Paper 1 - social influence, memory, attachment, psychopathology Flashcards
Explanations for obedience AO1
Agentic state
-individuals believe they are not responsible for their behaviour as they are the agent of an authority figure.
-Allows the individual to commit acts they morally are opposed to.
-May feel discomfort as a result of their actions but are unable to resist the demands of the authority figure
-This is opposite to the autonomous state where an individual’s actions are free from control
Legitimacy of authority
-Individuals accept that people higher up in the social hierarchy should be obeyed
-These people have the right to harm or punish others such as the police force and the criminal justice system
-This is learnt in childhood through socialisation processes
-It is accepted by my most people that legitimacy of authority is required for society to function properly
Explanations for obedience AO3
:) Milgram - supporting study - participants hesitant in continuing the shocks, continued when the professor clarified that he was responsible. Professor is high up in the social hierarchy due to his education, supporting the idea of the agentic state. Obedience dropped when the instructor had no uniform.
:) Bickman - supporting study - 39% of public picked up litter when asked to by investigator dressed as security guard but only 14% when dressed as milkman. Demonstrates legitimacy of authority in real world
:( Milgram - conflicting evidence - a significant minority of participants disobeyed despite awareness of the professor’s authority. Suggest other factors - innate tendencies to dis/obey
:( Agentic state used to justify war crimes eg: crimes committed by death camp Nazi, Eichmann
Situational variables affecting obedience AO1
Milgram conducted study in response to holocaust.
Participants were the ‘teacher’ and introduced to confederates: ‘professor’ in a lab coat and ‘learner’.
Learner strapped to chair in another room and participant instructed to deliver shocks (15-450v) when learner answered incorrectly.
At 300v the learner refused to go on, after 315v the learner was silent indicating unconsciousness or death.
Professor encouraged the learner to continue
Results: Participants distressed but obeyed: 100% to 300v, 12.5% stopped at 300v, 65% to full 450v.
^This is milgram’s baseline study^
Proximity - learner in the same room, obedience dropped to 40%, hold hand on shock plate, 30%
Location - office block in run down area, obedience dropped to 47.5%, lack of LOA
Uniform - professor replaced with confederate in normal clothes, obedience dropped to 20%, lack of LOA
Situational variables affecting obedience AO3
:( Low internal validity - participants guessed that shocks were not real and were playing along, unclear whether findings were due to obedience or participants response to demand characteristics
:) Bickman - supporting study - 39% of public picked up litter when asked to by investigator dressed as security guard but only 14% when dressed as milkman. Demonstrates that situational variables such as uniform have an effect on obedience in the real world.
:) Meeus and Raaijmakers - supporting study - ordered dutch participants to say stressful things to a confederate in a job interview, 90% obeyed. When the person giving orders wasn’t present, obedience dropped dramatically - Milgram’s findings are valid across cultures.
:( Counterpoint - only two replications of Milgram’s study found in ‘non-western’ countries. May not be appropriate to conclude that Milgram’s finding apply to people of all cultures.
Dispositional explanations for obedience AO1
Authoritarian personality:
Dispositional explanation: explanation that highlights the importance of the individual’s personality.
Adorno et al. argued high obedience levels is a psychological disorder linked to personality
People with the authoritarian personality show an extreme respect for authority, had fixed stereotypes of other groups and identified with ‘strong’ people but disliked ‘weak’ people.
Adorno developed the F scale and those with a high score showed these characteristics
Adorno suggested this personality was shaped in early life by strict authoritarian parenting with harsh physical punishment.
Dispositional explanations for obedience AO3
:) Elms and Milgram - supporting research - interviewed those who took part in first 4 Milgram studies and found those who shocked until the full 450v scored higher on the F scale compared to disobedient participants.
:( Counterpoint - analysis of obedient participants found characteristics unusual for authoritarians - didn’t experience unusual levels of punishment during childhood. Authoritarianism my not be an accurate predictor of obedience
:( Confounding variables - the link between authoritarian personalities and following orders is correlational. There may be a third factor such as lower income or poorer education that result in both factors.
:( F scale questionnaire lacks internal validity - questions are written in one direction, agreeing to all questions labels someone as authoritarian - response bias
Explanations of resistance to social influence AO1
Social support -
seeing others resist social influence releases the pressure to obey or conform, increasing the individuals confidence.
Eg providing a disobedient role model (obedience) or creating a small alternate group to belong to (conformity).
