parasocial relationships Flashcards

1
Q

what is a parasocial relationship?

A

those which are similar to normal relationships by are one-sided and unreciprocated, usually a celebrity, on which the ‘fan’ expends a lot of emotional energy, commitment and time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what did mccutcheon et al. (2002) develop?

A
  • celebrity attitude scale (CAS)
  • used to objectively evaluate an individual’s level of interest or obsession with celebrities
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what did maltby et al. (2006) do?

A
  • used CAS in a large-scale survey
  • identified 3 levels of PSR
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what does each level of PSR describe?

A

attitudes and behaviours linked to ever more extreme forms of celebrity worship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what are the 3 levels of celebrity worship?

A
  • entertainment-social
  • intense-personal
  • borderline-pathological
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

describe the entertainment-social level

A
  • least intense level
  • celebrities are viewed as sources of entertainment and fuel for social interaction
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

entertainment-social (giles 2002)

A

PSRs were a fruitful source of gossip in offices

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

describe the intense-personal level

A
  • intermediate level
  • reflects a greater personal involvement in a PSR with a celebrity
  • frequent obsessive thoughts, intense feelings, considering them a ‘soulmate’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

describe the borderline-pathological level

A
  • strongest level
  • features uncontrollable fantasies and extreme behaviours
  • spending or planning to spend a large sum of money on a celebrity-related object
  • being willing to perform an illegal act for the celebrity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

links of levels of PSR and certain personality characteristics (maltby 2003)

A
  • entertainment-social = extraversion (sociable, lively)
  • intense-personal = neuroticism (tense, emotional, moody)
  • borderline-pathological = psychoticism (antisocial, egocentric)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

mccutcheon (2002) and levels of PSRs

A

linked the levels approach to the deficiencies people have in their own lives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

how can levels of PSR be linked to the deficiencies people have in their own lives?

A
  • person may have low self-esteem and lack fulflment in their everyday relationships
  • someone who initially has an entertainment-social orientation to a certain celebrity may be triggered into more intense involvement by personal crisis or stressful life event
  • PSR allows them to escape from reality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

describe the ‘absorption’ component of the absorption addiction model

A

seeking fufilment in celebrity worship motivates an individual to:

  • focus their attention as far as possible on the celebrity
  • become preoccupied with the celebrity
  • identify with them
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

describe the ‘addiction’ component of the absorption addiction model

A
  • individual needs to increase their ‘dose’ to gain satisfaction, just as with a physiological addiction to a psychoactive substance
  • leads to more extreme behaviours and delusional thinking eg. stalking
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

attachment theory explanation of PSRs (bowlby)

A

early attachment difficulties may lead to emotional troubles later in life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

attachment theory explanation of PSRs (ainsworth 1979)

A

identified 2 attachment types associated with unhealthy emotional development: insecure-resistant and insecure-avoidant

17
Q

why are are insecure-resistant types most likely to form PSRs as adults?

A

seek to have unfulfilled needs met, but in a relationship unaccompanied by the threat of rejection, break-up and disappointment that real-life relationships bring

18
Q

how do insecure-avoidant types view relationships?

A

prefer to avoid the pain and rejection of relationships altogether, whether they be social or parasocial

19
Q

attachment theory support (cole and leets 1999)

A

those with an insecure-resistant attachment style turn to TV characters as a means of satisfying their ‘unrealistic and often unmet’ relational demands

20
Q

evaluation: research support for levels (mccutcheon et al. 2016)

A
  • used CAS to measure level of PSRs
  • also assessed ps’ problems in their intimate relationships
  • ps who scored as borderline-pathological or intense-interpersonal tended to experience a high degree of anxiety in their intimate relationships whereas people at the entertainment-social level generally did not
  • ‘celebrity-worshipper’ can usefully be classified into 3 categories which are predictive of actual behaviour
21
Q

evaluation: support for absorption addiction model showing a link between celebrity worship and body image (maltby et al. 2005)

A
  • assessed boys and girls aged 14-16
  • researchers were particularly interested in girls who reported an intense-personal PSR with an adult female celebrity whose body shape they admired
  • girls tended to have poor body image, which may contribute to the development of an eating disorder
  • supports model’s prediction of an association between poor psychological functioning and the level (type and intensity) of PSR
22
Q

evaluation: attachment theory explains universal desire to form PSRs (dinkha et al. 2015)

A
  • compared collectivist (kuwait) and individualist (US) cultures
  • in both types of culture, people with an insecure attachment type were most likely to form intense PSRs with TV personalities and characters
  • driver for forming a PSR is independent of forming cultural influences
23
Q

evaluation: PSRs cannot be explained by attachment theoy (mccutcheon et al. 2006)

A
  • measured attachment types and celebrity-related attitudes in 299 american ps
  • attachment security did not affect the likelihood of forming a PSR with a celebrity
  • ps with insecure attachments were no more likely to form PSRs than ps with secure attachments
24
Q

evaluation: correlational analysis (eg. mccutcheon et al. 2016)

A
  • findings don’t show causal relationships between variables
  • eg. cannot conlcude that anxiety in relationships causes borderline-pathological parasocial involvement as relationship could be in other direction
  • 3rd factor, not measured in the study, could be the cause of both variables
25
evaluation: correlations are valuable
- suggest links between variables even if they don't demonstrate causes - such methods may be the only option we have when studying people's behaviour in their everyday lives