omnipotence Flashcards
main issues
- if illogical possibilities are possible for God, makes our world meaningless
- not all powerful = Biblical accounts impossible
- application of God’s omnipotence has to be defined
scholars
- Descartes
- Aquinas
- Vardy
- Hartshorne
what separates the scholars understanding of omnipotence?
- the varying definitions of omnipotence
Descartes
Descartes definition of omnipotence
- total omnipotence means God can do absolutely anything even things which seem logically impossible or self-contradictory to us
- we must accept that God defines all human understating
- ‘god must be that than which nothing greater could be conceived’
support for totally omnipotence understanding
- term God means - possess all perfections to their absolute maximum
- supported by scripture: miracles and Jesus incarnation
- if God is limited, he is not God: ‘God is totally omnipotent’ is an a-priori statement its true because it has to be
- total omnipotence is necessary for human salvation: Jesus’ resurrection logically impossible and essential for salvation
- logical contradictions: due to humans lack of understanding not Gods lack of ability
why is total omnipotence so important
- denying God has total power, same as denying the very nature of what God is
- rules of mathematics, laws of nature etc are laws that exist in our world and don’t apply to God = God can do the logically impossible
examples of logically impossible things
- circle square
- 2 + 2 = 7
- Virgin Mother
- miracles
why God’s ability to have total omnipotence coherent
- God is transcendent, supreme perfection = no limitations
- God is source of logic therefore can suspend or alter logic
criticisms of total omnipotence
- logical contradictions are not ‘things’
- humans would be unable to have a relationship with a totally omnipotent God
- undermines Christian theodicies and reenforces the problem of evil
- not supported by the Bible
logical contradiction are not ‘things’ - Descartes
- not about logical inconsistencies or God’s lack of power
- logical contradictions simply are not ‘things’
ex - more than 100% or square circle
why would humans not be able to have a relationship with a totally omnipotent God?
- by God’s ability to do logically impossible things changes the attributes of God, makes him unpredictable, arbitrary and tyrannical
- with total omnipotence God is comparable to doing evil and be unforgiving
- total omnipotence makes it difficult for humans to related to/ form a relationship
how does total omnipotence undermine Christian theodicies and reinforces the problem of evil?
- undermines Irenaean: why did God create a world where suffering wasn’t necessary for human development
- undermines Augustine: God allows free will which results in evil - why didn’t he create humans who were free but more able to resist temptation
which pieces of scripture don’t support total omnipotence
Numbers 23:19 and Hebrews 6:18 show what God is incapable of doing - cannot lie
Thomas Aquinas’ definition of omnipotence
- omnipotence means that God can do anything that is within his own nature and anything that is logically possible