Other Lists Flashcards
Challenges in valuations for group life and health business
- Group insurance encompasses different lines of business with different features
- There is a wide variety of benefits and financial arrangements
- For groups beyond a certain size, contracts are usually customized and contain side agreements
- Record keeping and administration practices for third party administrators do not always meet the actuary’s needs
- Statutory experience refund reserves may not equal the group’s surplus due to a difference in valuation bases
- There is a wide variety of benefit types, contract provisions, and rating practices
- Group contracts are traditionally short term, but some liabilities may be long term
- There are often data issues
CIA Note
Considerations in assessing trends in disability termination rates
- Changes in the mix of disabilities by cause, by severity, or by geographical region
- Changes in the level of benefits provided
- Changes in claim administration practices
- Economic cycles
- Material change in inflation or benefit indexation
- Changes in government plan definition of disability
CIA Note
Common types of reinsurance for group life and health business
- Coinsurance: the insurer cedes a portion of the business to one or more reinsurers. Each reinsurer holds the policy liabilities on its portion of the business
- Modified coinsurance: the insurer cedes a portion of the liabilities to other insurers, but retains the assets backing the policy liabilities (as an amount owing to reinsurers)
- Excess of risk reinsurance: the coverage of amounts above the insurer’s retention limit is ceded to a reinsurer who hold policy liabilities related to the coverage
CIA Note
Principles for determining premium deficiency reserves
According to the American Academy of Actuaries PDR work group
- Simulations that result in a PDR being established include:
- A block of business expected to have near-term losses
- A block of business expected to be profitable in the near term, but long-term guarantees will cause it to be unprofitable over the projection period - Should minimize false positives: no PDR should be required unless there is a meaningful potential for loss
- Should minimize false negatives: a PDR should be required whenever there is an expectation for loss
Premium Deficiency Reserves Discussion`
Contract groupings for PDR calculations
- The process of grouping contracts consists of two levels:
- The testing level is the minimum level at which financial projections are performed. The focus is on how to group contracts so that projections will provide meaningful and credible results
- The reporting level is based on how management combines the testing level results for external reporting purposes. Contracts should be grouped in a manner consistent with how policies are marketed, serviced, and measured - Deficiencies on a product can be offset by profits on other products within its group, but not by profits in other contract groupings
- The recommended groupings from the Health Reserves Guidance Manual are:
- Comprehensive major medical
- LTC
- Income protection (disability income)
- Limited benefit plans
Premium Deficiency Reserves Discussion
Factors that affect how contracts are grouped at the testing level for determining a PDR
- Materiality of a group relative to the size of the whole reporting entity
- Similarity of product types
- Differences in marketing methods
- Potential rate restrictions
- Geographical rating areas
- Length of rate guarantee periods
- Regulatory requirements
- Line of business (individual vs group)
- Case size within group business
- Expected future growth or decline of a possible grouping
Premium Deficiency Reserves Discussion
Statements the actuary must make in the Statement of Actuarial Opinion for the health annual statement
- The liabilities are in accordance with accepted actuarial standards
- The liabilities are based on appropriate actuarial assumptions
- The liabilities meet the requirements of the laws of the state of domicile
- The liabilities make good and sufficient provision for all unpaid claims and other actuarial liabilities
- Liabilities are computed based on assumptions that are consistent with the prior year’s assumptions
- Liabilities include appropriate provision for all actuarial items that out to be established
Statement of Actuarial Opinion for Health Annual Statement
Approaches for signing the Statement of Actuarial Opinion when reserves are too high or too low
- Issue a qualified opinion: be straightforward in laying out the concerns and then state the actuarial opinion with those exceptions noted
- Convince management to change the reserves to an appropriate level
- If other options fail, notify management that you must sign an opinion stating that reserves are inadequate (you may lose your job as a result)
Statement of Actuarial Opinion for Health Annual Statement
Uses of health insurance financial models
- Pricing: financial and sales models are used to determine premiums
- Reserve calculations and reserve basis evaluations: some reserves (such as gross premium reserves) are calculated by forecasting models
- Monitoring of results: to validate assumptions, to warn of deviations from expected values, and for resource planning
- Solvency testing: may indicate a need for gross premium reserves
- Financial forecasting: corporations forecast results for various reasons
- Actuarial appraisals: these are studies of the value of a block of business, typically used when transferring ownership
Leida Ch 8
Essential characteristics of a good model
- Reliable accuracy: a model must be good at predicting the future. It must also be robust
- Suitability for use: the model should produce the results it is designed for, without adding unnecessary complications
