paragraph 1: select committees Flashcards
1) firstly, the most significant way that parliament scrutinises the executive is…
through their work on select committees
2) select committees…
usually consist of 11 members with a chair elected by the rest of the House
their role is to scrutinise departments of government and examine details of expenditure, administration and policy
3) committees provide effective scrutiny because…
they focus heavily on improving the work of government by questioning ministers and forcing them to explain their actions
thus being crucial in holding the executive to account because without select committees, the executive could escape accountability seeing as general elections are held every 5 years under the Fixed Term Parliament Act
4) furthermore, they are far less party political…
as they work across all parties and and are centred on improving the work of the executive rather than acting for their own gain
5) since the 2010 Wright reforms…
chairs are elected by the whole House instead of being appointed by party whips
in other words, they are more legitimate and less restricted by party whips which allows them to act more effectively in scrutinising the executive in great depth and detail
6) they can also devote weeks to debating and investigating an issue…
for example, in 2018, the International Development Committee have been responsible for scrutinising and examining Oxfam in depth that would not have been achieved in regular parliamentary debates as they cannot dedicate this much time to an issue
just goes to show how effective select committees are
1) however, the government usually holds a majority in these committees…
due the electoral system of FPTP (unit 1 link) that tends to produce a strong government with a clear majority
2) the existence of this majority…
can restrict the committees effectiveness because MPs and peers belonging to the governing party are expected to support their party instead of criticising it
making it difficult to properly scrutinise the government
3) similarly, select committees hold no enforcement powers…
this means that they cannot compel the government to follow their recommendations or force them to take any action at all
4) while its true that…
40% of committee recommendations are accepted, these rarely involve major changes to policy
which raises the question of the effectiveness of parliamentary scrutiny via select committees
5) but despite their limitations…
select committees still play a very important role in holding the executive to account
which demonstrates that they are an effective means of scrutiny as such scrutiny could not be done at the same level anywhere else