Paper 1 Theme 5 Flashcards
Thatcher
Context: What was Britain like in 1979 before Thatcher? What were some events in Thatcher era?
economy in 1979: high taxation, 83% for high earners- due to full employment and nationalised industries funded by the govt, high public expenditure by govt caused high taxation
- high inflation- people spent more money due to full employment so prices went up e.g in 1978 inflation was at 11%
- govt regulation of the economy- on interest rates, limits on foreign currency (stop-go economics and govt control of money)
- trade unions had millions of members and were very powerful e.g Winter of Discontent 1978-79
- councils funded by rates- local govt
politics in 1979: consensus politics- Labour and Conservative agreed with eachother
- powerful local govts e.g the GLC (Greater London Council) which promoted left-wing ideas
society in 1979: social divisions- poorest 10% of people had 4.3% of the wealth in the UK, richest 10% had 20%
events:
- became PM in 1979
- 1980 Iranian embassy siege- protestors took people hostage, right to buy your own council house
- 1981- mass unemployment in Britain caused riots and Thatcher’s popularity dropped
- 1982 Falkland’s War- success helped her reputation
- 1983 Thatcher won general election by landslide
- 1984 miners’ strike because govt wanted to close down mines, Brighton bomb- IRA tried to assassinate Thatcher
- 1985- miners’ strike ended and mines were closed, Greenham peace protests about missiles in Britain, privatisation of British telecom, railways etc
- 1986 Big Bang- deregulation of London
- 1990 Saddham Hussein invaded Kuwait, resigned in Nov due to unpopularity of the poll tax
Economic: What were Thatcher’s views and policies on inflation and what was the impact?
- sound finance- believe in not spending too much and avoiding inflation
- there was too much money in circulation which caused inflation- Thatcher cut public expenditure and raised interest rates by cuts to borrowing and stopping printing of money
- used Milton Friedman’s idea of monetarism which argues that govts should prioritise low inflation by controlling the amount of money in circulation in the economy- Thatcher wasn’t sure exactly how it worked e.g how much money was in circulation?
- monetarism was abandoned in 1983 but the principle was kept
- a range of supply side policies were introduced- govt encouraging production by removing regulations and cutting taxes e.g there were cuts to income tax, cuts to welfare payments and deregulation
impact: (negative)
- businesses went bankrupt which caused 14% fall in production
- high unemployment (3 million in 1982)
- cuts in govt expenditure in 1980 and 1981- spending on housing and social security was cut
- all of these led to riots in 1981- the most severe were in Handsworth in Birmingham, Chapeltown in Leeds and Toxteth in Liverpool- partly sparked by racial issues but there were also tensions due to poverty
(positive)
- by 1982 inflation was reduced and remained below 10% for the whole decade
Economic: What were Thatcher’s views and policies on privatisation and what was the impact?
- Thatcher believed in greater ownership of property and shares
- Thatcher wanted to remove govt monopolies and start ‘contracting out’ of services where projects would be offered to private companies and funded by govt to reduce costs
benefits of privatisation: public expenditure was cut by selling off nationalised industries e.g before 1983 British Aerospace, British sugar and British petroleum had been sold off, British telecom was sold off in 1984
- entrepreneurship was stimulated which caused competition and innovation- Thatcher argued privatisation would reinvigorate the economy and give people an incentive to work- shares were sold cheaply and between 1979 and 1990 number of shareholders increase from 3 million to 11 million
- govt earned money from sales
- created a capitalist, property-owning democracy- ‘popular capitalism’ was the idea that everyone should have opportunity to own a property and have shares in companies
negatives of privatisation: companies were sold off cheaply and quickly
- shares were also sold cheaply and quickly just to make a profit e.g individuals owned 38% of shares in 1975 but only 20% in 1990
- shares usually owned just by middle class people- 9% of unskilled male workers owned shares compared to 50% of middle class professional males
- £19 billion raised by sales of companies but this funded tax cuts for the rich, didn’t help w.c
- chief executives became shareholders, not regular people
after Thatcher (impact) - John Major continued privatisation e.g British Rail was privatised between 1994 and 1997- bad because govt had to subsidise private companies that operated trains
- Tony Blair continued privatisation with ‘public-private partnerships’ (collaboration between public sector and private companies to provide a govt service)- projects were given to private companies to build hospitals, schools etc which meant they could be built cheaper and faster BUT profit was more important than providing services so they were low quality
Economic: What were Thatcher’s views and policies on deregulation and what was the impact?
deregulation = ending govt control
benefits:
- October 1979- Thatcher ended controls on buying foreign currency- fuelled greater overseas investment which returned profits to Britain BUT this also led to huge increase in spending on foreign goods which drained wealth
- Big Bang 1986- ended govt restrictions on banks and borrowing e.g they could offer different types of mortgages that required more interest- riskier but earned more money
negatives:
- City of London became world’s premier financial centre
- deregulation meant institutions could offer riskier financial products (schemes which help consumers manage money) and individuals could make lots of money in an unsustainable ways- led to the financial crisis of 2008 because this was not managed by Labour govt after 1997
impact:
- rise in private household debt- £47 billion in 1989
- rise in mortgage debt- £235 million in 1989
- personal debt was at £1.3 trillion in 2003
- in 2003 20% of families (6 million) had debt problems
- by 1980 there were 10 million credit cards in Britain and by 1990 there were 27 million
Economic: What were Thatcher’s views and policies on taxation and what was the impact?
