Opportunistic Infections in Solid-Organ Transplantation Flashcards

1
Q

The Immunocompromised Host: Extremely Complicated

A

T2DM
Liver Dx, CKD

Biologics Use
Severe,
prolonged
neutropenia

Very uncontrolled HIV
SOTRs/HSCTRs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

“Immunocompromised” – Oversimplifying A Complex Problem

A

Increased Susceptibility
E.g., uncontrolled T2DM, chronic
kidney or liver disease, solidorgan tumors not on
chemotherapy, burn victims, etc.
Increased chance of NORMAL
infections compared to healthy
population, does not get
atypical or strange infections
with uncommon organisms

Specific Deficiency
E.g., patients on biologics,
patients with controlled HIV,
those with structural lung disease
Increased chance of NORMAL
infections compared to healthy
population, are susceptible to
CERTAIN infections with
uncommon organisms (e.g., TB,
endemic fungi)

Truly Immunocompromised
E.g., post-SOT, post-stem cell
transplant, severely
uncontrolled HIV, severe bone
marrow suppression
Increased chance of ATYPICAL
infections with organisms THAT
DON’T USUALLY CAUSE
DISEASE and increased chance
of severe but normal infections
I
Be specific about the extent/severity of your patient’s immunodeficiency to properly assess for infectious diseases!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Opportunistic Infections in Solid-Organ Transplantation

A

Infections that occur in solid-organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) are
challenging to manage, and a whole infectious diseases sub-specialty
is devoted to their care (transplant infectious diseases).
Management is difficult for several reasons:
1. May be more severe, progress more rapidly
2. May be more difficult to recognize
a. Immunosuppression may blunt inflammatory response
b. Use of steroids may mask fever/inflammatory response
c. Surgical alterations in anatomy may hinder recognition
d. Non-infectious causes often mimic infection
a. E.g., steroid-induced leukocytosis
b. Allograft rejection & graft-versus-host disease
3. DDIs between immunosuppression and antimicrobials
Infections in SOTRs often involve transplant infectious diseases, an ID subspecialty branch

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Risk Factors for Infection in Solid-Organ Transplantation

A

Donor Factors
Latent infections
Unrecognized
active illness in
donor

Recipient Factors
Underlying illness
Age
Vaccination status
Allograft organ
(++ infx @ graft)

Intra-Operative
Factors
Surgical procedure
Ischemic injury and
OR duration
increases
contamination risk

Post-Operative
Factors
Immunosuppression
Technical problems
affecting allograft
Foreign devices
Hospital exposure
There are many predisposing factors OTHER than immunosuppressive medications!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The Most Important Reason for Compromise

A

T-CELL DEPLETION
* In SOTRs – patients receive T-cell depleting agents to
substantially reduce the risk of rejection – aka. Rabbit
antithymoglobulin (rATG) or basiliximab which severely
affect T-cell function
* In stem-cell transplant recipients – patients usually have a
bone marrow cancer – so are given myeloablative
chemotherapy to wipe out all of their bone marrows stemcells and malignant cells
Some patients T-cells never completely recover – but in those
who do – recovery is delayed but generally around 1-2 years!

T-cell depletion more than any other feature is responsible for the extent of compromise.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Relative Immunosuppression & Risk Post-SOT

A

early period
intermediate period
late period

Immune function waning
Possible donor derived OR hospital
acquired infection

Immunosuppression often REDUCED
Decreased risk of OI compared to
intermediated period, but higher baseline
risk of OI compared to general population
Peak of immunosuppression. OI risk is
the highest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Timing of Infection & Solid-Organ Transplantation

A

Early Period

Nosocomial bacterial
infections (e.g., line-related
infx, CA-UTI, wounds,
ventilator-associated PNA,
C. difficile colitis)

Intermediate Period
M. tuberculosis or nontuberculous mycobacterial
infections
Viral Reactivation/Infection
Herpesviruses (HSV, VZV,
CMV, EBV)
BK virus

Fungal Infection
Pneumocystis jirovecci (PJP)
C. neoformans

Late Period
M. tuberculosis or nontuberculous mycobacterial
infections
Late Viral OI
Late CMV infection
M. tuberculosis or nontuberculous mycobacterial
infections
Late Fungal Infection
Invasive Aspergillosis
Other mold infections

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Why These Weird Organisms? Why Now?

