph of article 1498 shall govern. In any other case wherein said provisions are not applicable, the placing of the titles of ownership in the possession of the vendee or the use by the vendee of his rights, with the vendor’s consent, shall be understood as a delivery.

What is Art. 1498 (1)?

A

When the sale is made through a public instrument, the execution thereof shall be equivalent to the delivery of the thing which is the object of the contract, if from the deed the contrary does not appear or cannot clearly be inferred.

when that mode of delivery is not applicable, placing title on vendor or vendee or allowing vendee to by consent of vendor

353
Q

Problem: S owed B money and as security therefore delivered to B the title papers over 4 parcels of land. It was orally agreed that since S had no money, B was to have the land, permitting S to cultivate upon condition that, after deducing expenses, 1/2 of the products was to go to B. then S died and the 4 parcels were included in the inventory of the estate of S. B brought action to exclude them from the inventory. Is there delivery of the property in contemplation of law?

A

Yes. contract is valid kahit hindi in writing. delivery of titles effective mode of delivery of property itself. nasa case to

354
Q

TRADITIO or actual delivery

A

a. actual
b. constructive
i. delivery of keys (traditio symbolica) - keys or title of property
- by execution of a public instrument. 1498. movable and immovable. presumptive delivery. so it can be proven contrary. ex: a 3rd person is illegally occupying a property. deemed modified by torren’s system sec. 51 no deed shall take effect as a conveyance until its registration. PD 1529

ii. by consent (longa manu) - by pointing at property
- 1499. takes place by mere consent or agreement. pointing of hands. if the thing sold cannot be transferred to the possession of the vendee during such time of transaction.

iii. brevi manu
- when the vendee already has possession of the thing by virtue of another title as when the lessor sells the thing leased to the lessee. occurs by operation of law

iv. constitutum possessorium
- 1500. a mode of delivery in the opposite of brevi manu. when the vendor continues in possession of the property sold not as the owner but in some other capacity (ex: tenant) presumption na may consent na

355
Q

Other kinds of delivery

A

a. delivery to a common carrier: 1503(2-4), 1523, 1582&raquo_space; deemed delivery to the buyer xpn: bakit may 1505 bigla
b. quality/quantity: 1481, 1522, 1539-1543, 1630, 1632-1633

356
Q

The vendor shall be bound to deliver the thing sold, even if the vendee has not paid him the price, or if no period for the payment has been fixed in the contract. T or F.

A

False.

357
Q

Delivery to a common carrier

A

Article 1523. Where, in pursuance of a contract of sale, the seller is authorized or required to send the goods to the buyer, delivery of the goods to a carrier, whether named by the buyer or not, for the purpose of transmission to the buyer is deemed to be a delivery of the goods to the buyer, except in the cases provided for in article 1503, first, second and third paragraphs, or unless a contrary intent appears.

Unless otherwise authorized by the buyer, the seller must make such contract with the carrier on behalf of the buyer as may be reasonable, having regard to the nature of the goods and the other circumstances of the case. If the seller omit so to do, and the goods are lost or damaged in course of transit, the buyer may decline to treat the delivery to the carrier as a delivery to himself, or may hold the seller responsible in damages.

Unless otherwise agreed, where goods are sent by the seller to the buyer under circumstances in which the seller knows or ought to know that it is usual to insure, the seller must give such notice to the buyer as may enable him to insure them during their transit, and, if the seller fails to do so, the goods shall be deemed to be at his risk during such transit. (n)

Article 1503. When there is a contract of sale of specific goods, the seller may, by the terms of the contract, reserve the right of possession or ownership in the goods until certain conditions have been fulfilled. The right of possession or ownership may be thus reserved notwithstanding the delivery of the goods to the buyer or to a carrier or other bailee for the purpose of transmission to the buyer.

Where goods are shipped, and by the bill of lading the goods are deliverable to the seller or his agent, or to the order of the seller or of his agent, the seller thereby reserves the ownership in the goods. But, if except for the form of the bill of lading, the ownership would have passed to the buyer on shipment of the goods, the seller’s property in the goods shall be deemed to be only for the purpose of securing performance by the buyer of his obligations under the contract.

Where goods are shipped, and by the bill of lading the goods are deliverable to order of the buyer or of his agent, but possession of the bill of lading is retained by the seller or his agent, the seller thereby reserves a right to the possession of the goods as against the buyer.

Where the seller of goods draws on the buyer for the price and transmits the bill of exchange and bill of lading together to the buyer to secure acceptance or payment of the bill of exchange, the buyer is bound to return the bill of lading if he does not honor the bill of exchange, and if he wrongfully retains the bill of lading he acquires no added right thereby. If, however, the bill of lading provides that the goods are deliverable to the buyer or to the order of the buyer, or is indorsed in blank, or to the buyer by the consignee named therein, one who purchases in good faith, for value, the bill of lading, or goods from the buyer will obtain the ownership in the goods, although the bill of exchange has not been honored, provided that such purchaser has received delivery of the bill of lading indorsed by the consignee named therein, or of the goods, without notice of the facts making the transfer wrongful. (n)

358
Q

Article 1522. Where the seller delivers to the buyer a quantity of goods less than he contracted to sell, the buyer may reject them, but if the buyer accepts or retains the goods so delivered, knowing that the seller is not going to perform the contract in full, he must pay for them at the contract rate. If, however, the buyer has used or disposed of the goods delivered before he knows that the seller is not going to perform his contract in full, the buyer shall not be liable for more than the fair value to him of the goods so received.

Where the seller delivers to the buyer a quantity of goods larger than he contracted to sell, the buyer may accept the goods included in the contract and reject the rest. If the buyer accepts the whole of the goods so delivered he must pay for them at the contract rate.

Where the seller delivers to the buyer the goods he contracted to sell mixed with goods of a different description not included in the contract, the buyer may accept the goods which are in accordance with the contract and reject the rest.

In the preceding two paragraphs, if the subject matter is indivisible, the buyer may reject the whole of the goods.

The provisions of this article are subject to any usage of trade, special agreement, or course of dealing between the parties.

A

Oki

359
Q

If the sale of real estate should be made with a statement of its area, at the rate of a certain price for a unit of measure or number, the vendor shall be obliged to deliver to the vendee, if the latter should demand it, all that may have been stated in the contract; but, should this be not possible…

A

the vendee may choose between a proportional reduction of the price and the rescission of the contract, provided that, in the latter case, the lack in the area be not less than one-tenth of that stated.

The same shall be done, even when the area is the same, if any part of the immovable is not of the quality specified in the contract.

The rescission, in this case, shall only take place at the will of the vendee, when the inferior value of the thing sold exceeds one-tenth of the price agreed upon.

Nevertheless, if the vendee would not have bought the immovable had he known of its smaller area of inferior quality, he may rescind the sale.

Art. 1539

Article 1540. If, in the case of the preceding article, there is a greater area or number in the immovable than that stated in the contract, the vendee may accept the area included in the contract and reject the rest. If he accepts the whole area, he must pay for the same at the contract rate.

Article 1542. In the sale of real estate, made for a lump sum and not at the rate of a certain sum for a unit of measure or number, there shall be no increase or decrease of the price, although there be a greater or less area or number than that stated in the contract.