- Appropriate precision: this relates to how many decimal places should be kept in the values
- Sensibility: the model should reflect a logical construction of what is being modeled. It should also be theoretically sound
- Effectively communicated: this includes communicating everything necessary to understand and use the model’s results
Leida Ch 8
Steps in building a forecasting model
- Choosing the basic structure of the model
- Tools used include spreadsheets, database models, and sequential programs
- Model types include asset share models, reserve development models, and agent-based models - Choosing the information to be carried: the information needed will depend on the purpose of the model
- Choosing assumptions and building a prototype projection
- Starting values and assumptions must be built into the model
- A prototype cell is defined, and then projected to the end of the forecast period - Extending the prototype: after the prototype cell is built, the model must be extended to other cells which represent the different subsets of the business being modeled
- Validating the model
- Documenting the model: this allows the model to be evaluated by other professionals, and makes it easier to make modifications
- Designing output and communicating results: the model output can be useless unless it is put into the context of the question being asked
Leida Ch 8
Methods for validating forecast models
- Starting values are compared directly to the actual values for that year
- Year to year changes in the model are compared to actual past historical results
- Model results are checked for reasonableness by people familiar with the business
- Stress testing: analyze how the modeled results behave when some of the underlying assumptions are changed (incl. sensitivity testing)
Leida Ch 8
Assumptions needed for forecasting
- Lapse assumptions: lapse rates vary widely by product, duration, company, and member or policy characteristics. They are generally highest in the first year, and then decrease thereafter
- Mortality: some models treat mortality as a separate decrement, but most models combine mortality and lapses (because mortality is a minor assumption for health insurance)
- Claim costs: it is best to use actual experience when possible. Trend assumptions are needed for determining future claim costs
- Expense assumptions: expenses are usually expressed on a per unit basis (such as per policy or a percentage of premium or claims)
- Profit assumptions: profits can be measured as an ROI, an ROE, or a percentage of premium
- Model office assumptions: these assumptions define the proportion of the block of business that is represented by each model cell
Leida Ch 8
ASOP considerations for estimating incurred claims
- Health benefit plan provisions and business practices: reflect provisions and practices that materially affect the cost, frequency, or severity of claims
- Economic and other external influences: such as unemployment levels, cost shifting, and catastrophic events
- Behavior of claimants: consider pent-up demand for new benefits
- Organizational claims administration: considerations include staffing levels, computer system changes, or seasonal backlogs
- Claim seasonality: adjustments should be made for the impact of seasonality on claims
- Credibility: consider how the credibility of the data affects the incurred claim estimates
- Risk characteristics and organizational practices by block of business: consider the effects of marketing and underwriting on the types of risks accepted
- Legislative requirements: consider how regulations can affect incurred claims, such as by mandating benefits or influencing rating, reserving, and underwriting practices
- Carve outs: consider the effect of carved-out benefits on incurred claim levels
- Special considerations for long-term products: such as cost of living adjustments, inflation protection, and integration with social insurance
ASOP #5
ASOP procedures for analyzing incurred claims
- Unpaid claims liability: use incurral and processing dates to estimate the liability for claims incurred as of the valuation date. In doing this, consider:
- The intended purpose or use of the estimate
- Plan provisions
- The claim dating methods used
- Provision for adverse deviation
- Time value of money
- The assumption and methodology used: these should typically be consistent with those used for estimating related liabilities - Categories of incurred claims: consider separate estimation of claims for each category exhibiting different lag patterns, costs, or trends
- Reinsurance arrangements: consider their effect on estimated claims
- Large claims: consider the effect or large claims, which includes distortions in payment patterns
- Coordination of benefits, subrogation, and government programs: understand these items and how they are reflected in the data
- Provider contractual arrangements: consider how these affect trends, claim cost levels, and claims processing, and consider any changes in these arrangements
ASOP #5
Items to include in an actuarial communication subject to ASOP #5
- Important dates used in the analysis, such as the incurral, processing, and valuation dates
- Significant limitations that constrained the actuary’s analysis
- Specific significant risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to vary from the incurred claim estimate
- Any explicit provisions for adverse deviation
- The risk that provider insolvency may have a material effect on the liability
- Any follow-up studies the actuary may have utilized in developing the incurred claim estimate
- When updating a previous estimate, changes in assumptions, procedures, methods, or models that the actuary believes to have a material impact on the incurred claim estimate, as well as the reasons for such changes
