OLA1957 Flashcards

1
Q

What is the test to determine an occupier?

A

One of control

Example: Wheat v Lacon (manager of pub had control over premises)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does ‘premises’ include in the context of occupiers’ liability?

A

Includes land, buildings, houses, vehicles, and fixed or moveable structures

Examples: lifts, ladders, bouncy castles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who does the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957 apply to?

A

Lawful visitors

Includes those with express or implied permission to enter premises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What can visitors claim under the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957?

A

Personal injury and damage to property arising from the state of premises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the common duty of care under s.2(2) of the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957?

A

To take reasonable care to keep the visitor reasonably safe for the purpose of their visit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What case established that wet floor signs were sufficient to discharge the duty of care?

A

Laverton v Kiapasha Takeaway

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did the case Rochester Cathedral v Debell conclude about uneven paving slabs?

A

Did not pose a real source of danger; visitors could be expected to take reasonable care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What special consideration must occupiers have for child visitors under s.2(3)(a)?

A

Occupier must be prepared for children to be less careful than adults

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What case involved boys playing on an abandoned boat concerning child visitors?

A

Jolley v Sutton LBC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the expectation for parental supervision for child visitors?

A

Expected where the child is particularly young

Example: Phipps v Rochester Corporation (5-year-old playing unaccompanied)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What can occupiers expect from professional or skilled visitors under s.2(3)(b)?

A

Tradespersons to guard against special risks associated with their job

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What case involved chimney sweeps inhaling poisonous fumes?

A

Roles v Nathan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is one defense to a claim by a lawful visitor under s.2(4)(a)?

A

Warning notices must give effective warning of danger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What case demonstrated that a sign could not be seen in the dark?

A

Rae v Marrs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Which dangers do not require a warning sign according to s.2(4)(a)?

A

Obvious dangers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What case involved algae-covered rocks as an obvious danger?

A

Staples v West Dorset

17
Q

What is a defense under s.2(4)(b) regarding independent contractors?

A

Must have been reasonable to entrust work to a contractor

18
Q

What case involved a lift repair concerning independent contractors?

A

Haseldine v Daw

19
Q

What must occupiers do to ensure a contractor is competent?

A

Take reasonable precautions

20
Q

What case involved an uninsured firework display team?

A

Bottomley v Todmorden Cricket Club

21
Q

What should occupiers do if possible regarding contractor work?

A

Inspect the work

22
Q

What case involved a visual inspection revealing icy steps?

A

Woodward v Mayor of Hastings

23
Q

What does the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1984 apply to?

A

Trespassers

24
Q

How is a trespasser defined?

A

A person without permission or authority to be on premises

25
Q

What must a claimant prove under s.1(3) of the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1984?

A

All three elements regarding awareness of danger, knowledge of trespasser, and reasonable expectation of protection

26
Q

What case involved an occupier unaware of danger at the bottom of a lake?

A

Rhind v Astbury

27
Q

What must an occupier know about a trespasser’s potential presence?

A

Must know or have reasonable grounds to believe trespasser may come near the danger

28
Q

What case involved a police officer conducting surveillance?

A

Higgs v Foster

29
Q

What is the rule regarding obvious dangers for trespassers?

A

No liability for obvious dangers

30
Q

What case demonstrated no liability for a drunk student diving into a shallow pool?

A

Ratcliff v McConnell

31
Q

What does s.1(4) of the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1984 require from occupiers?

A

To take reasonable care to ensure the trespasser does not suffer injury

32
Q

What does the time of day/year impact regarding liability for trespassers?

A

May affect liability

Example: Donoghue v Folkestone Properties

33
Q

Is there a need to spend lots of money to make premises safe for trespassers?

A

No need to spend lots of money

34
Q

What case involved a council warning people not to swim in a lake?

A

Tomlinson v Congleton

35
Q

What is the consideration for child trespassers?

A

Same rules apply for child trespassers

36
Q

What case involved an 11-year-old playing on a fire escape?

A

Keown v Coventry NHS

37
Q

What must warning notices do for trespassers under s.1(5)?

A

Make danger clear

38
Q

What case involved warning notices and a child trespasser?

A

Westwood v Post Office