The same rule shall be applied when two or more immovables as sold for a single price; but if, besides mentioning the boundaries, which is indispensable in every conveyance of real estate, its area or number should be designated in the contract, the vendor shall be bound to deliver all that is included within said boundaries, even when it exceeds the area or number specified in the contract; and, should he not be able to do so, he shall suffer a reduction in the price, in proportion to what is lacking in the area or number, unless the contract is rescinded because the vendee does not accede to the failure to deliver what has been stipulated.

Article 1543. The actions arising from articles 1539 and 1542 shall prescribe in six months, counted from the day of delivery.

360
Q

1,000 pairs of shoes but seller delivered 1,200 can the buyer reject everything?

A

NO. he has the right to reject only the excess but he can be compelled to accept 1,000. what if 800 lang nadeliver, can the buyer be compelled to receive it? NO. partial performance is not a performance at all. what if same quantity pero may kahalong ibang brand. YES buyer may reject. if goods indivisible each sack may mix. pero if divisible, he may be compelled to accept yung brand na agreed upon and reject the rest.

361
Q

sale of realty: 1542&raquo_space; the sale of parcel of land and price agreed upon is 1M. the actual area deliver was only 95sqm not 100sqm. what would be the remedy?

A

specific performance if the seller is still in the position to deliver the balance. proportional reduction pwede? it depends. it is a sale with a statement or lump sum. rescission? no. it would only be a remedy if the area is lacking more than 10% of that area agreed upon.

362
Q

Apart from any such contract, express or implied, or usage of trade to the contrary, the place of delivery is

A

the seller’s place of business if he has one, and if not his residence; but in case of a contract of sale of specific goods, which to the knowledge of the parties when the contract or the sale was made were in some other place, then that place is the place of delivery.

363
Q

Where by a contract of sale the seller is bound to send the goods to the buyer, but no time for sending them is fixed, the seller is bound to send them when?

A

within a reasonable time

364
Q

Article 1525. The seller of goods is deemed to be an unpaid seller within the meaning of this Title:

A

(1) When the whole of the price has not been paid or tendered;
(2) When a bill of exchange or other negotiable instrument has been received as conditional payment, and the condition on which it was received has been broken by reason of the dishonor of the instrument, the insolvency of the buyer, or otherwise.

In articles 1525 to 1535 the term “seller” includes an agent of the seller to whom the bill of lading has been indorsed, or a consignor or agent who has himself paid, or is directly responsible for the price, or any other person who is in the position of a seller.

365
Q

The vendor is not bound to deliver the thing sold in case the vendee should lose the right to make use of the terms as provided in article 1198.

Article 1198. The debtor shall lose every right to make use of the period:

(1) When after the obligation has been contracted, he becomes insolvent, unless he gives a guaranty or security for the debt;
(2) When he does not furnish to the creditor the guaranties or securities which he has promised;
(3) When by his own acts he has impaired said guaranties or securities after their establishment, and when through a fortuitous event they disappear, unless he immediately gives new ones equally satisfactory;
(4) When the debtor violates any undertaking, in consideration of which the creditor agreed to the period;
(5) When the debtor attempts to abscond.

T or F.

A

True. Art. 1536

366
Q

The debtor shall lose every right to make use of the period:

A

(1) When after the obligation has been contracted, he becomes insolvent, unless he gives a guaranty or security for the debt;
(2) When he does not furnish to the creditor the guaranties or securities which he has promised;
(3) When by his own acts he has impaired said guaranties or securities after their establishment, and when through a fortuitous event they disappear, unless he immediately gives new ones equally satisfactory;
(4) When the debtor violates any undertaking, in consideration of which the creditor agreed to the period;
(5) When the debtor attempts to abscond.

367
Q

may buyer be considered in delay if the buyer refuses to accept if there is no place stipulated in the contract?

A

it depends. determine muna if determinate or generic. if determinate, it will be the place where the thing is located at the time of the perfection of the contract. (1251) if generic, the seller’s place of business or residence. if there is no stipulation, seller cannot be compelled to deliver. what if at the time of the perfection of a determinate thing, the thing was in transit? it depends on the shipping arrangement of the parties.
- what really determines the place of the object? intention of the parties as to the place of delivery as to the manner of payment. so kung san payment dun din presumed yung place of delivery.

368
Q

Period vs. Term vs. Condition

A

Period and term interchangeable
Period - future and certain event
Condition - future and uncertain event

369
Q

when is the seller not bound to deliver?

A
  1. not bound to sell if he loses the right to use term. 1198.
370
Q

Article 1169. Those obliged to deliver or to do something incur in delay from the time the obligee judicially or extrajudicially demands from them the fulfillment of their obligation.

However, the demand by the creditor shall not be necessary in order that delay may exist:

A

(1) When the obligation or the law expressly so declare; or
(2) When from the nature and the circumstances of the obligation it appears that the designation of the time when the thing is to be delivered or the service is to be rendered was a controlling motive for the establishment of the contract; or
(3) When demand would be useless, as when the obligor has rendered it beyond his power to perform.

In reciprocal obligations, neither party incurs in delay if the other does not comply or is not ready to comply in a proper manner with what is incumbent upon him. From the moment one of the parties fulfills his obligation, delay by the other begins.

371
Q

Article 1562. In a sale of goods, there is an implied warranty or condition as to the quality or fitness of the goods, as follows:

A

(1) Where the buyer, expressly or by implication, makes known to the seller the particular purpose for which the goods are acquired, and it appears that the buyer relies on the seller’s skill or judgment (whether he be the grower or manufacturer or not), there is an implied warranty that the goods shall be reasonably fit for such purpose;
(2) Where the goods are brought by description from a seller who deals in goods of that description (whether he be the grower or manufacturer or not), there is an implied warranty that the goods shall be of merchantable quality.

372
Q

In the case of contract of sale of a specified article under its patent or other trade name, there is no warranty as to its fitness for any particular purpose, unless there is a stipulation to the contrary. T or F.

A

True.

373
Q

In the case of a contract of sale by sample, if the seller is a dealer in goods of that kind, there is an implied warranty that the goods shall be free from any defect rendering them unmerchantable which would not be apparent on reasonable examination of the sample. T or F.

A

True.

374
Q

The vendor is responsible to the vendee for any hidden faults or defects in the thing sold, even though he was not aware thereof. T or F.

A

True.

This provision shall not apply if the contrary has been stipulated, and the vendor was not aware of the hidden faults or defects in the thing sold.

375
Q

Remedy for breach of warranty against defect

A

In the cases of articles 1561, 1562, 1564, 1565 and 1566, the vendee may elect between withdrawing from the contract and demanding a proportionate reduction of the price, with damages in either case.

376
Q

Art. 1629

A

In case the assignor in good faith should have made himself responsible for the solvency of the debtor, and the contracting parties should not have agreed upon the duration of the liability, it shall last for one year only, from the time of the assignment if the period had already expired.

If the credit should be payable within a term or period which has not yet expired, the liability shall cease one year after the maturity.

377
Q

One who sells for a lump sum the whole of certain rights, rents, or products, shall comply by answering for the legitimacy of the whole in general; but he shall not be obliged to warrant each of the various parts of which it may be composed, except in the case of eviction from the whole or the part of greater value. T or F.

A

True.

