Old English Grammar Flashcards
What do nouns inflect according to in Old English?
grammatical gender (f, m, n), case inflection (nom, acc, gen, dat, [inst]), number (sg / pl)
What are Strong & Weak nouns?
Strong and weak are overused metalinguistic terms in the study of OE. There needn’t be any agreement between strong and weak nouns, verbs and adjectives. In fact the term only refers to differing patterns of inflection.
Ending for STRONG masc/neuter singular nouns (e.g staan, scip) in Nominative or Accusative
zero
ending for STRONG masc/neuter singular nouns in the genitive
-es
ending for STRONG masc/neuter singular nouns in the dative
-e
ending for STRONG feminine singular nouns in the nominative
-u
ending for STRONG feminine singular nouns (e.g giefu - gift) in the accusative, genitive & dative
-e
ending for STRONG masculine plural nouns in the nominative and accusative
-as
ending for STRONG neuter plural nouns in the nominative and accusative
-u
ending for STRONG feminine plural nouns in the nominative or accusative
-a/-e
ending for all STRONG plural nouns in the genitive
-a
ending for all STRONG plural nouns in the dative
-um
ending for WEAK masculine singular nouns (e.g nama -name) in the nominative
-a
ending for WEAK masculine singular nouns (e.g nama -name) in the accusative, genitive and dative.
-an
ending for WEAK neuter singular nouns (e.g eaage - eye) in the nominative and accusative cases
-e
ending for WEAK neuter singular nouns (e.g eaage - eye) in the genitive and dative cases
-an
ending for WEAK feminine singular nouns (e.g tunge - snare) in the nominative case
-e
ending for WEAK feminine singular nouns (e.g tunge - snare) in the accusative, dative & genitive case
-an
ending for all WEAK plural nouns in the nominative and accusative case
-an
ending for all WEAK plural nouns in the genitive
-ena
ending for all WEAK plural nouns in the dative
-um
What is syncretism?
The loss of inflectional distinctiveness, which Jeremy Smith (2012) identifies as an ongoing process in the germanic languages. For example, Gothic had a nominative/accusative distinction in Strong nouns not present in Old English.
Where do the noun inflections in OE come from?
Jeremy Smith (2012) says that these endings are based on the thematic (word-final) vowels of words in PIE, and new words are incorporated by analogy. Strong masculine come from a, ja, wa, i, strong feminine from o, jo, wo, i. Strong neuters have same thematic vowels as masculine but there are no u-stems neuters. (obviously u-stems have the thematic vowel u). The -an declension, often described as the weak noun, had a consonantal theme in Proto-Germanic, -n-. This thematic element derived from ProtoIndo-European themes in *-en-, with the vowel subject to Ablaut variation, yielding *-on-, lengthened grades *-ēn- and *-ōn-, and the reduced or ‘zero’ grade *-n-. One example of reduced or zero grade survives in OE, namely oxna ‘oxen’ (genitive plural).
How does umlaut affect OE?
A stressed vowel with /i/ or /j/ in the next syllable underwent i-mutation (umlaut):
◦short front vowels raise a level (æ > e, e > i)
◦all back vowels become front (a > æ, o (> oe) > e, u > y)
◦diphthongs shift (ea > ie, eo > ie)
The triggering environment was then lost, leaving umlaut as a
morphological rather than phonological process in OE
(hence OE fēt ‘feet’ < PG *fo:tiz)
We don’t reconstruct this sound change for Proto-Germanic
because it is not found in Gothic (East Germanic)
Umlaut plurals
mann:menn ‘man’ tōþ:tēþ ‘tooth’ bōc:bēc ‘book’ gōs:gēs ‘goose’ lūs:lȳs ‘louse’ mūs:mȳs ‘mouse’ frēond:frīend ‘friend’ fēond:fīend ‘enemy’
Irregular plurals in OE (Jeremy Smith 2012)
A few nouns have irregular paradigms, through the operation of analogy or as relicts of Proto-Germanic paradigms otherwise extinct by OE times. One set of neuters decline like the general neuter declension in the singular, but add an intrusive -r- in the plural, e.g. lamb ‘lamb’, lambru (nominative/accusative plural), lambra (genitive plural), lambrum (dative plural). Other neuters with similar paradigms include cealf ‘calf’, æ¯g ‘egg’, while cild ‘child’ can be declined like word, in the general neuter
declension, throughout but also appears with -r- forms, e.g. cildru (nominative/accusative plural). Another small group of nouns display relics of the Proto-Indo-European t-declension, e.g. mōnaþ ‘month’. Some don’t inflect at all in the plural, most notably relationship nouns: mother, daughter, brother, father.
u-stem declension
singular nominative and accusative
-u
u-stem declension
singular genitive and dative
-a
u-stem declension
plural nominative, accusative, genitive
-a
u-stem declension
plural dative
-um
What do OE pronouns inflect according to?
person (1st, 2nd, 3rd), case inflection (nom, acc, gen, dat, [inst]), number (sg, du, pl).
first person OE pronouns
singular: ic, mee, miin, mee
dual: wit, unc, uncer, unc
plural: wee, uus, uure, uus
second person OE pronouns
singular: thuu, thee, thiin, thee
dual: git, inc, incer, inc
plural: gee, eeow, eeower, eeow