Parliamentary Sovereignty and Statutory Interpretation Flashcards

1
Q

What is parliamentary sovereignty?

A

Parliamentary sovereignty is a constitutional principle which allows Parliament to be the supreme legal authority in the UK

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is parliamentary sovereignty subject to?

A

Some EU law concepts, even in spite of Brexit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the key principles of parliamentary sovereignty?

A

It gives Parliament the power to create and repeal any law.

The courts cannot overrule statute, but statute can overrule case law.

UK Courts and international courts have no power under English law to declare an Act invalid. UK judges can say that an act is incompatible with HRA 1998, but this is not the same as declaring an Act unlawful.

However, Parliament cannot pass laws that future Parliaments cannot change.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What happens when there is a conflict between statute and other sources of law?

A

Statute prevails

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

To whom do statutes apply?

A

Statues apply to all of the UK unless there is a specific statement in the Act that says otherwise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does it mean to consolidate legislation?

A

Where one statue re-enacts law that was previously contained in several different statutes. This does not include case law. It also does not (usually) change old law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does codification mean?

A

Where all the law on one topic (inc. common law, custom and statute) is bought together under one new statutes. Codification does include case law and can change old law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the Wales settlement?

A

In the 60s, Wales wanted independence. This was rejected in a referendum. There was another referendum for Wales to have a degree of self-government in the 90s. This was positive and lead to the establishment of the Senedd which as devolved powers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the reserved powers model and where is this used?

A

The Senedd can make primary legislation, but some matters are reserved for UK parliament and there are restrictions on Senedd’s powers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are acts of the Senedd also called?

A

National Assembly Acts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What structure do Acts of the Senedd take?

A

The same as UK acts, but the coat of arms is different

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

When are the statutory interpretation mechanisms used by a judge?

A

When the Act relevant to the case is unclear

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Give an overview for the procedure to pass a Senedd Act

A

Bill is formally introduced

Stage one consists of:
o Initial committee report
o Consideration of correspondence, timetable and consideration by the financial committee
o Debate on general principles and financial resolution

Stage two consists of:
o Detailed committee stage where amendments are considered

Stage three:
o Plenary consideration of amendments

Stage four:
o The Bill received Royal Assent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Who used the statutory interpretation rules?

A

Judges in cases and lawyer when advising clients as to how a judge might decide upon their case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the rules of construction?

A

o The literal rule
o The golden rule
o The mischief rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How must a judge use statutory interpretation mechanisms?

A

A judge has discretion over which rule to use. They are under no obligation to use these rules.

They can consider more than one and do not need to disclose which rule they use.

Rules of language and rules of contraction can be used at the same time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What approach should the judge take when there is ambiguity and the Act imposes criminal sanction?

A

The judge should give any benefit of doubt to D but a judge may want to rely on the mischief rule in order to give effect to the purpose of the legislation

i.e. an act says prostitution is illegal in the street or public places. Literal interpretation would mean prostitution in the home is permissible. A judge used the mischief approach to to find the prostitute guilty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the literal rule?

A

Words in a statute must be given their plain, ordinary and literal meaning

If the words are clear, they must be applied in this way even if the intention of the legislator may have been different

This is usually the starting point for judges

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is the drawback of the literal rule?

A

It could lead to absurd results which are in facts the opposite of parliaments intention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is the golden rule?

A

Courts can depart from the literal rule where necessary to avoid an absurd/inconsistent result. This can be applied in two ways:

Narrow application - if a word is capable of more than one meaning, the court can choose between those meanings, but they cannot go beyond this

Broad application - judges interpret words in a certain way to avoid an obnoxious result (i.e. issue cannot inherit if they have killed a their parent, even though they would otherwise inherit under the intestacy rules)

19
Q

What is the mischief rule?

A

The law is interpreted in accordance with parliaments intention i.e. the ‘mischief’ / defect the statute was intended to remedy.

20
Q

What is the purposive approach?

A

Very similar to the mischief rule.

Judges will look at why the statute was passed and its purpose, even if this means departing from the ordinary meaning of the words

21
Q

What does s3 HRA 1998 provide?

A

Primary and subordinate legislation must be applied in a way that is compatible with the convention rights

21
Q

If statute is not compatible with EHCR, what can the courts do?

A

Make a declaration of incompatibility

22
Q

What effect does a declaration of incompatibility have?

A

This does not say the Act is unlawful. The court does not have the power to do that.

It instead notifies the government and Parliament of the incompatibility. Parliament decides whether to change the law.

