Ownership Flashcards

1
Q

Fee simple absolute (FSA)

A

Grants all possible rights to land
May last forever - alienable, devisable, and descendible
Only way to terminate: owner dies w/o will or heirs
“To X and their heirs”
Modern view: also “to X”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Fee simple determinable (FSD)

A

Terminates automatically based on durational language - “for so long as”, “during”, “until”, “while”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Fee simple subject to a condition subsequent (FSSCS)

A

Based on conditional language - “provided however”, “but if”, etc
Unlike determinable, MUST reserve power of termination to the grantor
Without power of termination, courts interpret attempt to make FSSCS - often fails, becomes FSA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Fee simple subject to executory interest

A

Durational or conditional language, but interest goes to THIRD PARTY
“A to B on condition that B farms during his lifetime. If he does not, to C”
If B farms, then fee simple, goes to B’s heirs etc. if not, goes to C on B’s death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the default position when an interest is ambiguous?

A

Courts favor free alienability and disfavor forfeiture. Whatever outcome leads to free alienability of the property is most likely

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Fee tail

A

“To B and the /heirs of his body/“
Can pass only to biological children
Disfavored, most jx treat as fee simple absolute these days

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Life estate

A

“A to B for life”
Reverts to A after expiration
Can also be a different life: “to B for duration of C’s life” (if B dies first, goes to B’s estate, but then reverts when C dies)
Can be multiple “for duration of B and C’s lives” - lasts til both die
Can be defeasible “A to B for life, as long as…”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Non-freehold estates

A

Durational. Basically landlord-tenant

“A to B for 50 years / 1 year / etc”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Grantor future interests (3)

A

Possibility of reverter
Right of reentry / power of termination
Reversion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Grantee future interests

A

Executory interest

Remainder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Possibility of reverter

A

Grantor future interest
Automatic return to grantor after condition met - “silent” interest
Fee simple determinables and life estates automatically create this
Freely transferable
Not subject to RAP because already vested, like all grantor future interests

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Power of termination / right of reentry

A

Grantor future interest
Not silent - MUST be written out, grantor must execute to recover property
FSSCS and defeasible life estates create
Descendible and devisable, but not transferable inter vivos (b/t the living)
Not subject to RAP because already vested, like all grantor future interests

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Reversionary interest

A

Grantor future interest
Created whenever grantee gets less than a fee simple
Comes w life estates, non-freeholds, etc. “Silent” - no language necessary
“A to B for life” - returns to A after B dies
“A to B for life, then to C 10 years after B’s death” - returns to A in between
Freely transferable
Not subject to RAP because already vested, like all grantor future interests

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Grantee future interests

A
Remainder (vested or contingent)
Executory interest (springing or shifting)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Remainder

A

Grantee future interest - created in third party intended to take effect after the NATURAL TERMINATION of the preceding estate
CONTINGENT REMAINDER: not vested yet. “A to B for life, then to oldest child of C then living” - we don’t know who gets it til B dies (a condition precedent)
VESTED REMAINDER: is a) created in an ascertainable person and b) not subject to any conditions precedent. “A to B for life, then to C” gives vested remainder to C

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Vested remainder subject to total divestment

A

Remainder is presently vested but may be terminated on some future event
“A to B for life, then to C, so long as liquor never sold on the premises”
C has vested remainder, with condition SUBSEQUENT - interest divests if liquor sold
A retains reversionary interest! because C could divest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Vested remainder subject to open

A
Remainder made to a class, w at least one ascertainable member and conditions satisfied
BUT, class may open if more events occur
"A to B for life, then to children of C" - vests once C has one child, opens if they have more
Once C is incapable of more children, interest stops being subject to open
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Class opening

A

Inter vivos conveyance (during life) - opens at time of conveyance
Testamentary conveyance - opens at death of testator
e.g. “A to B for life, then to children of C”. C has child D, D dies before A
if inter vivos - class opens as soon as A conveys. D (and estate) gets an interest
If in A’s will - D dies before class opens at A’s death. D’s estate gets no interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Class closing

