Organometallics [Andy Johnson] Flashcards

1
Q

early transition metals - groups 3,4

A

labile - anion and cation exchange easily

high Zeff

strongly electrophilic and oxophilic

few redox reactions

polar and v. reactive M-C bonds

preference for “hard” σ-donors (non-polarisable)

weak complexation of π-acceptors

typical catalysis = polymerisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

middle transition metals - groups 5-7

A

ligands bound strongly

strong, not v. reactive M-C bonds

preference for σ-donor/π-acceptor combinations

typical catalysis = alkene and alkyne metathesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

late transition metals - groups 8 - 11

A

easy ligand association/dissociation

weak - not v. reactive M-C bonds

even weaker/reactive M-O/M-N bonds

preference for s-donor/weak π-acceptor ligands

typical catalysis = hydroformylation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

role of catalyst

A

lowers activation barrier

by introducing a new reaction pathway

** doesn’t change thermodynamics **

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

why can sigma, pi and delta bonds be treated separately?

A

they overlap between different classes of orbitals (i.e. net overlap = 0)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

criteria for strong orbital interactions

A

correct symmetry

spatial overlap - must occupy same region in space

similar energy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

why can’t pi bonding occur in M-C alkyl bonds?

A

all available orbitals on C are involved in C-H/C-R bonding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

why can’t pi bonding occur in M-C aryl bonds?

A

it would disrupt the aromaticity of the phenyl ring

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is the most stable state in an 18 e- system?

A

18 e- involved in bonding orbital

0 e- involved in anti-bonding orbital

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

L ligand

A

both electrons provided by ligand

= dative covalent bond

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

X ligand

A

one electron provided by ligand and by metal

= normal covalent bond

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Z ligand

A

both electrons provided by metal

= dative covalent bond

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

metallo

A

[metal separate from ring]

metal “on” rather than “in”

e.g. ferrocene

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

metalla

A

metal “in” ring

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

oxidation state (in terms of X ligands)

A

(number of X ligands) + (charge on complex)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

bridging ligands

A

halides often bridge between 2 metal centres using a lone pair

= LX

X = sigma bond
L = donor bond

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

metal-metal bonds

A

[doesn’t add to oxidation state]

assign one of the electrons of the electron pair in a single to each metal centre

double, triple, quadruple -> 2,3,4 respectively

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

NO molecules

A

radical

BENT - acts as a 1 electron X ligand (l.p. on nitrogen not used)

LINEAR - l.p. now can be used (LX)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

electronic effects

A

late TM d8 -> square planar

d10 -> trigonal

-as Z increases, d-shell is stabilised
-occupied dx2 orbital (perpendicular to plane) no longer involved in ligand bonding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

steric effects

A

early TM have less d-electrons
-> must achieve 18 e- count via larger ligands

if ligands = too bulky, low-electron count complexes are formed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

back-bonding

A

ligand donates sigma/non-bonding e- to metal while accepting e- density through overlap of metal t2g orbital and ligand π*

^ ligand = both sigma donor and π acceptor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

what happens as the amount of pi e- density donated into pi* ligand increases?

A

more backhanding/electron density in ligand anti bonding orbital

weakens CO bond

bond lengthens

lowers CO stretching frequency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

why is there an increase in CO frequency/bond order across the periodic table group?

A

d orbital energies decrease/increase in electron density on M

energies of dπ and π* orbitals separate

back bonding becomes worse

24
Q

non-classical carbonyls

A

major interaction = σ-donation from CO 5σ orbital (anti-bonding, l.p. on CO) to metal

stretching frequency > free CO

25
relationship between wave number and bond length
wave number is proportional to 1/bond length
26
how many electrons does CO contribute?
2e- whether terminal or bridging
27
how can we fix a molecule which is coordinatively unsaturated?
M-M bonds
28
what type of ligand are phosphine ligands?
L type
29
2 important parameters of PR3 ligands
[electronic] - donor and acceptor strength -> change R groups [sterics] size of sub. -> Tolman Cone Angle
30
what do phosphine ligands primarily function as?
Lewis bases interact with metals as σ donor ligands
31
phosphine ligands - electronics
e- density on P is low when R group contains EWG e- density on P is high when R group contains EDG
32
why can't NR3 participate in back-bonding?
strong σ-donors BUT have no accessible molecular orbitals available with correct symmetry
33
PR3, AsR3, SbR3
descending 15 σ* orbitals which bond R groups to P, As and Sb -> get lower in energy makes it more available
34
why does M-P bond lengths increase and P-R bond lengths decrease upon oxidation?
oxidation decreases ability of metal to backbone -> removes e- density from metal => would cause M-P bond length to increase σ*P-R orbitals are used in back-bonding -> stops elongating with less back-bonding
35
CO stretching frequency trend
more e- density on metal = more back bonding onto CO = greater occupancy of π* CO = more electron density on M = lower CO stretching frequency
36
what does wider cone angles indicate?
greater steric congestion = more labile phosphine ligand
37
how does V(CO) change as the electron-donating ability of the phosphine ligand increases?
strongly donating = more e- rich metal better at CO back-bonding = lower V(CO) due to decreased C-O bond order
38
C-C π to empty metal orbital (σ)
e- density moves from bonding orbital to empty metal orbital depopulation of π orbital = C-C bond length increasing M-C = SHORTER
39
occupied metal d -> empty C-C π*
e- density moves from full M orbital to anti-bonding C-C orbital population of π* orbital leads to C-C length increases M-C = SHORTER
40
factors which favour π-back bonding
[make M e- rich] strong donor ligands on M negative charge on M low oxn state on M
41
how does back bonding affect alkene reactivity?
back bonding reduces δ+ charge reduces reactivity to nucleophiles
42
how do compounds relieve strain?
hybridisation sp2 -> sp3 = less strain
43
metal alkynes
more electronegative encourage back bonding bind more strongly to metals
44
activation
cleavage of organic bonds by metal centres produces more reactive form of organic species
45
oxidative addition - favoured conditions
favoured with more electron rich metal centres -> low oxidation states -> negative charge -> ED CO-ligands
46
PPh3 vs P(OPh)3
[PPh3] - stronger σ donor - more e- density on metal - strong Co-H [P(OPh)3] - better π-acceptor (electronegative group) - more back bonding -less e- density on metal - Co-H = weaker and more acidic
47
M-C bond enthalpy
decreases with atomic number increases within a TM triad
48
sigma bond metathesis compared to oxidative addition/reductive elimination
sigma bond metathesis -> no change in oxidation state oxidative addition/reductive elimination -> 2 electron change in oxidation state
49
problems for C-H activation - THERMODYNAMICS
ΔS - disfavoured entropically (2 -> 1 molecules) ΔH - must be sufficiently exothermic to overcome loss of entropy
50
H-H vs CH3-H
H-H and CH3-H have similar strengths -> weaker M-alkyl bonds disfavour C(sp3)-H activation
51
Ph-H vs CH3-H
energy required to break the stronger Ph-H is outweighed by strong M-Ph and M-H bonds in the product -> Ph-H bond activation much easier than sp3-C-H activation
52
what is a negative ΔS of activation indicative of?
associative mechanism
53
what is a positive ΔS of activation indicative of?
dissociative mechanism
54
what are Fischer carbenes direct analogues of?
reactivity of carboxylic acids both have electrophilic carbon centres with leaving groups
55
sterically crowded early TM alkyls
undergo alpha-elimination readily to give nucleophilic carbenes and alkanes
56
what promotes carbene formation?
increasing steric strain in metal complex