378
Q

Article 1546. Any affirmation of fact or any promise by the seller relating to the thing is an express warranty if the natural tendency of such affirmation or promise is to induce the buyer to purchase the same, and if the buyer purchases the thing relying thereon. No affirmation of the value of the thing, nor any statement purporting to be a statement of the seller’s opinion only, shall be construed as a warranty, unless the seller made such affirmation or statement as an expert and it was relied upon by the buyer.

A

Oki :)

379
Q

if you buy my car, your crush will fall in love with you. is that warranty?

A

No. love is an emotion not the quality, character or title of the thing. affirmation must pertain to the thing itself.

380
Q

10 sacks of rice, guaranteed na walang fertilizer na ginamit. warranty?

A

Yes, express warranty.

381
Q

seller said this is the best banana in the whole world. warranty?

A

depends.

382
Q

A sold land to B for 1M. As agreed, 100k will be paid upon signing of the DOS. The balance to be paid within 30 days from the time squatters of the land are evicted. If within 6 months, the squatters were not evicted, the seller will return the 100k. Also, within the 6-month period, the value of the land will be doubled. Despite the filing of an eviction suit by the seller and the lapse of the 6-month period, the squatters remained. The seller offers to retun the 100k, but the buyer refused to accept the 100k and told the seller that he will still buy the land. So the buyer offered to pay the balance of 900k and demanded that a DOS be executed by the seller. The seller refused to accept the 900k. What he did is to file an action to rescind the contract. Would the action prosper?

A

NO. Only the aggrieved party can invoke rescission.

383
Q

The usual exaggerations in trade, when the other party had an opportunity to know the facts, are not in themselves fraudulent. T or F.

A

True.

384
Q

A mere expression of an opinion does not signify fraud. T or F.

A

True.

unless made by an expert and the other party has relied on the former’s special knowledge

385
Q

Misrepresentation made in good faith is not fraudulent but may constitute error. T or F.

A

True.

386
Q

Opinions are not counted as warranty unless

A

Experty ka

387
Q

Is dealer’s talk warranty?

A

dealer’s talk&raquo_space; cannot be used as express warranty. pero allowed yung kunyari this powder will make your cloth as white as cotton tapos naprove. be careful. exaggerate orally only not in writing.
- false representation

388
Q

Same problem. WON what was imputed in the contract is a warranty or condition yung removal of the squatters in the area.

A

eviction is a condition, not a warranty. because it is an operative act. seller’s failure to comply does not mean failure of contract because buyer may cancel contract or waive such right na lang. eviction must not prejudice the occupants.

389
Q

Implied warranties (1547)

A

a. if the seller has the right to sell thing at the time when ownership is to pass 1547 (1)
b. warranty against eviction (1548)
c. 1561 warranty against hidden defects
d. warranty as fitness and merchantability 1562

390
Q

It is immaterial won seller knew warranty is t or f. T or F.

A

True. natural element of a contract yan.

391
Q

Exceptions to warranty

A
  1. as is where is clause. the vendor makes no warranty to the quality of the goods. does not apply to liens or encumbrances that cannot be disclosed by mere physical inspection or was unknown to vendee
  2. second-hand articles. xpn: if the vendor issues a certification that the item is in good condition. express warranty na yun.
  3. sale by authority or fact of law. when the sheriff sells a property of the judgment-debtor. the court will never warrant the item being sold. any action in breach of warranty must be taken against the judgment-debtor
  4. property sold in auction by tax delinquency. same as 3.
392
Q

If the seller was able to transfer ownership to the buyer, may the seller nonetheless be held liable for beach of warranty against eviction?

A

YES. obligation to transfer ownership and obligation to warrant the thing (in contract of sales).

393
Q

Mere trespassing cannot be remedied by warranty against eviction. T or F.

A

True. Pwede kasi damages lang yun.

394
Q

When adverse possession had been commenced before the sale but the prescriptive period is completed after the transfer, the vendor shall not be liable for eviction. T or F.

A

True.

effect of prescription: if the sale was consummated before transfer, all elements of prescription have been performed, vendor is liable for warranty against eviction EXCEPT vendee knowing of the prescription still proceeded with the sale (estoppel)
if the sale was consummated after transfer, vendor is not liable for WAE.

395
Q

If the property is sold for nonpayment of taxes due and not made known to the vendee before the sale, the vendor is liable for eviction. T or F.

A

True.

396
Q

The judgment debtor is also responsible for eviction in judicial sales, unless it is otherwise decreed in the judgment. T or F.

A

True.

397
Q

In sale by authority of law or in execution sale, can there be breach of warranty against eviction?

A

YES. sa judgment-debtor

398
Q

Under a contract of sale, S delivered and installed in B’s establishment a refrigerating machine. The machine was in perfect accord with the description made in the contract but it did not give the result expected by B. S brought action to recover the balance of the purchase price. B refused to pay the remaining balance. Is B liable to pay the remaining balance?

A

No. The inability of B to use the machine satisfactorily cannot be attributed to the machine’s defect nor S’s fault because specifications lang yung nasa contract? Balance should not be given.

399
Q

Waiver of liability

A

1553 - void if act is in bad faith. both vendee and vendor dapat. otherwise, in pari delicto. in seller was in good faith, xpn is valid but without prejudice to 1554. if seller was in bad faith, stipulation is void.

400
Q

1554 two instances to waive right

A

a. consciente - without knowledge of risk of eviction. value at time of eviction shall be returned. solutio indebiti
b. intencionada - with knowledge of risk of eviction. nothing should be returned. aleatory contract. buyer assumes consequences of his actions.

401
Q

Every warranty is presumed consiente unless otherwise stipulated. T or F.

A

True. Less onerous for the buyer kase.

402
Q

Even if there is no specific waiver, the buyer cannot take refuge on the warranty against eviction when he purchases the land fully aware of a claim by third party on the title to the land and who was in actual possession thereof; one who cannot show that he is a buyer in good faith, is not entitled to the waiver. T or F.

A

True. (Tuazon v. CA)

403
Q

Article 1555. When the warranty has been agreed upon or nothing has been stipulated on this point, in case eviction occurs, the vendee shall have the right to demand of the vendor:

A

(1) The return of the value which the thing sold had at the time of the eviction, be it greater or less than the price of the sale;
(2) The income or fruits, if he has been ordered to deliver them to the party who won the suit against him;
(3) The costs of the suit which caused the eviction, and, in a proper case, those of the suit brought against the vendor for the warranty;
(4) The expenses of the contract, if the vendee has paid them;
(5) The damages and interests, and ornamental expenses, if the sale was made in bad faith.

404
Q

Why is rescission not a remedy in case of total eviction?

A

Remedy contemplates that the one demanding has the capacity to return whatever he has received under the contract. in this case, if total eviction, ano pa mababalik sa seller? kasi totally evicted na eh.
- if partial sana pwede.

alternative: enforcement of warranty

Effect of rescission: no encumbrances to the property dapat.

405
Q

Article 1556. Should the vendee lose, by reason of the eviction, a part of the thing sold of such importance, in relation to the whole, that he would not have bought it without said part, he may demand the rescission of the contract; but with the obligation to return the thing without other encumbrances that those which it had when he acquired it.

He may exercise this right of action, instead of enforcing the vendor’s liability for eviction.

The same rule shall be observed when two or more things have been jointly sold for a lump sum, or for a separate price for each of them, if it should clearly appear that the vendee would not have purchased one without the other.