- Thatcher believed taxation gave the incentive to work hard and have rewards, encouraging more hard work
- 1980- income tax for high earners was cut from 83% to 60% and cut to 40% in 1988
- basic rate was reduced from 33% to 25%
- inheritance tax was cut from 75% to 40%
- indirect taxation was increased
- 1979- VAT increased from 8% to 15% on food, cars, clothes etc
- national insurance contributions increased
- these were all regressive so those with the lowest incomes ended up paying more tax, the rich weren’t taxed as much
How was Thatcher’s economic policy SUCESSFUL?
inflation: inflation fell in the early 1980s and it remained low from 1983-89, it was 13.4% in 1979 and 4.6% in 1983
economic growth: Thatcher aimed to improve economic growth , in 1983-92 it was 2.5%- better than Heath’s govt which was in recession
productivity: wanted to improve labour productivity which did improve compared to the 1970s
industry and finance: financial services expanded greatly, boosted the economy of London and the South East
How was Thatcher’s economic policy UNSUCCESSFUL?
inflation: in the 1980s and 90s, inflation was still higher than the rest of Europe- 6.1% in the UK compared to 5.8% in Europe in 1985
economic growth: Thatcher’s growth was weaker than Macmillan and Wilson’s govt in the 1960s- average growth 3.3%, her policies were unable to halt Britain’s economic decline- in 1950 UK was 5th in GDP by 1997 UK was 14th
unemployment: huge rise in unemployment, peaked at 3.2 million in 1985- historically high
the state and economy: Thatcher wanted to reduce the state’s role in the economy- failed because it actually rose, wanted to reduce public expenditure but this also failed- 37% in 1979 rose to 44% in 1997
productivity: worse compared to the rest of the world, in the 1970s UK production was 50% of the USA’s
industry and finance: industrial production declined, 1960s UK produced 40% of GDP, by 1997 it was 21%, UK manufacturing exports declined- balance of payments of manufactured goods went from a surplus of £5 billion in 1979 to a £20 billion deficit in 1989
Why was Thatcher opposed to Trade Unions and what legislation was passed to curb TU powers?
- trade unions went on strike and caused the Winter of Discontent and the collapse of govts- TUs had too much power
- 1980 Employment Act meant workers did not have to join a union when they joined a particular firm, they were only allowed to strike against their direct employers, not in sympathy with other workers
- 1982 Act meant unions could be sued for illegal strikes
- 1984 Act meant a strike had to be approved by a majority of union members in a ballot before it was legal, Thatcher also built up coal reserves so if miners did strike, they would not have to resort to another 3 day week
Why did the miners strike in 1984 and what happened?
What was the impact?
- govt wanted to close down 10 pits, miners felt this was enough of a reason to go on strike
- strike began on 6th March 1984
- the leader of the NUM, Scargill, did not ballot NUM members and striked with flying pickets- caused miners in Nottinghamshire to leave the NUM and set up their own union which voted to keep their mines open
- Scargill did not benefit from public sympathy and his disapproval rating never fell below 79%
- 1985- the strike was defeated in 3rd March after almost a year, workers in Kent lasted for another 2 weeks
impact: unions became far more willing to work with govt legislation
- total number of trade union members fell from 13.5 million in 1979 to under 10 million in 1990
- total number of working days lost to strike action fell from 10.5 million in 1980-84 to 0.8 million in 1990-94
- series of Unemployment Acts in 1988, 1989 and 1990 further weakened TUs- after Thatcher’s resignation in 1990 TU membership fell again to 6.7 million in 1997
- removal of govt subsidies for older industries saw a decline in manual labour from 47% in 1974 to 36% in 1991, number of miners fell from 200,000 to 10,000 in the same period
- many local communities were greatly affected by the end of major local industry e.g shipbuilding- critics argue Thatcher caused unnecessary suffering to communities
Context: what was the state like before Thatcher and what were Thatcher’s views on state rollback?
- post-war political consensus favoured state intervention, a welfare state and a ‘safety net’ of insurance for British people e.g NHS, unemployment programmes
- Thatcher believed many people were lazy and dependent on the state as a result- the govt had become a ‘Nanny State’ which led to high taxation, waste in govt expenditure and high inflation
- Thatcher believed state ownership crushed innovation and competition, that taxation for state control drained wealth of successful individuals and there should be private entrepreneurship
- Thatcher disliked ‘creeping socialism’ of the post war consensus in the UK and wanted the Conservatives to move away from the centre-ground
- was inspired by Fredrich von Hayek’s idea of neo-liberalism- argued that there should be a free market which is better at allocating goods than the state, also that individuals can make their own choices so welfare should not be provided because it leads to state dependence
- overall Thatcher was popular because the Winter of Discontent meant the British public agreed something different had to be done and it is argued that ‘there was no alternative’ to Thatcher’s controversial policies
Rolling back the state: How did Thatcher want to reduce the civil service?