A
RAP can void a future interest (generally not vested interests, except subject to open)
If any member of class could claim in a way that violates RAP, whole class gift fails
RULE OF CONVENIENCE: Class closes as soon as one member of the class becomes entitled to immediate possession of the property. "too bad" rule
EXAMPLE: “A to B for life, then to the children of C who reach the age of 25.” At B’s death, C has two children: one is 30 and one is 20. A year after B dies, another child is born to C. The 30-year-old has a vested remainder being an ascertainable person over the age of 25, and can go into immediate possession. The class closes. Any child who is alive but has not satisfied the condition may try to do so. If the 20-year-old reaches 25, that child will join the class. The child born to C a year after B died is shut out.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Executory interest (2 types)

A

Future interest in third person that cuts short previous estate BEFORE natural termination
Fee interests potentially last forever, so any third party interest following a fee is executory
e.g. “A to B so long as liquor not served on premises in B’s lifetime - if it is, passes to C”
Two types
Shifting: passes from one grantee to another, as above
Springing: passes from a grantor to a grantee
e.g. “A to B for life, then to C 20 years after B’s death”. interest returns to grantor after B dies as fee simple, then “springs” to C when executed
Subject to RAP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Doctrine of worthier title:

A

“worthier to take by descent than by devise”. Grantor cannot create remainder in their heirs.
E.g. “A to B for life, remainder to A’s heirs”. Second clause is destroyed by this doctrine, should just be “A to B for life” w interest reverting (not remainder-ing) back to A and subsequently their heirs when B dies

22
Q

Doctrine of waste (3 types)

A

Owner of a fee estate can do whatever they want w property
Owner of less than a fee estate CANNOT commit waste (damage at expense of person who will hold them afterwards). e.g. cutting down trees, mining minerals, etc
Three types:
Voluntary/actual: cannot intentionally/negligently damage property. if so, they’re liable
Permissive: life tenant must take reasonable steps to avoid damage
Ameliorative: life tenant makes IMPROVEMENTS to the land. Illegal under common law but modern law permits if market value not impaired, AND either permitted by remainderer or substantial permanent change in neighborhood justifies improvement
Vested remainderer: can sue for damages or injunction
Contingent remainderer: can only sue for injunction
NOTE: this also applies in mortgage and landlord cases!!!

23
Q

Rule Against Perpetuities

A

No property interest is good unless it must vest, if at all, no later than 21 years after some life that exists at time of creation.
Only applies to three future interests: executory, contingent remainder, and vested remainder subject to open. All other future interests exempt.
Also applies to purchase options and right of first refusal.
Only wipes out the future interest in question, not the whole clause. e.g.
“A to B so long as the property is used for residential purposes. If it is not used for residential purposes, then to C.” C has contingent remainder that could vest any time in the future. This interest is eliminated, leaving fee simple determinable, reversion to A.

24
Q

How to apply the RAP

A

Step 1: identify the type of interest. Is it:
-executory interest
-contingent remainder
-vested remainder subject to open
-purchase option
-right of first refusal?
(I.e. is it a GRANTEE INTEREST or a PARTIAL RESTRAINT ON ALIENATION?)
If no, RAP doesn’t apply
If one of those, move to:
Step 2: is it possible to interpret the facts so someone can claim an interest more than 21 years after everyone currently alive is dead?
If yes, knock out that interest, interpret the rest accordingly
If no, it’s fine

25
Q

Restraints on alienation

A

Total restraint: “A to B, but if B tries to sell his interest, then to C”
- on a fee, this is NOT valid
- on less than a fee, upheld if reasonable
Partial restraints: two types. Both valid if reasonable
Purchase option: “A to B and her heirs, but A reserves the right to buy back the property during A’s life”.
Right of first refusal: “A to B and B’s heirs, but if B ever attempts to sell during A’s life, B must first offer it to A at the same price.”

