P12. Oversight by Regulators Flashcards
When was the first version of the UK Corporate Governance Code produced?
1992
Who produced the 1992 UK Corp Gov Code
The Cadbury Committee
Definition of corp gov as per cadbury committee
The system by which companies are directed and controlled
UK CG Codes advise on board appraisal
FTSE350 companies undertake independent board evaluation exercise at least once every three years, complemented by formal and rigorous annual evaluation of performance of board, committees and individual directors
What is the fundamental key to a board evaluation exercise?
Knowing what it is expected to achieve
4 main reasons for undertaking board evaluations
Address specific need identified by the board
Requirement to benchmark board performance externally
Ensure board is as effective as it can be
Directors observing benefits of previous evaluations
Internal board eval - pro - Cost
Cheaper
Internal board eval - pro - Objectivity
An internal evaluator might already know what types of common issues to ignore as not being relevant to their board
Internal board eval - pro - Focus
Issues may well already be known to the evaluator saving time in trying to establish the problems and concentrating on finding solutions
Internal board eval - pro - Ease of undertaking
Quicker as no need to bring external consultant up to speed
Internal board eval - pro - Expertise
High degree of company and industry knowledge
Internal board eval - con - Cost
Saving money is not the goal of board evaluation
Internal board eval - con (counterpoint) - Objectivity
An internal evaluator is likely to have preconceived ideas and lack of objectivity
Internal board eval - con - Focus
Internal evaluator may not be able to bring external experience to bear
Internal board eval - con - Ease of undertaking
An internal evaluator is likely to require more time to conduct research, assess different types of evaluation and the time to write the report will be competing for their time with their normal daily duties
Internal board eval - con - Expertise
Lack of evaluation expertise