Breaks the unanimity of the groups and challenges the legitimacy of authority of the authority figure.
Locus of control -
Proposed by Rotter
Factor of personality controls our lives and can be measured on a scale from high internal to low external LOC.
High internal LOC - have responsibility for their own actions which dictate the events in their lives, less concerned with social approval. Results in ability to pressure to conform or obey
Low external LOC - feel their lives are controlled by external forces e.g. fate or the government.
Most people are in the middle of the scale
Explanations of resistance to social influence AO3
:) Supporting study - replication of Milgram - participants assessed for LOC - 37% of those with an internal LOC refused to continue to the highest shock level, compared to 23% of those with an external LOC.
:) Supporting study - Asch - unanimity variation demonstrating social support - conformity dropped significantly from 32% to 5.5%
:( Conflicting evidence - analysis of data from LOC studies over a 40 year period. Over this time people became more resistant to social influence but more external. Suggests LOC is not a valid explanation of resistance to social influence
Minority influence AO1
Minority influence: minority of people persuades others to adopt their beliefs, attitudes or behaviours through informational social influence, leading to internalisation.
Starts as a slow process but as more of the majority is converted to minority view, process speeds up - snowball effect
Consistency - minority demonstrates confidence in it’s view by repeating the same message over time.
Commitment - members of the majority take them more seriously if they are willing to suffer for their views but still hold them
Flexibility - need to appear to consider valid counter arguments and slightly compromise to not be seen as dogmatic and unpersuasive
Minority influence AO3
:) Supporting study - when shown blue slides, participant majority were more likely to report the slides as green if a confederate minority was consistent in calling them green 8.4% compared to an inconsistent group 1.25%
:) Minority groups often show commitment by suffering eg gay rights, environmental activists, suffragettes
:( Artificial tasks - tasks involved in minority influence research are often artificial. Research is therefore very different to how minorities attempt to change the behaviour of majorities in real life. Findings of minority influence studies therefore lack external validity.
The multi-store model of memory AO1
Atkinson and Shifrin’s multi-store model - describes how information flows through the memory system
3 stores
Sensory register - receives all stimuli from the environment. Comprises several registers. Coding is modality specific - iconic memory codes for visual info, echoic memory codes for acoustic info. Duration - less than half a second. Capacity - very high.
Short-term memory - temporary active store - receives information from sensory register by paying attention or from long-term memory by retrieval. Info kept in STM by maintenance rehearsal or passed on to LTM by prolonged rehearsal. Coding - acoustic. Duration - approx 18 seconds. Capacity - 5-9 items
Long-term memory - permanent memory store. Info passed to LTM from STM by prolonged rehearsal - Coding - semantic. Duration - permanent. Capacity - unlimited
The multi-store model of memory AO3
:) research support for STM and LTM - Baddeley gave 4 lists of 10 words to 4 participant groups. Acoustically similar or dissimilar or semantically similar or dissimilar. Immediate recall worst for acoustically similar. Recall after 20 mins worst for semantically similar. Suggests STM is coded acoustically and LTM is coded semantically- shows they are separate stores
:) research support for duration of LTM - Bahrick tested recall of school friends in photographs - 90% after 15 years and still 80 % for names after 45 years. Supports the idea that duration of LTM is potentially limitless.
:( conflicting evidence - KFs STM for digits was very poor when read out loud to him but much better when he read them to himself. Suggests that there could be more than one STM store - disproving the MSM.
:( conflicting evidence - found that type of rehearsal is more important than the amount. Elaborative rehearsal - linking info to existing knowledge - is needed for long term storage. Info can be transferred to LTM without prolonged rehearsal. MSM does not fully explain how long term storage is achieved.
The working memory model AO1
Baddeley and Hitch
Explanation of how short-term memory is organised and functions
Central executive - monitors incoming data and filters info before allocating it to different ‘slave systems’
Phonological loop - processes sound information. Coding - acoustic. Capacity - 2 seconds. Made up of: phonological store - stores the words you hear, articulatory process - allows maintenance rehearsal.
Visuo-spatial sketchpad - stores visual and spatial info. Coding - visual/spatial. Capacity - 4 objects. Made up of: visual cache - stores visual date, Inner scribe - records the arrangement of objects.
Episodic buffer - added by Baddeley in 2000. Intergrates info from slave systems and maintains a sense of time sequencing.
The working memory model AO3
:) supporting evidence - KFs STM for digits was very poor when read out loud to him but much better when he read them to himself. Supports the existence of PL and VSS as two separate STM stores.