23
Q

What are the rules of language?

A

These are additional interpretation aids which can be used by judges
o Noscitur a sociis
o Eiusdem generis
o Expressio unius est exclusio alterius

24
Q

What are statutory interpretation mechanisms?

A

Rules of construction
Rules of language
Aids to interpretation

25
Q

What is noscitur a sociis?

A

A word derives its meaning based upon the words surrounding it

i.e. this is relevant where there is a list of particular words ‘dog, cat, mouse’

26
Q

What is eiusdem generis?

A

If a general word follows two or more specific words, the general word shall not extended beyond the subject of the specific words

i.e. ‘cats, dogs, mice and other animals’

27
Q

Give an example of noscitur a sociis

A

A clause in a lease agreement states:

Only the following animals are permitted in this block of flats – dogs, cats, hamsters and gerbils.

Could a leopard be included as a cat? Looking at the list of words, these are all domesticated animals one would reasonably be expected to be kept as a pet. Therefore, a leopard is unlikely to be included.

27
Q

Give an example of eiusdem generis

A

s 1 of the Betting Act 1853, which prohibited the keeping of a ‘house, office, room or other place’ for the purpose of betting

Did this apply to an outdoor area at a race course?

The court said it did not, as the specific places were all indoors, and so the area could not be included within the ambit of ‘other place’

28
Q

What is expressio unius est exclusio alterius?

A

The express statement of one thing, might be taken to exclude another

29
Q

What is an aid to interpretation?

A

Sources to assist judges with interpretation

29
Q

Give an example of expressio unius est exclusio alterius

A

The Act stated ‘lands, houses and coal mines’

The court had to decide whether this could apply to other mines, or just coal mines.

The court held the list was definitive, or ‘closed’ because the Act expressed the word ‘coal’ in front of ‘mine’. Therefore, it appears the Act intended to be restricted to that particular type of mine rather than including other sorts.

30
Q

What are the types of aids to interpretation?

A

Intrinsic aids
External aids

31
Q

What are intrinsic aids?

A

They come from the statute itself.

The judge can look at other parts of the statute to understand the particular part under discussion, but the statute must be read as a whole

32
Q

What are and what are not legitimate intrinsic aids?

A

Legitimate aids are words that have been debated by Parliament i.e. titles, preamble, punctuation, headings. Marginal nots are not debated so are not normally relied upon.

33
Q

Examples of extrinsic aids

A

Interpretation Acts. These acts define words commonly found in legislation

Dictionaries

Other statutes

Hansard (Hansard is a verbatim reporting system of proceedings in Parliament. Hansard would be helpful when using the mischief rule.)

Other sources i.e. academic sources like Halsbury’s Laws of England

34
Q

What are ‘presumptions’ in this context?

A

The judge can apply certain presumptions (in addition to rules etc) to interpret legislation

35
Q

Is the application of a presumption binding?

A

No, it can be rebutted with strong evidence that parliament had a contrary intention

36
Q

What are the presumptions relevant to statutory interpretation?

A

o Presumption against alternation of common law
o Presumption against retrospective operation of statutes
o Presumption against criminal liability without guilty intention (mens rea)
o Presumption against the deprivation of the liberty of an individual
o Presumption against deprivation of property or interference with private rights
o Presumption against binding the Crown
o Presumption against ousting the jurisdiction of the courts

37
Q

Explain the presumption against alternation of common law

A

unless the statute expressly states an intention to alter the common law, the interpretation that does not alter the existing law will be preferred.

38
Q

Explain the presumption against retrospective operation of statutes

A

it is presumed that new laws will only apply to future actions and will not apply retrospectively. However, some legislation will be intended to have a retrospective effect i.e. War Crimes Act 1991.

39
Q

Explain the presumption against criminal liability without guilty intention (mens rea)

A

Some new criminal offences don’t define the required mens rea. In these instances, the presumption applies i.e. that D cannot be convicted without the necessary mindset.

The exception to this is strict liability offences

40
Q

Explain the presumption against the deprivation of the liberty of an individual

A

Any ambiguity in a penal or criminal statute should be interpreted in favour of the citizen

41
Q

Explain the presumption against binding the Crown

A

Unless there is a clear statement to the contrary, legislation is presumed to not apply to the crown.

42
Q

What is the difference between the purposive approach and mischief rule?

A

The purposive approach focuses on the intentions of the lawmakers, while the mischief rule focuses on the defects in the previous law

43
Q
A