Overview of Audit, Assurance, and Related Engagements Flashcards
Three Types of Audit
Financial Audit, Compliance Audit, and Operations Audit
Financial Audit
- Fairly presented
- criteria based on PFRS and other financial frameworks
- opinion on whether to assert if the FS is fairly presented
- External Auditor
Compliance Audit
- organization compliance with laws, regulations, and contracts
- criteria based on laws, regulations, and contracts
- degree of compliance with laws, regulations, and contracts
- government auditors
Operations Audit
- organization is operating effectively and efficiently
- objectives set by the BOD or management of the organization
- recommendations and suggestion on how to improve operations.
Generally Accepted Auditing Standards
3 General Standards
1. adequate technical training and proficiency as an auditor
2. independence in mental attitude
due professional care
3 Standards of Fieldwork
- adequately planned and properly supervised
- sufficient understanding of internal control
- sufficient appropriate evidential matter
4 Standards of Reporting
- shall state if the FS complied with GAAP
- consistency in the application of GAAP
- adequacy of informative disclosures
- expression of opinion
Standards covered by PFAE
a. Philippine Standards on Auditing
b. Philippine Standards on Assurance Engagement
c. Philippine Standards on Review Engagement
Users of PFAE
- Practitioners
- Other parties involved in the engagement
- Standards setting bodies (IAASB,AASC)
Assurance Engagement
expressing a conclusion designed to enhance the degree of confidence of the intended users about the outcome of the evaluation or measurement of a subject matter against criteria.
Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants
- Integrity
- Objectivity
- Professional competence and due care
- Confidentiality
- Professional Behavior
Subject matter information
the outcome of the evaluation or measurement of a subject matter
Assertion based engagement
the evaluation or measurement of the subject matter is performed by the responsible party is in the form of assertions that is made available to intended users
Direct reporting engagement
the evaluation or measurement of the subject matter is performed directly by the practitioner and the subject matter information is provided to intended users in the assurance report
Reasonable assurance engagement
positive assurance - audit
absolute or high level
reduction of assurance risk to an acceptable low level in the circumstances of the engagement
Limited assurance engagement
negative assurance - review
moderate
reduction of assurance risk to an acceptable level in the circumstances of the engagement
risk is greater than reasonable assurance engagement
Engagements not Assurance Engagements
Engagements that does not have assurance or opinions
- Agreed-upon procedures
- Compilations
- Tax returns
- consultation or advisory
Engagements that meets the definition of assurance engagement but is not required by the framework
- testifying in legal proceedings
2. professional opinions
Reports on Non-Assurance Engagement
- implying compliance with Framework, PSA, PSRE, PSAE
- Words such as assurance, audit, or review
- statement that can be reasonably mistaken as a conclusion
Engagement Acceptance
- a practitioner must have independence, competence, and other ethical requirements.
- the engagement must have all the characteristics:
a. appropriate subject matter
b. suitable and available criteria
c. access to sufficient appropriate evidenced.
d. conclusion is drawn in a written report
e. rational purpose
Other consideration in engagement acceptance
- if there is a significant scope limitation it is unlikely the engagement has a rational purpose
- there may be additional requirements in the specific standards.
- an accepted assurance engagement cannot change to a non assurance, or a limited to reasonable engagement without reasonable justification
- a potential engagement cannot be accepted as assurance engagement, it is possible to identify a different engagement that will meet the needs of intended users.
Elements of Assurance Engagement
- three-party relationship
- appropriate subject matter
- suitable criteria
- sufficient and appropriate evidence
- Assurance report
Three party relationship
Practitioner - auditor or the party to perform the assurance engagement
Responsible party - auditee or the party responsible for the subject matter or the subject matter information
Intended users - a person for whom the practitioner prepares the assurance report
True or False?
the responsible party and the intended party may be from different or the same entity
True
True or False?
the responsible party may or may not be the party who engages the practitioner
True
True or False?
the responsible party can be the only intended user
False, the responsible party can be one of the intended users but not the only one.
Appropriate Subject Matter
identifiable and capable of consistent evaluation against criteria or can be subjected to procedures
Characteristics of a Suitable Criteria
relevance completeness reliability neutrality understandability
what are the criteria?
the benchmark used to evaluate or measure the subject matter
Formal Criteria
established framework or standard
Less formal criteria
internally developed code of conduct or an agreed level of performance
Audit evidence
information obtained in which the conclusion is based
sufficiency (Elements of engagement)
the measure of the quantity of the evidence
appropriateness
the measure of the quality of the evidence
reliability of evidence
influenced by its source and nature
Assurance report
written report consisting of the conclusion that conveys the assurance obtained about the subject matter
Who is the standard-setting body of the Philippines in auditing?
Auditing and Assurance Standards Council
Composition of AASC according to RA. 9298
15 regular members with 1 chairman and 1 representative of the following: BOA 1 SEC 1 COA 1 ACPAPP 1 PICPA: Public Practice 7 Commerce and Industry 1 Academe 1 Government 1
term of 3 years, renewable for another term
Composition of AASC according to the website
18 regular members with 1 chairman and 1 representative of the following: BOA 1 SEC 1 BSP 1 COA 1 ACPAPP 1 PICPA: Public Practice 9 Commerce and Industry 1 Academe 1 Government 1
term of 3 years, renewable for another term
Pronouncements by AASC
PSA, PSRE, PSAE, PSRS, PSQC, PAPS, PREPS, PAEPS
The objective of PSQC 1
Provides reasonable assurance:
- compliance with professional standards and regulatory and legal requirements
- issuance of appropriate reports
Elements of System Quality Control
- Leadership responsibilities for quality within the firm
- relevant ethical requirements
- acceptance and continuance of client relationships and specific engagements.
