part 1 Flashcards
experimental methods, observational techniques, self-report techniques, correlations, content analysis, case studies
define validity
Validity focuses on accuracy and accurately measuring the aim of the study. Additionally whether it can be generalised to the wider population outside of the research setting ==> two types: external and internal validity
Explain internal and external validity
internal validity:
measures whether the results are due to the manipulation of the independent variable and not cofounding variables
external validity:
measures whether the results can be generalised outside of the research
1. ecological validity: other settings
2. population validity: other people
3. temporal validity: can be generalised over time
how can internal validity be improved?
reducing investigator effects and demand characteristics
how can external validity be improved?
setting the research or experiments in naturalistic environments ==> these have less control and so are more representative
what is reliability?
focuses on the consistency of a study in a way that if a study is completed in the exact same way and gets the same results, it is reliable
==> two types internal and external
what is internal and external validity?
internal: the extent something is consistent with itself
external: the extent a test measure is consistent over time
what is inter-observer reliability and what is its purpose?
two or more observers complete independent observations on the same study, if their results are similar then they are reliable
==> the purpose is designed to stop observer bias
what is concurrent validity?
assesses validity through correlation, correlating scores from research already existing and known to be valid
what is an aim?
a general statement about what the researcher intends to study which generates a theory that they want to test
what is a hypothesis?
a specific testable statement that references the operationalised variables being investigated
==> precise and has no ambiguity
what needs to be included in the hypothesis?
reference to the IV and the DV which have been operationalised - giving specifics on how each variable is being manipulated or measured
what is a directional / one-tailed hypothesis? + what is it an example of
predicts which direction the results will go in
==> example of an experimental hypothesis
why would a directional / one tailed hypothesis be used?
when there are research findings from previous studies therefore they show what past findings have been, and so what a researcher might expect to happen
what type of language would be included in a directional / one-tailed hypothesis?
comparison language that favours one side of the hypothesis
==> for example; faster/slower, increase/decrease, larger/smaller.
what is a non-directional / two-tailed hypothesis? + what is it an example of?
Doesn’t predict which direction the results may go, instead just states one variable that will affect another.
==> am example of an experimental hypothesis
why would a non-directional / two-tailed hypothesis be used?
there is no previous research to suggest what the results may be or when there is contradictory findings from previous research
what is a null hypothesis?
the hypothesis states that there is no relationship between the IV and the DV and so there will be no difference or correlation
==> if there is a relationship it is merely due to chance and not because of purposeful experimentation of the IV
what is an independent variable?
The factor which is changed / manipulated by the researcher in order to see the effect it has on the dependant variable
what is the dependant variable?
the factor which is being measured in the study by the researcher
what does it mean to operationalise the variables?
process of clearly defining variables so they become measurable factors
what is the benefit of operationalising variables?
being clearly defined allows for manipulation of the IV and also means the DV can be precisely measured as the hypothesis clearly states what they are testing
what if variables aren’t operationalised properly?
can make the results unreliable as the research will not be able to replicated and so also effects the validity of the research
what are extraneous variables?
difference factors that could affect the DV and only the DV.
==> essentially nuisance variables and so are usually controlled so they have the same effect across all conditions. This stops them effecting the outcome of the research in an unbalanced way
==> does not vary systematically with the IV
give examples of extraneous variables
participant variables such as intelligence as well as situational variables such as temperature and noise
what happens if extraneous variables aren’t controlled?
become cofounding variables
what are cofounding variables?
variables which can effect the DV and impact the outcome of the research
==> change systematically with the IV
what are examples of cofounding variables and how are they discovered?
they have been discovered after the experiment as they have impacted the results. For instance, if all participants in one condition were found to have better memories, be more competitive, better eyesight
what are demand characteristics?
any cue from the researcher which may mean the cause the to work out the what is expected of them and what the researcher is looking for
what is participant reactivity?
demand characteristics result in participant reactivity and means that they change their behaviour
what are the types of demand characteristics ?
please-you effect
- guessing the research purpose and then trying to please the researcher by acting or giving the answers they think they should to obtain the ‘right’ result
screw-you effect
- guessing the research purpose and attempting to intentionally skew the results and give the wrong results in order to destroy the credibility of the study
other than being subjected to demand characteristics, why else may participants change their behaviour?
change behaviour and act unnaturally out of fear, nervousness, or social desirability
what are investigator effects?
when the researcher influences the result of the research by affecting the DV and can be both conscious and unconscious
what are examples of investigator effects?
1- could be biased in their interpretation of data and although it is likely to be unconscious, it will still impact the results
2- researchers physical characteristics, such as age, gender, ethnicity, or appearacnce
3- researcher smiling or being more/less encouraging to participants or varying how instructions are given to participants to achieve results that favour their hypothesis (leads to demand characteristics)
what are two ways demand characteristics and investigator effects can be minimised?
Randomisation and Standardisation