A

Ok :)

Effect of enforcement: 1556 (1)

406
Q

The warranty cannot be enforced until a final judgment has been rendered, whereby the vendee loses the thing acquired or a part thereof. T or F.

A

True.

407
Q

The vendor shall not be obliged to make good the proper warranty, unless he is summoned in the suit for eviction at the instance of the vendee. T or F.

A

True.

408
Q

The defendant vendee shall ask, within the time fixed in the Rules of Court for answering the complaint, that the vendor be made a co-defendant. T or F.

A

True.

Parties 1559 seller as co-defendant with buyer. seller has the right to be notified of pending suit against him. if seller was notified but did not appear, buyer has already won the suit. can the buyer recover expenses? no kasi wala naman breach of warranty.

409
Q

Why is it necessary to summon seller for eviction of buyer or enforcement of warranty?

A

preparation for the suit itself. it is immaterial won seller has good defense. summons must nevertheless be given and buyer has done his part. notice must be for suit of eviction not breach of warranty.

410
Q

Hidden Defects
Article 1560. If the immovable sold should be encumbered with any non-apparent burden or servitude, not mentioned in the agreement, of such a nature that it must be presumed that the vendee would not have acquired it had he been aware thereof, he may ask for the rescission of the contract, unless he should prefer the appropriate indemnity. Neither right can be exercised if the non-apparent burden or servitude is recorded in the Registry of Property, unless there is an express warranty that the thing is free from all burdens and encumbrances.

Within one year, to be computed from the execution of the deed, the vendee may bring the action for rescission, or sue for damages.

One year having elapsed, he may only bring an action for damages within an equal period, to be counted from the date on which he discovered the burden or servitude.

A

Ok :)

Requisites:

Article 1561. The vendor shall be responsible for warranty against the hidden defects which the thing sold may have, should they render it unfit for the use for which it is intended, or should they diminish its fitness for such use to such an extent that, had the vendee been aware thereof, he would not have acquired it or would have given a lower price for it; but said vendor shall not be answerable for patent defects or those which may be visible, or for those which are not visible if the vendee is an expert who, by reason of his trade or profession, should have known them.

411
Q

When do you call upon hidden defects?

A
  1. there must be grave or important defect
  2. defect is hidden
  3. defect present at the time of execution of the sale and not before or after
  4. no waiver of warranty against hidden defects
412
Q

In a sale of goods, there is an implied warranty or condition as to the quality or fitness of the goods, as follows:

A

(1) Where the buyer, expressly or by implication, makes known to the seller the particular purpose for which the goods are acquired, and it appears that the buyer relies on the seller’s skill or judgment (whether he be the grower or manufacturer or not), there is an implied warranty that the goods shall be reasonably fit for such purpose;
(2) Where the goods are brought by description from a seller who deals in goods of that description (whether he be the grower or manufacturer or not), there is an implied warranty that the goods shall be of merchantable quality.

413
Q

As a general rule, no implied warranty in goods as to their fitness for any particular purpose they were acquired. xpn: implied warranty on fitness

A
  1. kunyari sinabi ni buyer talaga kay seller kung san gagamitin yung goods
  2. buyer relied on seller’s judgment
  3. occupation of seller is important justification
414
Q

If the thing, which has a hidden defect, was lost or destroyed, can the vendee hold the vendor liable for this breach of warranty? Does it matter if the loss was due to a fortuitous event or maybe the loss was due to the fault of the buyer himself, nonetheless, can he hold the vendor liable?

A
  • Yes. against hidden defect kahit due to fe or fault ni vendee. but if the cause of loss is the defect itself, liability is greater. extent of liability of the vendor&raquo_space; determine the cause first. Was the vendor aware of the defect? If oo, damages may be recovered. If no, cannot be held liable pero pwede sa interest. if the defect was cause of lost, vendor is liable to return price + damages?. if vendor was not aware of defects, price itself lang. if fe, vendor will be held liable for price less the value.
415
Q

Easement

A

a right to cross or otherwise use someone else’s land for a specified purpose

Nonapparent easements are those which show no external indication of their existence.

416
Q

Would there be an encumbrance over an immovable, which is a form of easement or servitude?

A

Yes. Easement for right of way.

417
Q

If the buyer bought the land which turned out to have a road right of way in favor of a third person, can he claim breach of warranty against any charge or non-apparent encumbrance?

A

search pls

418
Q

If there is an encumbrance, what are the remedies of the buyer?

A
  • reduction of the price
  • rescission
  • if he became aware after a year pa lang, action for damages pwede. kaso dapat within a year since knowledge.
419
Q

Merchantability vs. Fitness

A

M: the goods purchased are reasonably fit for the general purposes for which they are sold
F: warranty that the goods are suitable for a particular or special purpose disclosed by the buyer which will not be satisfied by the mere fitness of the goods for general purpose

420
Q

Kinds of warranty against hidden defects

A

Warranty of fitness
Warranty of Merchantability
Warranty of Quality

421
Q

B went to Western Motors, Inc. to buy a car. After he was shown different car models, he chose a Cougar car. B intended to enter the car in a race. B lost the race. B sued the company for breach of warranty as to fitness. Will the case prosper?

A

It depends. If the car should not run as fast as expected, they will not be liable because B relied on his own judgment. If di nya naman ininform yung WMI. Pero kung alam ni seller beforehand yung purpose ni B, S has to provide info. breach of warranty if hindi sya nagprovide.

422
Q

Why is the seller responsible for hidden defects even if he is in good faith?

A
  1. Because of repair in the damage done. Object of the law is reparation, not punishment.
423
Q

Seller and buyer agreed that seller would be exempted from hidden defects. But seller knew of hidden defects. Would seller be liable?

A

Yes because of his bad faith.

424
Q

accion redhibitoria

A

Accion redhibitoria is the remedy of buyer to withdraw or cancel the sale because the item sold has defect and is not known by the buyer when he bought it. The buyer can return the item he bought and get the money he paid to the seller.

425
Q

accion quanti minoris

A

QUANTI MINORIS. The name of a particular action in Louisiana. An action quanti minoris is one brought for the reduction of the price of a thing sold, in consequence of defects in the thing which is the object of the sale.

426
Q

In the sale of animals with redhibitory defects, the vendee shall also enjoy the right mentioned in article 1567; but he must make use thereof within the same period which has been fixed for the exercise of the redhibitory action.

1567&raquo_space;

A

In the cases of articles 1561, 1562, 1564, 1565 and 1566, the vendee may elect between withdrawing from the contract and demanding a proportionate reduction of the price, with damages in either case.

427
Q

Article 1568. If the thing sold should be lost in consequence of the hidden faults, and the vendor was aware of them, he shall bear the loss, and shall be obliged to return the price and refund the expenses of the contract, with damages. If he was not aware of them, he shall only return the price and interest thereon, and reimburse the expenses of the contract which the vendee might have paid. (1487a)

Article 1569. If the thing sold had any hidden fault at the time of the sale, and should thereafter be lost by a fortuitous event or through the fault of the vendee, the latter may demand of the vendor the price which he paid, less the value which the thing had when it was lost.

If the vendor acted in bad faith, he shall pay damages to the vendee.

