Organized Crime Flashcards
1.) How does the criminality of persons in Organized Crime differ from that of conventional criminals?
The organization allows individuals to commit crimes of a different variety and on a larger scale than their less organized colleagues. (smuggling, racketeering, etc). Organizations are more effective in criminal negotiations and possess networks that facilitate cooperation that would otherwise not occur.
2.) What are the attributes of a bureaucracy?
- Complex hierarchy
- An extensive division of labor
- Positions assigned on the basis of skill
- Responsibilities carried out in an impersonal manner
- Extensive written rules and regulations
- Communication from the top of the hierarchy to persons on the bottom, usually in written (memo) form.
3.) What are the eight attributes of Organized Crime?
- Has no political goals
- Is hierarchical
- Has a limited or exclusive membership
- Constitutes a unique subculture
- Perpetuates itself
- Exhibits a willingness to use illegal violence
- Is monopolistic
- Is governed by explicit rules and regulations
5.) How does the patron-client model of Organized Crime differ from the bureaucratic model?
The patron-client model is decentralized whereas the bureaucratic model is heavily centralized. Taking out the head of a bureaucratic organization can be fatal to the group, where a high ranking patron can be replaced. Bureaucratic is more organized, patron is more concerned with recruiting from pre-existing relationships.
8.) How does an organizational affiliation enhance the ability of a criminal to engage in illegal activities?
Provides the criminal with exclusive connections, and the reputation of the group. Individuals and organizations may be more inclined to cooperate with an individual partnered with a situated organization. Provides access to new and larger criminal ventures.
1.) How does the definition of Organized Crime held by academics and researchers differ from that used by the government?
Academic definitions are developed through empirical studies and research, whereas government definitions are created through social and media influence, and are used for prosecutorial purposes.
2.) In Canada, two pieces of legislation have helped to provide a legal definition of a criminal organization: Bill C-95 and Bill C-24. Describe the key differences between these pieces of legislation. What do you see as the difficulties with using this legislation, in the context of a prosecution, to assist the court in determining a finding of a criminal organization?
Bill C-95 added a new offence being: participation in a criminal organization, which specifically targets membership in an organized group. Bill C-24 altered the definition to provide greater tools to prosecutors and police by broadening the definition of an organized crime group. Bill C-24 makes it so the prosecution does not have to prove that the organization facilitated or committed an indictable offence, nor that an individual was aware of the crime being facilitated by the organization, this could be seen as some what unfair. Simply participating in organized crime activity for the purpose of enhancing that organizations ability makes an individual vulnerable. BillC-95 is too narrow in scope to effectively pursue organized groups from a prosecutorial standpoint.
4.) Do any of the various pieces of Organized Crime legislation address the root causes of why people become involved in Organized Crime?
No, organized crime legislature is reactive, meaning it does not seek to prevent the action from occurring, but only reacts to said action. Does not solve the root problem.
1.) How does Robert Merton’s theory of anomie explain Organized Crime?
Organized Crime is a normal response to pressure exerted on certain persons by social structure. If an individual does not possess the means to achieve success, they will use whatever means necessary, illegal or legal, to obtain their desires. May appear as the only avenue to success given the conditions of some less fortunate individuals.
2.) What is the connection between differential association and Organized Crime?
People naturally learn from their surroundings. Subcultures of organized crime can facilitate indoctrination of individuals who are born into a similar situation. Through differential association, some persons organized their behaviors according to the norms of a criminal group to which they belong or identify with. In areas with a high rate of organized crime, people are more likely to become exposed to this kind of culture. Inadequate familial socialization can contribute to gang membership.
3.) How does cultural transmission explain the continuity of Organized Crime in certain neighborhoods?
Such neighborhoods are characterized by attitudes and values that are conductive to delinquency and crime.
4.) How does social disorganization explain why Organized Crime is more likely in certain neighborhoods?
A breakdown in social control can leads to an increase of deviant norms in certain communities. Financial strain can help propel a neighborhood into social disorganization. These norms then take root in areas that are conductive to criminal activity, which, in turn, creates a criminal subculture. A criminal subculture is used to integrate individuals born in similar conditions into the culture, thus into crime. Because these areas have a situated history and sub-culture of crime, they then become common places for organized crime.
5.) What do Cloward and Ohlin (differential opportunity) say about Organized Crime?
Economic strain forces individuals into areas wherein they experience further strain. Because of this, access to success through criminal means is more available, thus encouraging membership to organized crime groups. Legitimate opportunity is not equally distributed throughout society, where illegitimate opportunity is.
6.) What qualities of the delinquent subculture correlate well with the prerequisites of organized crime?
Social dysfunction can be a result of a high concentration of delinquents. Delinquents are nonconventional, meaning that they go against the surrounding norms. Because of the social dysfunction and erosion of social acceptable values caused by the abandonment of conventional norms, it is a good environment for organized crime to develop. Because legitimate means for success seem impossible, delinquents seek the easily obtainable reward through drugs, status through violence, and criminal pursuits.
8.) How does social control theory explain the emergence of Organized Crime?
The absence of external and internal restraints (punishment, shame, ostracized), and more risk than reward prevent individuals from committing crimes. When these are lessened, people become more willing to participate in organized crime because the only form of social deterrence is imprisonment, and crime is profitable when weighed against the risk (especially in poor areas). Criminal actions are being not prevented by social control.
10.) Why did Italians remain in Organized Crime for so long? What factors explain the exit of Italian Americans from Organized Crime?
Italians remained in Organized Crime for so long due to familial bonds, criminal sub-cultures, and success. They are being pushed out by the presence of black and Hispanic communities, and do not maintain as much of a force as they used to have. “paper tiger”, overly reliant on their past reputation. Also being fought by law enforcement.
1.) Characteristics of “political machines”?
Politicians who maintain a small following to spread their influence at an intense rate. Not afraid to use immoral tactics to achieve goals, and views the voter as a person living in a specific neighborhood, with specific personal problems and wants. Strong political force with influence in many facets of society. Also considered a patron-client network.
9.) How did prohibition stimulate the development of organized crime?
Increased rate of violence, less law enforcement. Instead of being involved with politicians it gave organized crime groups the chance to become involve in a profitable and illegal industry. Made gangs wealthier and gave them more influence. The power structure shifted, with gangs being above the political machine.
11.) How did prohibition lead to criminal syndication?
Organized crime groups had to cooperate to move liquor further inland, and into different regions. This was only possible through collaboration with other crime groups who control key areas. Syndication was the result of having to cooperate with each other to distribute the liquor.
13.) How did organized crime change with the repeal of prohibition
The end of prohibition resulted in Organized crime groups branching off into other enterprises like drugs, gambling, and prostitution.