Paper 3: formation of a contract Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Definition of a contract

A

An enforceable agreement between two parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Definition of an offer

A

A definite promise to be legally bound

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Definition of acceptance

A

Unconditional assent to all the terms of the offer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Definition of consideration

A

The price one party pays for the other parties promise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Definition of intention to create legal relations

A

The courts must have satisfied that the parties intended to be bound

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Definition of unilateral contracts

A

One party known as the offeror, makes a promise in exchange for an act by another party known as the offeree

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Definition of bilateral contracts

A

A reciprocal arrangement between two parties by which each promises to perform an act in exchange for the other parties act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Harvey v Facey (1893)

A

Held: Facey’s telegram was not a definite promise to sell but a mere statement of price and value. Harvey tried to accept this but could not as the statement was not an offer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Carlil v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co (1893)

A

Held: the advert was an offer as it was so detailed and it could be accepted by anyone who used the smoke ball correctly and still got flu. If the advert indicates a course of action in return for which the advertiser makes a promise to pay, then she is bound by this promise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Partridge v Crittenden (1968)

A

Held: not guilty as he was an offer but an invitation to treat. The contract s not formed until the person seeing the advertisement has made an offer to buy, which has then been accepted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemist Ltd (1953)

A

Held: boots were not guilty as goods on a supermarket shelf are only an invitation to treat, an offer is made when a customer picks the item off the shelf to bu, they are invited to make an offer to buy, the contract is formed when sale is agreed at the cash desk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Fisher v Bell (1961)

A

Held: flick knives were not an offer to buy, they were invitations to treat, goods on display windows are not offers, but an invitation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Shopping principles

A
  • Display or advert is an invitation to treat
  • Customer offers to buy the goods at particular price
  • he offer can then be accepted by the seller by some action
  • The offer and acceptance may then be a binding contract
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Gibson v Manchester City Council (1979)

A

Held: no contract, it was held that the councils proposal was an invitation to treat, Gibson made an offer on the form which the council rejected, therefore not forming a binding contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Auction principles

A
  • When the auctioneer holds up the ‘lots’ it is an invitation to treat
  • Each bid is an offer
  • Acceptance takes place when the auctioneer’s hammer falls
  • Any bidder may therefore withdraw a bid before the hammer falls and the auctioneer may withdraw goods on behalf of the seller before that point
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Harris v Nickerson (1873)

A

Held: no such right of action and could not recover the expenses. The advert for the auction was only an invitation to treat and did not amount to a promise that all the articles advertised would be put up for sale

17
Q

Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking (1971)

A

Held: the offer is made when the machine holds it ready to receive the money. The acceptance takes place when the customer pays his money into the slot, so the machine is an offer as you cannot negotiate with a machine

18
Q

Ramsgate Victoria Hotel v Montefiore (1866)

A

Held: 5 months is not a ‘reasonable’ length of time for acceptance of an offer to buy shares as they are a commodity with a rapidly fluctuating price. Therefore, the offer had lapsed before the company tried to accept therefore no contract between them

19
Q

Byrne v Van Tienhoven (1880)

A

Held: there is a binding contract as revocation could only take effect on communication but the acceptance by telegram and post took effect as soon as it was sent. By the time Byrne received the letter of revocation on the 20th, the contract had been made and so the revocation had no legal effect

20
Q

Dickenson v Dodds (1876)

A

Held: there was no contract as the offer had already been revoked by communication from the 3rd party and the 3rd party was shown to be a mutual acquaintance on whom both parties could rely

21
Q

Hyde v Wrench (1840)

A

Held: the counter offer of £950 destroyed the original offer of £1,000

22
Q

Stevenson v McClean

A

Held: it is difficult to draw a line between a counter-offer and a request for further information

23
Q

Felthouse v Bindley (1862)

A

Held: the court held that there was no contract as there was no communication of acceptance by the nephew to the uncle

24
Q

Entores v Miles Far East Corp (1955)

A

Held: the acceptance was only valid when received in London, as telex was a form of instantaneous communication

25
Q

When does acceptance take place?

A

When it is clearly heard and understood

26
Q

The Kodak case

A
  • Offers on the internet are an invitation to treat
  • Placing an order amounts to an offer
  • An automatic reply from the service provider is not an acceptance
  • Acceptance is only done when the company makes a formal acceptance
27
Q

Yates v Pulleyn (1975)

A

Held: a specific method was not mandatory, it made no practical difference to the offeror since the letter was delivered on time, so this was not binding. Any acceptance which was communicated to the offeror by any other no less advantageous method would conclude the contract

28
Q

Thomas v Thomas (1842)

A

Held: “consideration means something which is of value in the eye of the law, moving from the plaintiff: it may be of some benefit to the plaintiff or some different to the defendant”

29
Q

Currie v Misa (1875)

A

Held: “a valuable consideration, in the sense of law, may consist either in some right, interest, profit, or benefit accusing to one party, or some forbearance, detriment, loss or responsibility given, suffered or undertaken by another”

30
Q

Dunlop v Selfridge (1915)

A

Held: “an act of forbearance or the promise thereof is price which the promise of the other is bought and the promise thus given value is enforceable”

31
Q

Williams v Roffey Bros (1991)

A

Held: courts need to find the existence to reflect the intentions of the parties

32
Q

Tweddle v Atkinson (1861)

A

Held: he was unsuccessful in his claim, he failed as he had given no consideration for the agreement himself. No consideration moved from him, he had given nothing in return for Atkinson’s promise

33
Q

Re: McArdle (1951)

A

Held: daughter-in-law was unsuccessful in her claim and the money did not need to be paid as the promise was given in return for something already done. This was a past consideration and the promise made by the children was NOT binding which allows them to break their promise

34
Q

Lampleigh v Braitwaite

A

Held: