paper 1 - attachment Flashcards
define attachment according to schaffer
a close and emotional response between 2 persons characterised by mutual affection and a desire to maintain proximity
explain maccoby’s (1980) theory into attachment
1) proximity seeking (especially when stressed)
2) separation distress
3) joy upon reunion
4) general orientation towards specific individual
what is the importance for primary attachment
1) in infancy normally with child and mother
2) must be of good quality or issues later
neurologically (less brain capacity) physical ( under developed) cognitively and psychologically
what is reciprocity
the process in which a behaviour is matched during an interaction eg. smiling back when someone smiles
explain reciprocity and infant attachment
attachment develops by 2 way reciprocity when an emotional connection develops between an infant and his/her caregiver
- influences the child’s physical, neurological, cognitive and psychological development
- becomes basis for basic trust or mistrust, shapes how the child will relate to the world, and form relationship through life
explain meltzoff and moore’s research into reciprocity
2/3 week old infant mimicked and copy adult responses (stick out tongue), also evident in 3 day old. (innate not learnt)
- also investigated in newborn rhesus monkeys
what is interactional synchrony
how a parent’s speech and infant’s behaviour become finely synchronised so that they are in direct response to one another
- Feldman (2007) ‘temporal coordination of microleve social behaviour’
‘symbolic exchanges between parent and child’
must be in time!
explain interactional synchrony in infant development of attachment
helps the infant learn to read other’s emotions and develop the skills of social interaction
- synchrony in the first few months will become more frequent and more elaborate
- a coordinate, rapid and smooth exchange of responses between a caregiver and an infant
explain Condon and Ogston’s research into reciprocity
experiment using still face technique, adult keeps his or her face unmoving and expressionless in face to face interaction, Babies are distressed by still face and show signs of distress
- a parents responsiveness to an infant aids psychological and biological development, need social interaction to develop to their fullest and produce a secure attachment
explain Russell and Belsky’s research into unsecure and secure attachment with infant and care giver
mother and baby (1,3,9 month old)
observed them reading a picture book
secure attachment:
- well timed interactional synchrony + reciprocity (mutual enjoyment and rewarding)
insecure:
- mothers seemed to be inconsistently unresponsive or minimally responsive,
-insecure resistant, poorly coordinated actions, misunderstanding of each others actions
-insecure avoidant = maternal intrusion, mother taking control
strong correlation between secure attachment and interactional synchrony
explain schaffer and emersons study (1964)
longitudinal field study
- 60 infants with their families in working-class Glasgow in 1964
- range of 5-week olds up to 23 and all were studied until they were 1
aim; investigate first attachments of infants
triangulated methods
1) every month for 18 months they came in and observed for a whole day
2) mum kept a diary about everyday activity
3) interview with mum, asked about stranger anxiety, separation distress and joy upon reunion. asked for quantitative and qualitative responses
Findings;
65% mother primary attachment
30% mother and someone else
3% father only
also found play and social interaction matter most with forming attachments
explain the stages of attachment found by shaffer and emerson
stage 1 (birth-6 weeks): Asocial, does not recognise specific people and views humans and objects in the same way stage 2 (6 w -7 months); indiscriminate, tell people apart and enjoy social company, do not prefer anyone, no fear of strangers stage 3 (7-9 months); discriminate attachment, a clear preference for attachment figure, fear of strangers and separation anxiety 4 (10 months onward); multiple attachments towards multiple people
evaluate schaffer and emersons longitudinal study
1) are multiple attachments equal? monotropy vs multiple attachments
2) bias sample, only used working class, opportunity sample
3) role of father, 75% had attachment after 18 months
4) reliability, triangulation, PIS, qualitative vs quan, social desirability
5) cultural variation
6) temporal validity
7) stage theory is too unitary and inflexible to be applied to every child
who supports the need for a father
LAMB;
1) engagement (play) 2) accessibility 3) responsibility
money + play
different to mum but important
Ainsworth
caregiver sensitivity hypothesis
as long as you are sensitive and responsive it will predict attachment type, both can play a massive role
Brown
found more secure at 3yr joining nursey if father present
Grossman and Grossman
44 german family longitudinal study, father influences schema
who disagrees with the need for a father (monotropy)
Bowlby
the primary caregiver is the mother due to the evolution