Parliament Flashcards

1
Q

What is the structure of the UK Parliament?

A
  • bicameral
  • HOL + HOC
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

HOL Makeup

A

Life Peers: Appointed for their lifetime (e.g., for expertise).
Hereditary Peers: Inherited positions (numbers limited to 92 after the House of Lords Act 1999).
Bishops: Senior Church of England figures (26).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

HOC Makeup

A

The lower house, consisting of 650 Members of Parliament (MPs) elected by the public in constituencies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Briefly outline the history of Parliament.

A

Parliament Acts (1911 and 1949) reduced the power of the House of Lords, particularly over money bills, indicating a historical shift in the balance of power
HOL Act 1998 -> reduce to 92 hereditary peers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How are members of the House of Commons selected?

A

Members of Parliament (MPs) are directly elected by the public in general elections.
Each MP represents a specific geographical area called a constituency.
This direct election gives the House of Commons democratic legitimacy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How are members of the House of Lords selected?

A

Life Peers: Appointed for their lifetime, often for expertise or public service. The Appointments Commission plays a role in recommending life peers to ensure diversity and fairness (IMG_0344). Example: Crossbencher Lord Owen (IMG_0349)
Hereditary Peers: 92 remain, who inherited their titles, after reforms (House of Lords Act 1999) which significantly reduced their number (IMG_0341, IMG_0349).
Bishops: 26 senior figures from the Church of England

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Main functions of parliament

A
  • Create Law (Legislation): Both Houses debate and scrutinise proposed laws (Bills)
  • Provide/Dismiss Ministers: The House of Commons has the power to appoint and remove ministers, including the Prime Minister, through votes of confidence
  • Accountability: Holding the government (Executive) to account for its actions
  • Debate: Discussing important issues of the day
  • Representation: The House of Commons represents the interests of the electorate
  • Scrutiny and Influence: Both Houses check what the government is doing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Powers of HOC

A

Legislative Power: Can amend or reject legislation
Financial Power: Has primary control over money bills (laws relating to taxation and public spending)
Power to Dismiss Government: Can remove the government through a vote of no confidence
Scrutiny: Holds the government to account through:
- Questions to ministers.
- Debates.
- Select committees
- Urgent Questions
Parliament Acts: Can force bills through without the Lords’ agreement in certain circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

examples HOC hold gov accountable

A

Examples: 2003 Iraq War - government defeated on amendment , 2013 Direct military intervention in Syria - government defeated both times

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q
  • questions to ministers - scrutiny
A

MPs can directly question government ministers on their policies and actions, forcing them to provide explanations and justifications

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

debates

A

General debates and debates on specific government policies allow for detailed scrutiny and public airing of concerns
- general i.e future NHS
- specific bill i.e on the assisted Dying bill
opposition day debate i.e gurkhha justice campaign 2009 -> LD used an opposition day to put forward a motionn calling for all Gurkha vetrans to be given the right to settle if served for certain period -> gov defeated _> not legally binding but putt pressure alongside pulic and media -> gov changed policy
-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Urgent Questions:

A

Allow MPs to demand immediate answers from ministers on urgent issues, forcing the government to address pressing concerns

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

how effective select committees are at challenging the executive,

A

Detailed Scrutiny:
Evidence-Based Reports
Publicity and Influence:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

scrutiny examples : dodgy dossier

A

The “Dodgy Dossier” (Iraq War): The Hutton Inquiry and subsequent select committee scrutiny highlighted serious flaws in the government’s intelligence used to justify the Iraq War, damaging the government’s credibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

select committees : Amber Rudd

A

Amber Rudd’s Resignation (Home Office): The Home Affairs Select Committee’s questioning of Amber Rudd regarding immigration targets led to her admitting she had misled Parliament and ultimately resigning, demonstrating the direct impact of committee scrutiny - ramifications

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Committees 2012 London Olympics

A

2012 London Olympics: Home affairs select committee question Group 4 Security Chief Executive Nick Buckles -> over failure to fufill contract shows that unlike PMQs, select committees can question private companies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

2015 Sugar Tax: committees

A

The Health Select Committee’s strong support for a sugar tax provided evidence and momentum for the government to eventually implement this policy, showing how committees can influence policy direction

18
Q

COVID-19 Scrutiny: committees

A

The Science and Technology Committee 2021 played a crucial role in examining the government’s scientific advice and response during the pandemic, - domic coming prev spad 7 hrs of evidence highlighting Committees ability to have time for indepth srutiny of executive affairs

19
Q

Work and Pensions Select Committee:

A

The report on Universal Credit was ignored by the government, showing limitations in the ability of committees to force policy change

20
Q

Boris Johnson : committees

A

Not legally obliged to go to committees -> not first meeting with liason till 300 days into premiership

21
Q

Rupert Murdoc: committees

A

Rupert Murdoc: bring attention to isssues -> Culture, media and sports select committee -> boycotts _. closure of news of world in july 2011

22
Q

Describe the powers of the House of Lords.

A

Scrutiny: Can revise and amend legislation, providing expertise .
Delaying Power: Can delay non-money bills for up to one year
Limited Veto: Cannot block money bills and its power to block other bills is limited by the Parliament Acts
Salisbury Convention: Should not block legislation promised in the winning party’s manifesto
Examples: Assisted Dying Bill Lords Committees scrutinise various subjects (

23
Q

FOR: Assess whether the balance of power between the Houses is appropriate.

A

Arguments for the current balance:

The Commons is elected, giving it democratic legitimacy and the primary mandate to govern
The Lords provide valuable scrutiny and expertise
The Parliament Acts ensure the elected government can ultimately enact its legislation

24
Q

AGAINST: current balance:

A

he unelected nature of the Lords is a democratic deficit (IMG_0343).
The Lords’ delaying power can frustrate the will of the elected House (IMG_0345).
Concerns about “cronyism” in Lords appointments (IMG_0343).

