organisations, movements and members Flashcards
Ernst Troeltsch
distinguish between two main types of religious organisations- the church and the sect
Churches
-large organisations, often with millions of members, such as the Catholic Church run by a bureaucratic hierarchy of professional priests
-Claim a monopoly of the truth
-universalistic aiming to include the whole of society, although they tend to be more attractive to the higher classes because they are ideologically conservative and are often closely linked to the state
-e.g. The British sovereign is head of both the state and the church of England
-they place a few demands on their members
Sects
-small, exclusive groups
-Hostile to wider society, and they expect a high level of commitment
-Draw their members from the poor and oppressed
-Many are led by a charismatic leader, rather than a bureaucratic hierarchy
-Only similarity with churches, is that sex, or believe that they have a monopoly of religious truth
Denomination
-NIEBUHR describes denominations such as methodism as lying midway between churches and sects
-Membership is less exclusive than a sect, but they don’t appeal to the whole of society like a church
-Broadly except society’s values (like the church), but are not linked to the state
-They impose some minor restrictions on members, e.g. forbidding alcohol, but are not as demanding as sects
-Unlike both churches and sects, they are tolerant of other religious organisations, and do not claim a
monopoly of the truth
Cults
-The least organised of all
-highly individualistic, loose-knit and usually small grouping around some share themes and interests, but usually without a sharply defined and exclusive belief system
-Usually lead by ‘practitioners’ or ‘therapists’, who claim special knowledge
-Like denominations cults are usually tolerant of other organisations and their beliefs
-Cults do not demand strong commitment from followers, who are more like customers or trainees than members- they may have further involvement with the court once they have acquired the beliefs or techniques it offers
-many cults are world-affirming claiming to improve life in this world
Roy Wallis- similarities and differences
highlights two characteristics:
-How they see themselves: churches and sects claim that their interpretation of the faith is the only legitimate and correct one, while denominations and cults accept that there can be many valid interpretations
-How they are seen by wider Society: churches and denominations are seen as respectable, and legitimate, whereas sects and cults are seen as deviant
Bruce
From cathedrals to cults
-sociologists argue that some of these descriptions of religious organisations do not fit today’s reality
-e.g. BRUCE argues that Troeltsch’s idea of a church, as having a religious monopoly only applies to the Catholic Church before the 16th century, protestant reformation when it had religious monopoly over society, symbolised by its massive and imposing cathedrals
-since then sects and cults have flourished and religious diversity has become the norm
-In today’s society, churches are no longer truly churches in Troeltsch’s sense, because they have lost their monopoly and been reduced to the status of denominations competing with the rest
New religious movements
-since 1960 there’s been an explosion in the number of new religions and organisations e.g. the Unification Church AKA ‘Moonies’, the children of God, Transcendental Meditation (TM), Krishna Consciousness etc. - this has led to new attempts to classify them
How does Roy Wallis categorise these NRMs into three groups?
-categorised based on their relationship to the outside world- whether they reject, accommodate to it or affirm it
-World-rejecting NRMs
-World-accommodating NRMs
-World-affirming NRMs
world-rejecting NRMs
-similar to Troeltsch’s sects
e.g. the Moonies, the Branch Davidian, the People’s Temple
-vary greatly in size from a handful of members to hundreds of thousands
-several characteristics:
-Clearly religious organisations, with a clear notion of God
-Highly critical of the world outside, and they expect and seek radical change
-To achieve salvation members must make a sharp break with their former life
-Members live community with restricted contact with the outside world- the movement controls all aspects of their lives, and is often accused of brainwashing them
-Often have conservative moral codes e.g. about sex
world-accommodating NRMs
-often breakaways from existing mainstream churches or denominations e.g. neo-Pentecostalists who split from Catholicism or Subud- and offshoot of Islam
-Neither, except nor reject the world, and they focus on religious, rather than worldly matters, seeking to restore the spiritual purity of religion
-e.g. Pentecostalist believe that other Christian religions have lost the Holy Spirit.
-Members tend to live conventional lives
world-affirming NRMs
-differ from all other religious groups and may lack some of the conventional features of religion e.g. collective worship and some are not highly organised
-However, like religions, they offer their followers access to spiritual or supernatural powers e.g. Scientology, Soka Gakkai, TM and Human Potential
-They accept the world as it is, and are optimistic and promise followers success in terms of mainstream goals and values e.g. careers and personal relationships.
