Parenteral nutrition Flashcards
Describe the ASPEN definition of Parenteral Nutrition (PN) and mention the components it may include.
Parenteral nutrition (PN) involves intravenous administration of nutrients like protein, carbohydrate, fat, minerals, electrolytes, vitamins, and trace elements for patients unable to eat or absorb enough through tube feeding or orally. It’s important to note that not all PN formulations include fat, vitamins, and minerals.
Do the limitations of the evidence base for Parenteral Nutrition (PN) focus on the criteria for inclusion and exclusion of subjects? Also, discuss whether quantity or route is a more significant concern in PN research.
The limitations of the evidence base for PN include
- issues with criteria for inclusion (e.g., reliance on albumin levels) and exclusion (e.g., excluding malnourished subjects or those for whom enteral nutrition is contraindicated).
- debate arises if quantity (overfeeding) rather than the route of administration is the primary concern in PN research.
Outline the NICE (2006) guidelines on PN
Non surgical patients:
Malnourished/at risk + inadequate/unsafe oral/enteral intake + non functional/inaccessible/perforated GI tract - GRADE D
Surgical patients
Malnourished + inadequate/unsafe oral/enteral intake + non functional/inaccessible/perforated GI tract
GRADE B
Define the indications for Parenteral Nutrition (PN) in surgical patients according to ESPEN 2009 guidelines. Explain when PN is considered beneficial and the preferred choice of nutrition in specific scenarios.
- PN is beneficial for undernourished patients unable to tolerate or receive enough enteral nutrition.
- Also recommended for patients with postoperative complications affecting GI function and inadequate oral/enteral intake for at least 7 days.
The first choice is enteral nutrition or a combination of enteral and supplementary PN.
How does the choice between Parenteral Nutrition (PN) and Enteral Nutrition (EN) vary based on the patient’s condition and gut functionality? Explain the importance of regularly reviewing the choice of nutrition.
The decision between PN and EN depends on the patient’s symptoms and gut function. If the gut is partially functional, EN or oral intake should be encouraged. The choice between PN and EN should be regularly reassessed based on the patient’s condition, as it is a dynamic decision affected by gut functionality.
Describe the significance of understanding the patient’s GI anatomy in determining the need for Parenteral Nutrition (PN). Explain how different types of bowel surgeries impact the absorption of nutrients.
Understanding the patient’s GI anatomy is crucial in deciding whether PN is necessary.
- patients with a colostomy in the descending colon may have sufficient bowel for nutrient absorption, as bowels are for reabsorbing water + salt
Ileostomy –> EN still possible if no other bowel resection, water absorption will be an issue
Jejunostomy –> PN indicated
How much bowel is required for PN to be indicated?
Less than 100cm of bowel - PN indicated
100-200cm - hydration indicated, query PN, might need a little of it depending on patient
Describe the indications for parenteral nutrition (PN) in patients with intestinal failure, including T1, T2, and T3 categories. What are the specific scenarios that would necessitate PN in each category?
T1 (short-term) - post-operative ileus and small intestinal obstruction
T2 (medium-term) - complex Crohn’s, fistulae, and abdominal sepsis.
T3 (long-term/irreversible) - irreversible cases like short bowel syndrome or surgical complications.
How does the gut function impact the decision between enteral nutrition (EN) and parenteral nutrition (PN)? What factors are considered when assessing gut function for nutritional support?
The gut function determines whether to use EN or PN. Factors like bowel sounds, gastric aspirates, and stoma output are assessed. Bowel sounds, gastric acid secretion, stoma output volume/color are considered. If the gut works, EN is preferred.
Define the differences between enteral nutrition (EN) and parenteral nutrition (PN) based on the study by Woodcock et al. (2001). What were the intervention groups and the key findings regarding mortality and morbidity?
Woodcock et al. (2001) compared EN and PN in patients with negligible intake >7 days. Mortality was higher in EN, with more morbidity. No deaths were directly attributed to PN. The study recommended PN when in doubt.
Describe the key recommendations from the NCEPOD report (2010) regarding the use of parenteral nutrition (PN) in clinical practice. What factors should be considered when determining the route of feeding for patients?
NCEPOD recommends determining the feeding route based on GI function, assessed by a nutrition support team. PN is advised if EN cannot meet needs. EN and PN can be combined. Individual risks and benefits should be considered.
How is a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) used in parenteral nutrition administration?
A PICC line is inserted at the bedside for PN suitable for central administration, providing a longer-term solution compared to peripheral access.
Describe the differences between multi-chamber and compounded bags in parenteral nutrition.
Multi-chamber bags like Kabiven are licensed, stable, and ready to use but lack micronutrients. Compounded bags are unlicensed, need compounding, refrigeration, and are nutritionally complete but expensive.
What are the components of parenteral nutrition bags and their functions?
Parenteral nutrition bags contain macronutrients like nitrogen for anabolic processes and carbohydrates/lipids for energy. They also include micronutrients such as trace elements and vitamins for overall nutrition.
Explain the evolution of lipid emulsions in parenteral nutrition.
First-generation lipid emulsions are now rarely used due to liver concerns.
Current lipid emulsions are safer and more effective for providing essential fatty acids in parenteral nutrition.