Reasonability: limited in scope/time, purpose of restraint, legit interests of parties, if restraint is supported by consideration

26
Q

Conflicts of law re: real property

A

If a property interest is involved, categorize it if it’s movable or immovable
If interest is closely connected to land (leasehold, right to rent, etc) it is immovable. If it is not, it’s movable.
The law of the situs (where the property physically is) governs all rights in land and other immovables. Conveyances, mortgages, liens all governed by situs.
The underlying contract is governed by the law where it was made.

27
Q

Types of concurrent ownership (3)

A

Joint tenancy
Tenancy in common
Tenancy by the entirety

28
Q

Tenancy in common

A

Each cotenant owns an undivided possessory interest in the whole property

29
Q

Joint tenancy

A

Each cotenant owns an undivided interest in the whole property, AND has right of survivorship, meaning the surviving cotenant recovers a sole interest when the others die

30
Q

Right of survivorship presumption

A

Modern majority rule: a conveyance to two or more people to jointly own property is presumed to create a TENANCY IN COMMON with no survivorship. Common law rule was the opposite.
YOU MUST use language demonstrating a right of survivorship for it to attach
The right of survivorship takes precedence over wills and intestacy

31
Q

Creation of a joint tenancy: the four unities

A
TTIP:
Time (same time)
Title (by same instrument)
Interest (equal shares of same type)
Possession (each has right to the whole)
Common law: need all four
Modern view: ONLY need Interest and Possession
Tenancy in common ONLY requires Possession
32
Q

Tenancy by the entirety

A

Marital only
Each spouse has undivided interest in the whole of the property, with right of survivorship
Can be created by deed or will, but not by descent
Minority view. “Community property” states do not recognize
Only severed if spouses jointly convey, one spouse conveys to the other, or couple divorces

33
Q

Severance of a joint tenancy

A

Severing a joint tenancy by sale to third party creates a tenancy in common b/t remaining old owners (who may remain in joint tenancy w each other) and new buyer - severs right of survivorship
e.g. A, B, C have joint tenancy, so each have 1/3 interest. C sells to D. now, A and B have joint tenancy over 2/3 interest and are tenants in common w D, who owns last 1/3 interest
Don’t need permission of other joint tenants to sell
Can also seek partition action - chop up property
Mortgages by joint tenants: majority view says lien on property, no severance
Minority view says title, severs

34
Q

Partition: right and two types

A

Each cotenant has right to seek partition
Voluntary: done by exchange of deeds or selling the property and dividing the proceeds
Involuntary: done by partition action filed in court

35
Q

Rights and duties of contenants

A

Possession: each cotenant entitled to possess the whole property. Can sue for damages/ejectment if denied
Profits: profits produced by a cotenant need not be shared. Profits generated by third parties are split proportionally
Expenses:
Taxes/mortgages: everyone must pay proportionate share
Repairs: no direct duty, but cotenants who make repairs can be compensated by set-off from rent or partition proceeds
Improvements: no duty. If one cotenant improves, no right to contribution
- exception: if property is sold, improvement value goes to improving tenant

36
Q

Landlord-tenant questions: approach

A
Step 1: what type of tenancy?
 - term for years
 - periodic
 - at-will
 - at sufferance
Step 2: what is the dispute?
 - rent
 - condition
 - possession
 - improvements
Step 3: has a party transferred their interest in the property?  What are the effects?
 - sublease
 - assignment
37
Q

Lease creation

A

Oral or in writing. writing required for lease term longer than a year
Implied lease can occur through conduct of the parties - written lease never signed, tenant pays rent periodically

38
Q

Four types of leases

A

Term of years: has definite beginning AND end. Terminates automatically at the end! No notice required. Look for express agreement for these
Periodic: continues each period until notice to terminate is given. Can be created by implication, esp w holdover tenants. Appropriate notice can be oral unless statute/lease requires, and time equal to the rental period (capped at 6 months). Takes effect at the start of the next rental period
At-will: no fixed duration, lasts as long as parties agree. Generally created by express agreement. Terminates freely if either party decides (no notice), if either party dies, or if either party attempts to transfer interest
At sufferance: created by holdover. If LL wants tenant to stay, they get periodic; otherwise, they get this. Acceptance of rent indicates intent.

