Other Flashcards
What is the penalty for sexual violation by rape/UL SC
20 years
What must be proved for sexual violation?
- There was intentional act by the offender
- The complainant did not consent
- The offender did not believe the complainant was consenting
- If the offender did believe she consented, those ground were not reasonable.
Is it a defence to sexually violate someone if they are your spouse?
No - Under 128(4)
What are 3 ways to prove penetration?
- The complainants evidence
- Medical examination, including physical injuries and DNA evidence
- The Defendants admissions
Subjective Test v Objective Test
The crown must prove that:
- The complainant did not consent to the sexual act (a subjective test) and
- The offender did not believe the complainant was consenting (a subjective test) or
- If he did believe she was consenting, the ground for such belief were not reasonable (objective test)
What is the subjective test?
Whether or not the complaint was consenting
What was the complaining thinking at the time?
Crown must prove complainant was not consenting
Then, whether the defendant believed she was consenting
What was the defending thinking at the time?
Objective test
What would a reasonable person have believed if placed in the same position as the defendant?
(R v Gutuama)
Section 128A main points
Does not amount to consent if
1. They dont protest or resist
2. If they allow it due to force, threat or fear
3. Asleep or unconsious
4. impaired by alcohol or drugd
5. impaired by intellectual, mental or physical condition
6. Mistake about who the person is
7. Mistaken about nature and quality.
What must an be proven in relation to attempts for 129(1) Attempts to commit sexual violation?
To be guilty of an attempt to commit an offence a person must:
- Intent to commit the offence
- Take a real and substantial step towards achieveing that aim
What needs to be proven for attempts?
- Mens rea
- Actus Reas
- Sufficiently proximate
What is the mens rea element for assault with intent to commit sexual violation?
It must be proved that:
- there was intent to have sexual connection with the complianant
- The complainant did not consent to the sexual connection
- The defendant did not believe on reasonable grounds that the complinant was consenting
Discuss section 132(4) of the Crimes Act in relation to a defence of sexual conduct with a child
It is not a defence to a charge that the person believed that the child was of or over the age of 12 years
Discuss section 132(5) of the Crimes Act in relation to a defence of sexual conduct with a child
It is not a defence to a charge under this section that the child consented
Age of a child under section 132
Child means person under the age of 12 years
What are the statutory defences for section 134? (sexual conduct with a YP)
It is a defence if the person charges proves that:
- Before the act, he or she took reasonable steps to find out whether the young person was of or over 16
- He or she believed on reasonable grounds that the YP was of or over 16
- The young person consented