omissions Flashcards

Actus Reas, Mens Rea, and omissions

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

define actus reas

A

the physical element of committing a crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

define mens rea

A

the mental element of committing a crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is an omission ?

A

where someone fails to act and it results in liability (LBO)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the 8 omissions ?

A
  1. contractual duty
  2. public duties
  3. acceptance of care
  4. duty via relationship
  5. creation of danger
  6. omission under statue
  7. termination of duty
  8. good samaritin rule
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

explain contractual duty

A

If you fail your contractual duty then you will be LBO

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Adomako
eye doctor, O2

A
  • eye doctor didnt check O2 tube and patient died
  • LBO as he failed his contractual duty
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

explain public duties

A

emerancy services can be LBO if they fail to intervene

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Dytham
officer, beat, death

A
  • police officer watched a bouncer bear someone to death and didnt intervene
  • LBO as failed his public duty
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

explain acceptance of care

A

if D chooses to take care of someone but fails they are LBO

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Stone and Dobbinson
sister, starve

A
  • agreed to take in his ill sister
  • couldn’t care for her and she starved to death
  • LBO as they accepted care and failed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain duty via relationship

A

parents and children have an automatic responsibility to take care of each other, if they then fail then LBO

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Gibbins and Proctor
child, neglect

A
  • parents neglected and starved child to death, then hid her body
  • LBO as failed duty of care
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

explain creation of danger

A

if you create a dangerous situation and fail to act you will be LBO

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Miller
fire, self, stop

A
  • started a fire, went back to sleepand didn’t put it out
  • LBO as he created a danger and failed to stop it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

omissions under statute

A

some acts of parliment make you LBO if you do not act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

example of omission under statue

A

road traffict act 1988 - failure to stop at the scene of an accident

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

explain termination of duty

A
  • sometimes you can terminate your duty so you are not LBO if you fail to act
  • eg: when a doctor tunrs of a life suppport machine - Bland ruiling
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

explain the good samaritan rule

A
  • if you see someone in danger you have a duty to help
  • doesn’t exist in the UK
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what are the two parts to causation

A

factual causation
legal causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

what is the test for factual causation

A

‘but for’ the defendants actions ….

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

what is the test for legal causation ?

A

was D’s actions more than a minimal cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

White

A

D poisoned his mums drink she died of a heart attack before she drank it
not guilty

23
Q

Pagett

A

used his pregnant girlfriend as a human shield during police shootout
Was the legal cause - guilty

24
Q

what happens if the chain of causation is broken ?

A

a lesser charge or a full acquittal

25
Q

what are the 4 areas that can break the chain of causation ?

A

Thin skull rule
victims own acts
third parties
natural disasters

26
Q

explain the think skull rule

A

if the victim has a physical weakness that makes them more likely to be injured
must be taken as found
Won’t break the chain

27
Q

Blaue

A

stabbed a woman due to her religion - refused blood
chain not broken as religion is same as eggshell

28
Q

what are the 4 areas to victims own act

A

escape
self treatment/ neglect
refusal of treatment
self injection
suicide

29
Q

explain escape

A

can break chain
victims acts must be unexpected or grossly negligent

30
Q

Roberts

A

takes a woman home tries to touch her up
she jumps our of the care to escape
chain not broken as her actions were reasonable

31
Q

explain self treatment/ neglect

A

brakes chain of causation

32
Q

explain refusal of treatment

A

won’t break the chain of causation

33
Q

Holland

A

in a fight v is hit with a metal bar
got gas gasgrene but refused treatment
doesn’t break chain so guilty

34
Q

explain self injection

A

breaks chain as it’s the victims choice
if D helps in any way chain doesn’t break

35
Q

explain kennedy

A

victim was dealt heroin by D
v took it himself so the chain breaks

36
Q

explain suicide

A

if you injure the person so much you affect their life
and the suicide is linked to you chain doesn’t break

37
Q

wallace

A

jealous ex threw acid on her former partner, paralysing him
v committed suicide
jury decided causation when it was broken when it wasn’t

38
Q

what are the 3 areas to third parties

A

negligent medical support
life support machines
other situations

39
Q

explain negligent medical care

A

can break the chain
third parties actions must be grossly negligent

40
Q

Jordan

A

v recovering from stab wound
doctor gave x3 doses of medicine v was allergic to
gave V lots of water to try to cover it up
not guilty as chain broken

41
Q

explain life support

A

doesn’t break causation alsong as bland ruining us followed

42
Q

Malcherek and Steel

A

doctors turned off life support following the bland ruilling
chain not broken

43
Q

explain other situations

A

self defence - unlikely to break to chain

44
Q

Pagett

A

used pregnant girlfriend as a shield during police shoot out

45
Q

what are the 6 types of mens rea

A
  1. intention
  2. recklessness
  3. negligence
  4. transferred malice
  5. coincidence
  6. strict liability
46
Q

explain intention

A

direct intent - aim and desire for the outcome, absolutely certain that it will happen
oblique intent - no aim and desire but they are virtually certain it will occur

47
Q

Mohan

A

direct intent
attempted ABH on an officer
judge gave the definition of direct intent

48
Q

Woolin

A

oblique intent
baby wouldn’t stop crying
launched baby across the room
confirmed the test for oblique intent 1998

49
Q

explain recklessness

A

where you take an unjustified risk. tested with a two park test
1.did d see the risk and run it
2. was the risk unjustified

50
Q

explain negligence

A

where your actions fall below what is expected of you - you are negligent
plays a role in criminal and civil cases

51
Q

explain transferred malice

A

this is where you have the aim to commit a certain crime and you are guilty even if your victim is different from who you intended

52
Q

Mitchell

A

pensioners were queing and D jumped the que
wanted to hurt victim A but victim B was injured

53
Q

explain coincidence

A

As long as the Actus rea and Mens rea coincides at some point D is guilty