Paper 3 Flashcards
Correlation experiment
-no manipulation of variables
-yields statistical results
-most common way is questionnaires or surveys
Naturalistic experiment vs. natural experiment
Naturalistic: no manipulation of variables, observes behavior of participant in natural behavior
Natural experiment: the independent variable is naturally occurring, participants not randomly allocated
Quasi-experiment
-Researcher manipulates independent variables and measures its effect of dependent
-Participants not randomly allocated to conditions instead placed based on pre-existing traits
True Experiment
-manipulates IV and measures its effect of DV
-participants randomly allocated
-cause and effect established
Structured interviews
-procedure highly controlled
-highly standardized
-set list of questions
-data gathered easy to analyze
Unstructured interviews
-interview schedule only specifies topic and time
-open to the interests and motivations of interviewee and they can reveal more about themselves
-results may be more valid
-hard to analyze
Semi-structured interviews
-looks like an informal conversation but interviewer follows a schedule
-open-ended questions
-interviewers can ask additional questions
Focus groups
-group conversation 8-12
-has a facilitator
-conversation more natural than one-on-one
-listening to others may spark ideas and encourage conversation
-time effective
-conformity
Questions 2: reporting and applying results
Justice & equitable treatment: prejudice against a group
Sound & valid methadology: people may take the findings in as fact
Deception: avoid misunderstanding and misinterpretation
Reflexivity: aware of their own biases and how their findings may be used by others
Generalizing quantitative
-ecological validity
-sample size
-representative nature of sample
-reliability and replicability
-how sample was chosen (bias?)
-ecological vs. internal validity (artificiality and highly controlled)
Generalizing qualitative
-Transferability (representational, inferential (settings), theoretical)
-sampling bias
Ensuring credibility
Credibility = validity
-limiting confounding variables
-high internal validity may compromise external validity