ost Decades? Economic Performance in Post-Independence Latin America (Prados De La Escosura) Flashcards
What time period does the paper assess regarding Latin America’s economic performance?
1820-1870
This period is noted as the post-independence era for Latin America.
What term does the paper argue is an unwarranted depiction of the post-independence period?
‘lost decades’
The paper challenges the view that the half-century after independence were ‘lost decades’.
What alternative comparison does the paper suggest for analyzing Latin America’s economic performance?
Former European colonies
This comparison is said to provide new insights into Latin America’s performance.
What offset the release from the colonial fiscal burden according to the paper?
Higher costs of self-government
The transition to self-governance introduced new financial burdens.
What was the general impact of integration into the world economy on Latin American economies?
Net gains, though unevenly distributed
The integration had a long-term positive effect, despite regional disparities.
How did per capita GDP in Latin America change on average during the post-independence period?
Moderate average growth
This growth varied significantly across different regions.
Compared to which regions did Latin America maintain or improve its position during this period?
Africa and Asia
Latin America’s growth outpaced these regions, despite falling behind the United States.
What does the paper suggest about the economic discontinuity caused by independence?
It was shorter than often assumed
The paper presents a more gradual economic picture than previously thought.
What significant issue did independence exacerbate within Latin America?
Regional disparities
The economic differences between regions increased after independence.
Why is relying solely on the United States as a benchmark considered problematic?
Differing initial conditions and development potential
The US had unique factors that may not apply to Latin American countries.
What does the paper argue about the experience of former European colonies in Asia and Africa?
They provide a more relevant comparison
Their similar initial conditions may yield useful insights for Latin America.
What impact did the opening up to the international economy have on Latin American countries?
Substantial but uneven impact
The integration into global markets was significant but varied among countries.
What claims about early post-independence Latin America does the paper contradict?
Aggressive anti-trade policies and stagnant per capita export growth
Evidence presented in the paper shows significant trade growth.
What did the inflow of British capital indicate about Latin America?
Significant integration into the international capital market
This integration, however, was uneven across different countries.
What role did institutional modernisation play in economic performance?
Good predictor of long-term economic performance
Earlier modernisation in certain regions correlated with better economic outcomes.
How did geography affect Latin American countries’ access to global markets?
Conditioned access and growth potential
Coastal regions generally had better access than landlocked areas.
What was the growth rate of per capita product in Latin America between 1820 and 1870 compared to global averages?
Similar to the global average and European periphery; higher than Asia and Africa
This suggests that Latin America’s growth was competitive on a global scale.
What is the central argument of the paper regarding Latin America’s economic performance after independence?
The paper argues against the notion of ‘lost decades’, suggesting moderate but sustained growth in per capita income.
The author contends that Latin America kept pace with the European periphery and outperformed Asia and Africa between 1820 and 1870.
What were the initial economic consequences of independence from colonial rule in Latin America?
Independence brought potential benefits but significant costs, including increased administrative costs for new governments and disruption of fiscal transfers.
The colonial fiscal burden was removed, theoretically boosting GDP.
How did the opening of Latin America to the international economy affect its post-independence economic performance?
The end of colonial trade restrictions allowed access to global markets, reducing costs and increasing trade volume, with improvements in net barter terms of trade.
The ratio of export to import prices improved for most countries.
What fiscal challenges did newly independent Latin American nations face?
Increased costs of administering independent states and the disintegration of colonial fiscal systems.
This also included chronic deficits and destruction of colonial treasuries.
Define net barter terms of trade (NBTT).
The ratio of a country’s export prices to its import prices, indicating purchasing power.
NBTT reflects the quantity of imports that can be purchased with a given quantity of exports.
How did geographical factors influence trade patterns in post-independence Latin America?
Location (coastal vs. landlocked) and transportation infrastructure significantly impacted trade patterns and costs.
Geographical challenges affected regions’ integration into the global economy.
What does the analysis of purchasing power of exports per capita suggest about economic impacts in Latin America?
It indicates significant but uneven impacts, with the Southern Cone and Caribbean showing greater growth rates.
There was a notable increase in trade size for many countries.