Pa Con Law Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

“Adequate and independent state grounds” doctrine

A
  1. The power to review is the power to overturn
  2. Federal court has NO jurisdiction to review decisions of highest state courts if based on state grounds that are: adequate and independent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Adequate means?

A

Sufficient to decide case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Independent means?

A

Not dependent on federal law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the Michigan v. Long presumption?

A

Long presumption: When state high court decision rests on mix of federal and state grounds, U.S. Supreme Court will presume reliance on federal precedent and exercise jurisdiction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

“Plain statement” rule: To avoid review, state court must?

A

a. Explicitly state that it is relying on state law grounds for decision b. Indicate that federal law is being cited as persuasive authority only

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Edmunds framework.

Litigants raise/brief 4 FACTORS in ANY case implicating state Constitution:

A
  1. Text of state constitutional provision
  2. History and PA case law
  3. Related case law from other states
  4. Policy considerations (incl. issues of state/local concern) Failure to follow framework is NOT waiver, but its use is strongly advised
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the Privacy of bank records standard?

A

State Constitution requires probable cause, EXCEPT for:

1) Nonfinancial personal information held by bank (e.g. name and address of ATM user)
2) Insurance information

Federal rule: NO privacy expectation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Automatic standing rule

A

PA RULE: “Automatic standing rule” 1) D charged with possessory offense has “automatic standing” to challenge admissibility of evidence resulting from illegal search

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Claimant MUST establish for automatic standing

A

a) Legitimate expectation of privacy, AND
b) Standing:
i) Present at time of search
ii) Possessory interest in evidence improperly

seized

iii) Possession is an essential element of the case, OR
iv) Proprietary interest in the premises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Are Pen Registers allowed?

A

Warrantless use of pen registers to mentor incoming/outgoing numbers violate increased privacy of Pa. Constitution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Can Blood Alcohol databe used?

A

Can collect blood alcohol tests pursuant to statute (where D is suspected of DUI), but a warrant (or exigent circumstances) is required for access to blood tests taken for purely medical purposes 2) BUT D does NOT have a right to be informed that the test results could be the basis for criminal liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Are Canine Sniffs a search?

A

Federal rule: NOT a “search”

PA RULE: Canine sniff is a “search”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Canine Sniff Standards:

for the person

and for a place

A

a) Search of person – probable cause
b) Search of place – reasonable suspicion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Good Faith Exception for a warrant

A

Federal rule: Officers’ good faith reliance on warrant is an exception to the exclusionary rule

PA RULE: NO “good faith exception”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Stops and Fleeing Suspects

A

iFederal rule: Reasonable suspicion: 1) Of criminal activity police can “stop” someone 2) That detainee is armed and dangerouscan “frisk

PA RULE: If no probable cause or reasonable suspicion (as in Terry), contraband discarded by fleeing suspect is “fruit of illegal seizure”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Random stop of bus

A

PA RULES:

1) NO random stop of bus to conduct drug interdiction in absence of:
a) Reasonable suspicion OR
b) Probable cause
2) BUT boarding of bus to question passenger NOT a seizure requiring reasonable suspicion where:
a) Officers boarded with driver’s permission
b) During scheduled stop
c) Spoke to each passenger in turn

17
Q

Police radio broadcasts

A

Info from police radio broadcast may NOT be used to justify stop and frisk UNLESS:

1) Officer can establish that the info in the broadcast is reliable, OR
2) Independent basis exists for reasonable suspicion of criminal activity

18
Q

School drug testing

A

May NOT condition participation in extracurriculars on drug/alcohol testing UNLESS:

1) Actual showing of specific need for such a policy (i.e. drug problem), AND
2) Basis for believing policy would address need

19
Q

Knock and announce

A

Failure to knock and announce (absent exigent circumstances) violates PA Constitution and evidence is excluded

20
Q

Particularity of warrant

A

PA STANDARD: More specificity required

1) Art. I § 8 requires “describing [circumstances] as nearly as can be”
2) “Actual reasonable particularity” requirement limits government discretion

21
Q

Surveillance in the home

A

May NOT send wired informant into D’s home to electronically record conversation

1) Includes use of silent video camera
2) Rationale: Heightened privacy interest in the home

Federal law less concerned with the privacy of the home

22
Q

Under the automatic standing rule, a person has standing to challenge a search and seizure if?

A

He has a proprietary interest in the premises searched, not just a legal right to be there.

23
Q

Police may perform a warrantless search of an automobile when?

A

They have probable cause for the search.

Commonwealth v. Gary,

Police may search a vehicle when there is probable cause to do so, and this does not require any exigency “beyond the inherent mobility of a motor vehicle,” consistent with New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454 (1981).

24
Q

A retrial is prohibited under double jeopardy in Pennsylvania when?

A

Misconduct by the prosecutor is intentionally undertaken to prejudice the defendant to the point of the denial of a fair trial.