ASOP #5
Purposes of cash flow analysis
- Determination of reserve adequacy
- Determination of capital adequacy
- Product development or ratemaking studies
- Evaluation of investment strategy
- Financial projections or forecasts
- Actuarial appraisals
- Testing of future benefits that may vary at the discretion of the insurer (such as dividend scales)
ASOP #7
When to do cash flow testing
- Situations where cash flow testing is needed:
- Where there are material asset risks
- Where there are liabilities that have cash flows far out into the future
- Where a company has a new or rapidly growing line of business
- Where policyholder options are likely to result in antiselection - Situations where cash flow testing is not needed
- Products with short-term liabilities supported by short-term assets
- Business that is not sensitive to changes in economic conditions or interest rates
- If the risk being evaluated is unanticipated sources of significant claims (e.g., AIDS and asbestos)
ASOP #7
Cash flow analysis documentation required by actuarial standards
- Whether any prior analyses were relied on
- The purpose of the analysis and the risks analyzed
- The type of analysis performed (such as cash flow testing)
- The results of the analysis
- The actuary’s conclusions or recommendations
- Any conclusions or recommendations related to sensitivity testing
- The data, assumptions, and methods used
ASOP #7
Methods used for asset adequacy analysis
- Cash flow testing: is appropriate where cash flows of existing assets and liabilities may vary under different economic or interest-rate scenarios
- Gross premium reserve test: may be appropriate where the policy and other liability cash flows are sensitive to moderately adverse deviations in the actuarial assumptions
- Demonstration of extreme conservatism: when the degree of conservatism in the liabilities is so great that moderately adverse deviations are covered, then a demonstration of this conservatism is sufficient
- Demonstration that risks are not subject to material variation: for products that have risks that are not subject to material variation, it is sufficient to demonstrate this fact and show that moderately adverse deviations are covered
- Risk theory techniques: for products with short-term liabilities supported by short-term assets, it may be more appropriate to measure moderately adverse deviations using risk theory techniques
- Loss ratio methods: these may be appropriate when the cash flows are of short duratiion
ASOP #22
Considerations when forming an opinion with respect to asset adequacy
- Reasonableness of results
- Adequacy of reserves and other liabilities under moderately adverse conditions. Reserves do not need to be so great as to withstand any conceivable adverse circumstance
- Analysis of scenario results: inadequacy in only a small percentage of scenarios does not indicate the need for additional reserves
- Aggregation during testing: separate blocks of business should not be combined for reserve testing if their assets cannot be shared for satisfying the liabilities
- Aggregation of results: results from separate blocks can generally be combined so that deficiencies in one business segment can be offset by sufficiencies in another segment
- Trends: the actuary should reconcile results from prior years
- Management action: consider anticipated actions by management to address adequacy concerns
- Subsequent events: consider all material subsequent events that are likely to affect the analysis
ASOP #22
Considerations for determining contract reserves
- Interest rates: rates should be reasonable and consistent with the purpose of the reserve
- Morbidity: this assumption should reflect the underlying risk, including factors such as age, gender, durational effects, and adverse selection
- Persistency: this assumption should include both involuntary and voluntary terminations
- Expenses: consider whether maintenance, acquisition, or claim expenses should be included
- Trend: inflation, utilization, morbidity, and expense rates should reflect the appropriate trend
- Premium rate changes: assumptions for future rate changes should reflect market conditions, regulatory restrictions, and rate guarantees
- Valuation method: when the valuation method is not prescribed, the actuary should choose an appropriate method
ASOP #42
Considerations for determining provider-related liabilities
- Risk-sharing and capitation arrangements: the nature of the arrangement should be considered when determining whether to establish a liability
- Provider financial condition: consider whether the provider will be able to meet its obligations
- Provider incentive payments: if an agreement with a provider calls for incentive payments, consider whether a liability should be held for those payments
ASOP #42
Challenges in determining the value of an insurance company
- Long duration of liabilities
- Sensitivity to interest rate fluctuations and the performance of capital markets
- Subjective art of loss reserving
- Cyclical nature of insurance
- Impact of reinsurance recoverables
- Challenges associated with non-market competitors, such as state funds
- Varying state and sometimes federal regulations
- Impact of statutory accounting on operational decisions
- Influence of rating agencies
GHFV-130-19
Techniques used by investment bankers to determine the value of a company
- Comparable company analysis: the value of the company is estimated based on the values of a peer group of comparable companies
- Comparable transaction analysis: the value is estimated based on results of recent insurance mergers that are similar
- Discounted cash flow analysis: the projected cash flows and terminal values are discounted to a net present value using the weighted average cost of capital (WACC)
GHFV-130-19