A

1568 vs. 1569
Bad faith vs. Good faith

bf: vendor bears loss
gf: vendor bears loss

bf: vendor returns the price
gf: vendor returns the price paid with interest

bf: vendor refunds the expenses of the contract
gf: vendor reimburses expenses of the contract paid by the vendee

bf: vendor is liable for damages

428
Q

B purchased a 53-inch television from S at the price of P250,000 which was paid in full. The television has hidden defects, the repair of which will cost P50,000. The television, however, was lost through fortutious event. At the time of the loss, the television is worth P200,000. S is liable to refund B the sum of P50,000. What right, and to what extent, if any, has B have against seller? Reason.

A

take into consideration amount. Approx 175,000 purchase price - true value. S knew of the defect kasi eh.

429
Q

If one of the animals has redhibitory defect, can the buyer rescind the entire contract pertaining to all the animals?

A

It depends. General rule: no. yung mismong animal lang, not the entire. Xpn: if he can prove that he would not have bought the other animal if he had known of one defect.

430
Q

Redhibitory defect

A

a redhibitory defect is a hidden defect that prevents a product from performing the task for which it was purchased

431
Q

Who has the burden of proof that he would not have bought the others had he known of the defect of one?

A

normally buyer. pero law provided that this is presumed by the buyer na. usually nangyayari to pag by pairs yung binibili. ex boy and girl pig to breed them.

432
Q

There is no warranty against hidden defects of animals sold at fairs or at public auctions, or of live stock sold as condemned. T or F.

A

True.

433
Q

The sale of animals suffering from contagious diseases shall be void. T or F.

A

True.

A contract of sale of animals shall also be void if the use or service for which they are acquired has been stated in the contract, and they are found to be unfit therefor.

434
Q

If the hidden defect of animals, even in case a professional inspection has been made, should be of such a nature that expert knowledge is not sufficient to discover it, the defect shall be considered as redhibitory. T or F.

A

True.

But if the veterinarian, through ignorance or bad faith should fail to discover or disclose it, he shall be liable for damages.

435
Q

Article 1577. The redhibitory action, based on the faults or defects of animals, must be brought within _____ from the date of their delivery to the vendee.

This action can only be exercised with respect to faults and defects which are determined by law or by local customs.

A

40 days

436
Q

If the animal should die within three days after its purchase, the vendor shall be liable if the disease which cause the death existed at the time of the contract. T or F.

A

True.

437
Q

If the sale be rescinded, the animal shall be returned in the condition in which it was sold and delivered, the vendee being answerable for any injury due to his negligence, and not arising from the redhibitory fault or defect. T or F.

A

True.

438
Q

On Jan. 5, A sold and delivered his truck, together with the corresponding certificate of public convenience to B for the sum of P60,000, payable within 60 days. 2 weeks after the sale, and while the certificate of public convenience was still in the name of A, it (the certificate) was revoked by the Public Service Commission thru no fault of A. Upon the expiration of the 60-day period, A demanded payment of the price from B. B refused to pay, alleging that the contract of sale was VOID for the reason that the certificate of public convenience which was the main consideration of the sale no longer existed. Is the contention of B tenable? Reasons.

A

Article 1582. The vendee is bound to accept delivery and to pay the price of the thing sold at the time and place stipulated in the contract.

If the time and place should not have been stipulated, the payment must be made at the time and place of the delivery of the thing sold.

439
Q

why is buyer not bound to accept delivery by installment?

A

Article 1233. A debt shall not be understood to have been paid unless the thing or service in which the obligation consists has been completely delivered or rendered, as the case may be.

440
Q

Manifestation of acceptance

A

express communication or act

441
Q

Does law only accept express acceptance?

A

No. Pwede din implied.

442
Q

Kind of sale that after a lapse of time becomes a varied one.

A

sale or return.

443
Q

Article 1586. In the absence of express or implied agreement of the parties, acceptance of the goods by the buyer shall not discharge the seller from liability in damages or other legal remedy for breach of any promise or warranty in the contract of sale. But, if, after acceptance of the goods, the buyer fails to give notice to the seller of the breach in any promise of warranty within a reasonable time after the buyer knows, or ought to know of such breach, the seller shall not be liable therefor.

A

pag ka accept ni buyer, liable parin si seller sa breach ng warranty

444
Q

What is sale on trial 1502 (2)?

A

Article 1502. When goods are delivered to the buyer “on sale or return” to give the buyer an option to return the goods instead of paying the price, the ownership passes to the buyer on delivery, but he may revest the ownership in the seller by returning or tendering the goods within the time fixed in the contract, or, if no time has been fixed, within a reasonable time. (n)

When goods are delivered to the buyer on approval or on trial or on satisfaction, or other similar terms, the ownership therein passes to the buyer:

(1) When he signifies his approval or acceptance to the seller or does any other act adopting the transaction;
(2) If he does not signify his approval or acceptance to the seller, but retains the goods without giving notice of rejection, then if a time has been fixed for the return of the goods, on the expiration of such time, and, if no time has been fixed, on the expiration of a reasonable time. What is a reasonable time is a question of fact. (n)

445
Q

A buyer is not bound to return goods to seller, and mere notice to seller is sufficient as refusal. T or F.

A

True.

But when the buyer’s refusal to accept the goods is without just cause, the title thereto passes to him from the moment they are placed at his disposal.

446
Q

Article 1593. With respect to movable property, the rescission of the sale shall of right take place in the interest of the vendor, if the vendee, upon the expiration of the period fixed for the delivery of the thing, should not have appeared to receive it, or, having appeared, he should not have tendered the price at the same time, unless a longer period has been stipulated for its payment.

when does this provision apply?

A

when there is no delivery yet
what if may delivery na?&raquo_space; dapat favorable sa vendor. rescission is allowed. general rule: no extrajudicial rescission of a contract.
1191 affirmative action on the part of the parties&raquo_space; not an automatic right. there must be a judicial act before rescission can take place.

447
Q

Payment of Price

A
  1. Payment shall be made to the person in whose favor the obligation has been constituted, or his successor in interest, or any person authorized to receive it.&raquo_space; so pwede din sa agent
448
Q

What if payment was made to a third person?

A
  1. Payment made to a third person shall also be valid insofar as it has redounded to the benefit of the creditor.
449
Q

Payment shall be made in the place designated in the obligation. T or F.

A

True.

There being no express stipulation and if the undertaking is to deliver a determinate thing, the payment shall be made wherever the thing might be at the moment the obligation was constituted.

In any other case the place of payment shall be the domicile of the debtor.

If the debtor changes his domicile in bad faith or after he has incurred in delay, the additional expenses shall be borne by him.

These provisions are without prejudice to venue under the Rules of Court.

450
Q

S sold and delivered to B a parcel of land for 2M payable within 30 days from the date of contract. Soon after the sale, X claims ownership over the land by virtue of a prescriptive title. May B suspend the payment of price? Why?

A

Search and think please.

In the problem, if in order to avoid trouble, B pays off X to settle the latter’s claim to the land, may B recover
- He cannot recover property??

451
Q

X sold a parcel of land to Y on Jan 1, 2002. Payment and delivery to be made on Feb 1, 2002. It was stipulated that if payment were not to be made by Y on Feb 1, 2002, the sale between the parties would automatically be rescinded. Y failed to pay on Feb 1 2002 but offered to pay 3 dats later, which payment X refused to accept, claiming that their contract of sale had already been rescinded. Is X’s contention correct? Why?

