Page 3 - Moderation and Mediation Theory and Concepts Flashcards

1
Q

What are conditional effects in moderation

A

The relationship between a predictor and the outcome variable is dependent on the other predictor (moderating predictor (b3XMi) having a specific value (0)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

When should we use centering

A

When a predictor value of 0 is not possible (normally on b2 [moderator]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is grand mean centring

A

For each variable, subtracting the mean from each score

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Does centering assist the interpretation of ‘lower order’ (conditional) effects?

A

Yes, it alters the b value.

Particulary when there is no moderation effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Does centering assist the interpretation of ‘higher order’ (interaction) effects?

A

Yes, it does not alter the b value. Particulary when there is a moderation effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How are centring variables and multicollinearity related?

A

Reduces the strength of the correlation between the predictor(s) and interaction term

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How do you perform centring in SPSS

A

PROCCESS function

*Identify the grand mean from descriptives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The combined effect of two or more predictor variables on an outcome is know as…

A
Moderation (conceptually)
Interaction effection (Statistical term
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does the Johnson-Neyman Technique do?

A

Same analysis as simple slopes, but with more detail rather than just three levels of the moderator (1SD, 0, -1SD)
*Produces zones of significance instead

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the Zone of significance

A

Region in which values of the moderator results in a significant relationship between the predicitor and the outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the Zone of significance

A

Region in which values of the moderator results in a significant relationship between the predicitor and the outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

A mediator is a variable that helps explain…

A

WHY or HOW a predictor variable relaties to an outcome variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the key objectives od mediation

A

Quantify what proportion of the relationship between the predictor and outcome is;
A. Direct from the predictor
B. What proportion flows indirectly to the outcome via the mediator

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the three effect pathways of mediation?

A
Total effect (c) 
Indirect effect (a.b)
Direct effect (c' or c prime) =
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the Total effect (c)

A

The effect of the predictor on the outcome variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the Indirect effect (ab)

A

The effect of the predictor opn the outcome variable, through the mediator

17
Q

Direct effect (c’ or c prime)

A

The effect of the predictor on the outcome variable, controlling for the mediator

18
Q

What does path ‘a’ represent

A

The effect of the predictor on the mediator

19
Q

What does path ‘b’ represent

A

The effect of the mediator on the outcome, controlling for the predictor

20
Q

Baron and Kenny (1986) steps to mediation

A
  1. Determine predictor significantly predicts the outcome
  2. Determine that the predictor significantly predicts the mediator
  3. Determin the presence of the mediator in a regression model with thepredictor and outcome reduces the predictive strength of the predictor in the model
21
Q

What is the Sobel test

A

*Added to Baron and Kenny (1986) to test the significance of the indirect effect not provided view Baron and Kenny

22
Q

When can we state that the mediator has a significant effect of the relationship between the IV and DV in SPSS?

A

When the Confidence interval for the indirect effect (A x B correlations) does not cross 0
Examples
Significant = [0.09, 0.47]
Non=significant = [-.07, .047]

23
Q

When can we state that the mediator has a significant effect of the relationship between the IV and DV in theory

A

If the proportion of variance attributable to the indirect effect (A.B) via the proposed mediator is significant we say we have statistical support for the mediator

24
Q

Full mediation

A

If the proportion of variance attributable to the direct effect of the predictor is not significant we say we have support for full mediation

25
Q

Partial mediation

A

If the proportion of variance attributable to the direct effect of the predictor is significant we say we have support for partial mediation

26
Q

Is the Baron and Kenny (1986) method flawed?

A

Yes, Sobel test of indirect effect is more appropriate

Is causal, when significant mediators do not ensure causation - need solid theoretical base, RCT, longitudinal

27
Q

What does the Sobel test inappropriately assume?

A

Assumes normal distribtution for the indirect effect

*unstable results for small samples

28
Q

What did Preacher and Hayes develop?

A

Boostrapped test for the indirect effect which does not assume normality, thus avoid Sobel test issue
*Used through PROCESS macros in SPSS

29
Q

A moderator is a variable that helps explain/answer…

A

for WHOM and WHEN a relationship occurs between the predictor and the outcome variable

30
Q

What is moderation?

A

A technique used to explore whether the relationship between variable changes as a function of a third variable (moderator) [interaction effect

31
Q

What does centring involve?

A

The transformation of scores around a designated point that makes interpretation meaningful