Organisations, Movements and Members Flashcards
Defining Religious Organisations - Types
Church
Sect
Denomination
Cult
church
Troeltsch
Church - long established, large religious organisation
Tend to demand low commitment
Allow people contact with others outside the church - inclusive
Claim a monopoly on truth but are connected to the wider society
Examples: Catholic Church, Protestant Church (including, Church of England), Islam, Judaism, Hinduism. They are universalistic, aiming to include the whole of society
sects
Troeltsch
Sect - Religious movement which breaks away from a church, usually due to conflict with the teachings of the church
Tend to follow a charismatic leader who offers an alternative monopoly on truth
Smaller and exclusive (contact with ‘outsiders’ discouraged)
High commitment required from members.
denominations
Neibuhr
Troeltsch’s definitions are limited as more types of religious organisations exist
Identifies two more types of religious organisations:
Denomination – which exists between a church and a sect
If a sect can survive the death of its charismatic leader and establish a
second generation of followers it tends to become more mainstream.
As it grows larger it becomes less exclusive and less high demand than in
the early days of the sect.
However, it is still less mainstream and low demand than a church and less mainstream.
Examples: Methodists. Baptists.
cults
Neibuhr
Cults - Mystic movements
Focuses on the individual experience and pursuit of ultimate ‘truth’
Loose structured with individualistic organisation and charismatic leader
They tend not to claim a monopoly on truth but advocate pursuing the improvement of life in this world.
Seen as deviant/outside the mainstream.
Example: Scientology
evals of types of religious organisation
Many religious organisations do not fit neatly into one category, especially as practices tend to change over time
The Quakers are less exclusive than the Mormons
Neibuhr’s definition of a cult does not share the same characteristics we associate with cults
New Religious Movements
Wallis
Since the 1960s there has been a further growth in
religious movements different to those identified by
Troeltsch and Neibuhr
E.g. Children of God, Transcendental meditation,
Krishna consciousness etc.
New Religious Movements can be separated into three
categories
types of New Religious Movements
World Rejecting NRMS
World Accommodating NRMS
World Affirming NRM
sociologist for NRMs
Wallis
world rejecting NRMs
These are similar to Troeltschs sects, examples include the Moonies, Children of God. They vary in size. They have several characteristics - they are clearly religious organisations with a clear notion of God. They are highly critical of the outside world and they expect or seek radical change. To achieve salvation, members must make a sharp break from their former life. Members live communally with restricted contact with the outside world, The movement controls all aspects of their lives and is often accused of brainwashing them. They often have conservative moral codes
world accommodating NRMs
These are often breakaways from existing mainstream churches or denominations such as neo-Pentecostalism who split from Catholicism. They neither accept nor reject the world, and they focus on religious rather than worldly matters, seeking to restore the spiritual purity of religion. For example, neo-Pentecostalists believe that other Christian religions have lost the Holy Spirit, and members tend to lead conventional lives
world-affirming NRMs
They differ from all other religious groups and lack some of the conventional features of religion such as collective worship. Examples include - Scientology. Some characteristics - They accept the world as it is, they are optimistic and promise followers success in terms of mainstream goals and values such as careers and personal relationships. They are non-exclusive and tolerant of other religions, but claim to offer additional special knowledge that enables followers to unlock their own spiritual powers and achieve success or overcome problems such as unhappiness. Most are cults whose followers are often customers rather than members and entry is through training. The movement places few demands on them and they carry on normal lives. They are the most successful movements studied by Wallis
eval of NRM
Wallis offers a useful way of classifying the new religious movements that have developed in recent decades. However some argue that it is not clear whether he is categorising them according to the movement’s teachings or individual members’ beliefs. He also ignores the diversity of beliefs that may exist within an NRM. Stark and Bainbridge reject the idea of constructing such typologies altogether. Instead, they argue that we should distinguish between religious organisations using just one criterion - the degree of conflict or tension between the religious group and wider society.
Sects and Cults
Stark and Bainbridge
Both sects and cults are in conflict with societ
Sects offer other-worldly rewards to people suffering economically or to those of have different views to mainstream society
Cults offer this-world rewards to those suffering physically or psychologically
Audience cults – low organisation, low commitment, participation through social media (e.g. UFO cults)
Client cults – provide a business service to believers, promise better health and self-discovery (Transcendental Meditation, Yoga clubs
etc.)
Cultic Movements – Highly organised, demand high commitment, exclusive membership (e.g. doomsday groups)
explaining the growth of religious movements
Marginality
Relative deprivation
Social change
sociologists for marginality
Troeltsch
Weber
marginality
Troeltsch argues that sects tend to draw members from the poor and oppressed. Similarly, Weber argues that sects tend to arise in groups who were marginal to society. Such groups may feel that they are disprivileged in society. Weber argues that sects offer a solution to this problem by offering members a theodicy of disprivilege, that is, a religious explanation and justification for their suffering and disadvantages. This may explain their misfortune as a test of faith, for example, while holding out the promise of rewards in the future for keeping the faith. For example the NOI recruited among disadvantaged Black People in the USA. However other NRMs have recruited from the MC like the moonies
socologists for Relative Deprivation
Wallis
Stark and Bainbridge
relative deprivation
This refers to the subjective sense of being deprived. This means that those that are privileged can feel deprived. Thus although MC people are materially well off, they may feel spiritually deprived in todays society, which they may perceive as impersonal and lacking in moral value. As a result, Wallis argues they may turn to sects for a sense of community. Similarly, stark and Bainbridge argue that it is the relatively deprived who break away from churches to form sects. For exmaple, the deprived may want to emphasise Christ’s message that ‘the meek shall inherit the earth’ Stark and Bainbridge argue that world-rejecting sects offer to the deprived the compensators that they need for the rewards they are denied in this world. They are attracted to world-accepting churches that express their status and bring them further success in achieving earthly rewards
sociologist for social change
Wilson
Bruce