A

Article 1592. In the sale of immovable property, even though it may have been stipulated that upon failure to pay the price at the time agreed upon the rescission of the contract shall of right take place, the vendee may pay, even after the expiration of the period, as long as no demand for rescission of the contract has been made upon him either judicially or by a notarial act. After the demand, the court may not grant him a new term.

452
Q

On July 1, A sold B a piece of land, payment and delivery to be made on July 15. It was stipulated that should payment not be made on July 15, the contract would automatically be rescinded. On July 20, can B still pay?

A

Search

453
Q

If the installemnt buyer were to delay payment for several installments, and later sell th property to another buyer with the consent of the Subdivision, can the subdivision still make use of the forfeiture clause even as against the new buyer, if said new buyer should also fail to pay the installment?

A

Yes.

454
Q

When does the obligation to pay arise?

A

Search

455
Q

Remedies of unpaid seller

Who is considered an unpaid seller?

A

Article 1526. Subject to the provisions of this Title, notwithstanding that the ownership in the goods may have passed to the buyer, the unpaid seller of goods, as such, has:

(1) A lien on the goods or right to retain them for the price while he is in possession of them;
(2) In case of the insolvency of the buyer, a right of stopping the goods in transitu after he has parted with the possession of them;
(3) A right of resale as limited by this Title;
(4) A right to rescind the sale as likewise limited by this Title.

Where the ownership in the goods has not passed to the buyer, the unpaid seller has, in addition to his other remedies a right of withholding delivery similar to and coextensive with his rights of lien and stoppage in transitu where the ownership has passed to the buyer.

Are there other? yes.

456
Q

When is possessory lien exercised?

A

Search

457
Q

When would the seller be considered to have lost his lien?

A

Search

458
Q

What will happen if there was already a partial delivery made?

A

Article 1528. Where an unpaid seller has made part delivery of the goods, he may exercise his right of lien on the remainder, unless such part delivery has been made under such circumstances as to show an intent to waive the lien or right of retention.

459
Q

What will happen if there is a document of title issued?

A

Search

460
Q

What are the requisites for stoppage in transitu? How is this right exercised?

A

Search

461
Q

How is the insolvency of the buyer factored in?

A

Search

462
Q

When are goods considered in transit?

A

Article 1531. Goods are in transit within the meaning of the preceding article:

(1) From the time when they are delivered to a carrier by land, water, or air, or other bailee for the purpose of transmission to the buyer, until the buyer, or his agent in that behalf, takes delivery of them from such carrier or other bailee;
(2) If the goods are rejected by the buyer, and the carrier or other bailee continues in possession of them, even if the seller has refused to receive them back.

Goods are no longer in transit within the meaning of the preceding article:

(1) If the buyer, or his agent in that behalf, obtains delivery of the goods before their arrival at the appointed destination;
(2) If, after the arrival of the goods at the appointed destination, the carrier or other bailee acknowledges to the buyer or his agent that he holds the goods on his behalf and continues in possession of them as bailee for the buyer or his agent; and it is immaterial that further destination for the goods may have been indicated by the buyer;
(3) If the carrier or other bailee wrongfully refuses to deliver the goods to the buyer or his agent in that behalf.

If the goods are delivered to a ship, freight train, truck, or airplane chartered by the buyer, it is a question depending on the circumstances of the particular case, whether they are in the possession of the carrier as such or as agent of the buyer.

If part delivery of the goods has been made to the buyer, or his agent in that behalf, the remainder of the goods may be stopped in transitu, unless such part delivery has been under such circumstances as to show an agreement with the buyer to give up possession of the whole of the goods.

463
Q

When are goods no longer in transit?

A

Search

464
Q

Right of resale. When would the seller have this right?

A

If perishable yung good. Or in default yung buyer?

465
Q

Should notice be given to the original buyer of the intention to resell the goods?

A

No. 1533.

Article 1533. Where the goods are of perishable nature, or where the seller expressly reserves the right of resale in case the buyer should make default, or where the buyer has been in default in the payment of the price for an unreasonable time, an unpaid seller having a right of lien or having stopped the goods in transitu may resell the goods. He shall not thereafter be liable to the original buyer upon the contract of sale or for any profit made by such resale, but may recover from the buyer damages for any loss occasioned by the breach of the contract of sale.

Where a resale is made, as authorized in this article, the buyer acquires a good title as against the original buyer.

It is not essential to the validity of resale that notice of an intention to resell the goods be given by the seller to the original buyer. But where the right to resell is not based on the perishable nature of the goods or upon an express provision of the contract of sale, the giving or failure to give such notice shall be relevant in any issue involving the question whether the buyer had been in default for an unreasonable time before the resale was made.

It is not essential to the validity of a resale that notice of the time and place of such resale should be given by the seller to the original buyer.

The seller is bound to exercise reasonable care and judgment in making a resale, and subject to this requirement may make a resale either by public or private sale. He cannot, however, directly or indirectly buy the goods.

466
Q

What would be the effect of resale?

A

Search

467
Q

Special Right to Rescind: When can rescission be exercised?

A

Search

468
Q

What would the effect of rescission be?

A

Search

469
Q

Remedies of the Buyer

1598, suspension of payment, maceda law

A

Article 1598. Where the seller has broken a contract to deliver specific or ascertained goods, a court may, on the application of the buyer, direct that the contract shall be performed specifically, without giving the seller the option of retaining the goods on payment of damages. The judgment or decree may be unconditional, or upon such terms and conditions as to damages, payment of the price and otherwise, as the court may deem just.

470
Q

Article 1231. Obligations are extinguished:

A

(1) By payment or performance;
(2) By the loss of the thing due;
(3) By the condonation or remission of the debt;
(4) By the confusion or merger of the rights of creditor and debtor;
(5) By compensation;
(6) By novation.

Other causes of extinguishment of obligations, such as annulment, rescission, fulfillment of a resolutory condition, and prescription, are governed elsewhere in this Code.

471
Q

Conventional redemption

A

Article 1601. Conventional redemption shall take place when the vendor reserves the right to repurchase the thing sold, with the obligation to comply with the provisions of article 1616 and other stipulations which may have been agreed upon.

Seller reserved the right to repurchase thing sold coupled with obligation to return price of the sale, expenses of contract & other legitimate payments and the necessary & useful expenses made on the thing sold Note: Right to repurchase must be reserved at the time of perfection of sale.

Article 1606. The right referred to in article 1601, in the absence of an express agreement, shall last four years from the date of the contract.

Should there be an agreement, the period cannot exceed ten years.

However, the vendor may still exercise the right to repurchase within thirty days from the time final judgment was rendered in a civil action on the basis that the contract was a true sale with right to repurchase.

472
Q

Pacto de retro sales

A

Pacto de Retro sale refers to the sale wherein the seller has the right to repurchase the subject matter or the property being sold. The essence of a pacto de retro sale is that the title and ownership of the property sold transfers immediately to the vendee a retro.

473
Q

ARTICLE 1602. The contract shall be presumed to be an equitable mortgage, in any of the following cases:

A

(1) When the price of a sale with right to repurchase is unusually inadequate;
(2) When the vendor remains in possession as lessee or otherwise;
(3) When upon or after the expiration of the right to repurchase another instrument extending the period of redemption or granting a new period is executed;
(4) When the purchaser retains for himself a part of the purchase price;
(5) When the vendor binds himself to pay the taxes on the thing sold;
(6) In any other case where it may be fairly inferred that the real intention of the parties is that the transaction shall secure the payment of a debt or the performance of any other obligation.