:) supporting evidence - when Baddeley asked participants to carry out visual and verbal tasks at the same time, they performed similarly to when they performed the tasks separately. But when tasks were both visual or both verbal, performance declined. This supports the existence of separate systems for visual and verbal ino.
:( counterpoint - it is unclear whether KF had any other cognitive impairments which may have affected his performance on memory tasks. This challenges the evidence that comes from KF as his brain injuries may have affected different systems.
:( inaccurate theories - it is impossible to directly observe the memory processes described in the model so it is necessary to make inferences on the basis of behaviour and brain scan images - these inferences could be incorrect - decreasing the validity of the model
Improving the accuracy of eyewitness testimony AO1
Fisher and Geiselman argued that EWT could be improved if police used the cognitive interview - four main techniques
Reinstate the context - mentally returning to the crime scene - triggers environmental/ emotional contextual cues
Report everything - all details, even those which seem irrelevant should be mentioned - seemingly unimportant details may be important and may trigger other important memories
Reverse the order - switches the chronology - checks accuracy and challenges any expectations the victim may have of how something occured
Change perspective - consider the situation from the perspective of a witness or perpetrator - disrupts the effect of expectations and schemas on recall
Improving the accuracy of eyewitness testimony AO3
:) research support - 16 detectives at Florida PD were put into matched pair groups. The group trained in CI gained 63% more info than the control group in interviews. Suggests the CI is an effective technique for real police officers in the real world.
:) research support - meta-analysis of 42 studies including over 2500 interviews found that the cognitive interview did result in a significant increase in the amount of correct info recalled.
:( counterpoint - CI significantly increased both the amount of correct and incorrect information recalled meaning overall accuracy rate is similar for the CI (85%) and the standard interview (82%)
:( expensive - CI takes a lot more time and training than the standard police interview. Therefore police officers may be reluctant to use the CI as many forces do not have the resources to provide the special training needed. The CI may not be a realistic method for police officers to use.
Animal studies of attachment AO1
Lorenz’s research tested imprinting: Hatched half a clutch of goose eggs using an incubator where the first thing they saw was Lorenz and half hatched by the mother. Findings: goslings hatched by Lorenz followed him and goslings hatched by mother followed her, even after they were mixed. Conclusions: imprinting is when an animal will strongly attach to the first object they encounter and then follow this object. Critical period - if the gosling did not see a large moving object to imprint on within the first few hours, it would not imprint at all.
Harlow’s research tested cupboard love: babies love their mothers because they feed them. Suggested instead that the basis of attachment is contact comfort and babies have an innate need for physical contact. Procedure: 16 baby monkeys placed in cages with surrogate mothers. Combinations of wire and/or cloth mothers that did or did not provide milk. Findings: Monkeys with cloth mothers always preferred its company even if the wire mother provided milk. Monkeys with cloth mothers demonstrated confidence in novel situations and returned to it when scared. Monkeys without a cloth mother showed signs of stress related illness. Follow up studies - maternal deprivation resulted in permanent social disorders - difficulty mating and raising offspring
Suggesting: infants have an innate need for physical contact, will attach to whatever provides comfort.
Animal studies of attachment AO3
:) later research - Lorenz and Harlow’s work influenced later researchers such as Bowlby in the development of the idea of the critical period and internal working model in humans. Studies have had a wider impact on psychology
:) real world value - findings have been applied to early childcare - helped social workers and clinical psychologists understand that a lack of bonding experience may be a risk factor in a child’s development. Allowing them to intervene and prevent poor outcomes.
:( generalisability to humans - geese are genetically and socially very different to humans so behaviour is likely to be different. Although monkeys are genetically similar, there are significant differences in biology and social environments. Therefore it may not be appropriate to generalise these findings to humans.
:(ethical issues - intentionally orphaning infant primates and subjecting them to high levels of stress. Led to a negative view of psychology
Explanations of attachment: learning theory AO1
Dolland and Miller - cupboard love theory - children become attached to their caregiver because they learn the caregiver meets physical needs like food. Based on learning theory - can be explained by classical and operant conditioning
Classical conditioning - learning by association - food and mother are presented together resulting in pleasure, pleasure starts to be associated with the mother. Pleasure response occurs whenever the mother appears
Operant conditioning - learning by consequences - positive reinforcement - positive consequences (food) for crying behaviour, negative reinforcement - baby stops crying when parent produces food