Overview/ Steve Flashcards

1
Q

Why study ecology

A
  1. Wealth- Yellowstone wolves
  2. Well-being- more diversity healthier
  3. Ecosystem services- trees prevent flooding
  4. Self preservation- understand where crops can grow under CC
  5. Ethical/ philosophical people like knowing they’re there

Utilitarian and none benefits from environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the non- utilitarian benefits we get from the environment

A

Intrinsic- right if a spp to exist

Extrinsic- value of knowing a species or habitat exists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the utilitarian benefits we receive from the environment

A

Direct- consumptive and none
Indirect- ecosystem services
Option value- use values in the future of this generation
Bequest value- use of values for future generations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is push pull agriculture

A

intercropping a cereal crop with a repellent intercrop such as Desmodium uncinatum (silverleaf)[4] (push), with an attractive trap plant such as Napier grass (pull) planted as a border crop around this intercrop. Gravid stemborer females are repelled from the main crop and are simultaneously attracted to the trap crop. Napier grass produces significantly higher levels of attractive volatile compounds (green leaf volatiles), cues used by gravid stemborer females to locate host plants, than maize or sorghum. There is also an increase of approximately 100-fold in the total amounts of these compounds produced in the first hour of nightfall by Napier grass (scotophase), the period at which stemborer moths seek host plants for laying eggs, causing the differential oviposition preference. However, many of the stemborer larvae, about 80%, do not survive, as Napier grass tissues produce sticky sap in response to feeding by the larvae, which traps them, causing the death of about 80% of larvae.[3

striga bad weed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the main threats to biodiversity

A
  1. Over exploitation
  2. Agricultural activity
  3. Urban development
  4. Invasion and disease
  5. Pollution
  6. System modification
  7. Climate change

Based on most prevalent threats for IUCN red list app

Wayne says OE, invasive species, habitat destruction and modification, over exploitation, and co extinction/chains of extinction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What percentage of birds animal and plant species are on the IUCN red list

A

More than 80%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Between what years was half of the worlds rainforest cleared

A

1830-1984

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the evil quartet

A

Diamond

  1. introductions
  2. habitat destruction and degradation (inc pollution)
  3. overkill
  4. chains of extinction
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Past human impacts on biodiversity

A

Much of human history populations have been low and so assumed impacts have been low

Howeerv 150 genera of megafauna were extant 50,000 years ago. 97 gone by 10,000 YA. Can quantify human impacts where human arrival can be dated with relative precision and continental isolation shows clear impact on naive fauna eg australia and n america

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Australia late pleistocene extinction

A

fossil evidence tells us aus had diverse fauna in last 100,000 years. Including large bodied animals.

Fossil record difficult because patchy. Timing of extinctions uncertain and body size difficult to ascertain

Howeerv, evidence suggest Aus and New Guinea lost 55 species of mammals, large birds and reptiles about 45,000 ya

Competing hypotheses for what caused this:
climate change
habitat destruction
overkill

Evidence-

a. climate formerly v variable- cold explain wide spread extinction and size selectivity
b. timing consistent with hunting by humans

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

North Americas late pleistocene extinctions

A

Humans arrived later than australia (around 14,000- 12,000 YA). Coincides with ice retreat- bering land bridge- “clovis people” had tools to hunt large mammals

Previously north america fauna similar to Africa. Arrival of people at the same time as extinction of 15 genera of large mammals eg mammoths, smilodon- sabertooth cats, ground sloths (fruit produced by trees thought to appeal to these animals)

Cause of extinction debated but prevailing view is native humans in touch with nature so not overkilling for some reason

Controversial view emerging that N america natives far more abundant than usually acknowledge (pop may have been >1million). Evidence increasing that native people over exploit wildlife resources. Evidence that N America already human dominated and wildlife depauperate before Eu arrival

Pre-industrial humans like not conservationists. Overkill can account for many late Plei extinctions. N American extinctions coincide with arrival of humans. Overall humans and overkill (rather than CC) implicted in most extinctions between late Plei and recent centuries

Pic on phone - Jonson 2009

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the 2 possibilities with overkill

A
  1. blitzkreig - high rapid killing focussed on large bodied spp
  2. Gradual but unsustainable harvest

Pic on phone ??

Reproductive rate, not large body size, predicts extinction. Implies longterm unsustainable hunting than abrupt focus on large animals

  • bigger body = more food for less effort
  • high reproductive rates can withstand offtake

Climate in invokes in some areas such as S America

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Since 1600 most extinctions attributable to

A
  1. introductions eg pig, rats, cats, goats
  2. habitat destruction
  3. hunting and extermination
  4. other
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

cichlids and lake victoria

A

had loads of species because various radiations then nile perch introduced as to lake victoria. They grow rapidly, were introduce bc thought they’d be a good fishery fish . Boomed in 80s. Extinction of 100 species in lake in 10 years.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

American introductions

A

American signal crayfish outcompete Uk native white claw bc rapid growth, higher fecundity and predate on juvenile white claw

American mink released by animal rights activists fur farmed. Devastating impact on countryside brought water vole close to extinction. Thought otter could outcompete but they have niche partitioned

15% of floridas reptiles and amphibians exotic species

Grey squirrels to UK Paradox virus

Mountain gorillas suffer from colds and flu that tourists bring

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Definition of habitat degradation is thorny