39
Q

How much rent can a landlord sue for?

A

Tenancy for years: all unpaid rent in the lease. LL has duty to mitigate future rent
Periodic tenancy: all rent up until proper notice to terminate is given
At-will: amount of rent stated in agreement that is already owed. Often, at-will tenancies have a rent other than money
Sufferance: the reasonable rental value of the property

40
Q

Rent defenses (6)

A

Failure to deliver possession to the tenant
Tenant has been evicted, actual or constructive (partial constructive eviction only reduces)
Tenant surrenders premises to LL (if LL accepts)
Destruction of the property (unless tenant caused it)
Warranty of habitability
Other contract defenses (impossibility, impracticality, frustration of purpose, violation of quiet use and enjoyment covenant)

41
Q

Landlord’s obligations to maintain the premises

A

Implied warranty of habitability
Tort liability: tenant has tort duty of care to invitees, licensees, trespassers on portion of private occupancy, but LL may retain tort duty for common passageways, stairs, etc

42
Q

Tenant’s obligations to maintain

A

No obligation to repair. However, waste doctrine applies
Voluntary waste: liable if int’ly or neg’ly damages
Permissive waste: must take steps to guard against damage
Ameliorative waste: tenant can improve if expressly authorized, or change in circumstances justifies

43
Q

Security deposits: 3 kinds

A

True security deposit, returned after lease, minus funds to repair
Deposit forfeited in event of default
Deposit for rent for last period of the lease (last month’s rent)

44
Q

Eviction

A

Rule: can retake for MATERIAL BREACH OF LEASE
Modern law says no force, legal process only. no self-help
generally, LL owes notice to either cure breach or vacate
Then eviction process
No retaliatory evictions

45
Q

Assignment vs subletting

A

Assignment means the tenant transfers all the remainder of their interest, and rental obligation, to a new tenant
Subletting means the tenant transferred less than their whole interest - e.g. one year of a five year lease

46
Q

Who gets the rent for a landlord transfer?

A

The landlord of record on the date the rent is due

47
Q

Assignment

A

Assignee comes into privity of estate w landlord, but tenant remains in privity of contract
Assignee is liable for rent unless they re-assign privity of estate
Tenant is ALSO liable for rent as long as contract stays intact

48
Q

Sublease

A

A sublease is a “lease within a lease” - the tenant has a separate lease to the sublettor
The tenant stays in privity of contract with the landlord and is liable to them for rent
The sublessor is in privity of contract and estate with the TENANT, and is liable to them for rent, but has no privity with the landlord

49
Q

Privity of estate vs privity of contract

A

Privity of estate means the person is physically occupying the premises
Privity of contract means the person is bound legally by a contract

50
Q

Covenant to pay rent

A

Can always be enforced by LL against the original tenant under contract law
To enforce against a new tenant, must meet requirements of a covenant running with the land:
- vertical privity! only assignees are in privity of estate with the landlord so can only enforce against an assignee. sublessees can’t be sued for rent
If there are multiple assignments, only first and last are liable, not “middle-of-the-chain” (because no privity)
NOTE: if the LL isn’t receiving rent, that’s a material breach of lease, so they can still evict, be it assignee or sublessor

51
Q

Do subleases and assignments require landlord’s consent?

A

No, unless the lease says so. By default at common law, lease interests are fully transferable
However, if a consent clause exists and is “silent” about reasons for withholding, the majority view is that the LL can withhold consent for any reason or no reason at all.
Minority rule: must be reasonable

52
Q

Rule in Dumper’s Case (assignment clause waiver)

A

If a LL has a express prohibition on assignments in the lease, and the LL waives it (expressly or impliedly), it STAYS waived for the rest of the lease