A

With few exceptions (e.g., very poorly controlled HIV, HSCT), the opportunistic infections (OI) that occur in
SOTRs are unique to SOTRs. So why don’t these occur in otherwise healthy people?
The primary defect responsible is the loss in the cellular branch of the adaptive immune system,
predominantly T-cell mediated. This is often accomplished through use of anti-thymocyte globulin or other
T-cell depleting immunosuppressive induction regimens.
Loss of cellular immune response is the primary defect explanatory for OIs with these organisms.

The Importance of T-Cells in Infectious Diseases
Intracellular pathogens are hard to eradicate since they can hide within host-cells (e.g.,
viruses, mycobacteria). The loss of T-cell functions predisposes to infection with these
organisms, as well as those who require T-cell assistance to activate innate responses (e.g.,
PJP, fungal organisms, mycobacteria as well)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Patient Case #1: Early Infections in Solid-Organ Transplantation
55-year-old female with chronic bronchiectasis who
received a bilateral sequential lung-transplant (BSLTx) 6-
days ago (POD6) from a deceased donor. Today she is
febrile (T 39.1°C) and has developed increased secretions
on mechanical ventilation. A CXR is ordered, which
reveals new multifocal airspace opacities concerning for
PNA.
Pre-operatively, the recipient was colonized with MDR
Pseudomonas aeruginosa with the following
sensitivities. The donor graft microbiology is still
pending. A bronchoscopy sample is taken for culture.
Q: What organisms do we treat in this case?

A

CONSIDER: Does the past microbiology of explanted organs still play a role in this infection?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Early Infections in Solid-Organ Transplantation

A

Predominantly hospital-acquired infections related to
surgery, procedural intervention, foreign device
installation and exposure to nosocomial pathogens by
healthcare staff.
Immune system functionally intact
Infection-rates post-operatively are not equally
distributed across allograft types:
* In general, organs that are contain a larger bacterial
burden and higher lymph organ burden (e.g., the
LUNG, the intestines) contribute to a higher
infectious burden than others (e.g., kidneys, heart)
Early infections (month 1) are less related to immunosuppressive regimens than later infections.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Hospital-Acquired Infections

EXAMPLE CASE:
36M admitted for BSLTx and is POD13 (post-op day #13). The
patient was recovering well and becoming ready for discharge
until the nurse alerts you to a new fever (38.5°C) and a
leukocytosis (WBC 14.1 up from 8.1).
Q: What infections should you be looking for?
* A head-to-toe infection approach is prudent, although some
infections are more likely in the hospital than others (i.e.,
unlikely to have developed a STI, for example)

A

When sick patients are admitted to the hospital for a prolonged
period of time, their risk of hospital-acquired infections
increases. We already discussed how some organisms are mostly
relevant as nosocomial pathogens.

Check for hospitalacquired PNA
(uncommon)
Assess for
catheter-related
UTI (if Foley in
place)
Assess for linerelated
bloodstream
infection (common,
especially with
central IV catheters)
Assess for C.
difficile (CDI) even
if not on antibiotics
(other risk factors)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Patient Case #1 Revisited: Early Infections in Solid-Organ Transplantation

Case continued…
The donor’s bronchoscopy results return, demonstrating
the following microbiology results.
The patient’s microbiology results (day 6 bronchoscopy
and bronchoalveolar lavage) return positive for
Pseudomonas aeruginosa (susceptibility pending).
PEARL: Past microbiology despite explantation may still be relevant in early post-SOT infection.
Q: What are the possible explanations for this patient’s
microbiology results?
Q: What is a reasonable empiric antibiotic regimen for
this patient with ventilator-associated PNA?

A

the nuance point in lung transplants is that, despite the fact that they actually transplant your lungs and remove both sets of your lungs and give you 2 new longs.
They keep your trachea in a lung transplant, and if you’re colonized with bacteria in your lungs, patients are often colonized all the way up their trachea and into their mouth. And so we know that when patients are colonized with organisms pre transplant, and then have those organs expplanted.
Unfortunately, they just colonize their new set of lungs, no matter what organisms were in there.

a big problem is when patients have a spurgeless or tuberculosis pre-transplants, because we know we’re just going to give their new set of lungs the same organism. So we end up having to deal with that contraction later on as well. So it’s no surprise. They still grow this pseudomonus in their day. 6 bronc.