In any of the foregoing cases, any money, fruits, or other benefit to be received by the vendee as rent or otherwise shall be considered as interest which shall be subject to the usury laws.

474
Q

In case of doubt, a contract purporting to be a sale with right to repurchase shall be construed as an equitable mortgage. T or F.

A

True.

475
Q

Who may exercise the right to redeem?

A

Article 1608. The vendor may bring his action against every possessor whose right is derived from the vendee, even if in the second contract no mention should have been made of the right to repurchase, without prejudice to the provisions of the Mortgage Law and the Land Registration Law with respect to third persons.

Article 1610. The creditors of the vendor cannot make use of the right of redemption against the vendee, until after they have exhausted the property of the vendor. (1512)

Article 1612. If several persons, jointly and in the same contract, should sell an undivided immovable with a right of repurchase, none of them may exercise this right for more than his respective share.

The same rule shall apply if the person who sold an immovable alone has left several heirs, in which case each of the latter may only redeem the part which he may have acquired.

Article 1614. Each one of the co-owners of an undivided immovable who may have sold his share separately, may independently exercise the right of repurchase as regards his own share, and the vendee cannot compel him to redeem the whole property. (1516)

Article 1615. If the vendee should leave several heirs, the action for redemption cannot be brought against each of them except for his own share, whether the thing be undivided, or it has been partitioned among them.

But if the inheritance has been divided, and the thing sold has been awarded to one of the heirs, the action for redemption may be instituted against him for the whole.

476
Q

Legal redemption

A

Article 1619. Legal redemption is the right to be subrogated, upon the same terms and conditions stipulated in the contract, in the place of one who acquires a thing by purchase or dation in payment, or by any other transaction whereby ownership is transmitted by onerous title.

Article 1620. A co-owner of a thing may exercise the right of redemption in case the shares of all the other co-owners or of any of them, are sold to a third person. If the price of the alienation is grossly excessive, the redemptioner shall pay only a reasonable one.

Should two or more co-owners desire to exercise the right of redemption, they may only do so in proportion to the share they may respectively have in the thing owned in common. (1522a)

Article 1621. The owners of adjoining lands shall also have the right of redemption when a piece of rural land, the area of which does not exceed one hectare, is alienated, unless the grantee does not own any rural land.

This right is not applicable to adjacent lands which are separated by brooks, drains, ravines, roads and other apparent servitudes for the benefit of other estates.

If two or more adjoining owners desire to exercise the right of redemption at the same time, the owner of the adjoining land of smaller area shall be preferred; and should both lands have the same area, the one who first requested the redemption. (1523a) ARTICLE 1622. Whenever a piece of urban land which is so small and so situated that a major portion thereof cannot be used for any practical purpose within a reasonable time, having been bought merely for speculation, is about to be re-sold, the owner of any adjoining land has a right of pre-emption at a reasonable price.

If the re-sale has been perfected, the owner of the adjoining land shall have a right of redemption, also at a reasonable price.

When two or more owners of adjoining lands wish to exercise the right of pre-emption or redemption, the owner whose intended use of the land in question appears best justified shall be preferred. (n)

Article 1623. The right of legal pre-emption or redemption shall not be exercised except within thirty days from the notice in writing by the prospective vendor, or by the vendor, as the case may be. The deed of sale shall not be recorded in the Registry of Property, unless accompanied by an affidavit of the vendor that he has given written notice thereof to all possible redemptioners.

The right of redemption of co-owners excludes that of adjoining owners.

477
Q

Remedies of the buyer

A
  1. specific performance
  2. damages
  3. rescission
  4. recto law

Article 1484. In a contract of sale of personal property the price of which is payable in installments, the vendor may exercise any of the following remedies:

(1) Exact fulfillment of the obligation, should the vendee fail to pay;
(2) Cancel the sale, should the vendee’s failure to pay cover two or more installments;
(3) Foreclose the chattel mortgage on the thing sold, if one has been constituted, should the vendee’s failure to pay cover two or more installments. In this case, he shall have no further action against the purchaser to recover any unpaid balance of the price. Any agreement to the contrary shall be void. (1454-A-a)

Article 1485. The preceding article shall be applied to contracts purporting to be leases of personal property with option to buy, when the lessor has deprived the lessee of the possession or enjoyment of the thing. (1454-A-a)

Article 1486. In the case referred to in the two preceding articles, a stipulation that the installments or rents paid shall not be returned to the vendee or lessee shall be valid insofar as the same may not be unconscionable under the circumstances.

478
Q

Article 1527. Subject to the provisions of this Title, the unpaid seller of goods who is in possession of them is entitled to retain possession of them until payment or tender of the price in the following cases, namely:

A

(1) Where the goods have been sold without any stipulation as to credit;
(2) Where the goods have been sold on credit, but the term of credit has expired;
(3) Where the buyer becomes insolvent.

The seller may exercise his right of lien notwithstanding that he is in possession of the goods as agent or bailee for the buyer.

479
Q

Article 1529. The unpaid seller of goods loses his lien thereon:

A

(1) When he delivers the goods to a carrier or other bailee for the purpose of transmission to the buyer without reserving the ownership in the goods or the right to the possession thereof;
(2) When the buyer or his agent lawfully obtains possession of the goods;
(3) By waiver thereof.

The unpaid seller of goods, having a lien thereon, does not lose his lien by reason only that he has obtained judgment or decree for the price of the goods.

480
Q

Article 1530. Subject to the provisions of this Title, when the buyer of goods is or becomes insolvent, the unpaid seller who has parted with the possession of the goods has the right of stopping them in transitu, that is to say, he may resume possession of the goods at any time while they are in transit, and he will then become entitled to the same rights in regard to the goods as he would have had if he had never parted with the possession.

A

:)

481
Q

Article 1531. Goods are in transit within the meaning of the preceding article:

A

(1) From the time when they are delivered to a carrier by land, water, or air, or other bailee for the purpose of transmission to the buyer, until the buyer, or his agent in that behalf, takes delivery of them from such carrier or other bailee;
(2) If the goods are rejected by the buyer, and the carrier or other bailee continues in possession of them, even if the seller has refused to receive them back.

Goods are no longer in transit within the meaning of the preceding article:

(1) If the buyer, or his agent in that behalf, obtains delivery of the goods before their arrival at the appointed destination;
(2) If, after the arrival of the goods at the appointed destination, the carrier or other bailee acknowledges to the buyer or his agent that he holds the goods on his behalf and continues in possession of them as bailee for the buyer or his agent; and it is immaterial that further destination for the goods may have been indicated by the buyer;
(3) If the carrier or other bailee wrongfully refuses to deliver the goods to the buyer or his agent in that behalf.

If the goods are delivered to a ship, freight train, truck, or airplane chartered by the buyer, it is a question depending on the circumstances of the particular case, whether they are in the possession of the carrier as such or as agent of the buyer.

If part delivery of the goods has been made to the buyer, or his agent in that behalf, the remainder of the goods may be stopped in transitu, unless such part delivery has been under such circumstances as to show an agreement with the buyer to give up possession of the whole of the goods.