- human resources
- engagement performance
- monitoring
Leadership responsibilities for quality within the firm
provides guidance on promoting an internal culture of quality
relevant ethical requirements (PSQC 1)
compliance with code of ethics
acceptance and continuance of client relationship and specific engagement (PSQC 1)
guidance on whether the firm is able to accept or continue client relationships
human resources (PSQC 1)
managing the firm’s human resources
Engagement Performance (PSQC 1)
engagements are performed appropriately
monitoring
ensuring the firm’s quality control system is relevant, adequate and operating effectively
PSA 220
Quality control for Audits of Historical Financial Statement
PSQC 1
Quality control for firms that perform audits and review of FS and other Assurance and Review Engagement
Leadership responsibilities for quality on audits
the engagement partner shall take responsibility for the overall quality of each audit engagement to which they are assigned
Independence (PSA 220)
the engagement partner shall form a conclusion on compliance with independence requirement and shall:
a. identify and evaluate circumstances and
relationships that create a threat to independence
b. evaluate information on breaches in the firm’s
independence policies and procedures to determine if they pose a threat to the independence of audit engagement
c. take appropriate action
Acceptance and Continuance of Client Relationships and Audit Engagements (PSA 220)
- the engagement partner shall be satisfied that appropriate procedures have been followed and conclusions reached are appropriate
- should information that could have caused the firm to decline the engagement, it shall be communicated to the firm and necessary actions must be taken
Assignment of engagement teams (PSA 220)
the engagement partner and any auditor’s expert not part of the engagement team shall have appropriate competence and capabilities
Engagement direction, supervision, and performance (PSA 220)
take responsibility for the direction, supervision, and performance are in compliance with professional standards and applicable legal and regulatory requirements and the audit’s report being appropriate in the circumstances
reviews
the engagement partner shall take responsibility for reviews being performed is in accordance with the firm’s review policies and procedures and shall be satisfied that sufficient appropriate audit evidence has been obtained
Consultation (PSA 220)
the engagement partner shall be responsible for:
a. appropriate consultations on difficult or contentious matters taken by the engagement team
b. be satisfied that the engagement team have undertaken appropriate consultation during the course of the engagement
c. be satisfied that the nature and scope of conclusions resulting from such consultations are agreed with the party consulted
d. determine that conclusions resulting from such consultations have been implemented
Engagement Quality Control Review
audits of financial statements of listed entities and other audit engagements for which engagement quality control review is required
duties of an engagement partner on an EQCR
- Determine that an engagement quality control reviewer has been appointed
- discuss significant matters that arise during audit engagement with the reviewer
- not date the auditor’s report until the completion of quality control review
What happens if there is a difference of opinion within the engagement team, with those consulted, or between engagement partner and engagement quality control reviewer?
the engagement team shall follow the firm’s policies and procedures for dealing with and resolving differences of opinion
Monitoring (Engagement Quality Control Review)
a monitoring process designed to provide reasonable assurance that the firm’s policies and procedures are relevant, adequate, and operating effectively.
Documentation by the auditor
included in the audit reports are:
- issues identified with respect to relevant ethical requirements and how are they resolved
- conclusion on compliance with independence requirements that happy to the audit engagement
- conclusion reached regarding the acceptance and continuance of client relationship and audit engagement
- nature and scope of, and conclusions resulting from consultations undertaken during the audit engagement
Documentation by the engagement quality control reviewer ( 3 inclusions)
- procedures required by firm policies that have been performed
- the engagement quality control review has been completed on or before the auditor’s report date
- the reviewer is unaware of any unresolved matter
PSAE 3400
The Examination of Prospective Financial Information
The objective of the engagement
PSAE 3400
- management’s best estimate assumptions are not unreasonable and in the case of hypothetical assumptions, are consistent with the purpose of the information
- PFI is prepared properly on the basis of the assumption
- PFI is properly presented and all material assumptions are adequately disclosed as to whether they are the best estimate assumption or hypothetical assumption
- PFI is prepared on a consistent basis with the historical financial statements using appropriate accounting principles.
Prospective financial information
financial information based on assumptions about events that may occur in the future and possible action by an entity
forecast
PFI prepared on the basis of assumptions as to future events which managements expect to take place and actions expected to be taken by the management
Projection
PFI prepared on the basis of a hypothetical assumption or a mixture of best estimate and hypothetical assumptions
Who is responsible for the preparation and presentation of PFI?
management
what is the role of the auditor according to PSAE 3400?
the auditor is tasked to examine the PFI to enhance its credibility
Auditor’s opinion
PSAE 3400
Express an opinion as to whether PFI is properly prepared on the basis of assumption and is presented in accordance with GAAP
PSRE 2400
Engagement to Review Financial Statements
The objective of PSRE 2400
- enable the auditor to state whether anything has come to the auditor’s attention that causes the auditor to believe that the financial statements are not prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with GAAP
what type of assurance is PSRE 2400?
limited assurance or moderate assurance ( negative assurance)
Review Procedures ( PSRE 2400)
Inquiry and analytical procedures
PSRS 4400
Engagements to Perform Agreed Upon Procedures
Objective off PSRS 4400
- for the auditor to carry out procedures of an audit nature
- simply provides a report of the factual findings, no assurance is expressed
- users of the reports assess themselves and draw their own conclusion
- the report is restricted to those parties that have agreed to the procedures
PSRS 4410
Engagements to Compile Financial Information
The objective of PSRS 4410
- to use accounting expertise to collect, classify and summarize financial information
- reduce detailed data to a manageable and understandable form
- it is not designed and does not enable accountants to express any assurance on the financial information