Optic Ataxia Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is Optic Ataxia

A

the inability to accurately point to or reach for objects under visual guidance with intact ability when directed by sound or touch despite strength

Therefore, a patient who can see an object may be unable to reach for it accurately until they physically contact it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Optic ataxia: lesions

A

Optic ataxia has lesions in the:
- superior parietal lobe
- around the intraparietal sulcus.

Lesions in BA (Brodmann’s areas, 5, 7,19, 39, 37)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Motor and visual functions

A

Primary motor cortex
- BA4
- Receives projections from Primary motor cortex
- Projects to spinal cord
- Delivers most of the commands through the spinal cord to the muscles
- BA 6&8 – receives projections from PFC and PPC, M1
- Projects mainly to M1 and spinal cord

Visual cortex
- Includes BA17 (v1), BA 18 (v2), BA19 (other secondary visual areas)
- Also, subcortical areas such as tegmentum, superior colliculus etc
- Cortical visual areas project largely to the temporal and parietal lobes
- Middle and inferior temporal cortex are also visual
- Responsible for visual recognition process e.g., faces, objects, patterns, etc
- Projections to parietal lobe as well

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Spatial processing

A

Visuo-spatial processing is the ability to tell where objects are in space

  • including your own body parts
  • it also involves being able to tell how far objects are from you and from each other
  1. Object recognition
    Objects must be recognisable from various viewpoints
  2. Navigation
    Medial parietal region seems involved in route navigation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Visuomotor processing

A

Where vision meets somatosensorial is a good candidate for the control of visually guided movements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Somatosensory symptoms of parietal lobe lesions

A

Mainly associated with damage to primary areas (1-3) and secondary (area 5) somatosensory cortex

May also cause astereognosis – the inability to recognise objects by touch.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Posterior Parietal Cortex (PPC)

A
  • Involved in the control of saccades as well as visual spatial attention.
  • The PPC is active during a variety of visuospatial and cognitive tasks including eye movements and spatial memory.

The posterior parietal cortex, along with the temporal lobe and prefrontal cortex, is one of the three major regions in the brain.

  • It is located between the visual cortex and the somatosensory cortex just behind the central sulcus.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Damage to PPC:

A

Language deficits
- Includes but is not limited to Wernicke’s aphasia
- Can also include problems with reading and writing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Left IPL (inferior parietal lobe)

A

Left-right discrimination: A complex neuropsychologic process that calls upon several higher functions, including visuospatial processing, memory, language, and integration of sensory information

-The ability to discriminate between left and right is essential in everyday life
-Lesions to IPL- Memory for left vs right is disturbed following lesions of left IPL (inferior parietal lobe)

Dyscalculia: Difficulty in performing arithmetical calculations resulting from damage to the brain

-Inability to do calculations mentally
-The patient may be unable to do simple maths such as 10 + 10
-During developmental dyscalculia, an overactivation of left IPL is observed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Right inferior parietal lobe

A

Right PL lesion- spatial cognition

-Can have difficulty telling which object is nearer or whether one object is higher than the other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Unilateral neglect

A
  • Following damage to right inferior parietal lobe
  • Involves inattention to or neglect of the left side of space
  • Patients may simply ignore half the world
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Object recognition (Warrington & Taylor, 1973)

A

-Showed that patients with right PL damage could recognise an object viewed canonically but not when presented non-canonically

-Supports the idea that the right PL is involved in spatial manipulations of images e.g., mental rotation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Balint’s Syndrome (Balint, 1909)

A

Reported a patient with a bilateral PPC lesion

Intact visual fields and could recognise, use, and name objects normally, but had three main problems:

  1. Neglect
    When presented with an array of objects, his gaze would automatically shift to those on his right
  2. Simultagnosia
    When his attention was directed towards an object, he did not notice other objects without prompting from the examiner
  3. Optic Ataxia
    A severe deficit in reading under visual guidance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Balint’s patient – the syndrome included optic ataxia

A

-The patient was inaccurate in reaching with one hand in one visual field only
-Could not be a simple visuoperceptual or attentional problem (would affect both hands)
-Could not be a simple motor problem (would affect both visual fields)
-Therefore, it must have been a problem with the visuomotor system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Deficits in optic ataxia

A

-Pointing to targets in the periphery (fixate central location, point to a peripheral target)

-Posting hand in slot (slot in various orientations, also in visual periphery)

-Grasping (time course of grip aperture is affected)

-Manual tracking (target moves about at random, must track target with finger)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Four explanations for Optic Ataxia:

A
  1. Visuomotor transformation

Optic ataxia represents a problem with transforming visual input into motor outputs, visual input arrives in retinocentric coordinates, motor output uses other, body-centred coordinates (e.g., hand-centred)
-Optic ataxia patients represent the other half of a double dissociation with visual agnosia
-Visual agnostic patient DF – damage to ventral visual stream
-Severely impaired perceptions but relatively intact visuomotor performance

  1. Online control
    Optic ataxia patients do not have a general visuomotor deficit, but a deficit specific to execution (online control)
    -E.g., they are still able to plan actions appropriately but during execution feedback is used wrongly to adjust their movements in flight
    -Argue that situations where movement accuracy is poor represent instances that emphasise action online control
    -Movements that are accurate rely heavily on intact planning
    -Peripheral movements require greater online control
    -Improvements with practice – greater planning
    -Familiar objects – better planning
  2. Attentional deficit
    (McIntosh et al., 2011)
    -Correlated perceptual and visuomotor deficits in case IG on a task in which the target jumped
    -IG took as long to detect to it manually
    -Argued that OA reflects a role of the parietal lobe in orienting attention, both for action and perception
  3. Perception
    (Jackson et al., 2018) examined bimanual matching movements in OA
    -Participants grasped two rectangular bars (one in each hand) and had to rotate them to the same orientation, without vision
    -OA patients impaired
    -Argued that this was due to the OA patients being unable to make accurate spatial perceptual judgements