25
arguements for reform
Arguments for reform: Increased Democratic Legitimacy: Making the Lords elected would address the democratic deficit Reduced Government Patronage: Reform could limit the government's ability to appoint its supporters Improved Scrutiny: An elected or reformed Lords might feel it has a stronger mandate to challenge the Commons
26
arguements fagainst reform of hol
Loss of Expertise: Appointed Lords bring valuable knowledge and experience Potential for Gridlock: An elected Lords could rival the Commons, leading to legislative deadlock Difficulty of Achieving Consensus: There is no clear agreement on what form reform should take ). Examples of Reform Proposals: Hain's White Paper (IMG_0343), various models including fully/partially elected Lords, reducing size, term limits
27
describe all the stages of legislative process
A bill becomes an Act of Parliament through these stages: House of Commons: First Reading: Formal introduction of the bill ( Second Reading: Debate on the main principles (). Committee Stage: Detailed examination by a Public Bill Committee, amendments can be made (). Report Stage: Consideration of committee amendments by the whole House (). Third Reading: Final debate and vote (). House of Lords: The bill goes through the same stages in the Lords (). The Lords can propose amendments, which the Commons can accept or reject. Royal Assent: The Monarch formally approves the bi
28
How do the two Houses interact during the legislative process?
Bills are usually introduced in the House of Commons, but can start in the Lords (except for money bills) (). The bill passes through similar stages in each House (). The Lords can propose amendments to bills (except money bills) (). If the Commons agrees to Lords' amendments, the bill proceeds to Royal Assent. If not, the bill goes back to the Lords, and a "ping pong" process may occur to reach agreement (). The Parliament Acts can be invoked to pass a bill without the Lords' consent in certain circumstances, especially after delays ( .
29
Explain the Salisbury Convention
The Salisbury Convention is a constitutional convention stating that the House of Lords should not reject or significantly delay legislation that was included in the governing party's manifesto (IMG_0342, IMG_0345, IMG_0351). It aims to prevent the unelected Lords from frustrating the will of the elected Commons.
30
Explain the role of Money Bills.
Money Bills are legislation that deals with taxation and government spending The House of Commons has primacy over Money Bills; the House of Lords cannot amend or block them The Parliament Acts reinforce the Commons' power over Money Bills
31
Assess how effective Parliament is as a legislature.
Parliament passes a large volume of legislation The legislative process allows for scrutiny and amendment of bills ( The Parliament Acts ensure the elected government can ultimately pass its program Arguments against effectiveness: Government dominance can limit effective scrutiny Party discipline can reduce the influence of individual MPs The House of Lords can delay legislation
32
Assess how effective backbenchers are at challenging the executive,
- Questions: They can use Parliamentary Questions and Urgent Questions to press ministers on specific issues and demand answers, holding the government accountable for its actions and forcing it to provide information - Debates: Participating in debates allows them to voice concerns, scrutinise legislation, and offer alternative perspectives on government policy - Select Committees: As members of select committees, they contribute to detailed inquiries and can hold ministers and officials to account - Rebellion: Voting against their own party (rebellion) demonstrates dissent and can force the government to reconsider its position, especially if the government's majority is small Example: Backbench rebellions over Brexit legislation forced government concessions. - Backbench Business Committee: This committee allows backbenchers to choose topics for debate, giving them some control over the parliamentary agenda and the opportunity to raise issues of concern (IMG_0357). Parliamentary Privilege: This is fundamental to backbenchers' ability to challenge the executive effectively. It grants them freedom of speech within Parliament, meaning they cannot be sued or prosecuted for what they say during parliamentary proceedings (IMG_0347, IMG_0356, IMG_0365). This protection allows them to raise sensitive or critical issues about the government without fear of reprisal. Limitations: Despite these tools, backbench
33
arguements against effevtiveness of parliamentary committees
The government is not obliged to accept their recommendations (IMG_0359, IMG_0362). Government can control information and delay responses (IMG_0359). Media coverage can be limited (IMG_0359, IMG_0362). Chairs are often from the governing party (IMG_0362).
34
arguements against effevtiveness of backbenchers
However, their effectiveness is limited by: Party discipline and loyalty (IMG_0340, IMG_0369). Government majorities (IMG_0357). Limited resources (
35
Assess how effective the opposition are at challenging the executive
36
Controversies of HOL
- House of Lords during the last parliament have given a combined £109m in political donations, almost £50m of which was contributed before they secured their seats & 62% of which went to Conservatives (9.3.25) size - approx 700 members 2000, approx 800 members 2022 - cronyism - On 13 November 2023, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak appointed former prime minister David Cameron as foreign secretary. Following this announcement, he joined the House of Lords as Lord Cameron of Chipping Norton.
37
Parliament Act 1911
Removed Lords veto power delay 2 yrs
38
Parliament Act 1949
reduce Lords delay power to 1 yr cannot ammend money bills and money bills must receive royal assent within 1 month of being intro. HoL even if not passed in HoL
39
House of Lords Act 1999
allowed 92 hereditary peers to remain (reduce hereditary peers)
40
Impact HoL Act 99
removal of hereditary peers end of traditional dominance of tories more crossbenchers
41
Impact HoL Act 99 - Removal of hereditary peers
^ HoL sense of legitimacy not democratically appointed by appointed by democratic leaders more likely to challenge gov + break Salisbury convention Thatcher 156 Defeats in 11 yrs Cameron 2015-17 92 defeats Con 2019-24 410 defeats in 5 yrs --
42
Impact HoL Act 99 - End traditional dominance of conservative
pre-reform 1999 -> 40% of peers conservative approx 34% as of 9.03.25