-Are non-exclusive and tolerant of other religions, but claim to offer additional special knowledge or techniques that enable followers to unlock their own spiritual powers and achieve success, or overcome problems e.g. unhappiness or illness- have been described as psychologising religions offering this-worldly gratification
-most are cults, whose followers are often customers rather than members and entry is through training- the movement place few demands on them and they can carry on normal lives
-they have generally been the most successful of the movements that Wallis studied- e.g. Scientology had about 165,000 members in the UK in 2005, but only 1200 Moonies
EVALUATION OF NRMs (of Wallis)
(: Wallis offers a useful way of classifying the new religious movements that have developed in recent decades
): but some argue that he is not clear whether he is categorising them according to the movements teachings or individual members beliefs
): Also ignores the diversity of beliefs that may exist within an NRM
): Wallis himself recognises that real NRMs will rarely fit into his typology and some such as 3HO (Healthy Happy Holy Organisations) may have features of all three types-
(: nevertheless, many sociologists find such typologies useful as a way of analysing and comparing the significant features of NRMs
Stark and Bainbridge
Sects and Cults
-identify two kinds of organisations that are in conflict with wider society- sects and cults
-SECTS result from schisms- splits in existing organisations. They break away from churches, usually because of disagreements about doctrine.
-CULTS are new religions, such as Scientology and Christian Science or one’s new to the particular society that have been imported like TM
-They see sects as promising ‘other-worldly’ benefits (e.g a place in heaven) to those suffering, economic deprivation, or ethical deprivation, where their values can conflict with wider society
BUT
-Cults tend to offer ‘this-worldly’ benefits (e.g. good health) to more prosperous individuals who are suffering psychic deprivation (normlesness) and organismic deprivation (health problems)
How do Stark and Bainbridge subdivide cults?
according to how organised they are:
-Audience cults: least organised
-Client cults
-Cultic movements: most organised
Audience cults
-least organised
-do not involve formal membership or much commitment.
-there is little interaction between members.
-Participation may be through the media.
-e.g. Astrology and UFO cults
Client cults
-based on the relationship between a consultant and a client and provide services to their followers.
-In the past, they were often purveyors of medical miracles, contact with the dead etc. but the emphasis has shifted to ‘therapies’ promising personal fulfilment and self discovery
Cultic movements
most organised, and demand, a higher level of commitment than other cults. aim to meet all its members religious needs and unlike followers of audience and client cult they are rarely allowed to belong to other religious groups at the same time e.g. Moonie
-Some client cults become cultic movements for their most enthusiastic followers e.g. Scientology, which developed out of the client cult, Dianetics
-Some well-publicised Doomsday cults that predict the end of the world and practice mass suicide may be best seen as cultic movements
What are some useful distinctions between organisations that Stark and Bainbridge make?
-e.g. The idea of using the degree of conflict with wider society to distinguish between them is similar to Troeltsch’s distinction between church (accepts society) and sects (reject society)
-however, some of their examples do not fit neatly into anyone of their categories
Explaining the growth of religious movements
-marginality
-relative deprivation
-social change
marginality: Weber
-sects tend to arise in groups to are marginal to society and who may feel they are disprivileged- not receiving their just economic rewards or social status
-sects offer a solution to this, by offering members a ‘theodicy of disprivilege’- a religious explanation, and justification for their suffering and disadvantage, which may explain their misfortune as a test of faith e.g. Holding out the promise of rewards in the future for keeping the faith.
e.g. 20th century: the Nation of Islam (black Muslims) recruited successfully among disadvantaged blacks in the USA
e.g. the Moonies recruited, well educated, young, middle-class, whites (Wallis argues that these individuals have become marginal society, even though they were middle-class, as most were hippies, dropouts or drug users)
relative deprivation:
Wallis
Stark and Bainbridge
-‘The subjective sense of being deprived’
-Middle-class may be material well off, but spiritually deprived, especially in today’s materialistic consumer world which they may perceive as impersonal and lacking in moral value, emotional warmth or authenticity so Wallis says they may turn to sects for a sense of community
-Stark and Bainbridge argue that it is the relatively deprived who break away from churches to form sects
-world-rejecting sects offer the deprived compensators needed for the rewards, denied in this world, while the privileged don’t need compensators or W-R religion so instead are attracted to world-accepting/affirming churches that express their status, and bring them further success in achieving earthly rewards
Social change:
Wilson
Bruce
-Augies, that periods of rapid change, disrupt, and undermine established norms and values, leading to enemy or homelessness, which creates uncertainty and insecurity, and so there is most affected by the disruption may turn to sects as a solution
-e.g. dislocation created by the industrial revolution in Britain in the late 18th and early 19th century, caused the birth of Methodism, which offered a sense of community, warmth and fellowship, clear, norms and values and a promise of salvation, so they recruited large numbers of the new, industrial working class.
-Bruce she’s growth of sex and cults as responses to social change involved in modernisation and secularisation- as society is more secular people are less attracted to the traditional churches and strict sects as they demand too much commitment and so prefer cults, which are less demanding and require a few of sacrifices