Open Responses Flashcards
Who, What, Where, When
What was the Significance and origin of the Agricultural Revolution? What factors led to settled farming communities while others chose the Nomadic route?
The origin is structured on the transition from a hunter-gatherer society to a more stable agricultural society.
Significance: Led to settled communities with food surplus, population growth, and societal complexity (number and diverse group of individuals).
Settlement benefits: availability of suitable crops (wheat, barley, rice), climate and geography conductive to farming, domestication of animals and plants.
Nomadic Existence: some areas lacked fertile land, mobility allowed access to more resources, cultural preferences in reference to social cohesion
What aspects of the culture of greek states made their unlikely victory over the persian empire possible?
strong sense of identity and independence among city-states.
citizen soldiers motivated by patriotism and in defending their way of life.
innovative military tactics such as phalanx formation
unlikely victory: Persias size and resources exceeded those of the greeks. Their leadership (themistocles) and strategic decisions (battle of thermopylae)
Compare and contrast mesopotamia and egypt. Provide specific examples.
- Both were early civilizations with advanced agricultural systems supported by river valleys. Mesopotamia relied on the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers and Egypt relied on the Nile River.
- both had complex political and social structures however Mesopotamia tends to have more decentralized city states while Egypt has a centralized monarchy
- Both civilizations were polytheistic, and played a role in shaping cultural practices, architecture, and governance
- Mesopotamia faced environmental challenges: unpredictable annual rainfall and lacked natural barriers for protection against invaders while Egypt beneffited from predictable flooding and natural protective barriers.HI
- the writing systems differed: Mesopotamia (cunieform) Egypt (hieroglyphics) reflecting different linguistics and cultural contexts.
In what ways did the expansion of Roman control over an larger territory create tensions within the Roman Republic itself? Did that expansion make the end of the Republic inevitable?
- The expansion of the republic brought immense wealth to Rome: with that also came the widened gap between the wealthy and the common people. As Rome continued conquering new lands, the influx of profit would benefit the elite and upper class who would become even more powerful.
- The elite used their wealth to control politics and influence making it harder for lower class individuals to have a say in how things run, this made rome less democratic and fair.
- Through expansion, vunerable segments of rome experienced turmoil as a result of conquered region with the influx of slaves. Slaves and non-citizens were subjected to harsh treatment and prejudice.
The expansion did make the end of the republic inevitable due to the disintegration of political norms helped pave the way for the rise of autocratic rule under the leadership of Julius Caeser which marked the transformation of the Roman Republic into the Roman Empire.
As the Qin and then the Han dynasties reunited China after centuries of division and war, the restoration and maintenance of order became a central goal of government. In pursuit of this goal the Qin dynasty advocated a policy of legalism, while the Han chose to follow the dictates of Confucianism. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each of these approaches. Which do you think would be most effective in the modern world. Explain your choice.
Strengths of Legalism:
- emphasizes strict laws and centralized authority enabling control over the population. Can impose stability and order during times of chaos
- provides clear guidelines on punishments which can deter crime and disobediance
- emphasizes practical governance over moral ideals, decisions are based on pragmitism and efficiency (effective resource allocation and administration)
Flaws of legalism:
- can result in an authoritarian government leaving less room for individual freedom and innovation
- excessive control can lead to resentment and resistance from the population
- lacks a strong ethical framework- focusing solely on maintaining order through coercion can lead lead to a lack of moral values and social cohesion
Strengths of Confucianism
-promotes ethical principles and and fosters a harmonious society based on mutual respect and moral conduct
- advocates for education and self-improvement, this promotes good governance and social stability (cultivation of capapble leaders)
- promotes a flexiblible governance as rules are encouraged to adapt policies to the needs of the society
Weaknesses of Confucianism
- less effective in times of crisis
- less focus on legal aspects of governance
- resistance to change may lead to stagnation which can impede progress in society
Modern World
Confucanism may be more suitable to the modern world due to its emphasis on moral values and adaptability to more diverse populations and structures. Legalisms authoritarian nature and emphasis on control may not align with the modern worlds democratic values.
Compare and contrast the second wave civilizations of Rome and China. What did they have in common? How did they differ? What factors contributed to the decline of each?
- they both experienced territorial expansions and established empires during their time of prosperity
- both experienced conflicts with invasions (the huns for the romans and the xiongnu for china) which interrupted the stability of the empires and the trade routes for both
- The political structure of both were distinct as rome was a republlic (power was shared amongst elected officials) and china was an imperial dynasty where power laid in the hands of an emperor
- roman religion was polytheistic with a group of respected gods to look up to while china practiced confusianism, daoism, and buddhism.
- military startegy was distinct as china focused on protective strategies by building the great wall of china and rome focused on professional conquest
factors that led to the decline of rome include internal issues such as political corruption, social inequality, economic instability in addition to external issues such as nomadic invasions by the huns and germanic tribes
factors that led to the decline of china: han dynasty declined due to political fragmentation, internal rebellion, and nomadic invasions.