They’re not growing. The steno, however. despite it being in the donor microbiology. So my empiric regimen would only be covering this pseudonymous.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Patient Case #2: The Intermediate Period in Solid-Organ Transplant
55-year-old female with chronic bronchiectasis who
received a bilateral sequential lung-transplant (BSLTx) 3
months prior, on a maintenance immunosuppression
regimen of TAC + MMF. She is being followed up as an
outpatient for routine bloodwork and antimicrobial
prophylaxis.
Donor: CMV IgG+ // Recipient: CMV IgGYou notice on her routine bloodwork that over the past 2
weeks her WBC count has been falling and is now 0.3 x
109/L.
Q: What – if any – drug-induced explanations are
there for this neutropenia? What is your action plan?

A

CONSIDER: What type of drugs are being used in this patient post-SOT?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Cytomegalovirus (CMV). AKA HHV5

A

Structure & Nucleic Acid
Group II (dsDNA) virus
* Icosahedral, enveloped (easy to destroy)

Epidemiology
* Ubiquitous (prevalent worldwide)
* Seropositivity (IgG+) ~ equal to age (e.g., ~50%
of people have been exposed @ age 50 years)

Transmission
* Usually shared by direct contact with blood or
bodily fluids (e.g., sharing drinks/sexual/oral)
* Also shared vertically (possible, but not
guaranteed transmission of virus)
Structure & Nucleic Acid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

HHV-5
CMV
Cytomegalovirus

A

Attachment/Infectious Site
Predominantly mucosal
epithelium

Latency Site (Tropism)
Myeloid cells
(e.g., WBCs)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Primary versus Secondary Disease

A

Primary Infection: WORSE
First exposure, no immune
memory of virus
May cause acute illness

Recovery And establishment of latency
Most patients asymptomatic in this
stage chronically, still can be
contagious

Secondary Disease
Reactivation of latent
virus due to loss of
immune-system control
Some HHVs only “unlock” in VERY SEVERE depths of immunosuppression (i.e., SOTR/HSCTRs)

Reactivation occurs in
~90% of infected
patients, can be
frequent OR infrequent

17
Q

The Pleiotropic Effects of Cytomegalovirus Infection

A

Increased risk of
opportunistic infections
(bacteremia, invasive fungal,
EBV-related PTLD)
Increased incidence of
acute & chronic allograft
injury/rejection (suspected
but not definitively proven)
Chronic allograft
nephropathy (renal SOTR)
Bronchiolitis obliterans
(lung SOTR)
Coronary vasculopathy
(heart SOTR) Decreased survival overall

18
Q

Risk Factors
for CMV
Disease
Post-SOT

A

CMV Donor + / Recipient –ve Serostatus
Use of anti-thymocyte globulin induction
Net state of immunosuppression
Acute or chronic GVHD
HLA mismatch
Steroid use

19
Q

Confusing Terminology & Cytomegalovirus

A

Latent CMV – CMV IgG+, no active viral replication
CMV Infection – CMV IgG+, viral replication detected in any bodily fluid or by culture
(asymptomatic OR symptomatic)
CMV Syndrome – NOT well defined: fever/malaise, atypical lymphocytosis, leukopenia, and
elevated transaminases with viral replication
CMV Disease – usually requires clinically evident disease + some form of tissue/fluid
diagnosis (histopathology gold standard, considered probable in local fluids)

20
Q

CMV Management Pathway

A

High Risk SOT
(e.g., CMV D+/R- )
Prophylaxis:
Valganciclovir 450 mg PO
DAILY x 3-12/12 (depending
on the organ)
Monitoring for viremia &
clinical disease onset

Development of True CMV
Disease
CMV Syndrome or
Mild Disease
Oral valganciclovir
may be acceptable

Moderate-Severe
CMV Disease
Start with IV
ganciclovir

GOAL: Until symptom resolution + clearance of
DNAemia

21
Q

CMV Antiviral Pharmacology

A

slide 27

22
Q

Valganciclovir & Ganciclovir

A

MECHANISM:
* Chain-termination of viral DNA polymerase
PK:
* VGCV much better PO absorption, converted into GCV by
intestinal mucosa. Eliminated renally (80-90% unchanged),
requires dose adjustment in renal failure
MAJOR TOXICITIES:
* Therapy-limiting bone marrow suppression even with
prophylactic doses (can be aplastic; involving all cell lineages
including neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia)
* This occurs in up to ~20% of patients to varying degrees

ROUTINE MONITORING: Includes CBC at least monthly to monitor for marrow suppression.

