OTHER PLANNING MATTERS Flashcards
Overall Audit Strategy
The overall audit strategy involves:
- a. determining the characteristics of the engagement that define its scope, such as the basis for reporting, industryspecific reporting requirements, and the locations of the entity;
- b. ascertaining the reporting objectives of the engagement to plan the timing of the audit and the nature of the communications required, such as deadlines for interim and final reporting, and key dates for expected communications with management and those charged with governance;
- c. considering the important factors that will determine the focus of the audit team’s efforts, such as determination of appropriate materiality levels, preliminary identification of areas where there may be higher risks of material misstatement, financial reporting developments, etc.; and
- d. ascertaining the nature, timing, and extent of resources necessary to perform the engagement.
Initial Audit Planning
- Developing a preliminary outline for conducting the audit.
- Develop a general idea of which tests of internal controls and which substantive tests will be performed.
- Prior years’ workpapers are reviewed,
- general business and economic conditions are examined,
- interim financial statements are studied,
- scope of the engagement is discussed with the client.
- The timing of the audit is set both with the client and with audit personnel
Detailed Audit Plan
The auditor must develop an audit plan for the audit in order to reduce audit risk to an acceptably low level.
The audit plan is more detailed than the audit strategy and includes the nature, extent, and timing of audit procedures to be performed by audit team members
Audit Plan
The audit plan should include a description of:
- the nature, extent, and timing of planned risk assessment procedures sufficient to assess the risks of material misstatement.
- the nature, extent, and timing of planned further audit procedures at the relevant assertion level for each material class of transactions, account balance, and disclosure.
- other audit procedures to be carried out for the engagement in order to comply with GAAS.
Considering the Work of Other Independent Auditors
- A CPA may rely on the work and reports of other CPAs who have examined one or more components that are part of the financial statements being audited.
- The CPA must decide whether the CPA’s participation is sufficient to be the principal auditor. In making this decision, consideration of the following must be given
- Materiality of the auditor’s portion of the financial statements audited as compared to the portion audited by other auditors
- Extent of the auditor’s knowledge of the overall financial statements
- Importance of the components audited by the auditor to the company taken as a whole
Work of Component Auditor.
The principal auditor must decide whether to accept responsibility for the work of the component auditor.
- a. If so, no mention of the component auditor is made in the opinion.
- b. If not, the work of the component auditor is mentioned and responsibility is divided
If no reference is to be made of the component auditor, the principal auditor must be satisfied as to the component auditor’s:
- a. independence,
- b. professional reputation
- c. audit examination.
No reference would usually be made when:
- a. the component auditor is an associated or correspondent CPA,
- b. the component auditor is retained by the principal CPA,
- c. the principal auditor is satisfied as to the component auditor’s work, and
- d. the portion of the financial statements examined by the component auditor is immaterial.
Reliance on Work of Component Auditor
After deciding to rely on the work of the component auditor, the following should be done:
a. Discuss with the component auditor the appropriate audit procedures to be carried out.
b. Review the component auditor’s audit program and workpapers
If the principal auditor determines that it is not possible to rely on the work of the component auditor, a qualification or disclaimer of the financial statements taken as a whole would be appropriate. The reasons for the qualification or disclaimer should be stated
Component Auditor
When reference is made to the work of the component auditor, the report must clearly indicate the division of responsibility by stating the magnitude of the component auditor’s examination in dollar amounts or percentages of total assets, revenues, or other measures.
The division of responsibility should also be referred to in the opinion paragraph
Reference to the report of another CPA reflects division of responsibility and is not a qualification of opinion.
Component Auditor
In either case (reference or no reference to component auditor), the following procedures should be followed:
- a. Inquire of professional organizations, other CPAs, banks, and creditors as to the reputation of the other auditor.
- b. Obtain a letter of representation from the component auditor stating their independence.
- c. Ascertain that the component auditor:
- knows that the component financial statements and the reports will be used by the principal CPA,
- is familiar with GAAP and GAAS (and will conduct the audit in accordance with GAAS),
- is familiar with SEC rules, if applicable
- knows a review of intercompany transactions will be made by the principal auditor.
Reliance on Work of Specialist
- AU-C 620 requires the auditor to reach an understanding with the specialist about the objectives and scope of the specialist’s work and the methods or assumptions used by the specialist.
- The purpose of using a specialist is to obtain sufficient appropriate evidence about items material to the financial statements of which the auditor does not have knowledge
Reliance on Work of Specialist
The auditor responsibility:
- a. obtaining an understanding of the methods and assumptions used by the specialist;
- b. making appropriate tests of data provided to the specialist, taking into account the auditor’s assessment of control risk
- c. evaluating whether the specialist’s findings support the related assertions in the financial statements.
Use of findings:
- a. The CPA should accept the findings of the specialist unless the auditor’s procedures determine that the findings are unreasonable.
- b. If there is a material difference between the specialist’s findings and the assertions in the financial statements, the auditor should apply additional procedures.
- c. If the auditor is unable to resolve the matter, the auditor should obtain another opinion, if possible. If the difference cannot be resolved, the auditor should issue a qualified opinion or disclaimer.
- d. If an unmodified opinion is issued, do not mention the use of a specialist. In a qualified or adverse opinion, mention the use of a specialist only if it will help readers understand the reason of the qualification
Engagement Letter
The engagement letter should contain:
- the objective of the audit-an expression of an opinion on the financial statements
- the fact that management is responsible for:
o the financial statements,
o establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting,
o identifying and ensuring that the entity complies with laws and regulations,
o adjusting the financial statements to correct material misstatements,
o making all financial records and related information available to the auditor, and
o providing the auditor with a letter that confirms certain representations made during the audit; - the scope of the audit work to be performed -in accordance with GAAS
- the fact that the purpose of the audit is not to detect fraud but to enable the auditor to express an opinion as to the fairness of the financial statements
- mention that an audit includes obtaining an understanding of internal control and that the audit committee will be made aware of any discovered significant deficiencies
- additional work to be performed, such as tax, consulting, or other services (if applicable)
- any limitations or restrictions on the scope of the study
- work to be performed by the client’s staff (if applicable)
- the basis of the auditor’s fee
- the audit work schedule and estimated date of completion
Auditor Responsibility
- Financial information with reasonable assurance
- Free from Material Misstatement - Due to Error or Fraud
- Express an Opinion
- Prepared in accordance with Applicable Financial Reporting Framework
- All Material Respects
- Prepared in accordance with Applicable Financial Reporting Framework
- Appropriateness of Going Concer
Fraud Responsibility
- Auditor is not responsible to detect theft or fraud
- Reasonable assurance free from material missatement
Timing of Audit Proceedures
- Audit procedures can be carried out at interim dates if Control Risk is LOW
- Changes s/b reviewed at year end