Origins of WW1 Flashcards
How did some people justify fighting the war?
Because they saw it as being against dangerous enemies
Why was there a sense that Britain was not feeling very European?
Both World Wars would not be fought on their soil
What were the 4 Empires that ended as a result of WW1?
Austro-Hungarian, German, Ottoman and Tsarist
Which regime can be argued to have been created by WW1?
The Communist Regime under Lenin in the Russian Revolution
How did the War affect Italy, in regards to fascism?
Mussolini’s regime was born from the debate around Italy joining the war or not
How did the war affect the relationship between European powers and their non-European colonies?
They had to rely on men from their colonies
How did the war affect the relationship between States and Society?
There was popular resentment against the state in many European nations - the actual systems themselves rather than the parties involved
In what way can you argue the death of Archduke Franz Ferdinand highlights an underlying cause of the War?
He was the heir to the Austria-Hungarian throne (a declining empire) which contained various nationalist movements seeking independence. He was then killed by a Serbian nationalist.
What were the ‘power crises’ (medium term causes) that helped cause the war?
- Area of the Balkan States becomes both important for Russia and Germany/Austria as it acts as a possible corridor for expansion
- Militarism/Arms race - considering how important technology was in the war
- Imperialist Rivalries
- Significance of the Alliance System
Where in the world is a good example of Imperial Rivalries?
Germany making threats towards French territories in North Africa (Morocco etc)
What was the significance of the Alliance System? And when had this system started?
Started in the 1870s and 1880s, it resulted in a Europe split into Central Powers and Allied Powers
How did the historiography regarding who was to blame for WW1 change?
In the first few decades after the war it was thought the Germans were to blame (1918-19 ‘war guilt’ ruling”), but by the late 20s/30s this thesis was dismantled. Sponsored by post-war governments who used documents to ‘prove’ Germany’s innocence and instead shift blame to Russia and France etc - as they saw that Germany could be an ally against the up and coming threat of the Soviets. However after WW2 German blame was extrapolated backwards to include the First World War too
What was the ‘Fischer Thesis’? Who opposed it and what was agreed upon?
The idea that the militaristic German society not only caused the Second World War, but also the First. The German establishment (historians and politicians) were outraged and tried to discredit its followers. Most disagree with Fischer that the world was intentionally provoked - and instead concluded that there were key decision makers in every European country who considered a European war a risk worth taking
What did some people argue the War would do to European Culture?
It would save it and Nation States, as well as improve the mettle of Europeans
What has the recent historiography shown in regards to emotion?
There was a definite undercurrent of emotion in the build up to the war - with many individuals fearing what was going to happen