482
Q

Article 1532. The unpaid seller may exercise his right of stoppage in transitu either by obtaining actual possession of the goods or by giving notice of his claim to the carrier or other bailee in whose possession the goods are. Such notice may be given either to the person in actual possession of the goods or to his principal. In the latter case the notice, to be effectual, must be given at such time and under such circumstances that the principal, by the exercise of reasonable diligence, may prevent a delivery to the buyer.

When notice of stoppage in transitu is given by the seller to the carrier, or other bailee in possession of the goods, he must redeliver the goods to, or according to the directions of, the seller. The expenses of such delivery must be borne by the seller. If, however, a negotiable document of title representing the goods has been issued by the carrier or other bailee, he shall not be obliged to deliver or justified in delivering the goods to the seller unless such document is first surrendered for cancellation.

A

:)

483
Q

Article 1535. Subject to the provisions of this Title, the unpaid seller’s right of lien or stoppage in transitu is not affected by any sale, or other disposition of the goods which the buyer may have made, unless the seller has assented thereto.

If, however, a negotiable document of title has been issued for goods, no seller’s lien or right of stoppage in transitu shall defeat the right of any purchaser for value in good faith to whom such document has been negotiated, whether such negotiation be prior or subsequent to the notification to the carrier, or other bailee who issued such document, of the seller’s claim to a lien or right of stoppage in transitu.

A

:D

484
Q

Insolvent

A

A person is insolvent within the meaning of this Title who either has ceased to pay his debts in the ordinary course of business or cannot pay his debts as they become due, whether insolvency proceedings have been commenced or not.

485
Q

Article 1533. Where the goods are of perishable nature, or where the seller expressly reserves the right of resale in case the buyer should make default, or where the buyer has been in default in the payment of the price for an unreasonable time, an unpaid seller having a right of lien or having stopped the goods in transitu may resell the goods. He shall not thereafter be liable to the original buyer upon the contract of sale or for any profit made by such resale, but may recover from the buyer damages for any loss occasioned by the breach of the contract of sale.

Where a resale is made, as authorized in this article, the buyer acquires a good title as against the original buyer.

It is not essential to the validity of resale that notice of an intention to resell the goods be given by the seller to the original buyer. But where the right to resell is not based on the perishable nature of the goods or upon an express provision of the contract of sale, the giving or failure to give such notice shall be relevant in any issue involving the question whether the buyer had been in default for an unreasonable time before the resale was made.

It is not essential to the validity of a resale that notice of the time and place of such resale should be given by the seller to the original buyer.

The seller is bound to exercise reasonable care and judgment in making a resale, and subject to this requirement may make a resale either by public or private sale. He cannot, however, directly or indirectly buy the goods.

A

Aye.

486
Q

Remedies of an unpaid seller

A
  1. Withhold delivery (possessory lien)
  2. Stoppage in transitu
  3. Resell the goods
  4. Rescission
  5. Action for the price (specific performance)
  6. Action for damages
487
Q

Marvin offered to sell his house to Carlos for a very reasonable price of P10,000,000, giving the latter 10 days within which to accept or reject the offer. On the fifth day, before Carlos could make up his mind, Marvin withdrew his offer.

a. what is the effect of the withdrawal of Marvin’s offer?
b. What if may payment for consideration?
c. supposing that carlos accepted the offer before Marvin could communicate his withdrawal thereof? Discuss the legal consequences.

A

a. - cause the offer to cease by law. even if he subsequently accepted, hindi na pwede kasi withdrawn na yung offer before pa sya iterminate. no contract of sale to begin with because wala naman consent.
- no damages because of the withdrawal. wala pang rejection or acceptance, so the offer can be withdrawn anytime. Rigos vs. Sanchez

b. - answer will be the same. lack of consent. may withdrawal pa nga din eh kahit may bayad yun, no consent na. pero damages will be given.
c. - perfected na yung contract. valid and perfected contract na to. They are bound to fulfill what is stated in the contract.

488
Q

In 2019, Manuel bound himself to sell Eva a house and lot which is being rented by another person, if Eva passes the 2020 bar examinations. Luckily for Eva, she passed said examinations. Suppose Manuel had sold the same house and lot to another before Eva passed the 2020 bar examinations, is such sale valid? Why?

A

Yes. Resolutory condition.

489
Q

A is the lessee of an apartment owned by Y. A allowed his married but employed daughter B, whose husband works in Kuwait, to occupy it. The relationship between Y and A soured. Since he has no reason at all to eject A, Y, in connivance with the City Engineer, secured from the latter an order for the demolition of the building. A immediately filed an action in the RTC to annul the order and to enjoin its enforcement. Y and A were able to forge a compromise agreement under which A agreed to a 20% increase in the monthly rentals. They further agreed that the lease will expire 2 years later and that in the event that Y would sell the property, either A or his daughter shall have the right of first refusal. The Compromise Agreement was approved by the court. 6 months before the expiration of the lease, A died. Y sold the property to the Viserro Realty Corp. without notifying B. B then filed an action to rescind the sale in favor of the corporation and to compel Y to sell the property to her since under the Compromise Agreement, she was given the right of first refusal which, she maintains is a stipulation pour atrui under Art. 1311 of the Civil Code. Is she correct?

A

No. She needs to manifest her acceptance.

490
Q

In a contract of sale, perfection of the contract will not automatically transfer to the buyer ownership over the property. T or F.

A

True.

491
Q

The sale made by the husband of a conjugal property without the written consent of the wife is not merely voidable but void.

A

True.

492
Q

There is no valid sale when there has been no meeting of the minds as to the price.

A

False. 1474

Article 1474. Where the price cannot be determined in accordance with the preceding articles, or in any other manner, the contract is inefficacious. However, if the thing or any part thereof has been delivered to and appropriated by the buyer he must pay a reasonable price therefor. What is a reasonable price is a question of fact dependent on the circumstances of each particular case.

493
Q

The failure to pay the price in a contract of sale goes into the perfection of the sale.

A

False. Specific performance action

494
Q

The subject matter of a contract of sale and an option contract remains the same because of the very nature of the transaction entered into by the parties.

A

False.

Option - right to purchase
Sale - thing itself

495
Q

An option contract without a consideration separate from the purchase price is void but will constitute as a valid offer.

A

True.

496
Q

There is already a contract of sale subject to a suspensive condition and it therefore makes the obligation therein legally demandable.

A

False.

Sale is not subject to a suspensive condition

497
Q

A voidable contract of sale can only be assailed by the contracting parties as a matter of right.

A

False. 1397

Article 1397. The action for the annulment of contracts may be instituted by all who are thereby obliged principally or subsidiarily. However, persons who are capable cannot allege the incapacity of those with whom they contracted; nor can those who exerted intimidation, violence, or undue influence, or employed fraud, or caused mistake base their action upon these flaws of the contract.

498
Q

A sale between the husband and wife cannot assail the contract because they are parties to the illegality of the transaction.

A

True.

499
Q

In a contract of sale, if the subject matter is determinate, the defense of force majeure is applicable to relieve the seller from the consequences of delivering the object of the contract.

A

True.

1174

500
Q

A sold a mango plantation to B but they stipulated that delivery will be after the signing of the deed of sale. After the expiration of the 6-month period, B demanded for the delivery. The vendor was able to deliver 1 month after the date when he was supposed to deliver the mango plantation. During this period, the vendor harvested mango fruits and sold them to X. The vendor was able to deliver only after the fruits were harvested and sold to Y. Can B recover the mango fruits from Y during the sixth month period?

A

Search