Paper 2 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Actus Reus of murder

A

unlawful killing
of a reasonable creature
under the queens’ peace

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Mens rea of killing

A

malice athorthought

express or implied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

R V Martin

A

Used to much force (unreasonable and unforeseeable)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Reasonable creature

A

Attorney general reference no3 of 1994

life starts at birth, existence indpeant of the mother

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

R v Malcherek and steel

A

legally life ends at brain death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Alredale Trust v Bland

A

life support can be switched off before brain death, if in best interest and if in a vegetative state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R v Clegg

A

The priminster has to declare war to not be under the queen’s peace

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

express malice

A

intent to kill

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Implied malice

A

intent to cause GBH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

DPP v Smith

A

serious harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

R v Vickers

A

Implied malice

intent to cause GBH is sufficient enough men’s rea for a murder conviction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Direct intent

A

R V Mohan

where the defendant aims to cause a particular consequence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Indirect intent

A

R v Woolin

1) the consequence was virtual certainty
2) the defendant realised this

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

factual causation

A

But for test

R v Pagett

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

legal causation

A

operative and substantial test

R v Smith

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Broken chain

A

act of god
3rd party - R v Jordan
Victims own actions - R v William