- Environment minister Michael Heseltine introduced the Management Information System for Ministers which allowed him to closely monitor cost and responsibilities of civil servants
- job losses followed- 1 in 4 workers in the environment ministry were sacked in 3 years
- Thatcher abolished the civil service department in 1981- it existed to protect members but Thatcher saw it as a trade union
- by 1988 22.5% of civil servants had been sacked which saved about £1 billion
- 1988 ‘Next Steps’ report promoted a less centralised civil service and the rise of more flexible agencies- by 1991 there were 57 agencies like this
- rise of agencies which work with the private sector- by 1997 76% of civil servants worked in 100 different agencies e.g the prison service (for the home office)
- overall govt control was reduced
Rolling back the state: How did Thatcher want to reduce local govt?
- 1985 Local Govt ACt enabled Thatcher to abolish councils she found to be troublesome (left wing)
- the Greater London Council and 6 others were dissolved
- Thatcher was concerned by left wingers in the councils and cut central govt payments from 60% to 49% funding
- introduced rate ‘caps’ on 18 councils in the 1984 Rates Act- local rates were only paid by people who owned or rented property, some councils could give welfare and benefits to people who weren’t paying for it which Thatcher didn’t like, she felt that by capping local rates she was encouraging people to be less lazy and dependent on the state
- Thatcher tried to widen sense of financial responsibility by introducing the ‘poll tax’- the charge was the same for everyone which meant poor people paid a higher percentage of their income than the rich- hugely unpopular and their were mass protests when the tax was rolled out in 1990
- she used the example of Conservative councils like Wandsworth in London to promote greater efficiency through ‘contracting out’ council services- private firms were encouraged to bid for contracts to supply services such as rubbish collection by 1985, staff numbers fell by 1/3 in Wandsworth
- 1980 Housing act gave people the ‘right to buy’- enabled people living in council houses for 3 or more years to buy a new house from the council- 204,000 houses bought in 1982-83 and home ownership rose from 55% to 63% in 1979-1990
Rolling back the state: How did Thatcher want to reduce govt role in the NHS?
- Thatcher wanted to abolish tax funding for the NHS by enforcing private healthcare BUT the vast majority of British people approved of the NHS’ free, expert care to those in need regardless of wealth
- between 1980-87 NHS spending rose by 60% and NHS’ share of govt spending rose from 12 to 15% between 1979 and 1996- Thatcher didn’t reduce role of the state here
- 1989 White Paper ‘working for patients’ called for creation of an ‘internal market’ where health authorities would purchase healthcare services from hospital trusts- the idea was that better providers would attract more demand from GPs HOWEVER it was only implemented after Thatcher resigned
- reforms to the NHS were very unpopular with doctors and money spent on NHS managers increased from £25.7 million to £383.8 million- not reducing state role
- 34 of NHS trusts were in debt by 1996, attempts to cut costs affected quality of care e.g 2% of hospital beds were lost 1990-94
- requirement to meet targets led to demoralisation among doctors and nurses who felt they spent less time on patients and more time trying to please managers
- Thatcher was unable to roll back govt provision of healthcare, NHS still remained- while numbers of people with private healthcare increased from 500,000 in 1955 to 6.6 million in 1990, the majority of the British public relied on the NHS
Rolling back the state: How did Thatcher want to reduce govt role in the education?
- Thatcher wanted to raise educational standards and delivery more value for money, she thought Local Education Authorities (LEAs) were trying to protect inadequate teachers and promote ‘soft’ ‘child-centred’ learning instead of encouraging measurable academic success
- Keith Joseph, education minister, began the process of raising standards and creating a national curriculum by merging the old O-level and CSE to a single GCSE- the plans were announced in 1984, new courses were first taught in 1986 and were first examined in 1988
- 1988 Education Act- Kenneth baker imposed a national curriculum and new methods of assessment at several ‘Key Stages’, including the GCSE examination at the end of Key Stage 4
- exam results formed the basis of league tables which aimed to empower parents to select better schools- ‘good’ schools quickly became oversubscribed
- the Act allowed schools to become grant-maintained and directly funded by the govt, not by LEAs- increased the dependence of 1,200 schools (19% of all secondary schools)- this and introduction of the National Curriculum meant there was an increase in central govt control
Overall how was Thatcher SUCCESSFUL in rolling back the state?
- Civil Service- overall govt role was reduced in this area, 22.5% civil servants were sacked which saved around £1 billion, rise of different agencies, abolished civil service department
- Local govt- overall role of local govt was reduced- 1985 Local Govt Act, cuts to central govt payments, ‘contracting out’, right to buy
- Defence- 1984-1986 18,000 troops made redundant — plans to buy a new RAF plane were scrapped in 1986 - the Navy was reduced in size- Chatham dockyard and the Royal dockyard in Gibraltar were closed