Overview Flashcards
types of personal jurisdiction
- in personam
- in rem
- quasi in rem
in personam
forum has personal jurisdiction over defendant
in rem
forum has power to adjudicate rights of all persons to a particular item of property; defendant not personally bound
quasi in rem (two types)
quasi in rem type I - court ajudicates rights of parties in property based on property being in the forum; a close connection between the case and the property provides minimum contacts
quasi in rem type 2 - court attaches property to bring defendant into forum on unrelated claim; defendant must have minimum contacts with forum
statutory limitations on personal jurisdiction
federal court has to analyze PJ like it were a court in the state where it is located.
most, if not all, states authorize jurisdiction over defendant who:
- is present in forum state and personally served with process there
- is domiciled in forum state
- conducts systematic and continuous business in the state such that the defendant is essentially at home there
- consents to jurisdiction or
- commits an act covered by the long arm statute
constitutional limitations on personal jurisdiction
modern due process standard is about contact and fairness.
Minimum Contacts
Defendant has to have such minimum contacts with the forum state such that exercise of PJ over him is reasonable and fair.
Ask: Did the defendant purposefully avail himself of the benefits and protections of state law and whether he could have anticipated being brought into state court.
notice also required for PJ
- traditional personal service methods will satisfy notice requirements
- requirement that agent notify defendant
- requirement for cases involving multiple or unknown parties
Subject matter jurisdiction in federal courts
- diversity of citizenship jurisdiction
- federal question jurisdiction
diversity of citizenship jurisdiction
- complete diversity
- jurisdictional amount in excess of 75,000
- erie doctrine
- exceptions to diversity doctrine
- multiparty, multiforum trial jurisdiction act
federal question jurisdiction
- federal question must appear in complaint
- implied federal right of action possible
- supplemental jurisdiction
- specific statutory grants of exclusive federal jurisdiction
What is complete diversity?
every defendamt must be of diverse state citizenship from each plaintiff - this is “complete diversity”
When must you have complete diversity?
when action commenced
Exception: interpleader
what is alienage jurisdiction?
citizen of US state and foreign citizen
indiividual citizenship
domicile (physical presence and intent)
corporation citizenship
every state where incorporated and the one state with PPB
unincorporated associations and LLCS citizenship
citizenship of its members
legal representatives citizenship
domicile of the represented person
class action citizenship
domicile of the named members
nonresident US citizens
no citizen of any state and not an alien
aggregation
- one P may aggregate claims against single D
- one P may NOT aggregate SEPARATE claims against several Ds
- one P may sue several Ds on a joint liability claim if it exceeds 75,000
- several Ps may aggregate claims against one D if seeking to enforce single title or right
counterclaims
- compulsory counterclaim may invoke supplemental jurisdiction
- permissive counterclaim needs original jurisdiction
- citizenship generally not an issue
Supplemental jurisdiction under FQ
a. pendant claims - federal courts CAN hear a state law claim arising from a common nucleus of operative fact
b. pendant parties - MUST be common nucleus of operative fact
General Venue Rules
Venue is usually proper in federal district where any defendant resides (if all the defendant are in the same state). Also where a substantial part of the events happened, or where a substantial part of property situated
Fallback provision of the general venue rule
If no district satisfies above, venue proper where any defendant is subject to court’s PJ
can venue be waived?
Yes
Residence for Venue purposes
individuals - domicile
business entities - where subject to court’s PJ
nonresidents - any judicial district
transfer of venue original venue proper
transfer for convenience to venue where case might have been brought or to venue to which parties consent
original venue wrong transfer
transfer to venue where case could have been brought to correct error
applicable law original venue proper transfer
When a transfer is based on convenience grounds we carry the law of the transferor court to the transferee court unless the transfer was ordered to enforce a forum selection clause
applicable law original venue improper
law of transferee court applies
What is removal
D can remove an action that could have originally been brought to federal court.
requirements for removal
- original jurisdiction
- state court need not have had jurisdiction
- only Ds can remove
- venue - federal district where state action was filed
diversity jurisdiction removal
- dismissal of nondiverse party can allow removal
- case cannot be removed based only on diversity if a defendant is a forum state citizen
- case cannot be removed based solely on diversity more than one year after case was filed unless D can show P acted in bad faith and stopped removal
FQ jurisdiction removal
- having a federal defense is insufficient
- entire case is removed
- state law claims may be severed and remanded to state court.