Oligopolies Flashcards
1
Q
Concentration Ratios show How dominant the big firms in a market are
A
- Some are dominated just by a few = concentrated markets
- Level of domination is measured by the concentration ratio
- ‘look in book’
2
Q
There are two ways to define an Oligopoly
A
- Can define it in terms of market structure
2. Or can define it in terms of conduct of firms (i.e. how they behave)
3
Q
Firms in an oligopoly can either Compete or Collude
A
- Unlike monopolies and perfect competition, there’s no single strategy that firms in an oligopolistic firm should adopt in order to maximise profits
- Firms in oligopoly face a choice - what kind of long-term strategy - each decision affected by how other interdependent firms in market act.
4
Q
There are different possible scenarios in an oligopolistic market
A
- Competitive Behaviour
- various firms dont cooperate but compete esp on price - Collusive behaviour
- Various firms cooperate with each other esp over prices charged
- Formal collusion (make an agreement) => involves cartel = illegal
- Informal collusion => tacit = without agreement
Some in collusive oligopoly act as price leaders, setting the pattern for others to follow
5
Q
The behaviour that occurs depends on the characteristcs of a particular market
A
Competitive behaviour is more likely when…..
a, b, c, d (in book)
Collusive behaviour is more likely when….
a, b, c, d
6
Q
Collusion can bring about similar outcomes to a Monopoly
A
- Collusive oligopolies can produce results quite similar to those in a monopoly
- Generally => higher prices, restricted output as well as allocative and productive efficiency. etc…
- As firms in a collusive oligopoly dont lower prices even though they could, they make supernormal profits at the expense of consumers
- LOOK AT GRAPH ON PAGE 69
- Firms that collude on price may still compete in other ways though e.g. marketing policies are v important.
- Other firms try to break into the market may face predatory pricing tactics…
7
Q
Oligopolies Might Not be as bad as they sound
A
- Some economists argue that collusive oligopolies are either
a) not as bad
b) unstable
c) both of the above - They argue that formal collusion is quite unlikely - illegal and any informal collusion is likely to be temporary - one firm will cheat, and lower its prices to gain advantage, first-mover advantage => price war
- Even in a collusive oligopoly:
- if firms aren’t competing price, then non-price competition might even be stronger, leading to some dynamic efficiency. This would be good for consumers if it => product innovations and improvements
- firms are unlikely to raise prices to very high levels - high prices may provide a strong incentive for new entrants to join the market, even if barriers to entry are high. - Competitive oligopolies can achieve high levels of efficiency - these markets often work well in practice.