A

species are part of habitat- physical and biotic components

17
Q

Causes of tropical degradation 1994

A
Slash and Burn agriculture 61%
Logging 18%*
Dams 9%
Plantations 6%
Cattle ranching 6%*

*prolly increased

Some people think defo reducing because people moving to urban areas so may start to decline. But urban pop incr so will prolly export environmental damage. SO pressure on rural areas increased

18
Q

Loss vs conversion vs degradation

A

Is loss compensated for by conversion eg to plantations

Evidence suggests not, value fo secondary forests and plantations to birds was low compared to primary forest

19
Q

Small intense or large less intense

A

Gov pays farmers to make land less productive and have hedge corridors etc, less pesticides. Also means humans encounter more biodiversity so want to protect it.

Not just farm that damages the environment but the associated infra too eg leeching, needs water etc

20
Q

Albatross chicks

A

90% on midway island have plastics in their gullet

21
Q

Acid rain

A

50% of Eu forests damaged

22
Q

How much has the temperature increased now

A

0.6 degrees in 100 years
What will happen with +0.4 by 2030
1-1.64 by 2100

23
Q

Yellow bellied marmots

A

Colorado Rocky Mountains emerging 38 days earlier than 23 years ago bc warmer spring temps. Longer period of snow covered ground before growing season begins but warmer temps. Snow melt data hasn’t changed since 1981. Warmer air thought to be the trigger for early hibernation termination - Inouye et al (2000)

24
Q

Bushmeat hunting

A

5 millions tonnes (wild mammal meat) consumed annually

Fa et al 2002

25
Q

Over exploitation

A

Bushmeat

Fisheries- large marine predatory fish declined by about 90% over 50 years (Myers and Worm 2003). Few exploited fish currently reach pre-industrial size

Sea turtles- all species endangered mostly by overkill (meat, eggs, shells). About 35,000 killed in Mexico every year + by catch

Rarity induced by hunting can create positive feedback. Only exploit when cost of collection is less than money gained.

26
Q

Chains of extinction

A

Sumption and Flowerdew 1986
Mixamatosis- affected larvae of blue butterfly and ants

Nichols et al 2009 
Dungbeetles may face extinction where large mammals are heavily hunted. 
Consequences for 
1. nutrient cycling
2, soil aeration
3. parasite surpression
4. seed dispersal
27
Q

Landscape level conservation

A
  • don’t even know how many species exist, about 500,000 threatened. Cant have 0.5 million conservation programmes
  • definition of species difficult. Issues associated with hybridisation
  • conserving habitat could protect many species- doesn’t work as well the other way round
28
Q

Species level conservation

A

Flagship species- appeal to tourists. Emblematic of the entire habitat/ecosystem.

  • Panda vs chinas bamboo uplands
  • Grizzly bear needs a lot of space, could have umbrella potential
  • cod justify conservation bc economic and cultural value- human societies built around fish

Keystone species- ecosystem engineers. Disproportionate impact on shaping their habitat eg beavers

29
Q

Why species level cons bad

A
  • do flag ship species help others? CB doesn’t help others

Expensive to put so much resource into one species

Conservation of different FS species can conflict- eg indian dog and banteng = Java

Usually become focus when in extreme peril at which point they need a lot of management

Umbrella species- protection conferred is a matter of faith because species are the focus. If we are having to manage then the environment isn’t providing something - are we treating the symptom not the cause

Economically important species- managing commodity is not managing biodiveristy.
By putting things in monetary terms dangerous. If alternate way to boost the economy the biodiversity may be forgotten.
eg economic ornithology- someone calculate the value of the birds in N America eg eating pests. Value given but then organochloride pesticides introduces so the birds had no use.

Different perceptions- need local people to be involved to encourage conservation. UK primary kids favourite animals lion and tigers etc.
Tanzanian children viewed them with fear and preferred zebra and buffalo. - Bowen-Jones and Entwistle 2002

30
Q

Advantages of species conservation

A

Target/monitoring/delivery- PVA. Can make models, can see when species are doing better

Ecosystem stability- key stone species

  • rivets and redundancy
  • unpredictable consequences of changes in abundance of individual species
31
Q

Should you choose landscape or species conservation

A

Weight up each indvidiaul situation
Need to remain flexible
Integrate both according to need
Towards rivet end- so cant neglect species all together

rivet- airplane need as many spp as poss
redundancy- conserve a few key species to protect ecosystem

32
Q

Priorities and listing pros and cons

A

Pros

  • has powerful infleucen on conservation
  • evidence shows it works (when some want it removed bc impedes economic development)
  • evaluations not just how many there are but trend, range size, current threats
  • if flexible then can be relevant to all species situations

Cons

  • can be poorly defined
  • species that aren’t listed may suffer decline bc of it
  • almost impossible to have same criteria for fungi to elephant (so needs to be flexible)
  • shouldn’t be used for priority setting eg are 2 endangered worth less than one critically endangered? Prioritise based on return investment. P of recovery is hard to establish except in well studied organisms. Triage is at odds with priority setting
33
Q

IUCN

A

flexible, independent peer review data, identifies required action, motivates conservation, clarifies probable threats