23
Q

Host Immunity & Systemic Fungal Infections

A

Severely
immunodeficient

Invasive Pulmonary
Aspergillosis

Chronic Cavitating
Pulmonary
Aspergillosis

Allergic
Bronchopulmonary
Aspergillosis (ABPA)

Strong immunity
Healthy patient

24
Q

Aspergillosis

A

PATHOGEN: Aspergillus spp molds (hyphae with numerous septa, most frequently A.mfumigatus, but many other species; including A. flavus, A. niger, A. terreus)

GEOGRAPHY: ubiquitous worldwide saprophytes (breaks down decaying matter), inhaling constantly in most patients daily (not “black” mold in house)

ACQUISITION: inhalation of airborne conidia; most frequently causes clinical disease in immunocompromised patients/CGD (prolonged neutropenia as seen with heme malignancy; post-transplant) OR allergic disease

CLINICAL PRESENTATION:
* Invasive aspergillosis – immunocompromised – primary pulmonary infection (nodular diffuse lung disease) w/ fever which can disseminate since angioinvasive
* Chronic cavitating – less immunocompromised/chronic lung disease – captures aspergillus in these cavities – indolent lung infection/”fungus balls”
* Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) – IgE-mediated reaction to aspergillosis most seen in patients with asthma
DIAGNOSIS: Serum/BAL galactomannan (antigen), culture, biopsy (septate hyphae)

TREATMENT:
* Mold active azoles (voriconazole, posaconazole; for 2-6 months) over AmpB
* Resolution of risk factor (immunodeficiency, allergy with steroids, etc.)

25
Q

Azole Antifungals: Drug-Drug-Interactions

A
  1. Cytochrome P-450 Enzymes (CYP-450)
    * Perform Phase I metabolic reactions
    * Many azole antifungals and caspofungin are CYP450 inhibitors
    and therefore increase the levels of other medications who are
    metabolized this way
    * Inhibition leads to increased toxicity and effectiveness of
    other drugs
  2. P-Glycoprotein (PGP)
    * Drug/toxin efflux pump (back into intestines)
    * Drugs that are inhibitors of PGP will increase the
    intracellular/systemic concentrations of other agents by
    preventing efflux
    * Inhibition leads to increased toxicity and effectiveness of
    other drugs
  3. Organic Anion Transporting Polypeptide (OATP-1B1)
    * Drug/toxin hepatic INFLUX pump
    * Drugs that are inhibitors of OATP-1B1 will increase systemic
    exposure of drug instead of hepatic clearance
    * Inhibition leads to increased toxicity and effectiveness of
    other drugs
26
Q

Azole Antifungals: Cytochrome-P450 Enzyme Interactions

A

Antifungal Strength of CYP450
Inhibition
Ketoconazole >90%
Voriconazole >90%
Itraconazole ~90%
Caspofungin ~76%
Fluconazole ~50%

If your patient is started on antifungals, always screen for drug-drug interactions with CYP3A4!

27
Q

Drug-Drug Interactions in Solid-Organ Transplant Infectious Diseases

A

Rifampin CYP3A4 inducer
Reduces VORI Cmax/AUC by
93% and 96% respectively
Do NOT use with vori

Voriconazole CYP3A4 inhibitor
RIF Reduces AUC by
68% for IR PO TAC
Additional plasma monitoring,
often requires increase

Tacrolimus CYP3A4 substrate
Increases AUC/Cmax by
3-fold and 2-fold, respectively
Empirically reduce TAC dose to
1/3rd original dose when starting

27
Q

Drug-Drug Interactions in Solid-Organ Transplant Infectious Diseases

A

Rifampin CYP3A4 inducer
Reduces VORI Cmax/AUC by
93% and 96% respectively
Do NOT use with vori

Voriconazole CYP3A4 inhibitor
RIF Reduces AUC by
68% for IR PO TAC
Additional plasma monitoring,
often requires increase

Tacrolimus CYP3A4 substrate
Increases AUC/Cmax by
3-fold and 2-fold, respectively
Empirically reduce TAC dose to
1/3rd original dose when starting

28
Q

Patient Case #3 Revisited: Late Infections in Solid-Organ Transplant

55-year-old female with chronic bronchiectasis who
received a bilateral sequential lung-transplant (BSLTx)
approximately 9 months ago. She was doing relatively
well as an outpatient until presenting yesterday,
endorsing a cough that has lasted >2/52, intermittent
fevers at home and weight loss.
Diagnosed with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis with 2
species of mold (A. fumigatus + A. nidulans )
Patient is started on voriconazole.
Empiric dosing decrease in tacrolimus likely required
due to inhibition of CYP3A4 by voriconazole.
PEARL: Dose decreases may be required when starting antifungals with SOT maintenance regimens.

A

w