Paper 1 - Psychology Flashcards
Social Influence, Memory, Psychopathology, Attachement, Research Methods
Define compliance.
A person’s public behavior changes due to group pressure but does not change their personal beliefs.
Define identification.
A person’s public behavior changes when they want to be liked by a group, but only changes their personal beliefs in the group’s presence.
Define internalisation.
A person’s public behavior changes when they accept the group opinion as their own, changing their personal beliefs.
What is the difference between informative and normative social influence?
Informative social influence is when a person conforms because they believe the group is correct, while normative social influence is when a person conforms to be accepted or liked by the group.
Lucas’s Mathematical Self-Efficacy Study.
Informative - 45 high MSE and 42 low PPTs read aloud their answers after hearing three responses from CONs. All PPTs resisted conformity when the task difficulty was low, but the low MSE gp conformed 50% more in the critical trials.
Asch’s Line Study.
Normative - 50 male PPTs sat 6th in gp of CONs and were asked to match the line to the standard line. Each PPT completed 18 trials, and CONs gave the incorrect answer of 12. 32% (1/3) gave the wrong answer even when compromising the truth.
Asch’s Line Study - Variations
Increased group size up to three CONs, increases conformity.
The presence of another disenterner enables PPTs to defy group norms.
Increased task difficulty, increased conformity.
What is obedience?
A form of social influence where an individual follows a direct order or command from an authority figure.
Zimbardo’s Prison Study.
24 male volunteer PTTs were accessed psychological and physicians before being assigned randomly to the role of guard or prisoner. Prisoners were taken from their homes and blindfolded by a real police officer and taken to the basement of the Stanford psychological department, which had been set up by the guards.
Zimbardo’s Prison Study - Issues
Low ecological validity - Real guards would have been given a code of conduct; without it, the PPTs could act in extreme ways. They were also paid $15.00 for 2 weeks.
Demand characteristics - One guard claimed to base his role on Cool Hand Luke. However, the prisoners rioted like real prisoners would.
Zimbardo’s Prison Study - Unethical
Prisoners were taken from their homes, and they believed they could not leave. Prisoner 8612 acted crazy to get out, and Prisoner 416 starved himself in permanent isolation.
Zimbardo’s Prison Study - Ethical
PPTs knew they were taking part in the study, which gave the researcher informed consent as they volunteered. The Ethics Committee gave its approval to conduct the experiment, and they said the PPTs had the right to withdraw at any time.
Milgram’s Obedience Experiment.
Volunteer PPTs from Yale were instructed by an experimenter (CON) to shock the learner (CON) to increase learning, and the shock was tested on the PPTs at 45 volts (Shocks were fake to the learner). At 300 volts, the learner would bang on the wall, but the PPTs were encouraged to continue to 450 volts. Despite the warning marked at 420 volts, 65% continued and 5/40 stopped at 300 volts.
Milgram’s Obedience Experiment - Variations
Increased proximity, decreased obedience by 40%.
Physical contact decreased obedience to 30%.
The absence of the experimenter decreased obedience to 20% (1/5).
Location (Rundown Offices), decreased obedience to less than 50%.
Milgram’s Obedience Experiment - Issues
Low ecological validity - PPTs may have placed the responsibility of their action on to the researcher, and they were paid $4.00.
Low generalizability - All male sample. Androcentic not representing women presents a beta bias.
Milgram’s Obedience Experiment - Unethical
PPTs were deceived four times: aim of study, precence of confederates, fake shocks and the distress of the leaner. Three men had seizures, and two continued with the experiment.
Milgram’s Obedience Experiment Ethical
PPTs gave informed consent by volunteering. The Ethics Committee gave its approval to conduct the experiment, and they said the PPTs had the right to withdraw, even though this wasn’t easy with the prods.
Define agentic state.
When an individual feels no personal responsibility for their actions because they believe themselves to be acting for an authority figure, freeing them from the demands of their conscious.
Define autonomous state.
When an individual feels they are free to act according to their own principles and are responsible for the consequence of their actions.
Define authoritarian personality.
An individual who is highly obedient and has a conformist mindset, often showing submission to authority, hostility toward subordinates and security in their opinions.
Rotter’s Locus of Control
(Holland found that external locus of control PPTs were more likely to continue to 450 volts)
High internal locus of control means that an individual believes they have control of the events in their life, making them less obedient because they have high confidence and a positive outlook.
External locus of control means that an individual believes they have no control of the events in their life, making them more obedient because they have a stronger need to be a part of the majority.
Mosscovici’s Majority Influence Study
172 Female PPTs were put into groups of six, including two CONs, and viewed 36 blue slides of varying shades. The consistent condition had the CONs say all slides were green. The inconsistent condition had them say 24 green, 12 blue. There were higher rates of conformity in the consistent group.
Six Stages of Social Change
Drawing Attention
Consistency
Deeper Processing
Augmentation Principle - The minority shows they’re willing to suffer or sacrifice for their cause, boosting their credibility (e.g., arrests, hunger strikes).
Snowball Effect - More people adopt the minority view until it becomes the majority view.
Social Cryptoamnesia - Society accepts and remembers the change but can’t remember how it happened.
Multi-Store Memory Model (MSM) by Atkinson and Shiffrin
This model describes memory as consisting of three stores: the sensory register, short-term memory, and long-term memory.